Analisis Pengaruh Display Produk Terhadap Minat Beli Konsumen Pada Swalayan Willow Mart Binjai

  LAMPIRAN

Hasil Wawancara

  1. Sejak kapan Swalayan Willow Mart Binjai didirikan? “Swalayan ini berdiri sejak tanggal 8 November 2014.”

  2. Bagaimana pelaksanaan display produk toiletries pada swalayan ini? “Saya dan para karyawan saya selalu mengusahakan menata semua produk dengan baik dan menarik .”

  

3. Apakah penataan produk yang telah dilaksanakan mampu menarik minat

beli konsumen? “Menurut pengamatan saya display produk yang telah dilaksanakan sedikit banyaknya mampu menarik minat beli konsumen. Beberapa kerabat menyatakan bahwa swalayan ini sudah cukup nyaman dan menarik .”

  

4. Upaya apa saja yang Bapak laksanakan untuk melaksanakan display

produk dengan menarik? “Saya memotivasi para karyawan saya untuk selalu memperhatikan penataan produk dan lebih kreatif dalam pengaturan penataan produk tersebut. Kerapian dan kebersihan juga saya utamakan dalam penataan produk .”

  5. Bagaimana dengan ketersediaan produk toiletries di swalayan ini? “Saya mempunyai seorang istri yang juga ikut andil dalam usaha swalayan ini. Selain sebagai manajer keuangan di swalayan ini, dia juga membantu saya dalam urusan merekap barang keluar dan barang masuk sehingga ketersediaan barang selalu diperhatikan khususnya produk toiletries. Tidak hanya istri, tetapi ayah dan ibu saya juga membantu

  mengawasi bagian gudang. Tidak hanya terpercaya, mereka juga bisa diandalkan dalam upaya penghematan penggajian karyawan .”

  6. Bagaimana dengan kegiatan distribusi produk diluar swalayan? “Saya juga melaksanakannya cukup rutin, sekitar satu atau dua bulan sekali di sekitar swalayan. Saya melaksanakannya agar nama swalayan ini semakin terkenal di benak masyarakat. Pada saat melaksanakan distribusi tersebut, saya juga mengadakan promosi misalnya memberikan diskon pada produk toiletries tertentu .”

  

7. Apakah itu merupakan salah satu cara menarik minat beli konsumen?

Bagaimana dengan tanggapan para konsumen? “Ya bisa dibilang begitu, konsumen selalu antusias dalam pelaksanaan pendistribusian produk toiletries di luar swalayan. Pendistribusian yang biasanya dilakukan di pelataran parkiran swalayan ini, mampu menarik masyarakat yang sedang lewat karena pelaksanaan display produk yang menarik dan promo harga yang menonjol .”

  DOKUMENTASI

  Distribusi Jawaban X

x1.1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid sangat tidak setuju

  1

  1.1

  1.1

  1.1 tidak setuju

  2

  2.1

  2.1

  3.2 kurang setuju

  20

  21.1

  21.1

  24.2 Setuju

  48

  50.5

  50.5

  74.7 sangat setuju

  24

  25.3 25.3 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  

x1.2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid sangat tidak setuju

  2

  2.1

  2.1

  2.1 tidak setuju

  5

  5.3

  5.3

  7.4 kurang setuju

  23

  24.2

  24.2

  31.6 Setuju

  44

  46.3

  46.3

  77.9 sangat setuju

  21

  22.1 22.1 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  x1.3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid tidak setuju

  10

  10.5

  10.5

  10.5 kurang setuju

  17

  17.9

  17.9

  28.4 setuju

  49

  51.6

  51.6

  80.0 sangat setuju

  19

  20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  

x2.1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid sangat tidak setuju

  7

  7.4

  7.4

  7.4 tidak setuju

  5

  5.3

  5.3

  12.6 kurang setuju

  15

  15.8

  15.8

  28.4 Setuju

  53

  55.8

  55.8

  84.2 sangat setuju

  15

  15.8 15.8 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  x2.2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid tidak setuju

