Wahyu Choerul Tamsir 22010112120024 Lap.KTI Bab7
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
F. Cunningham, Kenneth Leveno, Steven Bloom, John Hauth, Dwight
Rouse
CS.
Williams
Obstetrics:
23rd
Edition
McGraw-Hill’s
AccessMedicine. 23rd ed. McGraw Hill Professional; 2009.
2.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group the and United Nations
Populations Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality : 1990 to 2015.
Organization. 2015;32(5):1-55.
3.
World Health Organization (WHO). Making Pregnancy Safer. 2015:1-6.
4.
Direktorat Bina Kesehatan Ibu Ditjen Bina Gizi dan Kesehatan Ibu dan
Anak Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Upaya Percepatan Penurunan Angka
Kematian Ibu. 2013:1-4.
5.
Anggorowati D, Hadisaputra H. Kejadian Preeklampsia / Eklampsia di
RSDK tahun 1997-1999. In: Kumpulan Makalah / Kuliah Utama . Denpasar
Bali: KOGI X POGI Cabang Semarang; 2000.
6.
Sibai
B,
Dekker
G,
Kupferminc
M.
Pre-eclampsia.
Lancet.
2005;365(9461):785-799.
7.
Dina S. Luaran Ibu dan Bayi Pada Penderita Preeklampsia Berat dan
Eklampsia Dengan atau Tanpa Sindroma Hellp. 2008:10-40.
8.
Padden MO. HELLP syndrome: recognition and perinatal management. Am
Fam Physician. 1999;60(3):829-836, 839.
9.
Raras AA. Pengaruh Preeklampsia Berat pada Kehamilan Terhadap
Keluaran Maternal dan Perinatal di Rs Dr Kariadi Tahun 2010. 2011.
10.
Prawirohardjo S, Wiknjosastro H. Ilmu Kebidanan. Jakarta: PT Bina
Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo; 2014.
11.
Wibowo N, Irwinda R, Frisdiantiny E. Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan
Kedokteran Diagnosis Dan Tata Laksana Pre-Eklampsia . Kementrian
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2011.
12.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Buku Saku Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu Di
Fasilitas Kesehatan Dasar
Dan Rujukan Pedoman Bagi Tenaga
Kesehatan. Jakarta: Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2013.
71
72
13.
James PR. Management of Hypertension Before, During, and After
Pregnancy. Heart. 2004;90(12):1499-1504.
14.
Leksana E. Manajemen Anestetik Sindrom Antifosfolipid dengan
Komplikasi Sindrom HELLP. 2013;40(7):497-499.
15.
Lim K-H. Preeclampsia. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1476919overview#a2. Accessed December 31, 2015.
16.
Myrtha
R.
Penatalaksanaan
Tekanan
Darah
pada
Preeklampsia.
2015;42(4):262-266.
17.
Roeshadi RH. Upaya Menurunkan Angka Kesakitan dan Angka Kematian
Ibu pada Penderita Preeklampsia dan Eklampsia. USU Repos. 2006:1-33.
18.
Manuaba IBG, Manuaba IAC, Manuaba IBGF. Pengantar Kuliah
Bstertetri. (Astuti NZ, Purba DL, Handayani S, Damayanti R, eds.).
Jakarta: EGC; 2007.
19.
Akip SD. Luaran Maternal dan Perinatal Pada Ibu Hamil dengan
Preeklampsia Berat (Analisis Perbedaan Faktor Risiko dengan dan Tanpa
Riwayat Preeklampsia). November 2015.
20.
Chrisna
E.
Sindroma
HELLP.
https://www.academia.edu/7823643/HELLP_BAB_1. Accessed December
31, 2015.
21.
Indrayani
N.
Analisis
Faktor-Faktor
yang
Berhubungan
dengan
Preeklampsia/Eklampsia pada Ibu Bersalin di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah
Kardinah Kota Tegal tahun 2011. Univ Indones. 2012:10-11.
22.
Roberts JM, Druzin M, August P a, et al. ACOG Guidelines: Hypertension
in Pregnancy. Washington; 2013.
23.
POGI.
Penatalaksanaan
Hipertensi
dalam
Kehamilan.
https://id.scribd.com/doc/182591019/PEB-POGI-pdf. Accessed December
31, 2015.
24.
Wiyati PS, Wibowo B. Luaran Maternal dan Perinatal pada Hamil dengan
Pen yakit Jantung di RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang. Subbagian
Fetomaternal, Dep Obstet dan Gin Ekol Fak Kedokt Univ Diponegoro
RSUP dr Kariadi Semarang. 2013.
73
25.
Arute JE, Oteri WM. Preclinical & Pharmaceutical Research Prescription
Pattern and Adherence to Antihypertensives Among Pregnant Women In
Central Hospital Warri , Delta State , Nigeria . 2015;6(3):110-117.
26.
Wulan SK. Karakteristik Penderita Preeklampsia dan Ekalampsia di RSUP
Haji Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2009 – 2011. March 2013.
27.
Dellinger R, Levy M, Rhodes A. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international
guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.
Intensive care. 2013;41(2):580-637.
28.
Prayogo BW, Prasetyo B, Dachlan EG, Nasronudin. Hubungan antara
Faktor Risiko Sepsis Obstetri dengan Kejadian Sepsis Berat dan Syok
Sepsis di Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekolodi RSUD Dr. Soetomo
Surabaya. 2011;19(3).
29.
Kelsey BJJ, Pharm D, Floyd RA, Chant C. Obstetric Emergencies in the
ICU. Blood Press. 2005.
30.
Vergani P, Ornaghi S, Pozzi I, et al. Placenta Previa: Distance to Internal
Os and Mode of Delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(3):266.e1-e5.
31.
von Schmidt auf Altenstadt JF, Hukkelhoven CWPM, van Roosmalen J,
Bloemenkamp KWM. Pre-eclampsia Increases the Risk of Postpartum
Haemorrhage: A Nationwide Cohort Study in the Netherlands. PLoS One.
2013;8(12).
32.
Ranuh IG. Masalah Kesehatan Anak.Tumbuh Kembang Anak dan Remaja.
IDAI. 2005.
33.
WHO. Dibalik Angka. Pengkajian Kematian Maternal dan komplikasi
untuk mendapatkan kehamilan yang lebih aman. 2001.
34.
Glanville T, Walker J. HELLP syndrome. Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;5(3):149154.
35.
Sungkar A. The Etiology and Prevention Strategy of Small for Gestational
Age from Obstetrician View. :2-6.
36.
Aprilia N, Ramadhan N. Hubungan Preeklampsia Dan Persalinan Macet
Dengan Kejadian Asfiksia Pada Bayi Baru Lahir Di Badan Layanan Umum
Daerah Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Dr. Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh Tahun
74
2012. 2012;0078.
37.
