The Village Independency: Decentralization Policy in Indonesia Perspective.
The Village Independency:
Decentralization
Perspective
Policy in Indonesia
Didik G. SuhartoUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
of
F a c u lt y
S o c ia l
and
P o lit ic a l
E m a il:
a
Abstract:
In
p r o b le m s
th e
g o v e rn a n c e
v a r ie t y
o f s e c to rs ,
v ii/ a g e
fa c e s
s y s te m .
T h is
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
in
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
p o lic y .
B ased
on
th e
r e s u lt
( p o lit ic a l/ b u r e a u c r a t ic )
r e v e a ls
5/1974,
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
th e
v ii/ a g e
a c h ie v e d
s tro n g
in d e p e n d e n c y
th e
o th e r
o c c u r r in g
le g is la t io n ,
is
U n iv e r s it y
T h e e s tu a ry
r e g u la t io n
a n a ly z e
th e
th e
v ii/ a g e
and
f o llo w in g
r e s u lt
can
about
v ii/ a g e
of
in d e p e n d e n c y
in
be
o b t a in e d :
o b je c t iv e
(1)
th e
th e
e x is t e n c e
(5)
fro m
o r r e g r e s s io n
th e
to
a s p e c ts
p o lit ic a l
end
h ig h ly
p o t e n t ia lly
A S P A I n d o n e s ia
I n t e r n a t io n a l
June, 2012,
S e m in a r
M a la n g , ln d o n e s ia
and
and A ct
t h e c o n s t r u c t io n
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
I n d o n e s ia
o f v illa g e
t h e r e is p r e d is p o s it io n
r e la t e d
th e
in
re s o u rc e ;
(2)
of
e q u a ls t o t h a t b u ilt in g o v e r n in g
o f v ii/ a g e
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
le v e ls ;
is
fro m
weak
a ffe c t th e
by
IA P A A n n u a l
to
it h a s
th e
no
a d m in is t r a t iv e / e c o n o m ic
o f im p r o v e d
a ffe c te d
not been
up
because
s o c ie t y in d e p e n d e n c y
o f v ii/ a g e g o v e r n m e n t
in d e p e n d e n c y
has
ceases
in d e p e n d e n c y
p e r s p e c t iv e ,
th e
d e s ig n
th e
of
C o n fe re n c e
2012
change
p r e v a ilin g
v ii/ a g e in d e p e n d e n c y
Keywords: Decentralization, Independency, Village, Indonesia
1 2 -1 4
of such
im p le m e n t a t io n
d iv id e d in t o in t e r n a l a n d e x t e r n a l f a c t o r s .
ij.' ~
th e
w it h t h e A c t N u m b e r 3 2 / 2 0 0 4
a n d im p le m e n t a t iv e
a d e q u a te
(6)
c lo s e ly
(7)
th e
of
lo c a l g o v e r n m e n t
th e
(4)
p e r s p e c t iv e ,
and
to
w e ig h t c o m p a r e d
(3)
and
hand;
a im s
o f s tu d y ,
o n th e o n e h a n d , a n d s ta g n a n c y
on
p r o b le m
g o v e rn a n c e ;
(a u to n o m y )
g o v e rn m e n t;
p o s it io n
th e
s tu d y
b u ilt in g o v e r n in g
g o v e rn m e n t;
r e g e n c y / c it y
in
b o t h in r e g u la t iv e
because
M a re t
a u t h o r it y t r a n s f e r d u r in g t h e e n a c t m e n t o f A c t N u m b e r 2 2 / 1 9 9 9
t h e h ig h e s t / la r g e s t
Num ber
S e b e la s
v ii/ a g e h a s m a n y p r o b le m s .
is
v ii/ a g e
S c ie n c e ,
d id ik g s u h a r t o @ y a h o o . c o m
can
be
Decentralization
Perspective
Policy in Indonesia
Didik G. SuhartoUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA
of
F a c u lt y
S o c ia l
and
P o lit ic a l
E m a il:
a
Abstract:
In
p r o b le m s
th e
g o v e rn a n c e
v a r ie t y
o f s e c to rs ,
v ii/ a g e
fa c e s
s y s te m .
T h is
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
in
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
p o lic y .
B ased
on
th e
r e s u lt
( p o lit ic a l/ b u r e a u c r a t ic )
r e v e a ls
5/1974,
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
th e
v ii/ a g e
a c h ie v e d
s tro n g
in d e p e n d e n c y
th e
o th e r
o c c u r r in g
le g is la t io n ,
is
U n iv e r s it y
T h e e s tu a ry
r e g u la t io n
a n a ly z e
th e
th e
v ii/ a g e
and
f o llo w in g
r e s u lt
can
about
v ii/ a g e
of
in d e p e n d e n c y
in
be
o b t a in e d :
o b je c t iv e
(1)
th e
th e
e x is t e n c e
(5)
fro m
o r r e g r e s s io n
th e
to
a s p e c ts
p o lit ic a l
end
h ig h ly
p o t e n t ia lly
A S P A I n d o n e s ia
I n t e r n a t io n a l
June, 2012,
S e m in a r
M a la n g , ln d o n e s ia
and
and A ct
t h e c o n s t r u c t io n
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
I n d o n e s ia
o f v illa g e
t h e r e is p r e d is p o s it io n
r e la t e d
th e
in
re s o u rc e ;
(2)
of
e q u a ls t o t h a t b u ilt in g o v e r n in g
o f v ii/ a g e
d e c e n t r a liz a t io n
le v e ls ;
is
fro m
weak
a ffe c t th e
by
IA P A A n n u a l
to
it h a s
th e
no
a d m in is t r a t iv e / e c o n o m ic
o f im p r o v e d
a ffe c te d
not been
up
because
s o c ie t y in d e p e n d e n c y
o f v ii/ a g e g o v e r n m e n t
in d e p e n d e n c y
has
ceases
in d e p e n d e n c y
p e r s p e c t iv e ,
th e
d e s ig n
th e
of
C o n fe re n c e
2012
change
p r e v a ilin g
v ii/ a g e in d e p e n d e n c y
Keywords: Decentralization, Independency, Village, Indonesia
1 2 -1 4
of such
im p le m e n t a t io n
d iv id e d in t o in t e r n a l a n d e x t e r n a l f a c t o r s .
ij.' ~
th e
w it h t h e A c t N u m b e r 3 2 / 2 0 0 4
a n d im p le m e n t a t iv e
a d e q u a te
(6)
c lo s e ly
(7)
th e
of
lo c a l g o v e r n m e n t
th e
(4)
p e r s p e c t iv e ,
and
to
w e ig h t c o m p a r e d
(3)
and
hand;
a im s
o f s tu d y ,
o n th e o n e h a n d , a n d s ta g n a n c y
on
p r o b le m
g o v e rn a n c e ;
(a u to n o m y )
g o v e rn m e n t;
p o s it io n
th e
s tu d y
b u ilt in g o v e r n in g
g o v e rn m e n t;
r e g e n c y / c it y
in
b o t h in r e g u la t iv e
because
M a re t
a u t h o r it y t r a n s f e r d u r in g t h e e n a c t m e n t o f A c t N u m b e r 2 2 / 1 9 9 9
t h e h ig h e s t / la r g e s t
Num ber
S e b e la s
v ii/ a g e h a s m a n y p r o b le m s .
is
v ii/ a g e
S c ie n c e ,
d id ik g s u h a r t o @ y a h o o . c o m
can
be