Edo Sun de Putra 22010112130065 Lap.KTI Bab7
53
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. UNICEF. Under-five and infant mortality rates and number of deaths.
2015. [Cited 2015 ] ; Available from:http://www.data.unicef.org/childmortality/under-five.html
2. UNICEF Indonesia (2012): Ringkasan Kajian Kesehatan Ibu&Anak,
Oktober 2012. Jakarta: UNICEF Indonesia
3. Dr Danzhen You, Simon Ejdemyr, Lucia Hug, Daniel Hogan, Colin
Mathers, Leontine Alkema JRN. Global, regional, and national levels
and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenariobased projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. 2015;386(10010) :
2275-86
4. Indonesia KKR. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2014. 2015. Jakarta:
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia
5. Monique W, Nikkels G, Peter, Franx A, Visser G. The Umbilical
Coiling Index. A Review Of The Literature. Journal Of Maternal-Fetal
And Neonatal Medicine. 2007; 17 (2): 93-100.
6. Machin G, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E. Abnormal Umbilical Cord
Coiling Is Associated With Adverse Perinatal Outcomes. Pediatr Dev
Pathol 2000; 3:462–71
54
7. Shalu Gupta, MMA Faridi, J Krishnan. The umbilical coiling index
and adverse perinatal outcome. International journal of Gynecology
and Obstetrics of India. July/August 2006 Pg 315-319.
8. Armangil D1, Yurdakök M, Korkmaz A, Yiğit S, Tekinalp G. Ponderal
index of large-for-gestational age infants: comparison between infants
of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. 2011 Mar-Apr;53(2):169-72.
9. Tantbirojn P, Saleemuddin A, Sirois K, Cruma C.P, Boyd T.K. Gross
Abnormalities Of The Umbilical Cord: Related Placental Histology
And Clinical Significance. Placenta. 2009; 30: 1083–88
10. Can A, Karahuseyinoglu S. Concise Review: Human Umbilical Cord
Stroma With Regard To The Source Of Fetus Derived Stem Cells.
Stemcells 2007;25: 2886–95
11. Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a
marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int.
2012;2012:213689. doi:10.1155/2012/213689
12. Sadler, Tw. Langman’s General Embryology 10th Edition. Maryland
Composition Co. Inc. Us. 2006
13. Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’Addario V. Umbilical cord
morphology and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
Biol. 2001;96:150-157. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00470-X.
14. Sebire N.J. Pathophysiological Significance Of Abnormal Umbilical
Cord Coiling Index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 804–806.
55
15. Rana J, Ebert G, Kappy K. Adverse Perinatal Outcome In Patients
With An Abnormal Umbilical Coiling Index. Obstet Gynecol
1995;85:573–77.
16. Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S. Umbilical coiling index : is it a marker
for fetus at risk?. Br J Clin Pract. 1996; 50(5):254-6
17. Brachet E. Total Water Electrolytes And Lipids Of The Human
Umbilical Cord. Archieves Internationalles De Physiologie Et De
Biochime. 1971; 79: 447-452.
18. Togni F.A, Arajuo Junior E, Vasques F, Et Al. The Cross-Sectional
Area Of Umbilical Cord Components In Normal Pregnancy.
International Journal Of Gynecology And Obstetrics 2007; 96: 156-61.
19. Kurita M, Hasegawa J, Mikoshiba T. Ultrasound Evaluation Of The
Amount Of Wharton’s Jelly And The Umbilical Coiling Index. Fetal
Diagn Ther 2009;26:85–89.
20. Virginia L , Ferguson, Reuben B, Et All. Bioengineering Aspects Of
The Umbilical Cord. Department Of Mechanical Engineering,
University Of Colorado, Us,2000.
21. Bobak, L.J. (2004). Buku Ajar Keperawatan Maternitas, Edisi 4,
Jakarta : ECG
22. Kuswani L. Perbandingan Indeks Koil Tali Pusat Terhadap Luaran
Berat Badan Bayi Lahir. 2011.
23. Baptiste-Roberts K, Salafia CM, Nicholson WK, Duggan A, Wang NY, Brancati FL. Maternal risk factors for abnormal placental growth:
56
the national collaborative perinatal project. BMC pregnancy and
childbirth 2008;8:44.
24. S. P. Ilmu kebidanan. Jakarta: EGC, 2010.
25. Botdorf J, Chaudhary K, Whaley-Connell A. Hypertension in
cardiovascular and kidney disease. Cardiorenal medicine 2011;1:183.
26. Møller S, Henriksen J. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: a pathophysiological
review of circulatory dysfunction in liver disease. Heart 2002;87:9-15.
27. Eadara Murthy IR M. Review: diabetes and pregnancy. Diabetologia
croatica. 2002:131-146.
28. Eclampsia (seizure) and preeclampsia, 2012.
29. Irnawati MH W. Ibu hamil perokok pasif sebagai faktor risiko bayi
berat lahir rendah. Jurnal Gizi Klinik Indonesia. 2011:54-59
30. Kim KS, Kim YS, Lim JI, Jung MH, Park HK. Nanoscale imaging of
morphological
changes
of
umbilical
cord
in
pre-eclampsia.