Rahardjani KB, Kosim MS, Sarosa GI, Rini AE, Radityo AN. Asfiksia
pada Bayi Baru Lahir. In: Buku Ajar Ilmu Kesehatan Anak. Semarang:
Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2011:13-18.
38.
Bawono SB. Gambaran Analisis Gas Darah Arteri Umbilikalis Neonatus
Pada Preeklampsia Berat. June 2005.
39.
Arfin S. Perbandingan Indeks Pulsasi Arteri Umbilikalis Janin pada Ibu
Hamil Normal dan Preeklampsi. 2002.
40.
Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. Dasar-Dasar Metodelogi Penelitian Klinis. 5th
ed. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2014.
41.
Visser W, Wallenburg HC. Temporising management of severe preeclampsia with and without the HELLP syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1995;102(2):111-117.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7756201.
Accessed June 7, 2016.
42.
Sibai BM. The HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and
low platelets): much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1990;162(2):311-316.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2309811.
Accessed June 11, 2016.
43.
H Morikawa, H Umikage, M Yamakasi. Clinical Difference Between
HELLP Syndrome and Partial HELLP Syndrome. In: AUFOG Accredited
Ultrasound and Workshop. Bandung; 2001.
44.
Rambulangi J. Sindrom HELLP. Bagian Obstet dan Ginekol Fak Kedokt
Univ Hasanuddin Makassar Sulawesi Selatan Indones. 2006:24-28.
45.
Sofoewan S. Pregnancy Outcome of Women with Severe Preeclampsia
With and Without HELLP Syndrome. In: AUFOG Accredited Ultrasound
and Workshop. Bandung; 2001.
46.
Barton JR, Riely CA AT. Hepatic Hispatologic in Condition does not
Correlate with Laboratory Abnormalities in HELLP Syndrome (hemolysis,
elevated liver enzymes and low trombosit counts). AmJ Obs Gynecol.
1992;(1538):167.
75
LAMPIRAN 1
76
LAMPIRAN 2
77
LAMPIRAN 3
Output SPSS
Frequency Table
Diagnosis
Valid
PEB
HELLP
Parsial
Total
Frequency
60
42
34
136
Percent
44.1
30.9
25.0
100.0
Valid Percent
44.1
30.9
25.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
44.1
75.0
100.0
Mortalitas maternal
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
7
129
136
Percent
5.1
94.9
100.0
Valid Percent
5.1
94.9
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
5.1
100.0
DIC
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
1
135
136
Percent
.7
99.3
100.0
Valid Percent
.7
99.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
.7
100.0
Gagal ginjal akut
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
27
109
136
Percent
19.9
80.1
100.0
Valid Percent
19.9
80.1
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
19.9
100.0
Gangguan pengl ihatan
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
18
118
136
Percent
13.2
86.8
100.0
Valid Percent
13.2
86.8
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
13.2
100.0
78
Edema paru
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
24
112
136
Percent
17.6
82.4
100.0
Valid Percent
17.6
82.4
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
17.6
100.0
Eklampsia
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
23
113
136
Percent
16.9
83.1
100.0
Valid Percent
16.9
83.1
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
16.9
100.0
SI RS
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
6
130
136
Percent
4.4
95.6
100.0
Valid Percent
4.4
95.6
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
4.4
100.0
Perawatan ICU
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
46
90
136
Percent
33.8
66.2
100.0
Valid Percent
33.8
66.2
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
33.8
100.0
Sepsis
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
5
131
136
Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Valid Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
3.7
100.0
79
Perdarahan post partum
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
5
131
136
Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Valid Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
3.7
100.0
Mortalitas perinatal
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
15
121
136
Percent
11.0
89.0
100.0
Valid Percent
11.0
89.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
11.0
100.0
IUGR
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
87
49
136
Percent
64.0
36.0
100.0
Valid Percent
64.0
36.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
64.0
100.0
IUFD
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
16
120
136
Percent
11.8
88.2
100.0
Valid Percent
11.8
88.2
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
11.8
100.0
Asfiksia
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
44
92
136
Percent
32.4
67.6
100.0
Valid Percent
32.4
67.6
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
32.4
100.0
80
Gawat janin
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
20
116
136
Percent
14.7
85.3
100.0
Valid Percent
14.7
85.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
14.7
100.0
Kelahiran prematur
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
85
51
136
Percent
62.5
37.5
100.0
Valid Percent
62.5
37.5
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
62.5
100.0
Kelainan Doppler
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
34
102
136
Percent
25.0
75.0
100.0
Valid Percent
25.0
75.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
25.0
100.0
81
Crosstabs
Mortalitas maternal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalitas
maternal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
3
1
1.6
2.4
7.1%
1.7%
39
59
40.4
57.6
92.9%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
4
4.0
3.9%
98
98.0
96.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
1.966b
.782
1.964
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
1.947
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.161
.377
.161
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.303
.188
.163
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
65.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
maternal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.538
.455
45.224
1.885
1.018
3.489
.415
.075
2.284
102
82
DIC * Diagnosis
Crosstab
DIC
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
.a
102
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
a. No statistics are computed because DIC is a constant.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
DIC (Tidak / .)
.
a
a. No statistics are computed because DIC is a constant.
Total
102
102.0
100.0%
102
102.0
100.0%
83
Gagal ginjal akut * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gagal ginjal
akut
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
9
9
7.4
10.6
21.4%
15.0%
33
51
34.6
49.4
78.6%
85.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
18
18.0
17.6%
84
84.0
82.4%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.703b
.330
.694
.696
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.402
.566
.405
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.438
.281
.404
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
41.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gagal
ginjal akut (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.545
.556
4.296
1.273
.747
2.169
.824
.503
1.348
102
84
Gangguan penglihatan * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gangguan penglihatan
Ya
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
5
5
4.1
5.9
11.9%
8.3%
37
55
37.9
54.1
88.1%
91.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
10
10.0
9.8%
92
92.0
90.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
.356b
.067
.351
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
.353
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.551
.796
.553
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.737
.393
.552
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
12.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gangguan
penglihatan (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.486
.402
5.497
1.243
.637
2.425
.836
.440
1.589
102
85
Edema paru * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Edema
paru
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
11
7
7.4
10.6
26.2%
11.7%
31
53
34.6
49.4
73.8%
88.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
18
18.0
17.6%
84
84.0
82.4%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
3.586b
2.656
3.533
3.551
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.058
.103
.060
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.069
.052
.060
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
41.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Edema
paru (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.687
.944
7.648
1.656
1.043
2.630
.616
.338
1.125
102
86
Eklampsia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Eklampsia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
10
5
6.2
8.8
23.8%
8.3%
32
55
35.8
51.2
76.2%
91.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
15
15.0
14.7%
87
87.0
85.3%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
4.718b
3.564
4.659
4.671
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.030
.059
.031
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.045
.030
.031
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
18.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or
Eklampsia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.438
1.079
10.950
1.813
1.154
2.847
.527
.253
1.098
102
87
SIRS * Diagnosis
Crosstab
SI RS
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
2
2
1.6
2.4
4.8%
3.3%
40
58
40.4
57.6
95.2%
96.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
4
4.0
3.9%
98
98.0
96.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.134b
.000
.132
.133
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.715
1.000
.717
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
1.000
.547
.716
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
65.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or SI RS
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.450
.196
10.724
1.225
.447
3.359
.845
.313
2.282
102
88
Perawatan ICU * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perawatan
ICU
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
22
5
11.1
15.9
52.4%
8.3%
20
55
30.9
44.1
47.6%
91.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
27
27.0
26.5%
75
75.0
73.5%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
24.628b
22.416
25.347
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
24.386
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.
