A STUDY ON THE QUALITY OF LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY A Study On The Quality Of Lesson Plans On Genre Developed By SMA Muhammadiyah English Teachers Of Surakarta.
A STUDY ON THE QUALITY
OF LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY
SMA MUHAMMADIYAH ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by:
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012
APPROVAL
A STUDY ON THE QUALITY
OF LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY
SMA MUHAMMADIYAH ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Proposed by:
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
Approved to be Examined by Consultants:
Consultant I
Consultant II
Dra. Zuhriyah Aryatmi, M. Hum
Dra. Dwi Haryati, M. Hum
ii
ACCEPTANCE
A STUDY ON THE QUALITY
OF LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY
SMA MUHAMMADIYAH ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA
By:
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
Accepted by the Examiners Board of School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Team of Examiners:
1.
Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M. Hum.
(
)
(
)
(
)
(Chair Person)
2.
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum.
(Secretary)
3.
Dra. Malikatul Laila, M. Hum.
(Member)
Surakarta, March 2012
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Dean
iii
TESTIMONY
Hereby, the writer testifies that in this research, there is no plagiarism of
the previous studies which have been raised to get bachelor degree of a university.
Besides, there is no opinion or masterpiece which has been written or published
by the writer except those of which the writings are mentioned in previous study
and bibliography.
Accordingly, if it is later proven that there are untrue statements in this
testimony, the writer will be responsible.
Surakarta, September 2012
The writer
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
iv
MOTTO
...Allah actually will not change the fate of a person till he/ she
changes his/ her own fate... (Al-Ra’du: 11)
"Difficulties are opportunities to better things; they are stepping stones to
greater experience. Perhaps someday you will be thankful for some temporary
failure in a particular direction. When one door closes, another always opens."
(Brian Adams)
If you do not run away early, the time will be kill you.
Don’t think inside of the cube, but look out of the cube.
(The Writer)
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is greatly dedicated to:
His identity, UMS
The witer himself
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalaamu’alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh
Alhamdulillaahirabbil’aalamiin, gratitude and praise be to Allah SWT, the
Glorious, the Lord of the King, and the Merciful having given blessing and
opportunity for the writer to finish this research paper entitled A Study on the
Quality of Lesson Plans on Genre Developed by Muhammadiyah English teachers
of Surakarta.
Sholawat and salaam are also given to Muhammad SAW who is the best
figure in the world who brought the mandkind from the darkness to the lightness
as today.
In this occasion, the writer wants to express his thanks for people who
have given his valuable contributions either as long as writing this research paper
or as long as his life. They are as follows:
1.
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si., the Dean of School of Teacher Training and
Education, for the legalization of this research paper.
2.
Titis Setyabudi, S. S., M. Hum., the Head of English Education Department,
for the permission to finish this research paper.
3.
Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M. Hum., the first consultant and first examiner
who has patiently guided, advised, and motivated him during the arrangement
of this research paper. The writer also thanks for the reference books which
have been lent to him, so this research paper can be finished easier.
vii
4.
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum., the second consultant and second examiner
who has given him valuable correction and suggestion so that the writer can
get more knowledges which have not been known before.
5.
Dra. Malikatul Laila, M. Hum, the third examiner, for the correction of this
research paper so that its result is better.
6.
All lecturers in English Education Department who cannot be mentioned one
by one, for sharing and transferring knowledge, inspiration, motivation, and
suggestion given for him.
7.
His greatest parents “Bapak Dwi Kuswinarno and Ibu Maryatun”. Thanks
for praying, support, and love given to him. Everything it’s been a pleasure
growing up with him.
8.
His beloved grandmother, thanks for motivating and loving him
9.
His beloved cousin, Pras and Fuzi. Thanks for making smile
10. His special friend “Abu Alihussain”. Thanks for all timing, thinking,
Knowledge, helping, motivating, and supporting.
11. His close friends Agung Budi S, Inoi, Chindul, Helda, David, Badrun,
Ogtri, Thata, Mimi, Eng, and Eva. Thanks for supporting and helping.
12. All his friends in English Department, Thanks for support and appreciate.
13. His beloved future one, “MARUARY” thanks for all loves given to the
writer. You always help and support the writer all the time.
