D IPA 1103399 Bibliography
Daftar Pustaka
Abrami, P.C. (2001). Improving judgments about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating
forms. In .Theall, M., Abrami, P.C and Mets. L.A., (Eds.). The student ratings
debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? [Special issue]. New Directions
for Institutional Research 109, 59-87.
Ackerman, J. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10, 334370
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and
Education,33, 131-152.
Ainsworth, S., & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation.
Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-255
Ann, W (2008). Teacher transformation in the national writing project. Research in the
Teaching of English 43(2). 144-187
Anastasi, A & Urbina, A (2002). Psychological Testing (7th Edition). New
Delhi: Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt. Ltd., Indian Branch.
Armitage, A., et al (2007).Mutual research design : redefining mixed methods research
design. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual
Conference, Institute Education, University of London.
Atila, M.E., Gunel, M., & Buyukkasap, E. (2010). The effect of using multimodal
representation within writing to learn activities on learning force and motion unit at
the midle school setting. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 7(4).113-127
Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a
practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes and -Hammond,L.D
(Eds.), Teaching as the Learning Profession:Handbook of Policy and Practice,. 332. 1999, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, Whitney T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J.
(2005).Writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, J. Little, L.Bethel, T. Chavkin, D. Fouquette,
& J. Garufis (Eds.), Reference guide to writing across the curriculum, 57-65. West
Lafayette, IN:Parlor Press.
Bandura,A.(1986). Social foundation of thought and action (ed) annals of child development,
6.Greenwich CT JAI Press
Beran, T., Violato, C., & Kline, D. (2007). What‟s the „use‟ of student ratings of instruction
for administrators? One university‟s experience. Canadian Journal of Higher
Education, 17(1), 27-43.
Bereiter,C. and Scardamalia,M.(1987).The pshycology of writen composition. The
Psychology of Education and Instruction Series, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc. Publisher, suite 102. Broadway Hillsdale NJ
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Beichner, R.J.(1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal
of Physics., 62(8), 750-762
Bereiter, Carl; Scardamalia, Marlene (1987) The Psychology of Written Composition.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bezemer, J., Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts a social semiotic account of
designs for learning. Written Communication 25 ( 2), 166-195 © 2008 Sage
Publications.
Bosse,M.J., Gyamfi,K.A., & Cheetham, M (2011) Translations Among Mathematical
Representations: Teacher Beliefs and Practices, Department of Mathematics, Science,
and Instruction Technology Education, College of Education, East Carolina University,
Greenville, NC 28590
Brewster,C & Klump, J. (2004) Writing To Learn, Learning To write: Revisiting Writing
Across the Curriculum in Northwest Secondary Schools. Northwest Regional
,Educational Laboratory Portland Oregon
Chan, C.(2009) Assessment: Concept Map, Assessment Resources@HKU, University of
Hong Kong [http://ar.cetl.hku.hk].
Coe, R (2000). What is an Effect Size ?.A Guide for User. Draft version.
Cohen, J. (1969) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. NY: Academic
Press in Coe, Robert (2000). What is an Effect Size ?.A Guide for User . Draft version.
Coppola, B. P. (1995). Progress in practice: Using concepts from motivational and selfregulated learning research to improve chemistry instruction. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.),
Understanding Self-Regulated Learning (pp. 87-96). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J.W.(2009)..Research Desaign :Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches.
Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
Creswell, J.W & Clark, V.L.P (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods research,
Sage Publication.
Danielson, S (2013). The Framework for Teaching, Evaluation Instrument. The Danielson
Group,All Righ Reserved, Princeton,NJ,USA
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer
simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research,68, (2), 179-201
DeLeone, C. & Gire,E.,(2005). edited by Heron, P., McCullough, L and Marx, J. 2005
Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT,2005, 45-48.
diSessa, A.(2004). Meta representation: Native competence and target for instruction.
Cognitive and Instruction,22 (3), 293-331.
Duncan, T. G.,& McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for
learning questionnaire, Educational Psychologist, 40, 117-128.