12.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Perawatan
ICU (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
12.100
4.037
36.265
3.056
2.015
4.633
.253
.113
.564
102
89
Sepsis * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Sepsis
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
1
2
1.2
1.8
2.4%
3.3%
41
58
40.8
58.2
97.6%
96.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
3
3.0
2.9%
99
99.0
97.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.078b
.000
.080
.078
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.779
1.000
.777
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
1.000
.632
.780
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
24.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Sepsis (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
.707
.062
8.063
.805
.160
4.056
1.138
.503
2.576
102
90
Perdarahan post partum * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perdarahan
post partum
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
2
1
1.2
1.8
4.8%
1.7%
40
59
40.8
58.2
95.2%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
3
3.0
2.9%
99
99.0
97.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.829b
.099
.816
.821
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.363
.753
.366
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.567
.368
.365
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
24.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Perdarahan post
partum (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.950
.259
33.636
1.650
.716
3.804
.559
.112
2.794
102
91
Mortalitas perinatal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalit as
perinatal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
9
1
4.1
5.9
21.4%
1.7%
33
59
37.9
54.1
78.6%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
10
10.0
9.8%
92
92.0
90.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
10.911b
8.791
11.617
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
10.804
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.003
.001
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
12.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
perinatal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
16.091
1.952
132.650
2.509
1.781
3.534
.156
.024
1.007
102
92
IUGR * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUGR
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
38
23
25.1
35.9
90.5%
38.3%
4
37
16.9
24.1
9.5%
61.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
61
61.0
59.8%
41
41.0
40.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
27.943b
25.816
31.157
27.669
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.
88.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUGR
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
15.283
4.819
48.471
6.385
2.466
16.530
.418
.298
.586
102
93
IUFD * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUFD
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
8
1
3.7
5.3
19.0%
1.7%
34
59
38.3
54.7
81.0%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
9
9.0
8.8%
93
93.0
91.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
9.277b
7.243
9.808
9.186
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.002
.007
.002
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.003
.003
.002
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
71.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUFD
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
13.882
1.664
115.801
2.431
1.707
3.463
.175
.027
1.119
102
94
Asfiksia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Asf iksia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
18
8
10.7
15.3
42.9%
13.3%
24
52
31.3
44.7
57.1%
86.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
26
26.0
25.5%
76
76.0
74.5%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
11.339b
9.837
11.317
11.227
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.002
.001
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.
71.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Asf iksia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.875
1.861
12.771
2.192
1.443
3.332
.450
.248
.817
102
95
Gawat janin * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gawat
janin
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
9
2
4.5
6.5
21.4%
3.3%
33
58
37.5
53.5
78.6%
96.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
11
11.0
10.8%
91
91.0
89.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
8.408b
6.632
8.582
8.326
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.004
.010
.003
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.007
.005
.004
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
53.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gawat
janin (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
7.909
1.612
38.810
2.256
1.528
3.331
.285
.081
1.009
102
96
Kelahiran prematur * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelahiran
prematur
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
35
24
24.3
34.7
83.3%
40.0%
7
36
17.7
25.3
16.7%
60.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
59
59.0
57.8%
43
43.0
42.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
19.025b
17.289
20.273
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
18.838
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.
71.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelahiran
prematur (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
7.500
2.866
19.626
3.644
1.792
7.412
.486
.348
.679
102
97
Kelainan Doppler * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelainan
Doppler
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
17
6
9.5
13.5
40.5%
10.0%
25
54
32.5
46.5
59.5%
90.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
23
23.0
22.5%
79
79.0
77.5%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
13.139b
11.452
13.188
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
13.010
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.001
.000
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.
47.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelainan
Doppler (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
6.120
2.153
17.393
2.336
1.558
3.502
.382
.189
.772
102
98
Crosstabs
Mortalitas maternal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalitas
maternal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
3
1
1.4
2.6
8.8%
1.7%
31
59
32.6
57.4
91.2%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
4
4.0
4.3%
90
90.0
95.7%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
2.728b
1.254
2.618
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
2.699
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.099
.263
.106
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.133
.133
.100
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
45.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
maternal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
5.710
.570
57.209
2.177
1.156
4.103
.381
.069
2.096
94
99
DIC * Diagnosis
Crosstab
DIC
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
1
0
.4
.6
2.9%
.0%
33
60
33.6
59.4
97.1%
100.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
1
1.0
1.1%
93
93.0
98.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
1.784b
.084
2.053
1.765
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.182
.772
.152
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.362
.362
.184
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .
36.
Risk Estimate
Value
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
N of Valid Cases
2.818
94
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.143
3.707
100
Gagal ginjal akut * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gagal ginjal
akut
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
9
9
6.5
11.5
26.5%
15.0%
25
51
27.5
48.5
73.5%
85.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
18
18.0
19.1%
76
76.0
80.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
1.844b
1.178
1.791
1.825
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.174
.278
.181
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.186
.139
.177
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
51.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gagal
ginjal akut (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.040
.721
5.774
1.520
.866
2.668
.745
.457
1.214
94
101
Gangguan penglihatan * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gangguan penglihatan
Ya
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
8
5
4.7
8.3
23.5%
8.3%
26
55
29.3
51.7
76.5%
91.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
13
13.0
13.8%
81
81.0
86.2%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
4.205b
3.027
4.029
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
4.161
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.040
.082
.045
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.061
.043
.041
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
70.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gangguan
penglihatan (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.385
1.008
11.359
1.917
1.124
3.270
.566
.280
1.145
94
102
Edema paru * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Edema
paru
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
6
7
4.7
8.3
17.6%
11.7%
28
53
29.3
51.7
82.4%
88.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
13
13.0
13.8%
81
81.0
86.2%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.651b
.246
.634
.644
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.420
.620
.426
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.536
.305
.422
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
70.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Edema
paru (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.622
.497
5.294
1.335
.691
2.581
.823
.486
1.395
94
103
Eklampsia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Eklampsia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
8
5
4.7
8.3
23.5%
8.3%
26
55
29.3
51.7
76.5%
91.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
13
13.0
13.8%
81
81.0
86.2%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
4.205b
3.027
4.029
4.161
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.040
.082
.045
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.061
.043
.041
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
70.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or
Eklampsia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.385
1.008
11.359
1.917
1.124
3.270
.566
.280
1.145
94
104
SIRS * Diagnosis
Crosstab
SI RS
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
2
2
1.4
2.6
5.9%
3.3%
32
58
32.6
57.4
94.1%
96.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
4
4.0
4.3%
90
90.0
95.7%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.346b
.003
.333
.342
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.556
.955
.564
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.618
.459
.558
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
45.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or SI RS
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.813
.244
13.486
1.406
.508
3.895
.776
.288
2.092
94
105
Perawatan ICU * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perawatan
ICU
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
19
5
8.7
15.3
55.9%
8.3%
15
55
25.3
44.7
44.1%
91.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
24
24.0
25.5%
70
70.0
74.5%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
25.807b
23.366
25.721
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
25.532
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.