14. His big families, The Oxford, F class community, Al-Firdaus, and all his
music groups. Thanks for your motivation, inspiration, and experiences.
viii
15. All members of PPL in SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Kartasura th. 2011.
Thanks for supporting.
16. All teachers in SMP Muhannadiyah 1 Kartasura
17. English teachers in SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta,
SMA
Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta, SMA Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta,
Thanks for the helping and timing.
Finally, the writer realizes that there are still many weaknesses in this
research paper. Therefore, suggestion and criticism are accepted. He also hopes
the result of this research can be meaningful for the readers.
Wassalaamu’alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh
Surakarta, September 2012
The Writer
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
ix
SUMMARY
Arwin Adin Prasetyo. A. 320 080 223. A STUDY ON THE QUALITY OF
LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY SMA MUHAMMADIYAH
ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA. Research Paper. Surakarta: School
of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
2012.
This research purposes to describe the quality of lesson plans of genre
developed by English teachers in Surakarta. The research type is descriptive
evaluative research. The data are lesson plans of genre and the data source of this
research is document.
The writer employs documentation as the method of collecting data with
steps: seeking, collecting data, and giving code. In analyzing the data, the writer
identifies three main components of lesson plans such indicators, teaching
learning process, and evaluation from English teachers in Surakarta.
Based on the PERMEN 41, the percentage of indicator in narrative,
hortatory exposition, and spoof are 30, 99%. The percentage shows that the
quality of the design of indicators is bad quality based on the theory of Suharsimi.
The percentage of teaching learning process in narrative, hortatory exposition, and
spoof are 62, 59%. The percentage shows that the quality of teaching learning
process is good quality based on the theory of Suharsimi. The percentage of
evaluation in narrative, hortatory exposition, and spoof are 24, 77%. The
percentage shows that the quality of the design of evaluation is bad quality based
on the theory of Suharsimi.
Keywords: lesson plans, indicators, teaching learning process, narrative,
hortatory exposition, spoof, social function, language feature, generic
structure, operational verbs.
x
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER ..........................................................................................................
i
APPROVAL ...................................................................................................
ii
ACCEPTANCE .............................................................................................
iii
TESTIMONY ................................................................................................
iv
MOTTO .........................................................................................................
v
DEDICATION ...............................................................................................
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................
vii
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
x
TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................
xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ..................................................................
1
A. Background of the Study ................................................
1
B. Previous Study .................................................................
5
C. Limitation of the Study ...................................................
9
D. Problem Statement ..........................................................
9
E. Objective of the Study .....................................................
10
F. Benefit of the Study .........................................................
10
CHAPTER II UNDERLYING THEORY ..................................................
12
A. Lesson Plan ......................................................................
12
1. The Meaning of Lesson Plan ....................................
12
2. The Purpose of Lesson Plan .....................................
13
3. Benefit of Lesson Plan ...............................................
14
4. Characteristic of Lesson Plan ...................................
14
B. PERMEN
(Peraturan
Menteri
Pendidikan
Nasional)
Number 41 in 2007 ..........................................................
xi
19
1. Identity of Subject .....................................................
20
2. Standard Competency ...............................................
20
3. Basic Competency .....................................................
21
4. Indicator .....................................................................
21
5. Goal .............................................................................
22
6. Material ......................................................................
22
7. Time ............................................................................
22
8. Method ........................................................................
22
9. Teaching Learning Process ......................................
23
a. Introduction .........................................................
23
b. The Core of Teaching ..........................................
23
c. Closing ..................................................................
23
10. Evaluation ..................................................................
26
11. Source .........................................................................
27
C. Genre of the Text .............................................................
27
1. Narrative ....................................................................
28
2. Hortatory Exposition ................................................
29
3. Spoof ............................................................................
30
D. Percentage of The Quality of Lesson Plan ....................
30
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD .....................................................
32
A. Type of Research .............................................................
32
B. Object of Research ..........................................................
32
C. Date and Date Source ......................................................
32
D. Method and Collecting Data ..........................................
33
E. Method of Analyzing Data ..............................................
35
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ...................
36
A. Research Finding ..............................................................
36
1. Narrative ....................................................................
36
a. Indicators .............................................................
36
xii
b. Teaching Learning Process ................................