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Ecles, J. S.,& Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of
Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Edward,W.M., Bruce, M.K & Gordon,B. (1993). Statistical Reasoning In Psychology and
Education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Emelie, A and Nathalie, L.(2007).Teaching Writing in Theory and Practice :
A Study of Ways of Working With Writing in the 9th Grade. Stockholm Institute of
Education Department of Curiculum Studies and Communication
Finkelstein. N, et.al. (2005), When learning about the real world is better done vitually: A
Study of Substituting Computer Simulation for laboratory Equipment. Phys. Rev. ST
Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010103,
Flores, S., Kanim, S,E, & Kautz, C.H.,Student use of vectors in introductory mechanics.
American Journal of Physics., 2004. 72
Funda, O., et.al (2008) What makes physics difficult. International Journal of
Environmental of Science Education,3(1)
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In D. Galbraith, & M.
Torrance(Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production.
Studies in Writing. 4, 139–160. 1999, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Galbraith, D.(1992). Conditions of discovery throught writing. Instructional Science, 21, 4572
Garcia, T.(1995).The role of motivational strategies in self regulated learning, in
Pintrich,P.R.,(ed).Understanding Self Regulated Learning, an Francisco ,Jossey Bass.
Gonzales,F., Prain, V.,and Waldrip,B. (2007). Using multi modal representations of concepts
in learning science,. ESSERA Conference on Research and The Quality of Science
Education.
Guba, E.G.,& Lincoln,Y.S.(1988). Do Inquiry paradigm imply methodologies. in Fattermen ,
D.M. (1988). Qualitative Approaches to Evaluate in Education. New York Praeger.
Gunel, M., Hand, B.,& Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A Secondary
analysis of six studies. International Journal of science and Mathematics Education ,
4(5),615-367
Guilford, J.P.(1965). Fundamental Statistic for Students of Psichologi and Education, New
York Mc Graw Hill.
Hand, B., Gunel, M., & Ulu, C. (2009). Sequencing embedded multimodal representation in
writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 46 (3),225-247
Hale, S. (2003). Concept mapping handout: Handout from Georgia Parimeter College.
http://facstaff.gpc.edu/-shale /composition / handout /concept.html
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Hake, R.R (1998). Interactive–engagement vs traditional methods: A six- thousand student
survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics course, American Journal of
Physics,66 ,64-74
Hayes, J. & Flower,L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In:Gregg, L.
and Steinberg, E. (Eds.) .Cognitive Processes in Writing, 3-30. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hayes, J.R.,& Nash,J.G. (1996).On the nature of planning in writing. In .Levy, C.M &
Ransdell, S.(1966). The Science of Writing: Theories,Methods, Individual Differencies,
and Application, Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heuvelen, A.V. & Zou,X (2001). Multiple representations of work-energy processes.
American Journal of Physics.69, 184.
Hedges, L. & Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic
Press
Hinrichs, B.(2004). In edited by Marx, J , Heron, P. & Franklin, S. (2004) Physics Education
Research Conference Proceedings, Sacramento, CA, 117-120.
Hopkins, W. G. (1997). New View of Statistics: Effect Magnitudes. Retrieved
12, 2001 from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html
November
Indiana department of Education (2012). RISE Evaluation & Development System Evaluator
& Teacher Hanbook version 1.0.
Johnson, R.B., and Turner,R.A.(2003). Data collection strategies in mixed research. In A.
Tashakkori, and C. Teddle (Eds), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and
Behavioral Research. 2003.Thousand Oaks, CA.
Klein, P.D. (2006). The challenges of science literacy: From the viewpoint of second
generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28,(2/3) 143178
Kohl.P.B. et al (2007). Strongly and weakly directed approach to teaching multiple
representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education
Research, 3, 010128
Kohl.P.B.et al (2008). Paterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during
physics problem solving, Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Educational
Research,4, 010111
Kozma, R.B.(2003). The material features of multiple representations and their and social
cognitive affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13 (2),
205-226
Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in
the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistri Journal of the Learning
Sciences, 9(2), 105-143.
