STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS ENGLISH TEACHER QUALITY (A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON XI GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 1 PURWOKERTO IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/2017) - repository perpustakaan
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS ENGLISH TEACHER QUALITY
(A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON XI GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK
MUHAMMADIYAH 1 PURWOKERTO IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/2017)
A THESIS
Submitted to the English Education Department as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for S. Pd Degree
By:
REZA PAHLEVI
1201050098
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY
THE UNIVERSITY OF MUHAMMADIYAH PURWOKERTO
2017
\
MOTTO
“The best among you are those who have
the best manners and character .”( H.R. Bukhari )
“Don’t waste your time or time will waste you.”
DEDICATION Bismillahirrohmanirrohim
My praise be toward Allah SWT, Shalawat and salam always be given to our Prophet Muhammad SAW. This thesis is heartedly dedicated to: 1.
My beloved parents, Mrs. Eni Supeni and Mr. Suherman for your countless support, prayers, love, and for your endless forgi veness. You’ve been through hard times because of me. I love you so much;
2. my brother, Lutfi Hendra Kurniawan, A.Md. for always encouraging me to keep learning;
3. Dra. Titi Wahyukti M. Pd. , my supervisor, for having inspired and guided me patiently in composing this thesis;
4. all the examiners who have given suggestions and critics to this thesis. Also all my great lecturers in English Department for the invaluable teaching;
5. all chiefs of departments of Teacher Training and Education Faculty; 6. my dearest friends who always stand by me, Brian, Dena, Windi, Reky,
Iswandee, Ali, Kukuh, thank you so much for your sincere and best companion; 7. my friends who always accompany me, Setyawan, Fredi, Teguh, Frizky, Risky,
Aswin, Rofiq at “Wisma Gading Putra” boarding house, thank you very much for your help and support;
8. my dearest classmates in Class D PBI UMP 2012. Love you all mates. Thanks for the best time we spent together;
9. everyone who has colored my days in UMP. I’ll keep our memories in my heart.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb.To The Almighty, Allah, all this thankfulness is presented. Praise is merely to Allah SWT for the gracious mercy, and tremendous blessing that enable me to accomplish this bachelor thesis as a requirements in accomplishing S-1 Degree in English Education Department, Teacher Training and Education Faculty, University of Muhammadiyah Purwokerto. The writer would like to express his great appreciation to: 1.
Drs. Pudiyono, M. Hum., the Dekan of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of The University of Muhammadiyah Purwokerto.
2. Aulia Nisa Khusnia, S.S, M.A. as the head of English Department.
3. Dra Titi Wahyukti, M. Pd. for the valuable assistance and inspiration as well as great constructive advice to the completion of this bachelor thesis.
4. Agus Suyono, S. Pd. as the headmaster of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Purwokerto who allowed me to collect the data at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Purwokerto.
5. Dyan Aristi Utami, S. Pd. as the English teacher of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Purwokerto.
6. all chiefs of departments of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, for the permission to conduct research.
7. all lecturers in English Department, for the inspiration, guidance, and patience during study in the university.
8. XI grade students of SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Purwokerto for the participation .
It is a real consciousness that this thesis is still far away from perfection. To do with this, constructive comments, suggestions, and guidance are very welcome for the sake of betterment of the quality of this research.
Wassalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb
Purwokerto, 24 Januari 2017 Reza Pahlevi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER .......................................................................................................... i APPROVAL ................................................................................................... ii LEGALIZATION .......................................................................................... iii DECLARATION ............................................................................................ iv MOTTO ......................................................................................................... v DEDICATION ................................................................................................ vi ACKNOWLEDGMENT ............................................................................... vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................... xii LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................. xiii ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... xiv CHAPTERIINTRODUCTION A.
Background of the Research ........................................ 1 B. Reasons of Choosing the Topic ................................... 3 C. Limitation of the Research ........................................... 3 D. Problem of the Research ............................................... 3 E. Objectives of the Research .......................................... 4 F. Contribution of the Research ........................................ 4
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW A. Perception ..................................................................... 5 1. The definition of Perception .................................. 5 2. Factors of Perception ............................................. 7
3. The Process of Perception ..................................... 8 B. English Teacher Quality .............................................. 9 1.
Good English Teacher ........................................... 9 2. Qualified and Professional Teacher ....................... 13 3.