Microscopy research and technique 2012;75:1445-51.
31. Samuel Bimpong. Qualitative Evaluation of Umbilical Cord and
Placental Indices and Pregnancy Outcome. 2012:1-109.
32. de Laat MWM, Nikkels PGJ, Franx A, Visser GH a. The Roach
muscle bundle and umbilical cord coiling. Early Hum Dev.
2007;83(9):571-574.
33. Bach M. The Umbilical Vessels. Perinatal Medicine, 13th Ed.
Hagerstown, Maryland: Harper And Row. 1976;134–42.
57
34. Qin Y, Lau Tk, Rogers Ms. Second-Trimester Ultrasonographic
Assessment Of The Umbilical Coiling Index. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol 2002;20:458–63
35. Singh Md Vivekanand, Khanum, Sufia. Umbilical Cord Lessions In
Early Intrauterine Fetal Demise. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003; 127:
850-853.
36. Strong T.H, Maria P. Manriquez-Cilpin Rn, And Cilpin B.C, Md.
Umbilical Vascular Coiling And Nuchal Entanglement. The Journal Of
Maternal-Fetal Medicine. 1995; 359-361
37. Predanic M, Perni S, Chasen S, Baergen R, Chervenak F. Antenatal
Umbilical Coiling Index And Doppler Flow Characteristics. J
Ultrasound Obstet gynecol 2006 ; 28 : 699 –703.
38. Nili F, Makipour M, Mobini J. The Value Of Ponderal Index As A
Prognostic Factor In Predicting Complications In Term Neonates.
2003;17(3):197-202.
39. Morris SS, Victora CG, Barros FC, et al. Length and ponderal index at
birth : associations with mortality , hospitalizations , development and
post-natal growth in Brazilian infants. 1998:242-247.
40. Onyiriuka AN, Okolo AA. Small-For-Gestatioanal Age , Ponderal
Index And Neonatal Policythaemia : A Study Of Their Association
With Maternal Hypertension Among Nigerian Women. 2005;4(4):154159.
58
41. Akram DS, Arif F. Original Article Ponderal Index of Low Birth
Weight Babies - a Hospital Based Study. (Cm):3-5.
42. Puffer,RR dan Serano,CV., “Patterns of Birthweights”, Scientific
Publication No.504, Pan American Health Organization, World Health
Organization, Washington, 1987
43. Wong, Donna L., dkk. (2008). Buku Ajar Keperawatan Pediatrik
Volume 1, Jakarta: EGC.
44. Ezimokhai M, Rizk DE, Thomas L. Maternal risk factors for abnormal
vascular coiling of the umbilical cord. Am J Perinatol., 2000;
17(8):441-446.
45. Nivedita S. Patil, Sunanda R. Kulkarni and Renu Lohitashwa.
Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Perinatal Outcome . J Clin Diagn
Res. 2013
46. Appiah, Peter Kwabenah. Relatioship Between the Morphology of the
Placenta, Umbilical Cord and Perinatal Outcome. Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology.2009
47. Degani S, Leibovich Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G. Early SecondTrimester
Low
Umbilical
Coiling
Index
Predicts
Small-for-
Gestational-Age Foetuses J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Nov;20(11):1183-8.
48. Reynolds SRM. Mechanisms of placentofetal blood flow.Obstet
Gynecol 1978;51:245–249.
59
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearence
60
Lampiran 2. Surat Ijin Penelitian
61
62
Lampiran 3. Sampel Informed Consent
63
Lampiran 4. Spreadsheet Data Penelitian
no
sampel
nama
umur
(thn)
paritas
BB
(kg)
TB