53
1) Introduction ......................................................
53
2) The Core of Teaching .......................................
61
3) Closing ................................................................
85
c. Evaluation ............................................................
93
2. Hortatory Exposition ................................................
102
a. Indicators ...............................................................
103
b. Teaching Learning Process ..................................
119
1) Introduction ......................................................
119
2) The Core of Teaching .......................................
119
3) Closing ...............................................................
139
c. Evaluation ...............................................................
146
3. Spoof ...........................................................................
152
a. Indicators ...............................................................
152
b. Teaching Learning Process ..................................
166
1) Introduction ......................................................
167
2) The Core of Teaching .......................................
173
3) Closing ...............................................................
190
c. Evaluation ..............................................................
196
B. Discussion ..........................................................................
204
1. Narrative ....................................................................
204
a. Indicators ..............................................................
204
b. Teaching learning process ..................................
206
c. Evaluation ............................................................
208
2. Hortatory Exposition ................................................
209
a. Indicators ..............................................................
209
b. Teaching learning process ..................................
211
c. Evaluation ............................................................
212
3. Spoof ...........................................................................
213
a. Indicators .............................................................
213
b. Teaching learning process ..................................
216
xiii
c. Evaluation ............................................................
217
4. Total Percentage ........................................................
217
a. Total Indicators ....................................................
217
b. Total Teaching learning process .........................
218
c. Total Evaluation ...................................................
218
d. Total Lesson Plans ................................................
219
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGENSTION .............................
220
A. Conclusion ..........................................................................
220
1. Indicators ......................................................................
220
2. Teaching Learning Process .........................................
220
3. Evaluation.....................................................................
221
4. Lesson Plans .................................................................
221
B. Suggestion ...........................................................................
221
1. For the Teachers ..........................................................
221
2. Other Researchers .......................................................
222
BIBLIOGRAPHY
VIRTUAL REFERENCES
APPENDIX
xiv
OF LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY
SMA MUHAMMADIYAH ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement
for Getting Bachelor Degree of Education
in English Department
by:
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA
2012
APPROVAL
A STUDY ON THE QUALITY
OF LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY
SMA MUHAMMADIYAH ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA
RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Proposed by:
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
Approved to be Examined by Consultants:
Consultant I
Consultant II
Dra. Zuhriyah Aryatmi, M. Hum
Dra. Dwi Haryati, M. Hum
ii
ACCEPTANCE
A STUDY ON THE QUALITY
OF LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY
SMA MUHAMMADIYAH ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA
By:
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
Accepted by the Examiners Board of School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Team of Examiners:
1.
Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M. Hum.
(
)
(
)
(
)
(Chair Person)
2.
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum.
(Secretary)
3.
Dra. Malikatul Laila, M. Hum.
(Member)
Surakarta, March 2012
School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
Dean
iii
TESTIMONY
Hereby, the writer testifies that in this research, there is no plagiarism of
the previous studies which have been raised to get bachelor degree of a university.
Besides, there is no opinion or masterpiece which has been written or published
by the writer except those of which the writings are mentioned in previous study
and bibliography.
Accordingly, if it is later proven that there are untrue statements in this
testimony, the writer will be responsible.
Surakarta, September 2012
The writer
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
iv
MOTTO
...Allah actually will not change the fate of a person till he/ she
changes his/ her own fate... (Al-Ra’du: 11)
"Difficulties are opportunities to better things; they are stepping stones to
greater experience. Perhaps someday you will be thankful for some temporary
failure in a particular direction. When one door closes, another always opens."
(Brian Adams)
If you do not run away early, the time will be kill you.
Don’t think inside of the cube, but look out of the cube.
(The Writer)
v
DEDICATION
This research paper is greatly dedicated to:
His identity, UMS
The witer himself
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalaamu’alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh
Alhamdulillaahirabbil’aalamiin, gratitude and praise be to Allah SWT, the
Glorious, the Lord of the King, and the Merciful having given blessing and
opportunity for the writer to finish this research paper entitled A Study on the
Quality of Lesson Plans on Genre Developed by Muhammadiyah English teachers
of Surakarta.
Sholawat and salaam are also given to Muhammad SAW who is the best
figure in the world who brought the mandkind from the darkness to the lightness
as today.