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY A. Method of Research ...................................................... 20 B. The Subject of The Research 1. Population .............................................................. 20 2. Sample ................................................................... 21 3. Sampling technique ............................................... 21 C. Technique of Data Collection 1. Questionnaire ......................................................... 22 2. Interview ................................................................ 24 D. Technique of Data Analysis 1. Percentage .............................................................. 25 2. Miles and Huberman ............................................. 25
a. Data Reduction .................................................. 26
b. Data Display ...................................................... 26
c. Conclusion/Verification ..................................... 27
CHAPTERIV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A.
Results 1.
Result of Questionnaire ......................................... 28 a.
Pedagogical Competence ................................ 31 b.
Professional Competence ............................... 36
c.
Personal Competence ..................................... 41 d.
Social Competence ......................................... 46 2. Result of Interview ................................................ 51 B. Discussion ..................................................................... 53
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION A. Conclusion .................................................................... 57 B. Suggestion .................................................................... 58 REFERENCES APPENDICES
LIST OF TABLES 1.
Table 3.1 (Indicators of questionnaire for students) .......................................22 2.
Table 3.2 (The score of categories) .................................................................23 3.
Table 3.3 (The level of quality)............................... ........................................24 4.
Table 4.1 5.(The result of questionnaire)...... .....................................................
30 6.
Table 4.2 (The result of interview)..................................................................51
LIST OF FIGURES 1.
(Percentage of item number 10) ...................................................... 40 13. Figure 4.12
(Percentage of item number 19) ...................................................... 49 22. Figure 4.21
(Percentage of item number 18) ...................................................... 48 21. Figure 4.20
(Percentage of item number 17) ...................................................... 47 20. Figure 4.19
(Percentage of item number 16) ...................................................... 46 19. Figure 4.18
(Percentage of item number 15) ...................................................... 45 18. Figure 4.17
(Percentage of item number 14) ...................................................... 44 17. Figure 4.16
(Percentage of item number 13) ...................................................... 43 16. Figure 4.15
(Percentage of item number 12) ...................................................... 42 15. Figure 4.14
(Percentage of item number 11) ...................................................... 41 14. Figure 4.13
(Percentage of item number 9) ........................................................ 39 12. Figure 4.11
Figure 3.1 (Miles and Huberman Technique) ..................................................(Percentage of item number 8) ........................................................ 38 11. Figure 4.10
(Percentage of item number 7) ........................................................ 37 10. Figure 4.9
(Percentage of item number 6) ........................................................ 36 9. Figure 4.8
(Percentage of item number 5) ........................................................ 35 8. Figure 4.7
(Percentage of item number 4) ........................................................ 34 7. Figure 4.6
(Percentage of item number 3) ........................................................ 33 6. Figure 4.5
(Percentage of item number 2) ........................................................ 32 5. Figure 4.4
(Percentage of item number 1) ........................................................ 31 4. Figure 4.3
(Percentage of questionnaire) .......................................................... 30 3. Figure 4.2
26 2. Figure 4.1
(Percentage of item number 20) ................................................. 50
Appendix A Questionnaire and Interview Guideline 2. Appendix B
Questionnaire Result 3. Appendix C
Surat ijin Penelitian
ABSTRACT
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS ENGLISH TEACHER QUALITY
(A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON XI GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK
MUHAMMADIYAH 1 PURWOKERTO IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2016/2017)
REZA PAHLEVI 1201050098
ABSTRACT This study aims to describe the perceptions of XI grade students towards
English teacher quality at SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Purwokerto. The study on students' perceptions towards English teacher quality is categorized by four competencies that must be owned by the teacher. According to Permendiknas No. 16 2007, the four competencies are pedagogical competence, professional competence, personal competence and social competence. This research is a descriptive research which questionnaire and interview used as instruments. To analyze the data of questionnaire the researcher used percentage and to analyze the data of interview the researcher used technique from Miles and Hubberman. Respondents in this study are 25% students of XI grade students. The total is 45 students. The results obtained from students' perceptions towards English teacher quality in aspect of pedagogical competence, the category is very good with percentage 76%. In aspect of professional competence, the category is good with percentage 68%. In aspect of personal competence, the category is very good with percentage 85%. In aspect of social competence, the category is very good with percentage 84%.
Key words: perception, quality, English teacher, students, competence