(m)
BMI
Umur hamil
(minggu )
kela
min
LILA
(cm)
Berat
bayi lahir
(gram)
Panjang
badan
bayi (cm)
Indeks
Ponderal
Indeks
Koil
1
Ny. Y
21
1
63
1.55
26.22
38
L
12
3600
51
2.71
0.27
2
Ny. K
33
2
70
1.55
29.14
38
P
13
4000
50
3.2
0.18
3
Ny. L
22
1
65
1.56
26.71
38
L
12
3300
49
2.8
0.31
4
Ny. L
36
3
58
1.54
24.46
38
P
12
3300
49
2.8
0.31
5
Ny. I G S
28
2
47
1.52
20.34
37
L
9
2100
45
2.3
0.67
6
Ny. D K S
18
1
73
1.53
31.18
38
L
12
3590
50
2.87
0.28
7
Ny. I S H
33
2
56
1.54
23.61
40
P
11
2700
48
2.4
0.42
8
ny. K R
39
2
59
1.53
25.20
39
L
12
3600
51
2.7
0.27
9
Ny. P A
27
2
58
1.64
21.56
38
P
11
3600
51
2.71
0.26
10
Ny, N K
26
1
55
1.5
24.44
39
P
10
2850
49
2.42
0.41
11
Ny. P S
35
2
54
1.48
24.65
38
L
11
3200
48
2.89
0.33
12
Ny. W
21
1
49
1.55
20.40
40
P
10
2700
48
2.44
0.4
13
Ny.A Y
36
3
49
1.58
19.63
38
L
11
3400
51
2.56
0.32
14
Ny. F D A
38
2
73.5
1.65
27.00
38
P
12
3150
47
3.03
0.33
15
Ny. C S
24
2
58
1.59
22.94
40
P
11
3000
48
2.71
0.35
16
Ny. N A
29
1
55
1.5
24.44
39
L
11
2900
49
2.46
0.39
64
17
Ny. Z A S
22
2
59
1.61
22.76
38
P
12
3600
52
2.56
0.27
18
Ny. W L
27
2
54
1.49
24.32
38
P
11
3200
48
2.89
0.32
19
Ny. J
22
1
60
1.54
25.30
38
P
11
3300
49
2.8
0.32
20
Ny. J Y
32
1
67
1.48
30.59
38
P
10
2750
48
2.49
0.41
21
Ny. Y R
25
1
40
1.52
17.31
40
P
10
2600
48
2.35
0.42
22
Ny. S A
27
1
68
1.7
23.53
40
P
10
2950
51
2.22
0.38
23
Ny. W P
23
1
63
1.55
26.22
40
P
11
2950
48
2.67
0.38
24
Ny. S N
21
1
75
1.6
29.30
38
P
12
3660
52
2.6
0.26
25
Ny. E E
29
2
60
1.5
26.67
37
L
9
2545
48
2.3
0.46
26
Ny. M
34
4
70
1.5
31.11
39
P
10
3115
47
3
0.33
27
Ny. N C
30
3
68
1.58
27.24
39
L
13
3950
50
3.16
0.18
28
Ny.N H
31
1
48
1.58
19.23
40
P
12
3400
50
2.72
0.33
29
Ny. D K
27
2
76
1.57
30.83
38
P
11
2800
48
2.53
0.38
30
Ny. T W
34
2
72
1.55
29.97
38
P
11
3200
51
2.41
0.35
31
Ny. H M
28
2
56
1.59
22.15
39
P
10
2700
48
2.44
0.42
32
Ny. S M
36
2
56
1.59
22.15
38
P
9
2500
47
2.4
0.48
33
Ny. D P
36
2
42
1.65
15.43
38
L
13
4000
51
3.01
0.2
34
Ny. S R W
34
2
80
1.55
33.30
39
L
11
3000
50
2.4
0.38
35
Ny. N A
25
1
64
1.63
24.09
37
P
10
2700
47
2.6
0.44
36
Ny. K A L
30
2
65
1.54
27.41
38
L
11
3550
50
2.84
0.29
65
37
Ny. Y S
32
1
67
1.48
30.59
38
L
10
2750
47
2.64
0.42
38
Ny. D W
30
2
63
1.48
28.76
38
P
10
2900
48
2.62
0.36
39
Ny. R N
30
1
65
1.53
27.77
38
P
10
2850
49
2.42
0.42
40
Ny. M Y
24
1
51
1.55
21.23
38
L
10
3000
50
2.40
0.38
41
Ny. L I
31
2
75
1.55
31.22
39
L
11
3500
50
2.80
0.3
42
Ny. M A H
29
2
71
1.54
29.94
39
P
11
3400
51
2.56
0.33
43
Ny. K H
45
3
54
1.5
24.00
39
P
11
3250
48
2.94
0.34
44
Ny. M P K
30
3
68.5
1.55
28.51
39
L
12
3850
51
2.90
0.22
45
Ny. N
29
2
58
1.55
24.14
38
l
10
2500
48
2.26
0.48
46
Ny. Y S
19
1
48
1.51
21.05
38
L
10
3100
49
2.63
0.37
47
Ny. E R
24
2
51
1.58
20.43
39
P
10
2600
48
2.35
0.47
48
Ny. K
27
2
60
1.55
24.97
38
L
11
3400
51
2.56
0.35
49
ny. T
30
2
68
1.54
28.67
38
L
12
3700
50
2.96
0.26
50
Ny. E
25
3
56
1.56
23.01
38
L
11
3300
49
2.80
0.33
66
Lampiran 5. Analisis statistik data
Normalitas d
Tests of Normality
LILA
Berat bay i lahir
Panjang badan bay i
Indeks Ponderal
Indeks Koil
St at ist ic
.910
.981
.933
.971
.589
Shapiro-Wilk
df
50
50
50
50
50
Sig.
