PAPER Theofransus Litaay Adoption of local knowledge in local development ppt
Adoption of local knowledge in local
p
g
development
( u t p e case stud es apua, ast usa e gga a & a u u)
(Multiple case studies: Papua, East Nusa Tenggara & Maluku)
Theofransus Litaay
Theofransus Litaay
Ph.D student, Charles Darwin University Darwin.
Presented in UNTL Dili, Timor Leste.
Presented in UNTL Dili, Timor Leste.
14‐17 November 2011
1
Acknowledgement
• Charles Darwin University, Darwin.
• Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga.
2
Background
2000
• Introduction
of regional
autonomy
2001
• Introduction
of Special
autonomy
system for
special
special
region
2004
• Revision of
regional
autonomy.
Local direct
election
election.
3
Local autonomy
Local autonomy
Local potentiality
Finding new source of
revenues
Local‐based source such as:
Tourism, Mining, Local tax
g
4
Case studies
Case studies
EEast
Greater
Nusa
Nusa
Maluku
Papua
Tenggara
5
Different features of regional
autonomy in research sites
h
Papua
East Nusa
East
Nusa
Tenggara
Maluku
Special
autonomy
General
General
regional
autonomy
General
General
regional
autonomy
6
Differences between the different
system
Institution
Budget
• Special
institution
institution
to preserve
local
identity
• Greater
portion for
portion for
the region
(esp. from
mining)
Local bylaws
• Special
formatfor
special
region.
7
What is so special about a region?
Political
Geographical
history? Justify setting? (case
special
special
of Archipelago
of Archipelago
treatment?
province)
Abundant
natural
resource?
(stronger
(stronger
bargaining
position)
8
Mountain of challenges
Mountain of challenges
Institutional capacity
Personnel capacity
Dependency to central
government
Planning mechanism
9
Existing development plan mechanism
(d l
(development planning deliberation)
l
d lb
)
Village
District
Province
National
10
Negative side of existing model
i
id f i i
d l
Results
National
process eating
p
g
up local ideas
Dependency
to national
program
Process
Too long and
unrealistic
li ti
11
Better approach is needed – industry‐
b d
based
Local
Industry
Policymaking
& dynamics
& dynamics
Local
Local
Community
Local
Local
Government
12
Better approach is needed –
community‐based
b d
Local
Community
Genuine
bottom‐up
planning
l
Local
Local
Industry
Local
Government
13
Genuine bottom‐up planing: not yet
clear in the existing system
l
h
Process
Participant
Budget
14
THANK YOU OBRIGADO!
THANK YOU. OBRIGADO!
Theofransus Litaay.
theolitaay@gmail.com
15
Q&A
• Di
Di Timor Leste, sedang
Timor Leste sedang implementasi otonomi
berbasis potensi daerah. Bagaimana
pendapat?
• Penelitian di Papua, bagaimana riset
mengenai otsus di provinsi Papua? Masyarakat
provinsi Papua? Masyarakat
tidak melihat signifikansi pembangunan?
Apakah hanya untuk menutupi
untuk menutupi pelanggaran
HAM dan migrasi dari wilayah lain?
16
Q&A
• Otonomi lokal langsung, tiga alternatif. Di
langsung, tiga alternatif. Di
Timor Leste ada 6 opsi, yang sekarang menjadi
alternatif adalah pemerintah lokal di tingkat
distrik. Pemerintah tingkat regional masih ada
seperti di Oekusi. Bagaimana kelemahan dan
k l bih ?
kelebihan?
• Kekurangan dan kelebihan selalu ada.
L k h l k h apa yang perlu
Langkah‐langkah
l dilakukan.
dil k k
• Mengapa politik intervensi hukum?
17
Q&A
• Otsus Papua & Aceh, devide
Papua & Aceh devide et impera?
et impera?
18
p
g
development
( u t p e case stud es apua, ast usa e gga a & a u u)
(Multiple case studies: Papua, East Nusa Tenggara & Maluku)
Theofransus Litaay
Theofransus Litaay
Ph.D student, Charles Darwin University Darwin.
Presented in UNTL Dili, Timor Leste.
Presented in UNTL Dili, Timor Leste.
14‐17 November 2011
1
Acknowledgement
• Charles Darwin University, Darwin.
• Satya Wacana Christian University, Salatiga.
2
Background
2000
• Introduction
of regional
autonomy
2001
• Introduction
of Special
autonomy
system for
special
special
region
2004
• Revision of
regional
autonomy.
Local direct
election
election.
3
Local autonomy
Local autonomy
Local potentiality
Finding new source of
revenues
Local‐based source such as:
Tourism, Mining, Local tax
g
4
Case studies
Case studies
EEast
Greater
Nusa
Nusa
Maluku
Papua
Tenggara
5
Different features of regional
autonomy in research sites
h
Papua
East Nusa
East
Nusa
Tenggara
Maluku
Special
autonomy
General
General
regional
autonomy
General
General
regional
autonomy
6
Differences between the different
system
Institution
Budget
• Special
institution
institution
to preserve
local
identity
• Greater
portion for
portion for
the region
(esp. from
mining)
Local bylaws
• Special
formatfor
special
region.
7
What is so special about a region?
Political
Geographical
history? Justify setting? (case
special
special
of Archipelago
of Archipelago
treatment?
province)
Abundant
natural
resource?
(stronger
(stronger
bargaining
position)
8
Mountain of challenges
Mountain of challenges
Institutional capacity
Personnel capacity
Dependency to central
government
Planning mechanism
9
Existing development plan mechanism
(d l
(development planning deliberation)
l
d lb
)
Village
District
Province
National
10
Negative side of existing model
i
id f i i
d l
Results
National
process eating
p
g
up local ideas
Dependency
to national
program
Process
Too long and
unrealistic
li ti
11
Better approach is needed – industry‐
b d
based
Local
Industry
Policymaking
& dynamics
& dynamics
Local
Local
Community
Local
Local
Government
12
Better approach is needed –
community‐based
b d
Local
Community
Genuine
bottom‐up
planning
l
Local
Local
Industry
Local
Government
13
Genuine bottom‐up planing: not yet
clear in the existing system
l
h
Process
Participant
Budget
14
THANK YOU OBRIGADO!
THANK YOU. OBRIGADO!
Theofransus Litaay.
theolitaay@gmail.com
15
Q&A
• Di
Di Timor Leste, sedang
Timor Leste sedang implementasi otonomi
berbasis potensi daerah. Bagaimana
pendapat?
• Penelitian di Papua, bagaimana riset
mengenai otsus di provinsi Papua? Masyarakat
provinsi Papua? Masyarakat
tidak melihat signifikansi pembangunan?
Apakah hanya untuk menutupi
untuk menutupi pelanggaran
HAM dan migrasi dari wilayah lain?
16
Q&A
• Otonomi lokal langsung, tiga alternatif. Di
langsung, tiga alternatif. Di
Timor Leste ada 6 opsi, yang sekarang menjadi
alternatif adalah pemerintah lokal di tingkat
distrik. Pemerintah tingkat regional masih ada
seperti di Oekusi. Bagaimana kelemahan dan
k l bih ?
kelebihan?
• Kekurangan dan kelebihan selalu ada.
L k h l k h apa yang perlu
Langkah‐langkah
l dilakukan.
dil k k
• Mengapa politik intervensi hukum?
17
Q&A
• Otsus Papua & Aceh, devide
Papua & Aceh devide et impera?
et impera?
18