68.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Perawatan
ICU (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
13.933
4.462
43.505
3.694
2.256
6.050
.265
.120
.584
94
106
Sepsis * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Sepsis
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
2
2
1.4
2.6
5.9%
3.3%
32
58
32.6
57.4
94.1%
96.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
4
4.0
4.3%
90
90.0
95.7%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.346b
.003
.333
.342
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.556
.955
.564
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.618
.459
.558
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
45.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Sepsis (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.813
.244
13.486
1.406
.508
3.895
.776
.288
2.092
94
107
Perdarahan post partum * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perdarahan
post partum
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
2
1
1.1
1.9
5.9%
1.7%
32
59
32.9
58.1
94.1%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
3
3.0
3.2%
91
91.0
96.8%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
1.248b
.257
1.187
1.235
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.264
.612
.276
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.296
.296
.266
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
09.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Perdarahan post
partum (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.688
.322
42.253
1.896
.812
4.424
.514
.103
2.565
94
108
Mortalitas perinatal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalit as
perinatal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
5
1
2.2
3.8
14.7%
1.7%
29
59
31.8
56.2
85.3%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
6
6.0
6.4%
88
88.0
93.6%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
6.175b
4.186
6.060
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
6.109
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.013
.041
.014
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.022
.022
.013
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
17.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
perinatal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
10.172
1.136
91.126
2.529
1.587
4.029
.249
.041
1.497
94
109
IUGR * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUGR
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
26
23
17.7
31.3
76.5%
38.3%
8
37
16.3
28.7
23.5%
61.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
49
49.0
52.1%
45
45.0
47.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
12.649b
11.167
13.160
12.514
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.001
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.000
.000
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.
28.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUGR
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
5.228
2.026
13.492
2.985
1.510
5.899
.571
.412
.792
94
110
IUFD * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUFD
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
7
1
2.9
5.1
20.6%
1.7%
27
59
31.1
54.9
79.4%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
8
8.0
8.5%
86
86.0
91.5%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
9.979b
7.697
9.974
9.873
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.002
.006
.002
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.003
.003
.002
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
89.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUFD
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
15.296
1.792
130.558
2.787
1.854
4.190
.182
.029
1.146
94
111
Asfiksia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Asf iksia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
18
8
9.4
16.6
52.9%
13.3%
16
52
24.6
43.4
47.1%
86.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
26
26.0
27.7%
68
68.0
72.3%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
17.015b
15.093
16.728
16.834
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.
40.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Asf iksia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
7.313
2.680
19.953
2.942
1.786
4.847
.402
.223
.727
94
112
Gawat janin * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gawat
janin
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
9
2
4.0
7.0
26.5%
3.3%
25
58
30.0
53.0
73.5%
96.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
11
11.0
11.7%
83
83.0
88.3%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
11.244b
9.116
11.022
11.124
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.003
.001
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
98.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gawat
janin (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
10.440
2.103
51.830
2.716
1.767
4.176
.260
.074
.919
94
113
Kelahiran prematur * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelahiran
prematur
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
26
24
18.1
31.9
76.5%
40.0%
8
36
15.9
28.1
23.5%
60.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
50
50.0
53.2%
44
44.0
46.8%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
11.594b
10.175
12.067
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
11.470
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.001
.001
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.
91.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelahiran
prematur (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.875
1.893
12.554
2.860
1.447
5.651
.587
.426
.808
94
114
Kelainan Doppler * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelainan
Doppler
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
11
6
6.1
10.9
32.4%
10.0%
23
54
27.9
49.1
67.6%
90.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
17
17.0
18.1%
77
77.0
81.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
7.320b
5.888
7.048
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
7.242
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.007
.015
.008
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.011
.008
.007
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
15.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelainan
Doppler (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.304
1.421
13.035
2.166
1.327
3.537
.503
.260
.974
94
115
Tabel Frekuensi Data
Variabel
Diagnosis
PEB
HELLP
Parsial
Mortalitas maternal
DIC
Gagal ginjal akut
Gangguan penglihatan
Edema paru
Eklampsia
SIRS
Perawatan ICU
Sepsis
Perdarahan post partum
Mortalitas perinatal
IUGR
IUFD
Asfiksia
Gawat janin
Kelahiran prematur
Kelainan Doppler
F
%
60
42
34
7
1
27
18
24
23
6
46
5
5
15
87
16
44
20
85
34
44,1
30,9
25
5,1
0,7
19,9
13,2
17,6
16,9
4,4
33,8
3,7
3,7
11
64
11,8
32,4
14,7
62,5
25
Tabel hasil uji chi square antar diagnosis HELLP dan PEB
Variabel
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
Bivariat
p
OR (IK95%)
1,7
0,303‡
4,54 (0,46-45,22)
0
0
–
–
9
15
0,402§
1,55 (0,56-4,3)
5
8,3
0,737‡
1,49 (0,40-5,50)
7
11,
7
0,058§
2,69 (0,94-7,65)
5
8,3
0,030§
3,44 (1,08-10,95)
2
3,3
1,000‡
1,45 (0,20-10,72)
5
8,3
1.
F. Cunningham, Kenneth Leveno, Steven Bloom, John Hauth, Dwight
Rouse
CS.
Williams
Obstetrics:
23rd
Edition
McGraw-Hill’s
AccessMedicine. 23rd ed. McGraw Hill Professional; 2009.
2.
WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group the and United Nations
Populations Division. Trends in Maternal Mortality : 1990 to 2015.
Organization. 2015;32(5):1-55.
3.
World Health Organization (WHO). Making Pregnancy Safer. 2015:1-6.
4.
Direktorat Bina Kesehatan Ibu Ditjen Bina Gizi dan Kesehatan Ibu dan
Anak Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Upaya Percepatan Penurunan Angka
Kematian Ibu. 2013:1-4.
5.