.001
.598
.007
.262
.000
a. Lillief ors Signif icance Correction
Precentile Umbilical Coiling Index
Percentil es
Percent iles
5
10
25
50
75
90
95
Weighted Av erage
(Def inition 1)
Indeks Koil
.1910
.2600
.2975
.3450
.4100
.4580
.4800
Tukey 's
Hinges
Indeks Koil
.3000
.3450
.4100
Frequencies
Umbilical Coiling Index
Indeks Koil
Valid
Kurang
Normal
Lebih
Total
Frequency
4
41
5
50
Percent
8.0
82.0
10.0
100.0
Valid Percent
8.0
82.0
10.0
100.0
Mean, Median, Maximum and Minimum
Cumulativ e
Percent
8.0
90.0
100.0
67
Case Summaries
Umur
BB
TB
BMI
Umur kehamilan
LILA
Berat bay i lahir
Panjang badan bay i
Indeks Ponderal
Indeks Koil
N
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Mean
28.88
60.8200
1.5520
25.3024
38.46
10.9200
3151.2000
49.1200
2.6446
.3506
St d. Dev iation
Median
5.637
29.00
9.25145
60.0000
.04798
1.5500
4.00736
24.8100
.813
38.00
1.00691
11.0000
438.18685 3175.0000
1.54708
49.0000
.24368
2.6250
.08709
.3450
Minimum
18
40.00
1.48
15.43
37
9.00
2100.00
45.00
2.22
.18
Hypercoiled, perinatal outcome
Statistics
LILA
N
Panjang badan
Indeks
bayi
Ponderal
Berat bayi lahir
Valid
5
5
5
5
Missing
0
0
0
0
Mean
9.4000
2449.0000
47.2000
2.3220
Median
9.0000
2500.0000
48.0000
2.3000
9.00
2500.00
48.00
2.30
.54772
199.38656
1.30384
.05404
Minimum
9.00
2100.00
45.00
2.26
Maximum
10.00
2600.00
48.00
2.40
Sum
47.00
12245.00
236.00
11.61
Mode
Std. Deviation
Normocoiled , perinatal outcome
Statistics
Berat bayi lahir
N
Valid
41
LILA
Indeks Ponderal
41
41
Panjang badan
bayi
41
Maximum
45
80.00
1.70
33.30
40
13.00
4000.00
52.00
3.20
.67
68
Missing
0
0
0
0
Mean
3158.9024
10.9268
2.6427
49.2195
Median
3200.0000
11.0000
2.6300
49.0000
a
11.00
2.80
48.00
Std. Deviation
324.58341
.75466
.20029
1.44070
Sum
129515.00
448.00
108.35
2018.00
Mode
2700.00
Hypocoiled, perinatal outcome
Statistics
Panjang badan
LILA
N
Berat bayi lahir
bayi
Indeks Ponderal
Valid
4
4
4
4
Missing
0
0
0
0
Mean
12.7500
3950.0000
50.5000
3.0675
Median
13.0000
3975.0000
50.5000
3.0850
13.00
4000.00
50.00
.50000
70.71068
.57735
.13841
Minimum
12.00
3850.00
50.00
2.90
Maximum
13.00
4000.00
51.00
3.20
Sum
51.00
15800.00
202.00
12.27
Mode
Std. Deviation
a
2.90
Correlations
Ibu, Indeks koil
a,b
Test Statistics
Umur
Kehamilan
Chi-Square
df
Asymp. Sig.
umur kategori
paritas
BMI
3.508
.963
3.492
2.430
2
2
2
2
.173
.618
.174
.297
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable: Indeks Koil
a
69
Ibu , Indeks ponderal
a,b
Test Statistics
Umur
Kehamilan
Chi-Square
paritas
BMI
.008
2.955
2.415
.760
1
1
1
1
.929
.086
.120
.383
df
Asymp. Sig.
umur kategori
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable: Indeks Ponderal
Indeks koil, indeks ponderal, perinatal outcome
Correlations
Berat
Indeks
Koil
Spearman's
Indeks Koil
rho
Correlation
Coefficient
N
Berat bayi
Correlation
lahir
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Panjang
Correlation
badan bayi
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
LILA
Correlation
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Indeks
Correlation
Ponderal
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
badan bayi
lahir
1.000
Sig. (1-tailed)
Panjang
bayi
-.668
**
-.447
LILA
-
**
.637
**
Indeks
Ponderal
-.627
**
.
.000
.001
.000
.000
50
50
50
50
50
**
1.000
.000
.
.000
.000
.000
50
50
50
50
50
**
.142
-.668
-.447
**
.768
**
.768
**
.858
1.000 .587
**
.729
**
.001
.000
.
.000
.163
50
50
50
50
50
**
1.000
-.637
**
.858
**
.587
.693
**
.000
.000
.000
.
.000
50
50
50
50
50
**
1.000
-.627
**
.729
**
.142 .693
.000
.000
.163
.000
.
50
50
50
50
50
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
70
Lampiran 6. Dokumentasi Penelitian
71
Lampiran 7. Biodata Mahasiswa
BIODATA MAHASISWA
Identitas
Nama
: Edo Sun de Putra
NIM
: 22010112130065
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 18 Mei 1994
Jenis Kelamin
: Laki Laki
Alamat
: Jl. Pandan Kuning V Pandanaran Hills Semarang
Nomor HP
: 081805923789
e-mail
: [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. TK PGRI Rogojembangan Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2000
2. SD Negeri Jomblang 03 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2006
3. SMP Negeri 2 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2009
4. SMA Negeri 3 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2012
5. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro
Masuk tahun : 2012
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. UNICEF. Under-five and infant mortality rates and number of deaths.