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge and learning. Computers
and Composition, 22, 5-22.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J.,& Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and
Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science classroom, London:Continum.
Kozminsky & Gurion. (2012). Concep maps theory, mathology, technologi. Proc.of the Fifth
Int. Conference on Concep Mapping, Canas, A.J.; Novac, J.D.; Vanhear,J. Eds.
Valenta Malta 2012.
Kellog, R.T. (2008). Training writing skills: a cognitive developmental perspective.Journal
of Writing Research, 1(1) 1-26.
Lemke, J.L.(1998).Multiplying meaning:Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In
Martin, J and Veel, R.,. Reading science, London Routledge.
Lemke, J.L. (2004). The literacies in science. In Saul, E.W., (Ed.), Crossing Borders in
Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives in Theory and Practice, 1332.Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers
Association.
Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of mulitmedia learning: Using the same instructional design
methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2),125-139..
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A
phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated
Learning and Academic Achievement: Theory, Research, and Practice.. 51-82. 1989,
New York: Springer-Verlag.
Meltzer, D.E.(2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual
learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores.
American Journal of Physics., 70, 1259.
Milkova,S (2012). Strategies for effectivenes lesson planning. Center for Research on
learning and Teaching. Tersedia di (http://www.crlt.umich.edu)
National Writing Project & Nagin, C. (2003). Because Writing Matters: Improving Student
Writing in Our Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Norris,S.P, & Phillips,L.M.(2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense in central to
scientific literacy. Scientific Education, 87(2).224-240
Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning How tolLearn. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Nguyen, N. & Meltzer, D.E. (2003). Initial understanding of vector concepts among students
in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics., 71(6), 630
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L (2004.b). Enhancing the interpretation of significant
finding; The role of mixed method research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of
The Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater,FL.
Permendiknas no 16 tahun 2007
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & Mc Keachie, W. J. (1991).A Manual for the use of
the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University
of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Post Secondary Teaching and
Learning.
Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In Pintrich, P.R., (Ed.),
Understanding Self Regulated Learning, 3-12. 1995. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation
inlearning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers‟ and students‟ use of multimodal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of
Science Education, 28(15),1843-1866
Prain.V ,et al (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation, International
Journal of Science Education, 31(6),787-808
Prain, V (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: some theoretical and practical
implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 170-201
Preece, J. (1993). Graphs are not straight forward. In Green,T.R.G. , Payne, S.J., &van der
Veer, G.C., (Eds.), The Psychology of Computer Use, 41-56. London:Academic
Press.
Rosengrant. D, Van Heuvelen. A, & Etkina. E, (2005) edited by Heron. P, . McCullough. L
and Marx. J, (2005). Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake
City, UT, 49-52.
Rosengrant.D, Etkina. E, & Van Heuvelen. A,(2006). National Association for Research in
Science Teaching Proceedings, San Francisco, CA (2006).
Ruohotie, P (2000a). Conative Constructs in Learning, in Pintrich, P. and Ruohotie,
P.(eds).Conative Constructs and Self Regulated learning, 2000, Hameenlinna ,
Research Centre for Vocational Education.
Scanlon, E. (1998). How beginning students use graphs of motion. In Van Someren, M.W., et
al.(Eds) Learning with Multiple Representation. 1998, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating reaching. A Practical Guide to Improved
Faculty Performance for Promotion/Tenure Decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Steitner, C.M., Alberth, D., & Hellor, J. (2007). Concept mapping as a means to build ELearning. In Buzetto-More, N.A (ed), Advanced Principles of Effective e-Learning
(59-111). Santa Rosa, California.Information Science Press.
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Sturm, J. M.,& Rankin, E, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated
concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning
disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 117(2), 124-139.
Tabachneck, H. J. M., Leonardo, A. M., & Simon, H. A. (1994). CaMeRa: A computational
model of multiple representations, Cognitive Science 21(3), 305–350.
Tashakkori,A., Teddle,C.(1998). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quatitative
approaches. Applied Social Method Research. Method Series ,46. Thousand Oaks,
CA:Sage.