In this occasion, the writer wants to express his thanks for people who
have given his valuable contributions either as long as writing this research paper
or as long as his life. They are as follows:
1.
Drs. H. Sofyan Anif, M. Si., the Dean of School of Teacher Training and
Education, for the legalization of this research paper.
2.
Titis Setyabudi, S. S., M. Hum., the Head of English Education Department,
for the permission to finish this research paper.
3.
Dra. Siti Zuhriah Ariatmi, M. Hum., the first consultant and first examiner
who has patiently guided, advised, and motivated him during the arrangement
of this research paper. The writer also thanks for the reference books which
have been lent to him, so this research paper can be finished easier.
vii
4.
Dra. Dwi Haryanti, M. Hum., the second consultant and second examiner
who has given him valuable correction and suggestion so that the writer can
get more knowledges which have not been known before.
5.
Dra. Malikatul Laila, M. Hum, the third examiner, for the correction of this
research paper so that its result is better.
6.
All lecturers in English Education Department who cannot be mentioned one
by one, for sharing and transferring knowledge, inspiration, motivation, and
suggestion given for him.
7.
His greatest parents “Bapak Dwi Kuswinarno and Ibu Maryatun”. Thanks
for praying, support, and love given to him. Everything it’s been a pleasure
growing up with him.
8.
His beloved grandmother, thanks for motivating and loving him
9.
His beloved cousin, Pras and Fuzi. Thanks for making smile
10. His special friend “Abu Alihussain”. Thanks for all timing, thinking,
Knowledge, helping, motivating, and supporting.
11. His close friends Agung Budi S, Inoi, Chindul, Helda, David, Badrun,
Ogtri, Thata, Mimi, Eng, and Eva. Thanks for supporting and helping.
12. All his friends in English Department, Thanks for support and appreciate.
13. His beloved future one, “MARUARY” thanks for all loves given to the
writer. You always help and support the writer all the time.
14. His big families, The Oxford, F class community, Al-Firdaus, and all his
music groups. Thanks for your motivation, inspiration, and experiences.
viii
15. All members of PPL in SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Kartasura th. 2011.
Thanks for supporting.
16. All teachers in SMP Muhannadiyah 1 Kartasura
17. English teachers in SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta,
SMA
Muhammadiyah 3 Surakarta, SMA Muhammadiyah 5 Surakarta,
Thanks for the helping and timing.
Finally, the writer realizes that there are still many weaknesses in this
research paper. Therefore, suggestion and criticism are accepted. He also hopes
the result of this research can be meaningful for the readers.
Wassalaamu’alaikum Warahmatullaahi Wabarakaatuh
Surakarta, September 2012
The Writer
ARWIN ADIN PRASETYO
A 320 080 223
ix
SUMMARY
Arwin Adin Prasetyo. A. 320 080 223. A STUDY ON THE QUALITY OF
LESSON PLANS ON GENRE DEVELOPED BY SMA MUHAMMADIYAH
ENGLISH TEACHERS OF SURAKARTA. Research Paper. Surakarta: School
of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
2012.
This research purposes to describe the quality of lesson plans of genre
developed by English teachers in Surakarta. The research type is descriptive
evaluative research. The data are lesson plans of genre and the data source of this
research is document.
The writer employs documentation as the method of collecting data with
steps: seeking, collecting data, and giving code. In analyzing the data, the writer
identifies three main components of lesson plans such indicators, teaching
learning process, and evaluation from English teachers in Surakarta.
Based on the PERMEN 41, the percentage of indicator in narrative,
hortatory exposition, and spoof are 30, 99%. The percentage shows that the
quality of the design of indicators is bad quality based on the theory of Suharsimi.
The percentage of teaching learning process in narrative, hortatory exposition, and
spoof are 62, 59%. The percentage shows that the quality of teaching learning
process is good quality based on the theory of Suharsimi. The percentage of
evaluation in narrative, hortatory exposition, and spoof are 24, 77%. The
percentage shows that the quality of the design of evaluation is bad quality based
on the theory of Suharsimi.