2015. [Cited 2015 ] ; Available from:http://www.data.unicef.org/childmortality/under-five.html
2. UNICEF Indonesia (2012): Ringkasan Kajian Kesehatan Ibu&Anak,
Oktober 2012. Jakarta: UNICEF Indonesia
3. Dr Danzhen You, Simon Ejdemyr, Lucia Hug, Daniel Hogan, Colin
Mathers, Leontine Alkema JRN. Global, regional, and national levels
and trends in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenariobased projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. 2015;386(10010) :
2275-86
4. Indonesia KKR. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2014. 2015. Jakarta:
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia
5. Monique W, Nikkels G, Peter, Franx A, Visser G. The Umbilical
Coiling Index. A Review Of The Literature. Journal Of Maternal-Fetal
And Neonatal Medicine. 2007; 17 (2): 93-100.
6. Machin G, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E. Abnormal Umbilical Cord
Coiling Is Associated With Adverse Perinatal Outcomes. Pediatr Dev
Pathol 2000; 3:462–71
54
7. Shalu Gupta, MMA Faridi, J Krishnan. The umbilical coiling index
and adverse perinatal outcome. International journal of Gynecology
and Obstetrics of India. July/August 2006 Pg 315-319.
8. Armangil D1, Yurdakök M, Korkmaz A, Yiğit S, Tekinalp G. Ponderal
index of large-for-gestational age infants: comparison between infants
of diabetic and non-diabetic mothers. 2011 Mar-Apr;53(2):169-72.
9. Tantbirojn P, Saleemuddin A, Sirois K, Cruma C.P, Boyd T.K. Gross
Abnormalities Of The Umbilical Cord: Related Placental Histology
And Clinical Significance. Placenta. 2009; 30: 1083–88
10. Can A, Karahuseyinoglu S. Concise Review: Human Umbilical Cord
Stroma With Regard To The Source Of Fetus Derived Stem Cells.
Stemcells 2007;25: 2886–95
11. Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a
marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int.
2012;2012:213689. doi:10.1155/2012/213689
12. Sadler, Tw. Langman’s General Embryology 10th Edition. Maryland
Composition Co. Inc. Us. 2006
13. Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’Addario V. Umbilical cord
morphology and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod
Biol. 2001;96:150-157. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00470-X.
14. Sebire N.J. Pathophysiological Significance Of Abnormal Umbilical
Cord Coiling Index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30: 804–806.
55
15. Rana J, Ebert G, Kappy K. Adverse Perinatal Outcome In Patients
With An Abnormal Umbilical Coiling Index. Obstet Gynecol
1995;85:573–77.
16. Ercal T, Lacin S, Altunyurt S. Umbilical coiling index : is it a marker
for fetus at risk?. Br J Clin Pract. 1996; 50(5):254-6
17. Brachet E. Total Water Electrolytes And Lipids Of The Human
Umbilical Cord. Archieves Internationalles De Physiologie Et De
Biochime. 1971; 79: 447-452.
18. Togni F.A, Arajuo Junior E, Vasques F, Et Al. The Cross-Sectional
Area Of Umbilical Cord Components In Normal Pregnancy.
International Journal Of Gynecology And Obstetrics 2007; 96: 156-61.
19. Kurita M, Hasegawa J, Mikoshiba T. Ultrasound Evaluation Of The
Amount Of Wharton’s Jelly And The Umbilical Coiling Index. Fetal
Diagn Ther 2009;26:85–89.
20. Virginia L , Ferguson, Reuben B, Et All. Bioengineering Aspects Of
The Umbilical Cord. Department Of Mechanical Engineering,
University Of Colorado, Us,2000.
21. Bobak, L.J. (2004). Buku Ajar Keperawatan Maternitas, Edisi 4,
Jakarta : ECG
22. Kuswani L. Perbandingan Indeks Koil Tali Pusat Terhadap Luaran
Berat Badan Bayi Lahir. 2011.
23. Baptiste-Roberts K, Salafia CM, Nicholson WK, Duggan A, Wang NY, Brancati FL. Maternal risk factors for abnormal placental growth:
56
the national collaborative perinatal project. BMC pregnancy and
childbirth 2008;8:44.
24. S. P. Ilmu kebidanan. Jakarta: EGC, 2010.
25. Botdorf J, Chaudhary K, Whaley-Connell A. Hypertension in
cardiovascular and kidney disease. Cardiorenal medicine 2011;1:183.
26. Møller S, Henriksen J. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy: a pathophysiological
review of circulatory dysfunction in liver disease. Heart 2002;87:9-15.
27. Eadara Murthy IR M. Review: diabetes and pregnancy. Diabetologia
croatica. 2002:131-146.
28. Eclampsia (seizure) and preeclampsia, 2012.
29. Irnawati MH W. Ibu hamil perokok pasif sebagai faktor risiko bayi
berat lahir rendah. Jurnal Gizi Klinik Indonesia. 2011:54-59
30. Kim KS, Kim YS, Lim JI, Jung MH, Park HK. Nanoscale imaging of
morphological
changes
of
umbilical
cord
in
pre-eclampsia.