Anggorowati D, Hadisaputra H. Kejadian Preeklampsia / Eklampsia di
RSDK tahun 1997-1999. In: Kumpulan Makalah / Kuliah Utama . Denpasar
Bali: KOGI X POGI Cabang Semarang; 2000.
6.
Sibai
B,
Dekker
G,
Kupferminc
M.
Pre-eclampsia.
Lancet.
2005;365(9461):785-799.
7.
Dina S. Luaran Ibu dan Bayi Pada Penderita Preeklampsia Berat dan
Eklampsia Dengan atau Tanpa Sindroma Hellp. 2008:10-40.
8.
Padden MO. HELLP syndrome: recognition and perinatal management. Am
Fam Physician. 1999;60(3):829-836, 839.
9.
Raras AA. Pengaruh Preeklampsia Berat pada Kehamilan Terhadap
Keluaran Maternal dan Perinatal di Rs Dr Kariadi Tahun 2010. 2011.
10.
Prawirohardjo S, Wiknjosastro H. Ilmu Kebidanan. Jakarta: PT Bina
Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo; 2014.
11.
Wibowo N, Irwinda R, Frisdiantiny E. Pedoman Nasional Pelayanan
Kedokteran Diagnosis Dan Tata Laksana Pre-Eklampsia . Kementrian
Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2011.
12.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Buku Saku Pelayanan Kesehatan Ibu Di
Fasilitas Kesehatan Dasar
Dan Rujukan Pedoman Bagi Tenaga
Kesehatan. Jakarta: Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2013.
71
72
13.
James PR. Management of Hypertension Before, During, and After
Pregnancy. Heart. 2004;90(12):1499-1504.
14.
Leksana E. Manajemen Anestetik Sindrom Antifosfolipid dengan
Komplikasi Sindrom HELLP. 2013;40(7):497-499.
15.
Lim K-H. Preeclampsia. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1476919overview#a2. Accessed December 31, 2015.
16.
Myrtha
R.
Penatalaksanaan
Tekanan
Darah
pada
Preeklampsia.
2015;42(4):262-266.
17.
Roeshadi RH. Upaya Menurunkan Angka Kesakitan dan Angka Kematian
Ibu pada Penderita Preeklampsia dan Eklampsia. USU Repos. 2006:1-33.
18.
Manuaba IBG, Manuaba IAC, Manuaba IBGF. Pengantar Kuliah
Bstertetri. (Astuti NZ, Purba DL, Handayani S, Damayanti R, eds.).
Jakarta: EGC; 2007.
19.
Akip SD. Luaran Maternal dan Perinatal Pada Ibu Hamil dengan
Preeklampsia Berat (Analisis Perbedaan Faktor Risiko dengan dan Tanpa
Riwayat Preeklampsia). November 2015.
20.
Chrisna
E.
Sindroma
HELLP.
https://www.academia.edu/7823643/HELLP_BAB_1. Accessed December
31, 2015.
21.
Indrayani
N.
Analisis
Faktor-Faktor
yang
Berhubungan
dengan
Preeklampsia/Eklampsia pada Ibu Bersalin di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah
Kardinah Kota Tegal tahun 2011. Univ Indones. 2012:10-11.
22.
Roberts JM, Druzin M, August P a, et al. ACOG Guidelines: Hypertension
in Pregnancy. Washington; 2013.
23.
POGI.
Penatalaksanaan
Hipertensi
dalam
Kehamilan.
https://id.scribd.com/doc/182591019/PEB-POGI-pdf. Accessed December
31, 2015.
24.
Wiyati PS, Wibowo B. Luaran Maternal dan Perinatal pada Hamil dengan
Pen yakit Jantung di RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang. Subbagian
Fetomaternal, Dep Obstet dan Gin Ekol Fak Kedokt Univ Diponegoro
RSUP dr Kariadi Semarang. 2013.
73
25.
Arute JE, Oteri WM. Preclinical & Pharmaceutical Research Prescription
Pattern and Adherence to Antihypertensives Among Pregnant Women In
Central Hospital Warri , Delta State , Nigeria . 2015;6(3):110-117.
26.
Wulan SK. Karakteristik Penderita Preeklampsia dan Ekalampsia di RSUP
Haji Adam Malik Medan Tahun 2009 – 2011. March 2013.
27.
Dellinger R, Levy M, Rhodes A. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international
guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.
Intensive care. 2013;41(2):580-637.
28.
Prayogo BW, Prasetyo B, Dachlan EG, Nasronudin. Hubungan antara
Faktor Risiko Sepsis Obstetri dengan Kejadian Sepsis Berat dan Syok
Sepsis di Departemen Obstetri dan Ginekolodi RSUD Dr. Soetomo
Surabaya. 2011;19(3).
29.
Kelsey BJJ, Pharm D, Floyd RA, Chant C. Obstetric Emergencies in the
ICU. Blood Press. 2005.
30.
Vergani P, Ornaghi S, Pozzi I, et al. Placenta Previa: Distance to Internal
Os and Mode of Delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(3):266.e1-e5.
31.
von Schmidt auf Altenstadt JF, Hukkelhoven CWPM, van Roosmalen J,
Bloemenkamp KWM. Pre-eclampsia Increases the Risk of Postpartum
Haemorrhage: A Nationwide Cohort Study in the Netherlands. PLoS One.
2013;8(12).
32.
Ranuh IG. Masalah Kesehatan Anak.Tumbuh Kembang Anak dan Remaja.
IDAI. 2005.
33.
WHO. Dibalik Angka. Pengkajian Kematian Maternal dan komplikasi
untuk mendapatkan kehamilan yang lebih aman. 2001.
34.
Glanville T, Walker J. HELLP syndrome. Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;5(3):149154.
35.
Sungkar A. The Etiology and Prevention Strategy of Small for Gestational
Age from Obstetrician View. :2-6.
36.
Aprilia N, Ramadhan N. Hubungan Preeklampsia Dan Persalinan Macet
Dengan Kejadian Asfiksia Pada Bayi Baru Lahir Di Badan Layanan Umum
Daerah Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Dr. Zainoel Abidin Banda Aceh Tahun
74
2012. 2012;0078.
37.
Rahardjani KB, Kosim MS, Sarosa GI, Rini AE, Radityo AN. Asfiksia
pada Bayi Baru Lahir. In: Buku Ajar Ilmu Kesehatan Anak. Semarang:
Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2011:13-18.
38.
Bawono SB. Gambaran Analisis Gas Darah Arteri Umbilikalis Neonatus
Pada Preeklampsia Berat. June 2005.
39.
Arfin S. Perbandingan Indeks Pulsasi Arteri Umbilikalis Janin pada Ibu
Hamil Normal dan Preeklampsi. 2002.
40.
Sastroasmoro S, Ismael S. Dasar-Dasar Metodelogi Penelitian Klinis. 5th
ed. Jakarta: Sagung Seto; 2014.
41.