  5

  5.3

  5.3

  5.3 kurang setuju

  19

  20.0

  20.0

  25.3 setuju

  53

  55.8

  55.8

  81.1 sangat setuju

  18

  18.9 18.9 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  

x.2.3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid sangat tidak setuju

  1

  1.1

  1.1

  1.1 tidak setuju

  5

  5.3

  5.3

  6.3 kurang setuju

  12

  12.6

  12.6

  18.9 Setuju

  52

  54.7

  54.7

  73.7 sangat setuju

  25

  26.3 26.3 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  

x2.4

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid sangat tidak setuju

  3

  3.2

  3.2

  3.2 tidak setuju

  5

  5.3

  5.3

  8.4 kurang setuju

  23

  24.2

  24.2

  32.6 Setuju

  45

  47.4

  47.4

  80.0 sangat setuju

  19

  20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  

x3.1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid sangat tidak setuju

  2

  2.1

  2.1

  2.1 tidak setuju

  1

  1.1

  1.1

  3.2 kurang setuju

  19

  20.0

  20.0

  23.2 Setuju

  52

  54.7

  54.7

  77.9 sangat setuju

  21

  22.1 22.1 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  x3.2

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid tidak setuju

  9

  9.5

  9.5

  9.5 kurang setuju

  19

  20.0

  20.0

  29.5 setuju

  45

  47.4

  47.4

  76.8 sangat setuju

  22

  23.2 23.2 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0 Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid tidak setuju

  7

  7.4

  7.4

  7.4 kurang setuju

  20

  21.1

  21.1

  28.4 setuju

  51

  53.7

  53.7

  82.1 sangat setuju

  17

  17.9 17.9 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  

x3.4

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid sangat tidak setuju

  9

  9.5

  9.5

  9.5 tidak setuju

  6

  6.3

  6.3

  15.8 kurang setuju

  18

  18.9

  18.9

  34.7 Setuju

  46

  48.4

  48.4

  83.2 sangat setuju

  16

  16.8 16.8 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  Distribusi Jawaban Y y1.1

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid tidak setuju

  2

  2.1

  2.1

  2.1 kurang setuju

  6

  6.3

  6.3

  8.4 setuju

  57

  60.0

  60.0

  68.4 sangat setuju

  30

  31.6 31.6 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  

y1.2

  Cumulative tidak setuju

  3

  3.2

  3.2

  5.3 kurang setuju

  17

  17.9

  17.9

  23.2 setuju

  49

  51.6

  51.6

  74.7 sangat setuju

  24

  25.3 25.3 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  y1.3

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid tidak setuju

  7

  7.4

  7.4

  7.4 kurang setuju

  17

  17.9

  17.9

  25.3 setuju

  55

  57.9

  57.9

  83.2 sangat setuju

  16

  16.8 16.8 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0

  y1.4

  Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

  Valid tidak setuju

  3

  3.2

  3.2

  3.2 kurang setuju

  17

  17.9

  17.9

  21.1 setuju

  56

  58.9

  58.9

  80.0 sangat setuju

  19

  20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 95 100.0 100.0 Validitas X Case Processing Summary

  N % Cases Valid 30 100.0

  a

  Excluded .0 Total 30 100.0

  a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha Based on

  Standardized Cronbach's Alpha Items N of Items

  .917 .933

  11 Inter-Item Correlation Matrix x1.1 x1.2 x1.3 x1.4 x1.5 x1.6 x1.7 x1.8 x1.9 x1.10 x1.11 x1.1 1.000 .755 .954 .374 .350 .567 .722 .290 .902 .554 .403 x1.2 .755 1.000 .800 .379 .351 .572 .762 .370 .948 .567 .492 x1.3 .954 .800 1.000 .408 .386 .621 .758 .477 .950 .598 .590 x1.4 .374 .379 .408 1.000 .826 .707 .157 .401 .415 .869 .406 x1.5 .350 .351 .386 .826 1.000 .889 .145 .388 .389 .814 .395 x1.6 .567 .572 .621 .707 .889 1.000 .332 .415 .629 .814 .426 x1.7 .722 .762 .758 .157 .145 .332 1.000 .353 .801 .288 .449 x1.8 .290 .370 .477 .401 .388 .415 .353 1.000 .447 .536 .916 x1.9 .902 .948 .950 .415 .389 .629 .801 .447 1.000 .614 .571 x1.10 .554 .567 .598 .869 .814 .814 .288 .536 .614 1.000 .540 x1.11 .403 .492 .590 .406 .395 .426 .449 .916 .571 .540 .573

