Two-way Analysis of Variance

TWO-WAY ANOVA

   To test the significant effect of two independent

variables to one dependent variable, and to test the

significant interaction of the two independent variables to the dependent variable.

   The two independent variables are called “row” factors (A factor) and “column” factor (B factor).

   Testing the mean of rows, testing the means of column, and testing the mean of cells in the same row or the same column.

  

The hypothesis test on 2 x 2 factorial design

eperiment LEARNING LEARNING METHOD A METHOD B SMALL CLASS BIG CLASS

  

The hypothesis test on 2 x 2 factorial design

eperiment

  LEARNING LEARNING METHOD A METHOD B SMALL CLASS BIG CLASS

  

The hypothesis test on 2 x 2 factorial design

eperiment LEARNING LEARNING METHOD A METHOD B SMALL CLASS BIG CLASS

  

The hypothesis test on 2 x 2 factorial design

eperiment LEARNING LEARNING METHOD A METHOD B SMALL CLASS BIG CLASS

  

The hypothesis test on 2 x 2 factorial design

eperiment LEARNING LEARNING METHOD A METHOD B SMALL CLASS BIG CLASS

  

The hypothesis test on 2 x 2 factorial design

eperiment LEARNING LEARNING METHOD A METHOD B SMALL CLASS BIG CLASS

  

The hypothesis test on 2 x 2 factorial design

eperiment LEARNING LEARNING METHOD A METHOD B SMALL CLASS BIG CLASS

NOTASI DAN TATA LETAK DATA

  1.

  5

  4  

    k j i ijk

  X , , 2

  2

   

    j i ij n AB , 2

   

   

    i i nq A 2

  3 ) ) 1 (

   3 (  JKA ) ) 1 (  4 (  JKB

  ) ) 4 ( ) 3 ( ) 5 (

   1 (    JKAB

   

  ) 5 (  2  JKG

    j j np B 2

  1 

   Komponen komputasi a.

  1q A

  Jumlah Kuadrat (JK) atau sum of square (SS) 1) Anava dua jalan sel sama

  Tabel jumlah AB Faktor A Faktor B

  Total b 1 b 2 ... b q a

  1 AB

  11 AB

  12 ... AB

  1 a

  N G 2

  2 AB

  21 AB

  22 ... AB

  2q A

  2 ... ... ... ... ... ... a p AB p1 AB p2 ... AB pq A p Total B

  1 B 2 ... B q G Untuk memudahkan perhitungan pada anava dua jalan sel sama, didefinisikan besaran-besaran (1), (2), (3), (4), dan (5) sebagai berikut:

   

        atau ) ) 1 ( 2 (

  1) Anava dua jalan sel tak sama

     

     ij ij

  AB B jumlah rerata pada kolom ke-j

     j ij j

   i ij i AB A jumlah rerata pada baris ke-i

   ij AB rerata pada sel ij  

    = jumlah kuadrat deviasi data amatan pada sel ij

  X X SS 2 2    

  Tabel rerata dan jumlah rerata Faktor A

  1 ij k ijk k ijk ij n

   j i ij n pq ,

   h n rerata harmonik frekuensi seluruh sel =

   ij n banyaknya data amatan pada sel ij

  N n , banyaknya seluruh data amatan

     j i ij

  

Faktor B

Total b 1 b 2 ... b q a 1 11 AB 12 AB ... AB q 1 A 1 a 2 21 AB 22 AB ... AB q 2 A 2

... ... ... ... ... ...

a p 1 AB p 2 AB p ... AB pq A p Total B 1 B 2 ... B q G Pada analisis variansi dua jalan dengan sel tak sama, didefinisikan notasi-notasi sebagai berikut:

  AB G jumlah rerata semua sel

  

Untuk memudahkan perhitungan, didefinisikan besaran-besaran (1), (2), (3), (4),

dan (5) sebagai berikut:   pq G

  5      

  JKG 2 

  JKAB n  

  1     h

  5

  3

  4

  JKB n          

  4   h

  1

  JKA n      

  3   h

  1

  2

  2

  AB

    ij ij

  4  

  2

    j j p B

  3  

  2

    i i q A

  2  

  SS

    ij ij

  1   

JKG JKAB JKB JKA JKT    

   Derajat kebebasan atau degrees of freedom (df) dkA = − 1 dkB = − 1 dkAB =

  − 1 ( − 1) dkG = − dkT = − 1

   Rerata kuadrat atau mean square (MS) = = = =

   Statistik uji 1)

  a

  ab

  = { | >

  ; −1 ( −1), −

  }  Keputusan uji

  1) H

  0A

  ditolak apabila F

  a

  ∈ DK

  2) H

  } 3)

  0B

  ditolak apabila F

  b

  ∈ 3)

  H

  0AB

  ditolak apabila F

  ab

  ∈ DK

  Daerah kritik untuk F ab adalah DK

  ; −1, −

  Untuk H

  Daerah kritik untuk F

  0A

  adalah =

  2) Untuk H

  0B

  adalah =

  3) Untuk H

  0AB

  adalah =

   Daerah kritik 1)

  a

  = { | >

  adalah DK

  a

  = { | >

  ; −1, −

  } 2)

  Daerah kritik untuk F

  b

  adalah DK

  b

  ab Rangkuman Analisis Source of Sum of Degrees of Mean Square Test Statistics variance squares Freedom Rows SSR p-1

  = = − 1 Columns SSC q-1

  = = − 1 Treatments SS(Tr) (p-1)(q-1)

  = ( ) = ( ) − 1 ( − 1) ( ) Error SSE N-pq = −

  • Total SST N-1
EXAMPLE 

  A study was conducted to examine the effect of eating high protein (level I, level II, and level III) breakfast on adolescents' performance during a physical education physical fitness test. Boys and Girls were given a fitness test with high scores representing better performance. The test scores are recorded below.