Microscopy research and technique 2012;75:1445-51.
31. Samuel Bimpong. Qualitative Evaluation of Umbilical Cord and
Placental Indices and Pregnancy Outcome. 2012:1-109.
32. de Laat MWM, Nikkels PGJ, Franx A, Visser GH a. The Roach
muscle bundle and umbilical cord coiling. Early Hum Dev.
2007;83(9):571-574.
33. Bach M. The Umbilical Vessels. Perinatal Medicine, 13th Ed.
Hagerstown, Maryland: Harper And Row. 1976;134–42.
57
34. Qin Y, Lau Tk, Rogers Ms. Second-Trimester Ultrasonographic
Assessment Of The Umbilical Coiling Index. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol 2002;20:458–63
35. Singh Md Vivekanand, Khanum, Sufia. Umbilical Cord Lessions In
Early Intrauterine Fetal Demise. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003; 127:
850-853.
36. Strong T.H, Maria P. Manriquez-Cilpin Rn, And Cilpin B.C, Md.
Umbilical Vascular Coiling And Nuchal Entanglement. The Journal Of
Maternal-Fetal Medicine. 1995; 359-361
37. Predanic M, Perni S, Chasen S, Baergen R, Chervenak F. Antenatal
Umbilical Coiling Index And Doppler Flow Characteristics. J
Ultrasound Obstet gynecol 2006 ; 28 : 699 –703.
38. Nili F, Makipour M, Mobini J. The Value Of Ponderal Index As A
Prognostic Factor In Predicting Complications In Term Neonates.
2003;17(3):197-202.
39. Morris SS, Victora CG, Barros FC, et al. Length and ponderal index at
birth : associations with mortality , hospitalizations , development and
post-natal growth in Brazilian infants. 1998:242-247.
40. Onyiriuka AN, Okolo AA. Small-For-Gestatioanal Age , Ponderal
Index And Neonatal Policythaemia : A Study Of Their Association
With Maternal Hypertension Among Nigerian Women. 2005;4(4):154159.
58
41. Akram DS, Arif F. Original Article Ponderal Index of Low Birth
Weight Babies - a Hospital Based Study. (Cm):3-5.
42. Puffer,RR dan Serano,CV., “Patterns of Birthweights”, Scientific
Publication No.504, Pan American Health Organization, World Health
Organization, Washington, 1987
43. Wong, Donna L., dkk. (2008). Buku Ajar Keperawatan Pediatrik
Volume 1, Jakarta: EGC.
44. Ezimokhai M, Rizk DE, Thomas L. Maternal risk factors for abnormal
vascular coiling of the umbilical cord. Am J Perinatol., 2000;
17(8):441-446.
45. Nivedita S. Patil, Sunanda R. Kulkarni and Renu Lohitashwa.
Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Perinatal Outcome . J Clin Diagn
Res. 2013
46. Appiah, Peter Kwabenah. Relatioship Between the Morphology of the
Placenta, Umbilical Cord and Perinatal Outcome. Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology.2009
47. Degani S, Leibovich Z, Shapiro I, Gonen R, Ohel G. Early SecondTrimester
Low
Umbilical
Coiling
Index
Predicts
Small-for-
Gestational-Age Foetuses J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Nov;20(11):1183-8.
48. Reynolds SRM. Mechanisms of placentofetal blood flow.Obstet
Gynecol 1978;51:245–249.
59
Lampiran 1. Ethical Clearence
60
Lampiran 2. Surat Ijin Penelitian
61
62
Lampiran 3. Sampel Informed Consent
63
Lampiran 4. Spreadsheet Data Penelitian
no
sampel
nama
umur
(thn)
paritas
BB
(kg)
TB
(m)
BMI
Umur hamil
(minggu )