Tashakkori, A.,& Teddle,C.(2003), Handbooks of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavior
Research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Unsworth, L. (2001a). Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior
high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6),
Unger.J. & Fleischman.S. (2004). Is Process Writing the “Write Stuff” Research Matters.
Printed in Educational Leadership, issue: October 2004, 90-91
UPI (2011). Kurikulum Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J.( 2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wolters,C. (1999).Self Regulated Learning and college Students Regulation of motivation,
Journal of Education Psychology, .90 (2)
Wright, R.E. (2006). Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and
possible solutions. College Student Journal, 40(2), 417-422.
Yore, L.D. & Treagust, D.F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and
science literacy empowering research and informing instruction.International Journal
of Science Education, 28, 291-314
Zimmerman, B.J.,& Risenberg, R.(1997). Becoming a self regulated writer: a social cognitive
perspective contemporary. Educational Psychology, 22(1),73-101.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In
Zimmerman,B.J., & Schunk,D.H., (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic
Achievement: Theory, Research, and Practice,
1-25. 1989. New York: SpringerVerlag.
Zimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study
time: A strategy approach. In Schunk,D.H., and
Zimmerman,B.J., (Eds.), SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, 181199. 1994. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self monitoring during collegiate studying: An
invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding
Self-Regulated Learning, 13- 27. 1995.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zimmerman,B.J.(1998). Developing Self fulfilling cycles of academic regulation; in Schunk,
D.H., and Zimmerman,B.J. (eds).Self Regulated Learning: from Teaching to Self
Reflective Practice. 1998. New York Guilford Press
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Abrami, P.C. (2001). Improving judgments about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating
forms. In .Theall, M., Abrami, P.C and Mets. L.A., (Eds.). The student ratings
debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? [Special issue]. New Directions
for Institutional Research 109, 59-87.
Ackerman, J. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written Communication, 10, 334370
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and
Education,33, 131-152.
Ainsworth, S., & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation.
Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241-255
Ann, W (2008). Teacher transformation in the national writing project. Research in the
Teaching of English 43(2). 144-187
Anastasi, A & Urbina, A (2002). Psychological Testing (7th Edition). New
Delhi: Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt. Ltd., Indian Branch.
Armitage, A., et al (2007).Mutual research design : redefining mixed methods research
design. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual
Conference, Institute Education, University of London.
Atila, M.E., Gunel, M., & Buyukkasap, E. (2010). The effect of using multimodal
representation within writing to learn activities on learning force and motion unit at
the midle school setting. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 7(4).113-127
Ball, D. L. & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a
practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes and -Hammond,L.D
(Eds.), Teaching as the Learning Profession:Handbook of Policy and Practice,. 332. 1999, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, Whitney T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J.
(2005).Writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, J. Little, L.Bethel, T. Chavkin, D. Fouquette,
& J. Garufis (Eds.), Reference guide to writing across the curriculum, 57-65. West
Lafayette, IN:Parlor Press.
Bandura,A.(1986). Social foundation of thought and action (ed) annals of child development,
6.Greenwich CT JAI Press
Beran, T., Violato, C., & Kline, D. (2007). What‟s the „use‟ of student ratings of instruction
for administrators? One university‟s experience. Canadian Journal of Higher
Education, 17(1), 27-43.
Bereiter,C. and Scardamalia,M.(1987).The pshycology of writen composition. The
Psychology of Education and Instruction Series, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc. Publisher, suite 102. Broadway Hillsdale NJ
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Beichner, R.J.(1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal
of Physics., 62(8), 750-762
Bereiter, Carl; Scardamalia, Marlene (1987) The Psychology of Written Composition.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bezemer, J., Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts a social semiotic account of
designs for learning. Written Communication 25 ( 2), 166-195 © 2008 Sage
Publications.