Visser W, Wallenburg HC. Temporising management of severe preeclampsia with and without the HELLP syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1995;102(2):111-117.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7756201.
Accessed June 7, 2016.
42.
Sibai BM. The HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and
low platelets): much ado about nothing? Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1990;162(2):311-316.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2309811.
Accessed June 11, 2016.
43.
H Morikawa, H Umikage, M Yamakasi. Clinical Difference Between
HELLP Syndrome and Partial HELLP Syndrome. In: AUFOG Accredited
Ultrasound and Workshop. Bandung; 2001.
44.
Rambulangi J. Sindrom HELLP. Bagian Obstet dan Ginekol Fak Kedokt
Univ Hasanuddin Makassar Sulawesi Selatan Indones. 2006:24-28.
45.
Sofoewan S. Pregnancy Outcome of Women with Severe Preeclampsia
With and Without HELLP Syndrome. In: AUFOG Accredited Ultrasound
and Workshop. Bandung; 2001.
46.
Barton JR, Riely CA AT. Hepatic Hispatologic in Condition does not
Correlate with Laboratory Abnormalities in HELLP Syndrome (hemolysis,
elevated liver enzymes and low trombosit counts). AmJ Obs Gynecol.
1992;(1538):167.
75
LAMPIRAN 1
76
LAMPIRAN 2
77
LAMPIRAN 3
Output SPSS
Frequency Table
Diagnosis
Valid
PEB
HELLP
Parsial
Total
Frequency
60
42
34
136
Percent
44.1
30.9
25.0
100.0
Valid Percent
44.1
30.9
25.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
44.1
75.0
100.0
Mortalitas maternal
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
7
129
136
Percent
5.1
94.9
100.0
Valid Percent
5.1
94.9
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
5.1
100.0
DIC
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
1
135
136
Percent
.7
99.3
100.0
Valid Percent
.7
99.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
.7
100.0
Gagal ginjal akut
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
27
109
136
Percent
19.9
80.1
100.0
Valid Percent
19.9
80.1
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
19.9
100.0
Gangguan pengl ihatan
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
18
118
136
Percent
13.2
86.8
100.0
Valid Percent
13.2
86.8
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
13.2
100.0
78
Edema paru
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
24
112
136
Percent
17.6
82.4
100.0
Valid Percent
17.6
82.4
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
17.6
100.0
Eklampsia
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
23
113
136
Percent
16.9
83.1
100.0
Valid Percent
16.9
83.1
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
16.9
100.0
SI RS
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
6
130
136
Percent
4.4
95.6
100.0
Valid Percent
4.4
95.6
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
4.4
100.0
Perawatan ICU
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
46
90
136
Percent
33.8
66.2
100.0
Valid Percent
33.8
66.2
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
33.8
100.0
Sepsis
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
5
131
136
Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Valid Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
3.7
100.0
79
Perdarahan post partum
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
5
131
136
Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Valid Percent
3.7
96.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
3.7
100.0
Mortalitas perinatal
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
15
121
136
Percent
11.0
89.0
100.0
Valid Percent
11.0
89.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
11.0
100.0
IUGR
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
87
49
136
Percent
64.0
36.0
100.0
Valid Percent
64.0
36.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
64.0
100.0
IUFD
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
16
120
136
Percent
11.8
88.2
100.0
Valid Percent
11.8
88.2
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
11.8
100.0
Asfiksia
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
44
92
136
Percent
32.4
67.6
100.0
Valid Percent
32.4
67.6
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
32.4
100.0
80
Gawat janin
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
20
116
136
Percent
14.7
85.3
100.0
Valid Percent
14.7
85.3
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
14.7
100.0
Kelahiran prematur
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
85
51
136
Percent
62.5
37.5
100.0
Valid Percent
62.5
37.5
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
62.5
100.0
Kelainan Doppler
Valid
Ya
Tidak
Total
Frequency
34
102
136
Percent
25.0
75.0
100.0
Valid Percent
25.0
75.0
100.0
Cumulat iv e
Percent
25.0
100.0
81
Crosstabs
Mortalitas maternal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalitas
maternal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
3
1
1.6
2.4
7.1%
1.7%
39
59
40.4
57.6
92.9%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
4
4.0
3.9%
98
98.0
96.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
1.966b
.782
1.964
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
1.947
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.161
.377
.161
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.303
.188
.163
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
65.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
maternal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.538
.455
45.224
1.885
1.018
3.489
.415
.075
2.284
102
82
DIC * Diagnosis
Crosstab
DIC
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
.a
102
Pearson Chi-Square
N of Valid Cases
a. No statistics are computed because DIC is a constant.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
DIC (Tidak / .)
.
a
a. No statistics are computed because DIC is a constant.
Total
102
102.0
100.0%
102
102.0
100.0%
83
Gagal ginjal akut * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gagal ginjal
akut
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
9
9
7.4
10.6
21.4%
15.0%
33
51
34.6
49.4
78.6%
85.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
18
18.0
17.6%
84
84.0
82.4%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.703b
.330
.694
.696
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.402
.566
.405
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.438
.281
.404
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
41.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gagal
ginjal akut (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.545
.556
4.296
1.273
.747
2.169
.824
.503
1.348
102
84
Gangguan penglihatan * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gangguan penglihatan
Ya
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
5
5
4.1
5.9
11.9%
8.3%
37
55
37.9
54.1
88.1%
91.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
10
10.0
9.8%
92
92.0
90.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
.356b
.067
.351
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
.353
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.551
.796
.553
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.737
.393
.552
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
12.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gangguan
penglihatan (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.486
.402
5.497
1.243
.637
2.425
.836
.440
1.589
102
85
Edema paru * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Edema
paru
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
11
7
7.4
10.6
26.2%
11.7%
31
53
34.6
49.4
73.8%
88.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
18
18.0
17.6%
84
84.0
82.4%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
3.586b
2.656
3.533
3.551
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.058
.103
.060
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.069
.052
.060
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.
41.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Edema
paru (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.687
.944
7.648
1.656
1.043
2.630
.616
.338
1.125
102
86
Eklampsia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Eklampsia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
10
5
6.2
8.8
23.8%
8.3%
32
55
35.8
51.2
76.2%
91.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
15
15.0
14.7%
87
87.0
85.3%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
4.718b
3.564
4.659
4.671
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.030
.059
.031
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.045
.030
.031
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
18.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or
Eklampsia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.438
1.079
10.950
1.813
1.154
2.847
.527
.253
1.098
102
87
SIRS * Diagnosis
Crosstab
SI RS
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
2
2
1.6
2.4
4.8%
3.3%
40
58
40.4
57.6
95.2%
96.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
4
4.0
3.9%
98
98.0
96.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.134b
.000
.132
.133
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.715
1.000
.717
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
1.000
.547
.716
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
65.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or SI RS
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.450
.196
10.724
1.225
.447
3.359
.845
.313
2.282
102
88
Perawatan ICU * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perawatan
ICU
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
22
5
11.1
15.9
52.4%
8.3%
20
55
30.9
44.1
47.6%
91.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
27
27.0
26.5%
75
75.0
73.5%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
24.628b
22.416
25.347
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
24.386
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11.