kela
min
LILA
(cm)
Berat
bayi lahir
(gram)
Panjang
badan
bayi (cm)
Indeks
Ponderal
Indeks
Koil
1
Ny. Y
21
1
63
1.55
26.22
38
L
12
3600
51
2.71
0.27
2
Ny. K
33
2
70
1.55
29.14
38
P
13
4000
50
3.2
0.18
3
Ny. L
22
1
65
1.56
26.71
38
L
12
3300
49
2.8
0.31
4
Ny. L
36
3
58
1.54
24.46
38
P
12
3300
49
2.8
0.31
5
Ny. I G S
28
2
47
1.52
20.34
37
L
9
2100
45
2.3
0.67
6
Ny. D K S
18
1
73
1.53
31.18
38
L
12
3590
50
2.87
0.28
7
Ny. I S H
33
2
56
1.54
23.61
40
P
11
2700
48
2.4
0.42
8
ny. K R
39
2
59
1.53
25.20
39
L
12
3600
51
2.7
0.27
9
Ny. P A
27
2
58
1.64
21.56
38
P
11
3600
51
2.71
0.26
10
Ny, N K
26
1
55
1.5
24.44
39
P
10
2850
49
2.42
0.41
11
Ny. P S
35
2
54
1.48
24.65
38
L
11
3200
48
2.89
0.33
12
Ny. W
21
1
49
1.55
20.40
40
P
10
2700
48
2.44
0.4
13
Ny.A Y
36
3
49
1.58
19.63
38
L
11
3400
51
2.56
0.32
14
Ny. F D A
38
2
73.5
1.65
27.00
38
P
12
3150
47
3.03
0.33
15
Ny. C S
24
2
58
1.59
22.94
40
P
11
3000
48
2.71
0.35
16
Ny. N A
29
1
55
1.5
24.44
39
L
11
2900
49
2.46
0.39
64
17
Ny. Z A S
22
2
59
1.61
22.76
38
P
12
3600
52
2.56
0.27
18
Ny. W L
27
2
54
1.49
24.32
38
P
11
3200
48
2.89
0.32
19
Ny. J
22
1
60
1.54
25.30
38
P
11
3300
49
2.8
0.32
20
Ny. J Y
32
1
67
1.48
30.59
38
P
10
2750
48
2.49
0.41
21
Ny. Y R
25
1
40
1.52
17.31
40
P
10
2600
48
2.35
0.42
22
Ny. S A
27
1
68
1.7
23.53
40
P
10
2950
51
2.22
0.38
23
Ny. W P
23
1
63
1.55
26.22
40
P
11
2950
48
2.67
0.38
24
Ny. S N
21
1
75
1.6
29.30
38
P
12
3660
52
2.6
0.26
25
Ny. E E
29
2
60
1.5
26.67
37
L
9
2545
48
2.3
0.46
26
Ny. M
34
4
70
1.5
31.11
39
P
10
3115
47
3
0.33
27
Ny. N C
30
3
68
1.58
27.24
39
L
13
3950
50
3.16
0.18
28
Ny.N H
31
1
48
1.58
19.23
40
P
12
3400
50
2.72
0.33
29
Ny. D K
27
2
76
1.57
30.83
38
P
11
2800
48
2.53
0.38
30
Ny. T W
34
2
72
1.55
29.97
38
P
11
3200
51
2.41
0.35
31
Ny. H M
28
2
56
1.59
22.15
39
P
10
2700
48
2.44
0.42
32
Ny. S M
36
2
56
1.59
22.15
38
P
9
2500
47
2.4
0.48
33
Ny. D P
36
2
42
1.65
15.43
38
L
13
4000
51
3.01
0.2
34
Ny. S R W
34
2
80
1.55
33.30
39
L
11
3000
50
2.4
0.38
35
Ny. N A
25
1
64
1.63
24.09
37
P
10
2700
47
2.6
0.44
36
Ny. K A L
30
2
65
1.54
27.41
38
L
11
3550
50
2.84
0.29
65
37
Ny. Y S
32
1
67
1.48
30.59
38
L
10
2750
47
2.64
0.42
38
Ny. D W
30
2
63
1.48
28.76
38
P
10
2900
48
2.62
0.36
39
Ny. R N
30
1
65
1.53
27.77
38
P
10
2850
49
2.42
0.42
40
Ny. M Y
24
1
51
1.55
21.23
38
L
10
3000
50
2.40
0.38
41
Ny. L I
31
2
75
1.55
31.22
39
L
11
3500
50
2.80
0.3
42
Ny. M A H
29
2
71
1.54
29.94
39
P
11
3400
51
2.56
0.33
43
Ny. K H
45
3
54
1.5
24.00
39
P
11
3250
48
2.94
0.34
44
Ny. M P K
30
3
68.5
1.55
28.51
39
L
12
3850
51
2.90
0.22
45
Ny. N
29
2
58
1.55
24.14
38
l
10
2500
48
2.26
0.48
46
Ny. Y S
19
1
48
1.51
21.05
38
L
10
3100
49
2.63
0.37
47
Ny. E R
24
2
51
1.58
20.43
39
P
10
2600
48
2.35
0.47
48
Ny. K
27
2
60
1.55
24.97
38
L
11
3400
51
2.56
0.35
49
ny. T
30
2
68
1.54
28.67
38
L
12
3700
50
2.96
0.26
50
Ny. E
25
3
56
1.56
23.01
38
L
11
3300
49
2.80
0.33
66
Lampiran 5. Analisis statistik data
Normalitas d
Tests of Normality
LILA
Berat bay i lahir
Panjang badan bay i
Indeks Ponderal
Indeks Koil
St at ist ic
.910
.981
.933
.971
.589
Shapiro-Wilk
df
50
50
50
50
50
Sig.