  Level I Level II Level III Boys 4 4 2 4 7 4 6 5 2 3 3 1 Girls 9 8 6 6 9 8 8 9 6 5 5 2

  Are there any significant main effects or an interaction effect ? (use 5% level of significance) SOLUTION 1.

  Hypotheses:  H : there is no difference in the effect of gender on the fitness score.

  0A H : there is difference in the effect of gender on the fitness score.

  1A  H : there is no difference in the effect of protein level on the fitness score.

  0B H : there is difference in the effect of protein level on the fitness score.

  1B 

  H : there is no interaction between gender and protein level of the fitness

  0AB score.

  H : there is interaction between gender and protein level of the fitness score.

  1AB

2. Level of significance = 5%

  SOLUTION

3. Computation

  Degrees of freedom Mean squares

  Protein level 52,75 2 26,375 17,264 3,55 H

  Error 27,5 18 1,528 - - - - Total 136,5 23 - - - - -

  is accepted there is interaction between gender and protein level of the fitness score

  0AB

  2,25 2 1,125 0,736 3,55 H

  Treatments /Interacton

  is rejected there is difference in the effect of protein level on the fitness score

  0B

  is rejected there is difference in the effect of gender on the fitness score

  F

  Source of variance Sum of square

  1 54 35,345 4,41 H

  54

  Decision Conclusion Gender

  table

  F

  test

  0A Level I Level II Level III Marginal means Boys 3,5 5,5 2,25 3,75 Girls 7,25 8,5 4,5 6,75 Marginal 5,375 7 3,375 means

HOMEWORK 

  No 12 on page , Statistika Untuk Penelitian

 No 15.34 on page 386, Modern Elementary Statistics Number 12  Ada perbedaan efektivitas ukuran kelas terhadap prestasi, dilihat dari rerata marginalnya, kelas kecil lebih efektif daripada kelas besar.

   Ada perbedaan efektivitas metode pembelajarn terhadap prestasi, dilihat dari rerata marginalnya, metode diskusi lebih efektif daripada metode ceramah.

   Ada interaksi antara ukuran kelas dan metode pembelajaran terhadap prestasi  Pada kelas kecil, metode diskusi sama efektifnya dengan metode ceramah, sedangkan pada kelas besar, metode diskusi lebih efektif daripada metode ceramah.

   Dengan metode diskusi, pembelajaran di kelas kecil sama efektifnya dengan pembelajaran di kelas besar, sedangkan dengan metode ceramah, pembelajaran di kelas kecil lebih efektif daripada pembelajaran di kelas besar. Problem 

  A study was conducted to know the effect of antibiotic dose (20 grams, 30 grams, and 40 grams) which are given to patients (children, adult, and elderly) on the recovery time. This study was conducted with 36 people as the sample who spreads into the same number of each cell (4 people for each). Assuming that the pre- conditions of analysis are all satisfied and the SSR = 158, 389; SSC = 1071, 056; SS(Tr) = 847, 444; and SST = 3589,889. Perform a two-way analysis of variance using the 5% of level of significance. Children Adult Elderly

  20 grams 31,75 34 36,5 30 grams 29,75 34,25 34,75 40 grams 21 42,5

  50

Dokumen yang terkait

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Karakteristik Aerodinamika Flying Boat pada Ketinggian Ground Effect (Studi Kasus Model Remote Control Flying Boat Pada Ketinggian 0,2 m dan 1 m) The Aerodynamic Characteristics of A Flying Boat on the Ground Effect A

0 0 8

Demand Forecasting Model with Dynamic Systems Approach to Support Financial Analysis in the Airport Infrastructure Development in Indonesia

0 1 14

Maintenance of Fire Fighting Vehicle in Hang Nadim Airport Batam

0 0 16

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Harapan dan Kepentingan Pengguna Jasa Angkutan Udara Terhadap Pelayanan di Bandar Udara H.AS Hanandjoeddin–Tanjung Pandan Belitung Air Transport Passenger Expectations and Interest of Airport Services in H.A.S Hanandj

0 0 12

The Evaluation of Air Transportation Infrastructure Performance in Indonesian Capital Province

0 0 10

Demand Forecasting of Modal Share of Bandara Internasional Jawa Barat (BJIB) in Kertajati Majalengka

0 1 12

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Analisis Flutter Pada Uji Model Separuh Sayap Pesawat N219 di Terowongan Angin Kecepatan Rendah The Analysis of Half Wing Flutter Test N219 Aircraft Model in The Low Speed Wind Tunnel

0 0 8

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Penerapan Skema Badan Layanan Umum Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Bandar Udara Internasional Jawa Barat The Application of Badan Layanan Umum Scheme in The Financial Management of Jawa Barat International Airport

0 0 16

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Dampak Masuknya Low-cost Carrier Terhadap Pergerakan Penumpang Internasional pada Bandar Udara Internasional di Asia Impact of Low-cost Carrier Entry on International Air Passenger Movements at International Airports

0 0 6

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Peran Jasa Ground Handling Terhadap Pelayanan Perusahaan Air Freight di Bali dalam Menghadapi Kompetisi Global The Role of Ground Handling Services to The Air Freight Services in Bali in The Face of Global Competition

0 1 14