  • .954
  • .374
    • .350
    • .567

  • .722
  • .290 .902
  • .554
  • .403
    • Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .021 .029 .001 .000 .060 .000 .001 .014 N

  • 1 .800
  • .379
    • .351
    • .572

  • .762
  • .370
    • .948

  • .567
  • .492
  • Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .019 .029 .000 .000 .022 .000 .001 .003 N
  • .800
  • 1 .408
    • .386
    • .621

  • .758
  • .477
  • .950
  • .598
  • .590
  • Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .013 .017 .000 .000 .004 .000 .000 .000 N
    • .379
    • .408
    • 1 .826

  • .707
  • .157 .401
    • .415
    • .869

  • .406
N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.3 Pearson Correlation

  .954

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  

Item-Total Statistics

  30

  Scale Mean if Item Deleted

  Scale Variance if Item Deleted

  Corrected Item- Total Correlation

  Squared Multiple Correlation

  Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted x1.1 41.0667 24.754 .728 . .907 x1.2 41.0333 24.861 .761 . .906 x1.3 41.1000 24.300 .849 . .902 x1.4 41.0000 26.000 .599 . .913 x1.5 40.9667 25.895 .593 . .913 x1.6 40.9000 25.403 .733 . .908 x1.7 41.1000 24.852 .608 . .913 x1.8 41.2000 22.579 .626 . .919 x1.9 41.0667 24.547 .862 . .902 x1.10 41.0000 25.655 .782 . .908 x1.11 41.2333 21.771 .710 . .913

  Correlations

  x1.1 x1.2 x1.3 x1.4 x1.5 x1.6 x1.7 x1.8 x1.9 x1.10 x1.11 x1.1 Pearson Correlation 1 .755

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.2 Pearson Correlation

  .755

  30 x1.4 Pearson .374

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.5 Pearson

  • .350 .351 .386 .826 1 .889 .145 .388 .389 .814 .395

  Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) .029 .029 .017 .000 .000 .223 .017 .017 .000 .015 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.6 Pearson

  .567 .572 .621 .707 .889 1 .332 .415 .629 .814 .426 Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .037 .011 .000 .000 .009 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.7 Pearson

  .722 .762 .758 .157 .145 .332 1 .353 .801 .288 .449 Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .204 .223 .037 .028 .000 .061 .006 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.8 Pearson

  .290 .370 .477 .401 .388 .415 .353 1 .447 .536 .916 Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) .060 .022 .004 .014 .017 .011 .028 .007 .001 .000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.9 Pearson

  .902 .948 .950 .415 .389 .629 .801 .447 1 .614 .571 Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .011 .017 .000 .000 .007 .000 .000 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.10 Pearson

  .554 .567 .598 .869 .814 .814 .288 .536 .614 1 .540 Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) .001 .001 .000 .000 .000 .000 .061 .001 .000 .001 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30 x1.11 Pearson

  .403 .492 .590 .406 .395 .426 .449 .916 .571 .540 573** Correlation Sig. (1-tailed) .014 .003 .000 .013 .015 .009 .006 .000 .000 .001 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  30

  • . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1- tailed).
    • . Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (1- tailed).
    Validitas Y

    Correlations

  y1.1 y1.2 y1.3 y1.4

  y1.1 Pearson Correlation 1 .084 .363 .469 Sig. (2-tailed) .659 .049 .009 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  • y1.2 Pearson Correlation .084

  1 .131 .455 Sig. (2-tailed) .659 .492 .012 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  y1.3 Pearson Correlation .363 .131 1 .379 Sig. (2-tailed) .049 .492 .039 N