Bosse,M.J., Gyamfi,K.A., & Cheetham, M (2011) Translations Among Mathematical
Representations: Teacher Beliefs and Practices, Department of Mathematics, Science,
and Instruction Technology Education, College of Education, East Carolina University,
Greenville, NC 28590
Brewster,C & Klump, J. (2004) Writing To Learn, Learning To write: Revisiting Writing
Across the Curriculum in Northwest Secondary Schools. Northwest Regional
,Educational Laboratory Portland Oregon
Chan, C.(2009) Assessment: Concept Map, Assessment Resources@HKU, University of
Hong Kong [http://ar.cetl.hku.hk].
Coe, R (2000). What is an Effect Size ?.A Guide for User. Draft version.
Cohen, J. (1969) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. NY: Academic
Press in Coe, Robert (2000). What is an Effect Size ?.A Guide for User . Draft version.
Coppola, B. P. (1995). Progress in practice: Using concepts from motivational and selfregulated learning research to improve chemistry instruction. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.),
Understanding Self-Regulated Learning (pp. 87-96). San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J.W.(2009)..Research Desaign :Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches.
Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage.
Creswell, J.W & Clark, V.L.P (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods research,
Sage Publication.
Danielson, S (2013). The Framework for Teaching, Evaluation Instrument. The Danielson
Group,All Righ Reserved, Princeton,NJ,USA
de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer
simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research,68, (2), 179-201
DeLeone, C. & Gire,E.,(2005). edited by Heron, P., McCullough, L and Marx, J. 2005
Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT,2005, 45-48.
diSessa, A.(2004). Meta representation: Native competence and target for instruction.
Cognitive and Instruction,22 (3), 293-331.
Duncan, T. G.,& McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for
learning questionnaire, Educational Psychologist, 40, 117-128.
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Ecles, J. S.,& Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of
Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Edward,W.M., Bruce, M.K & Gordon,B. (1993). Statistical Reasoning In Psychology and
Education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Emelie, A and Nathalie, L.(2007).Teaching Writing in Theory and Practice :
A Study of Ways of Working With Writing in the 9th Grade. Stockholm Institute of
Education Department of Curiculum Studies and Communication
Finkelstein. N, et.al. (2005), When learning about the real world is better done vitually: A
Study of Substituting Computer Simulation for laboratory Equipment. Phys. Rev. ST
Phys. Educ. Res. 1, 010103,
Flores, S., Kanim, S,E, & Kautz, C.H.,Student use of vectors in introductory mechanics.
American Journal of Physics., 2004. 72
Funda, O., et.al (2008) What makes physics difficult. International Journal of
Environmental of Science Education,3(1)
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In D. Galbraith, & M.
Torrance(Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production.
Studies in Writing. 4, 139–160. 1999, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Galbraith, D.(1992). Conditions of discovery throught writing. Instructional Science, 21, 4572
Garcia, T.(1995).The role of motivational strategies in self regulated learning, in
Pintrich,P.R.,(ed).Understanding Self Regulated Learning, an Francisco ,Jossey Bass.
Gonzales,F., Prain, V.,and Waldrip,B. (2007). Using multi modal representations of concepts
in learning science,. ESSERA Conference on Research and The Quality of Science
Education.
Guba, E.G.,& Lincoln,Y.S.(1988). Do Inquiry paradigm imply methodologies. in Fattermen ,
D.M. (1988). Qualitative Approaches to Evaluate in Education. New York Praeger.
Gunel, M., Hand, B.,& Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A Secondary
analysis of six studies. International Journal of science and Mathematics Education ,
4(5),615-367
Guilford, J.P.(1965). Fundamental Statistic for Students of Psichologi and Education, New
York Mc Graw Hill.
Hand, B., Gunel, M., & Ulu, C. (2009). Sequencing embedded multimodal representation in
writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 46 (3),225-247
Hale, S. (2003). Concept mapping handout: Handout from Georgia Parimeter College.
http://facstaff.gpc.edu/-shale /composition / handout /concept.html
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Hake, R.R (1998). Interactive–engagement vs traditional methods: A six- thousand student
survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics course, American Journal of
Physics,66 ,64-74
Hayes, J. & Flower,L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In:Gregg, L.
and Steinberg, E. (Eds.) .Cognitive Processes in Writing, 3-30. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hayes, J.R.,& Nash,J.G. (1996).On the nature of planning in writing. In .Levy, C.M &
Ransdell, S.(1966). The Science of Writing: Theories,Methods, Individual Differencies,
and Application, Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heuvelen, A.V. & Zou,X (2001). Multiple representations of work-energy processes.