12.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Perawatan
ICU (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
12.100
4.037
36.265
3.056
2.015
4.633
.253
.113
.564
102
89
Sepsis * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Sepsis
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
1
2
1.2
1.8
2.4%
3.3%
41
58
40.8
58.2
97.6%
96.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
3
3.0
2.9%
99
99.0
97.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.078b
.000
.080
.078
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.779
1.000
.777
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
1.000
.632
.780
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
24.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Sepsis (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
.707
.062
8.063
.805
.160
4.056
1.138
.503
2.576
102
90
Perdarahan post partum * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perdarahan
post partum
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
2
1
1.2
1.8
4.8%
1.7%
40
59
40.8
58.2
95.2%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
3
3.0
2.9%
99
99.0
97.1%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.829b
.099
.816
.821
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.363
.753
.366
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.567
.368
.365
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
24.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Perdarahan post
partum (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.950
.259
33.636
1.650
.716
3.804
.559
.112
2.794
102
91
Mortalitas perinatal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalit as
perinatal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
9
1
4.1
5.9
21.4%
1.7%
33
59
37.9
54.1
78.6%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
10
10.0
9.8%
92
92.0
90.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
10.911b
8.791
11.617
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
10.804
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.003
.001
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
12.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
perinatal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
16.091
1.952
132.650
2.509
1.781
3.534
.156
.024
1.007
102
92
IUGR * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUGR
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
38
23
25.1
35.9
90.5%
38.3%
4
37
16.9
24.1
9.5%
61.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
61
61.0
59.8%
41
41.0
40.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
27.943b
25.816
31.157
27.669
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.
88.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUGR
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
15.283
4.819
48.471
6.385
2.466
16.530
.418
.298
.586
102
93
IUFD * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUFD
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
8
1
3.7
5.3
19.0%
1.7%
34
59
38.3
54.7
81.0%
98.3%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
9
9.0
8.8%
93
93.0
91.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
9.277b
7.243
9.808
9.186
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.002
.007
.002
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.003
.003
.002
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
71.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUFD
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
13.882
1.664
115.801
2.431
1.707
3.463
.175
.027
1.119
102
94
Asfiksia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Asf iksia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
18
8
10.7
15.3
42.9%
13.3%
24
52
31.3
44.7
57.1%
86.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
26
26.0
25.5%
76
76.0
74.5%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
11.339b
9.837
11.317
11.227
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.002
.001
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.
71.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Asf iksia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = HELLP
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.875
1.861
12.771
2.192
1.443
3.332
.450
.248
.817
102
95
Gawat janin * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gawat
janin
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
9
2
4.5
6.5
21.4%
3.3%
33
58
37.5
53.5
78.6%
96.7%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
11
11.0
10.8%
91
91.0
89.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
8.408b
6.632
8.582
8.326
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.004
.010
.003
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.007
.005
.004
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
53.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gawat
janin (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
7.909
1.612
38.810
2.256
1.528
3.331
.285
.081
1.009
102
96
Kelahiran prematur * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelahiran
prematur
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
35
24
24.3
34.7
83.3%
40.0%
7
36
17.7
25.3
16.7%
60.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
59
59.0
57.8%
43
43.0
42.2%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
19.025b
17.289
20.273
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
18.838
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 17.
71.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelahiran
prematur (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
7.500
2.866
19.626
3.644
1.792
7.412
.486
.348
.679
102
97
Kelainan Doppler * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelainan
Doppler
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
17
6
9.5
13.5
40.5%
10.0%
25
54
32.5
46.5
59.5%
90.0%
42
60
42.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
23
23.0
22.5%
79
79.0
77.5%
102
102.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
13.139b
11.452
13.188
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
13.010
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.001
.000
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.000
.000
102
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.
47.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelainan
Doppler (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
HELLP
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
6.120
2.153
17.393
2.336
1.558
3.502
.382
.189
.772
102
98
Crosstabs
Mortalitas maternal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalitas
maternal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
3
1
1.4
2.6
8.8%
1.7%
31
59
32.6
57.4
91.2%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
4
4.0
4.3%
90
90.0
95.7%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
2.728b
1.254
2.618
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
2.699
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.099
.263
.106
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.133
.133
.100
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
45.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
maternal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
5.710
.570
57.209
2.177
1.156
4.103
.381
.069
2.096
94
99
DIC * Diagnosis
Crosstab
DIC
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
1
0
.4
.6
2.9%
.0%
33
60
33.6
59.4
97.1%
100.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
1
1.0
1.1%
93
93.0
98.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
1.784b
.084
2.053
1.765
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.182
.772
.152
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.362
.362
.184
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .
36.
Risk Estimate
Value
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
N of Valid Cases
2.818
94
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.143
3.707
100
Gagal ginjal akut * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gagal ginjal
akut
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
9
9
6.5
11.5
26.5%
15.0%
25
51
27.5
48.5
73.5%
85.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
18
18.0
19.1%
76
76.0
80.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
1.844b
1.178
1.791
1.825
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.174
.278
.181
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.186
.139
.177
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
51.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gagal
ginjal akut (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
2.040
.721
5.774
1.520
.866
2.668
.745
.457
1.214
94
101
Gangguan penglihatan * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gangguan penglihatan
Ya
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
8
5
4.7
8.3
23.5%
8.3%
26
55
29.3
51.7
76.5%
91.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
13
13.0
13.8%
81
81.0
86.2%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
4.205b
3.027
4.029
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
4.161
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.040
.082
.045
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.061
.043
.041
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
70.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gangguan
penglihatan (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.385
1.008
11.359
1.917
1.124
3.270
.566
.280
1.145
94
102
Edema paru * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Edema
paru
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
6
7
4.7
8.3
17.6%
11.7%
28
53
29.3
51.7
82.4%
88.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
13
13.0
13.8%
81
81.0
86.2%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.651b
.246
.634
.644
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.420
.620
.426
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.536
.305
.422
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
70.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Edema
paru (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.622
.497
5.294
1.335
.691
2.581
.823
.486
1.395
94
103
Eklampsia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Eklampsia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
8
5
4.7
8.3
23.5%
8.3%
26
55
29.3
51.7
76.5%
91.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
13
13.0
13.8%
81
81.0
86.2%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
4.205b
3.027
4.029
4.161
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.040
.082
.045
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.061
.043
.041
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.