Keywords: lesson plans, indicators, teaching learning process, narrative,
hortatory exposition, spoof, social function, language feature, generic
structure, operational verbs.
x
TABLE OF CONTENT
COVER ..........................................................................................................
i
APPROVAL ...................................................................................................
ii
ACCEPTANCE .............................................................................................
iii
TESTIMONY ................................................................................................
iv
MOTTO .........................................................................................................
v
DEDICATION ...............................................................................................
vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................
vii
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................
x
TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................
xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ..................................................................
1
A. Background of the Study ................................................
1
B. Previous Study .................................................................
5
C. Limitation of the Study ...................................................
9
D. Problem Statement ..........................................................
9
E. Objective of the Study .....................................................
10
F. Benefit of the Study .........................................................
10
CHAPTER II UNDERLYING THEORY ..................................................
12
A. Lesson Plan ......................................................................
12
1. The Meaning of Lesson Plan ....................................
12
2. The Purpose of Lesson Plan .....................................
13
3. Benefit of Lesson Plan ...............................................
14
4. Characteristic of Lesson Plan ...................................
14
B. PERMEN
(Peraturan
Menteri
Pendidikan
Nasional)
Number 41 in 2007 ..........................................................
xi
19
1. Identity of Subject .....................................................
20
2. Standard Competency ...............................................
20
3. Basic Competency .....................................................
21
4. Indicator .....................................................................
21
5. Goal .............................................................................
22
6. Material ......................................................................
22
7. Time ............................................................................
22
8. Method ........................................................................
22
9. Teaching Learning Process ......................................
23
a. Introduction .........................................................
23
b. The Core of Teaching ..........................................
23
c. Closing ..................................................................
23
10. Evaluation ..................................................................
26
11. Source .........................................................................
27
C. Genre of the Text .............................................................
27
1. Narrative ....................................................................
28
2. Hortatory Exposition ................................................
29
3. Spoof ............................................................................
30
D. Percentage of The Quality of Lesson Plan ....................
30
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD .....................................................
32
A. Type of Research .............................................................
32
B. Object of Research ..........................................................
32
C. Date and Date Source ......................................................
32
D. Method and Collecting Data ..........................................
33
E. Method of Analyzing Data ..............................................
35
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDING AND DISCUSSION ...................
36
A. Research Finding ..............................................................
36
1. Narrative ....................................................................
36
a. Indicators .............................................................
36
xii
b. Teaching Learning Process ................................
53
1) Introduction ......................................................
53
2) The Core of Teaching .......................................
61
3) Closing ................................................................
85
c. Evaluation ............................................................
93
2. Hortatory Exposition ................................................
102
a. Indicators ...............................................................
103
b. Teaching Learning Process ..................................
119
1) Introduction ......................................................
119
2) The Core of Teaching .......................................
119
3) Closing ...............................................................
139
c. Evaluation ...............................................................
146
3. Spoof ...........................................................................
152
a. Indicators ...............................................................
152
b. Teaching Learning Process ..................................
166
1) Introduction ......................................................
167
2) The Core of Teaching .......................................
173
3) Closing ...............................................................
190
c. Evaluation ..............................................................
196
B. Discussion ..........................................................................
204
1. Narrative ....................................................................
204
a. Indicators ..............................................................
204
b. Teaching learning process ..................................
206
c. Evaluation ............................................................
208
2. Hortatory Exposition ................................................
209
a. Indicators ..............................................................
209
b. Teaching learning process ..................................
211
c. Evaluation ............................................................
212
3. Spoof ...........................................................................
213
a. Indicators .............................................................
213
b. Teaching learning process ..................................
216
xiii
c. Evaluation ............................................................
217
4. Total Percentage ........................................................
217
a. Total Indicators ....................................................
217
b. Total Teaching learning process .........................
218
c. Total Evaluation ...................................................
218
d. Total Lesson Plans ................................................
219
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGENSTION .............................
220
A. Conclusion ..........................................................................
220
1. Indicators ......................................................................
220
2. Teaching Learning Process .........................................
220
3. Evaluation.....................................................................
221
4. Lesson Plans .................................................................
221
B. Suggestion ...........................................................................
221
1. For the Teachers ..........................................................
221
2. Other Researchers .......................................................
222
BIBLIOGRAPHY
VIRTUAL REFERENCES
APPENDIX
xiv