American Journal of Physics.69, 184.
Hedges, L. & Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. New York: Academic
Press
Hinrichs, B.(2004). In edited by Marx, J , Heron, P. & Franklin, S. (2004) Physics Education
Research Conference Proceedings, Sacramento, CA, 117-120.
Hopkins, W. G. (1997). New View of Statistics: Effect Magnitudes. Retrieved
12, 2001 from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html
November
Indiana department of Education (2012). RISE Evaluation & Development System Evaluator
& Teacher Hanbook version 1.0.
Johnson, R.B., and Turner,R.A.(2003). Data collection strategies in mixed research. In A.
Tashakkori, and C. Teddle (Eds), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and
Behavioral Research. 2003.Thousand Oaks, CA.
Klein, P.D. (2006). The challenges of science literacy: From the viewpoint of second
generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education, 28,(2/3) 143178
Kohl.P.B. et al (2007). Strongly and weakly directed approach to teaching multiple
representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education
Research, 3, 010128
Kohl.P.B.et al (2008). Paterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during
physics problem solving, Physical Review Special Topics, Physics Educational
Research,4, 010111
Kozma, R.B.(2003). The material features of multiple representations and their and social
cognitive affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13 (2),
205-226
Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in
the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistri Journal of the Learning
Sciences, 9(2), 105-143.
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge and learning. Computers
and Composition, 22, 5-22.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J.,& Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and
Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science classroom, London:Continum.
Kozminsky & Gurion. (2012). Concep maps theory, mathology, technologi. Proc.of the Fifth
Int. Conference on Concep Mapping, Canas, A.J.; Novac, J.D.; Vanhear,J. Eds.
Valenta Malta 2012.
Kellog, R.T. (2008). Training writing skills: a cognitive developmental perspective.Journal
of Writing Research, 1(1) 1-26.
Lemke, J.L.(1998).Multiplying meaning:Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In
Martin, J and Veel, R.,. Reading science, London Routledge.
Lemke, J.L. (2004). The literacies in science. In Saul, E.W., (Ed.), Crossing Borders in
Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives in Theory and Practice, 1332.Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers
Association.
Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of mulitmedia learning: Using the same instructional design
methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2),125-139..
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCombs, B. L. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A
phenomenological view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Selfregulated
Learning and Academic Achievement: Theory, Research, and Practice.. 51-82. 1989,
New York: Springer-Verlag.
Meltzer, D.E.(2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual
learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores.
American Journal of Physics., 70, 1259.
Milkova,S (2012). Strategies for effectivenes lesson planning. Center for Research on
learning and Teaching. Tersedia di (http://www.crlt.umich.edu)
National Writing Project & Nagin, C. (2003). Because Writing Matters: Improving Student
Writing in Our Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Norris,S.P, & Phillips,L.M.(2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense in central to
scientific literacy. Scientific Education, 87(2).224-240
Novak, J.D., & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning How tolLearn. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Nguyen, N. & Meltzer, D.E. (2003). Initial understanding of vector concepts among students
in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics., 71(6), 630
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Leech, N.L (2004.b). Enhancing the interpretation of significant
finding; The role of mixed method research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of
The Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater,FL.
Permendiknas no 16 tahun 2007
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & Mc Keachie, W. J. (1991).A Manual for the use of
the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University
of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Post Secondary Teaching and
Learning.