70.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or
Eklampsia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.385
1.008
11.359
1.917
1.124
3.270
.566
.280
1.145
94
104
SIRS * Diagnosis
Crosstab
SI RS
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
2
2
1.4
2.6
5.9%
3.3%
32
58
32.6
57.4
94.1%
96.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
4
4.0
4.3%
90
90.0
95.7%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.346b
.003
.333
.342
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.556
.955
.564
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.618
.459
.558
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
45.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or SI RS
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.813
.244
13.486
1.406
.508
3.895
.776
.288
2.092
94
105
Perawatan ICU * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perawatan
ICU
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
19
5
8.7
15.3
55.9%
8.3%
15
55
25.3
44.7
44.1%
91.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
24
24.0
25.5%
70
70.0
74.5%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
25.807b
23.366
25.721
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
25.532
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.
68.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Perawatan
ICU (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
13.933
4.462
43.505
3.694
2.256
6.050
.265
.120
.584
94
106
Sepsis * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Sepsis
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
2
2
1.4
2.6
5.9%
3.3%
32
58
32.6
57.4
94.1%
96.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
4
4.0
4.3%
90
90.0
95.7%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
.346b
.003
.333
.342
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.556
.955
.564
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.618
.459
.558
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
45.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Sepsis (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
1.813
.244
13.486
1.406
.508
3.895
.776
.288
2.092
94
107
Perdarahan post partum * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Perdarahan
post partum
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
2
1
1.1
1.9
5.9%
1.7%
32
59
32.9
58.1
94.1%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
3
3.0
3.2%
91
91.0
96.8%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
1.248b
.257
1.187
1.235
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.264
.612
.276
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.296
.296
.266
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.
09.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Perdarahan post
partum (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
3.688
.322
42.253
1.896
.812
4.424
.514
.103
2.565
94
108
Mortalitas perinatal * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Mortalit as
perinatal
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
5
1
2.2
3.8
14.7%
1.7%
29
59
31.8
56.2
85.3%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
6
6.0
6.4%
88
88.0
93.6%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
6.175b
4.186
6.060
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
6.109
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.013
.041
.014
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.022
.022
.013
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
17.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Mortalitas
perinatal (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
10.172
1.136
91.126
2.529
1.587
4.029
.249
.041
1.497
94
109
IUGR * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUGR
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
26
23
17.7
31.3
76.5%
38.3%
8
37
16.3
28.7
23.5%
61.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
49
49.0
52.1%
45
45.0
47.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
12.649b
11.167
13.160
12.514
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.001
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.000
.000
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.
28.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUGR
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
5.228
2.026
13.492
2.985
1.510
5.899
.571
.412
.792
94
110
IUFD * Diagnosis
Crosstab
IUFD
Ya
Tidak
Total
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
7
1
2.9
5.1
20.6%
1.7%
27
59
31.1
54.9
79.4%
98.3%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Total
8
8.0
8.5%
86
86.0
91.5%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
9.979b
7.697
9.974
9.873
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.002
.006
.002
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.003
.003
.002
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.
89.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or IUFD
(Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
15.296
1.792
130.558
2.787
1.854
4.190
.182
.029
1.146
94
111
Asfiksia * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Asf iksia
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
18
8
9.4
16.6
52.9%
13.3%
16
52
24.6
43.4
47.1%
86.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
26
26.0
27.7%
68
68.0
72.3%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
17.015b
15.093
16.728
16.834
df
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.000
.000
.000
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.000
.000
.000
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9.
40.
Risk Estimate
Value
Odds Ratio f or
Asf iksia (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort
Diagnosis = Parsial
For cohort
Diagnosis = PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
7.313
2.680
19.953
2.942
1.786
4.847
.402
.223
.727
94
112
Gawat janin * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Gawat
janin
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
9
2
4.0
7.0
26.5%
3.3%
25
58
30.0
53.0
73.5%
96.7%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
11
11.0
11.7%
83
83.0
88.3%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
11.244b
9.116
11.022
11.124
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.003
.001
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) hav e expect ed count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.
98.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Gawat
janin (Y a / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis
= Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis
= PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
10.440
2.103
51.830
2.716
1.767
4.176
.260
.074
.919
94
113
Kelahiran prematur * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelahiran
prematur
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
26
24
18.1
31.9
76.5%
40.0%
8
36
15.9
28.1
23.5%
60.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
50
50.0
53.2%
44
44.0
46.8%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
11.594b
10.175
12.067
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
df
1
1
1
11.470
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.001
.001
.001
1
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.001
.001
.001
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.
91.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelahiran
prematur (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.875
1.893
12.554
2.860
1.447
5.651
.587
.426
.808
94
114
Kelainan Doppler * Diagnosis
Crosstab
Kelainan
Doppler
Ya
Tidak
Total
Diagnosis
Parsial
PEB
11
6
6.1
10.9
32.4%
10.0%
23
54
27.9
49.1
67.6%
90.0%
34
60
34.0
60.0
100.0%
100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Count
Expected Count
% wit hin Diagnosis
Total
17
17.0
18.1%
77
77.0
81.9%
94
94.0
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
7.320b
5.888
7.048
Pearson Chi-Square
Continuity Correctiona
Likelihood Ratio
Fisher's Exact Test
Linear-by -Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases
7.242
df
1
1
1
1
Asy mp. Sig.
(2-sided)
.007
.015
.008
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
.011
.008
.007
94
a. Computed only f or a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.
15.
Risk Esti mate
Value
Odds Rat io f or Kelainan
Doppler (Ya / Tidak)
For cohort Diagnosis =
Parsial
For cohort Diagnosis =
PEB
N of Valid Cases
95% Conf idence
Interv al
Lower
Upper
4.304
1.421
13.035
2.166
1.327
3.537
.503
.260
.974
94
115
Tabel Frekuensi Data
Variabel
Diagnosis
PEB
HELLP
Parsial
Mortalitas maternal
DIC
Gagal ginjal akut
Gangguan penglihatan
Edema paru
Eklampsia
SIRS
Perawatan ICU
Sepsis
Perdarahan post partum
Mortalitas perinatal
IUGR
IUFD
Asfiksia
Gawat janin
Kelahiran prematur
Kelainan Doppler
F
%
60
42
34
7
1
27
18
24
23
6
46
5
5
15
87
16
44
20
85
34
44,1
30,9
25
5,1
0,7
19,9
13,2
17,6
16,9
4,4
33,8
3,7
3,7
11
64
11,8
32,4
14,7
62,5
25
Tabel hasil uji chi square antar diagnosis HELLP dan PEB
Variabel
Diagnosis
HELLP
PEB
Bivariat
p
OR (IK95%)
1,7
0,303‡
4,54 (0,46-45,22)
0
0
–
–
9
15
0,402§
1,55 (0,56-4,3)
5
8,3
0,737‡
1,49 (0,40-5,50)
7
11,
7
0,058§
2,69 (0,94-7,65)
5
8,3
0,030§
3,44 (1,08-10,95)
2
3,3
1,000‡
1,45 (0,20-10,72)
5
8,3