.001
.598
.007
.262
.000
a. Lillief ors Signif icance Correction
Precentile Umbilical Coiling Index
Percentil es
Percent iles
5
10
25
50
75
90
95
Weighted Av erage
(Def inition 1)
Indeks Koil
.1910
.2600
.2975
.3450
.4100
.4580
.4800
Tukey 's
Hinges
Indeks Koil
.3000
.3450
.4100
Frequencies
Umbilical Coiling Index
Indeks Koil
Valid
Kurang
Normal
Lebih
Total
Frequency
4
41
5
50
Percent
8.0
82.0
10.0
100.0
Valid Percent
8.0
82.0
10.0
100.0
Mean, Median, Maximum and Minimum
Cumulativ e
Percent
8.0
90.0
100.0
67
Case Summaries
Umur
BB
TB
BMI
Umur kehamilan
LILA
Berat bay i lahir
Panjang badan bay i
Indeks Ponderal
Indeks Koil
N
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Mean
28.88
60.8200
1.5520
25.3024
38.46
10.9200
3151.2000
49.1200
2.6446
.3506
St d. Dev iation
Median
5.637
29.00
9.25145
60.0000
.04798
1.5500
4.00736
24.8100
.813
38.00
1.00691
11.0000
438.18685 3175.0000
1.54708
49.0000
.24368
2.6250
.08709
.3450
Minimum
18
40.00
1.48
15.43
37
9.00
2100.00
45.00
2.22
.18
Hypercoiled, perinatal outcome
Statistics
LILA
N
Panjang badan
Indeks
bayi
Ponderal
Berat bayi lahir
Valid
5
5
5
5
Missing
0
0
0
0
Mean
9.4000
2449.0000
47.2000
2.3220
Median
9.0000
2500.0000
48.0000
2.3000
9.00
2500.00
48.00
2.30
.54772
199.38656
1.30384
.05404
Minimum
9.00
2100.00
45.00
2.26
Maximum
10.00
2600.00
48.00
2.40
Sum
47.00
12245.00
236.00
11.61
Mode
Std. Deviation
Normocoiled , perinatal outcome
Statistics
Berat bayi lahir
N
Valid
41
LILA
Indeks Ponderal
41
41
Panjang badan
bayi
41
Maximum
45
80.00
1.70
33.30
40
13.00
4000.00
52.00
3.20
.67
68
Missing
0
0
0
0
Mean
3158.9024
10.9268
2.6427
49.2195
Median
3200.0000
11.0000
2.6300
49.0000
a
11.00
2.80
48.00
Std. Deviation
324.58341
.75466
.20029
1.44070
Sum
129515.00
448.00
108.35
2018.00
Mode
2700.00
Hypocoiled, perinatal outcome
Statistics
Panjang badan
LILA
N
Berat bayi lahir
bayi
Indeks Ponderal
Valid
4
4
4
4
Missing
0
0
0
0
Mean
12.7500
3950.0000
50.5000
3.0675
Median
13.0000
3975.0000
50.5000
3.0850
13.00
4000.00
50.00
.50000
70.71068
.57735
.13841
Minimum
12.00
3850.00
50.00
2.90
Maximum
13.00
4000.00
51.00
3.20
Sum
51.00
15800.00
202.00
12.27
Mode
Std. Deviation
a
2.90
Correlations
Ibu, Indeks koil
a,b
Test Statistics
Umur
Kehamilan
Chi-Square
df
Asymp. Sig.
umur kategori
paritas
BMI
3.508
.963
3.492
2.430
2
2
2
2
.173
.618
.174
.297
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable: Indeks Koil
a
69
Ibu , Indeks ponderal
a,b
Test Statistics
Umur
Kehamilan
Chi-Square
paritas
BMI
.008
2.955
2.415
.760
1
1
1
1
.929
.086
.120
.383
df
Asymp. Sig.
umur kategori
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable: Indeks Ponderal
Indeks koil, indeks ponderal, perinatal outcome
Correlations
Berat
Indeks
Koil
Spearman's
Indeks Koil
rho
Correlation
Coefficient
N
Berat bayi
Correlation
lahir
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Panjang
Correlation
badan bayi
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
LILA
Correlation
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
Indeks
Correlation
Ponderal
Coefficient
Sig. (1-tailed)
N
badan bayi
lahir
1.000
Sig. (1-tailed)
Panjang
bayi
-.668
**
-.447
LILA
-
**
.637
**
Indeks
Ponderal
-.627
**
.
.000
.001
.000
.000
50
50
50
50
50
**
1.000
.000
.
.000
.000
.000
50
50
50
50
50
**
.142
-.668
-.447
**
.768
**
.768
**
.858
1.000 .587
**
.729
**
.001
.000
.
.000
.163
50
50
50
50
50
**
1.000
-.637
**
.858
**
.587
.693
**
.000
.000
.000
.
.000
50
50
50
50
50
**
1.000
-.627
**
.729
**
.142 .693
.000
.000
.163
.000
.
50
50
50
50
50
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
70
Lampiran 6. Dokumentasi Penelitian
71
Lampiran 7. Biodata Mahasiswa
BIODATA MAHASISWA
Identitas
Nama
: Edo Sun de Putra
NIM
: 22010112130065
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Semarang, 18 Mei 1994
Jenis Kelamin
: Laki Laki
Alamat
: Jl. Pandan Kuning V Pandanaran Hills Semarang
Nomor HP
: 081805923789
: [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. TK PGRI Rogojembangan Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2000
2. SD Negeri Jomblang 03 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2006
3. SMP Negeri 2 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2009
4. SMA Negeri 3 Semarang
Lulus tahun
: 2012
5. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro
Masuk tahun : 2012