  30

  30

  30

  30

  y1.4 Pearson Correlation .469 .455 .379 .471** Sig. (2-tailed) .009 .012 .039 N

  30

  30

  30

  30 *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

  • . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

  Reliability Statistics

  Cronbach's Alpha Based on

  Cronbach's Standardized Alpha Items N of Items

  .726 .692

  4

  Correlations

  a

  R Square Std. Error of the

  Estimate Change Statistics

  Durbin- Watson

  R Square Change

  F Chang e df1 df2

  Sig. F Change

  1 .529

  .280 .257 1.42242 .280 11.815

  Mod el R R

  3 91 .000 2.355

  a. Predictors: (Constant), Exterior Display, Window Display, Interior Display

  b. Dependent Variable: Minat Beli

  

ANOVA

b Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

  1 Regression 71.713 3 23.904 11.815 .000

  a

  Residual 184.119 91 2.023 Total 255.832

  94

  Square Adjusted

  b

  Minat Beli Window Display Interior Display Exterior Display Pearson Correlation Minat Beli 1.000 .435 .386 .454

  95

  Window Display .435 1.000 .548 .426 Interior Display .386 .548 1.000 .560 Exterior Display .454 .426 .560 1.000

  Sig. (1-tailed) Minat Beli . .000 .000 .000 Window Display .000 . .000 .000 Interior Display .000 .000 . .000 Exterior Display .000 .000 .000 .

  N Minat Beli

  95

  95

  95

  95 Window Display

  95

  95

  95 Model Summary

  95 Interior Display

  95

  95

  95

  95 Exterior Display

  95

  95

  95

  a. Predictors: (Constant), Exterior Display, Window Display, Interior Display

  b

ANOVA

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. a

  1 Regression 71.713 3 23.904 11.815 .000 Residual 184.119 91 2.023 Total 255.832

  94

  a. Predictors: (Constant), Exterior Display, Window Display, Interior Display

  b. Dependent Variable: Minat Beli

  a Coefficients

  Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity Coefficients Coefficients Correlations Statistics

  Zero- Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. order Partial Part Tolerance VIF 1 (Constant)

  9.583 1.105 8.670 .000 Window

  .227 .091 .268 2.482 .015 .435 .252 .221 .679 1.473 Display Interior

  .149 .081 .371 2.301 .010 .386 .063 .053 .569 1.756 Display Exterior

  .198 .072 .301 2.759 .007 .454 .278 .245 .666 1.501 Display

  a. Dependent Variable: Minat Beli

  a Collinearity Diagnostics

  Variance Proportions Condition Window Interior Exterior

  Model Dimension Eigenvalue Index (Constant) Display Display Display

  1 1 3.962 1.000 .00 .00 .00 .00 2 .015 16.034 .00 .67 .00 .50 3 .013 17.397 .99 .09 .06 .18 4 .010 20.037 .00 .24 .93 .33

Dokumen yang terkait

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Pengaruh Stres Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (RSUD) Tengku Mansyur Kota Tanjungbalai

0 2 33

Pengaruh Fungsi Pengawasan terhadap Disiplin Kerja Karyawan pada PT. Bona Trans Persada Cabang Medan

0 1 25

Pengaruh Fungsi Pengawasan terhadap Disiplin Kerja Karyawan pada PT. Bona Trans Persada Cabang Medan

0 0 10

Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Pembelian Pada Toko Pinkylips_shop Di Jejaring Sosial Instagram

0 0 14

Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Pembelian Pada Toko Pinkylips_shop Di Jejaring Sosial Instagram

0 0 26

II. Pertanyaan - Pengaruh Coaching Dan Training (Pelatihan) Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bank Syariah Mandiri Cabang Rantau Prapat

0 2 10

BAB II Kerangka Teori 2.1 Coaching 2.1.1 Pengertian Coaching - Pengaruh Coaching Dan Training (Pelatihan) Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bank Syariah Mandiri Cabang Rantau Prapat

3 17 23

Pengaruh Coaching Dan Training (Pelatihan) Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bank Syariah Mandiri Cabang Rantau Prapat

0 0 15

BAB II KERANGKA TEORI 2.1 Teknologi (E-Commerce) - Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Konsumen Pada Pembelian Produk- Produk Online Shop (Studi Pada Mahasiswa-Mahasiswi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sumatera Utara)

0 0 26

BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang - Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Keputusan Konsumen Pada Pembelian Produk- Produk Online Shop (Studi Pada Mahasiswa-Mahasiswi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Sumatera Utara)

0 0 8