Pintrich, P. R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated learning. In Pintrich, P.R., (Ed.),
Understanding Self Regulated Learning, 3-12. 1995. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation
inlearning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers‟ and students‟ use of multimodal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of
Science Education, 28(15),1843-1866
Prain.V ,et al (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation, International
Journal of Science Education, 31(6),787-808
Prain, V (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: some theoretical and practical
implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 170-201
Preece, J. (1993). Graphs are not straight forward. In Green,T.R.G. , Payne, S.J., &van der
Veer, G.C., (Eds.), The Psychology of Computer Use, 41-56. London:Academic
Press.
Rosengrant. D, Van Heuvelen. A, & Etkina. E, (2005) edited by Heron. P, . McCullough. L
and Marx. J, (2005). Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake
City, UT, 49-52.
Rosengrant.D, Etkina. E, & Van Heuvelen. A,(2006). National Association for Research in
Science Teaching Proceedings, San Francisco, CA (2006).
Ruohotie, P (2000a). Conative Constructs in Learning, in Pintrich, P. and Ruohotie,
P.(eds).Conative Constructs and Self Regulated learning, 2000, Hameenlinna ,
Research Centre for Vocational Education.
Scanlon, E. (1998). How beginning students use graphs of motion. In Van Someren, M.W., et
al.(Eds) Learning with Multiple Representation. 1998, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating reaching. A Practical Guide to Improved
Faculty Performance for Promotion/Tenure Decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Steitner, C.M., Alberth, D., & Hellor, J. (2007). Concept mapping as a means to build ELearning. In Buzetto-More, N.A (ed), Advanced Principles of Effective e-Learning
(59-111). Santa Rosa, California.Information Science Press.
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Sturm, J. M.,& Rankin, E, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer-generated
concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning
disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 117(2), 124-139.
Tabachneck, H. J. M., Leonardo, A. M., & Simon, H. A. (1994). CaMeRa: A computational
model of multiple representations, Cognitive Science 21(3), 305–350.
Tashakkori,A., Teddle,C.(1998). Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quatitative
approaches. Applied Social Method Research. Method Series ,46. Thousand Oaks,
CA:Sage.
Tashakkori, A.,& Teddle,C.(2003), Handbooks of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavior
Research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Unsworth, L. (2001a). Evaluating the language of different types of explanations in junior
high school science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6),
Unger.J. & Fleischman.S. (2004). Is Process Writing the “Write Stuff” Research Matters.
Printed in Educational Leadership, issue: October 2004, 90-91
UPI (2011). Kurikulum Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J.( 2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Wolters,C. (1999).Self Regulated Learning and college Students Regulation of motivation,
Journal of Education Psychology, .90 (2)
Wright, R.E. (2006). Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and
possible solutions. College Student Journal, 40(2), 417-422.
Yore, L.D. & Treagust, D.F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and
science literacy empowering research and informing instruction.International Journal
of Science Education, 28, 291-314
Zimmerman, B.J.,& Risenberg, R.(1997). Becoming a self regulated writer: a social cognitive
perspective contemporary. Educational Psychology, 22(1),73-101.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In
Zimmerman,B.J., & Schunk,D.H., (Eds.), Self-Regulated Learning and Academic
Achievement: Theory, Research, and Practice,
1-25. 1989. New York: SpringerVerlag.
Zimmerman, B. J., Greenberg, D., & Weinstein, C. E. (1994). Self-regulating academic study
time: A strategy approach. In Schunk,D.H., and
Zimmerman,B.J., (Eds.), SelfRegulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications, 181199. 1994. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Zimmerman, B. J., & Paulsen, A. S. (1995). Self monitoring during collegiate studying: An
invaluable tool for academic self-regulation. In P. R. Pintrich (Ed.), Understanding
Self-Regulated Learning, 13- 27. 1995.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zimmerman,B.J.(1998). Developing Self fulfilling cycles of academic regulation; in Schunk,
D.H., and Zimmerman,B.J. (eds).Self Regulated Learning: from Teaching to Self
Reflective Practice. 1998. New York Guilford Press
Parlindungan Sinaga, 2014
Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan Fisika Sekolah III Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Menulis Materi
Ajar Calon Guru Menggunakan Multi Modus Representasi
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu