Relationships between organizational support, customer orientation, and work outcomes

Emin Babakus

The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Abstract Purpose – This paper seeks to examine the nature of relationships between six organizational

support mechanisms, a personal resource, and selected psychological and behavioral work outcomes. A related objective of the study is to uncover whether these relationships exhibit similar patterns between employees with different characteristics.

Design/methodology/approach – Data for the study were collected from the employees of a large bank in New Zealand. Usable responses were obtained from 530 employees.

Findings – Results show that supervisory support is most closely associated with psychological work outcomes. On the other hand, job performance is more susceptible to influences of service technology and empowerment. Also customer orientation, as a personal resource, impacts job performance.

Research limitations/implications – Using multiple-informants (e.g. measuring frontline employees’ job performance on the basis of their supervisors’ or customers’ assessments) would help minimize common-method variance. To cross-validate our results, replication studies among other samples of frontline employees in banking as well as other service settings are in order.

Practical implications – To fuel greater affective organizational commitment and job satisfaction among frontline employees and to reduce their turnover intentions, management must take proactive actions for the frontline employees to receive support and encouragement from their supervisors. Instituting a structured mentoring program and providing training programs to supervisors in support skills can also pay dividends.

Originality/value – The study shows that an undifferentiated approach is warranted in managing employees. Similar strategies would be equally effective in inducing favorable and reducing negative affective and performance outcomes among employees with different demographic characteristics.

Keywords Banking, Employees, Customer orientation, Business support services, New Zealand Paper type Research paper

International Journal of Bank

Introduction

Marketing Vol. 28 No. 3, 2010

Regulatory, structural and technological factors have significantly changed the

pp. 222-238

banking environment throughout the world (Angur et al., 1999). In a milieu becoming

q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 0265-2323

increasingly competitive, bank executives realize that creating and maintaining a loyal

DOI 10.1108/02652321011036477

customer base is a key to their survival and success (see Yavas et al., 1997).

Accordingly, they design multi-pronged strategies to deliver quality service to

A study of

customers and enhance customer satisfaction and loyalty. Such executives also

frontline bank

recognize that no strategy aimed at satisfaction and retention of external customers can be considered complete unless it includes programs for reaching and winning over

employees

internal customers (Schneider and White, 2004). Viewed particularly important in this context are the frontline employees who, because of their boundary-spanning roles, play a crucial role in service delivery and building relationships with customers

(Babakus et al., 2003). Being direct participants in implementing the marketing concept (Brown et al., 2002), frontline employees’ attitudes and behaviors towards customers determine customers’ perceived service quality, satisfaction and emotional commitment to an organization (Henning-Thurau, 2004; Yoon et al., 2001). Frontline employees also have the capability, more so than other employees in an organization, for returning aggrieved customers to a state of satisfaction after a service failure occurs (Yavas et al., 2004).

Not surprisingly, bank executives view retention of motivated, satisfied and committed frontline employees as important to business success as customer satisfaction and retention (see Yavas et al., 1997). A question that begs an answer is: what support mechanisms and resources induce positive and reduce negative work outcomes among frontline bank employees? In this study, we seek an answer to this decidedly critical question. Specifically, we investigate the nature of relationships between several organizational support factors and a personal resource, and selected psychological and behavioral work outcomes. A related objective of our study is to uncover whether these relationships exhibit similar patterns between employees with different characteristics. We use frontline bank employees in New Zealand as our study setting.

A study addressing these issues is relevant and significant for several reasons. First, while some studies in the past have examined the relationships between organizational support and work outcomes among frontline employees in other service sectors (Bakker et al., 2004; Demerouti et al., 2001) and other countries (e.g. Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004), there is a paucity of research addressing this topic in the context of banking in general and New Zealand in particular. Second, previous studies have been limited in terms of the number of resources and/or outcomes they include in their conceptualization and scope. In this study, we use a comprehensive list of seven antecedent (six organizational support resources and a personal resource) and four work outcome (three psychological outcomes and a behavioral outcome) variables and investigate their interrelationships. Third, the findings from the study can provide bank executives in New Zealand with valuable insights in ways of enhancing positive and reducing negative work outcomes of their frontline employees. Furthermore, an understanding of the role of background characteristics is vital to managers in determining if, for instance, an undifferentiated or a differentiated (e.g. gender-specific) approach is warranted in managing frontline employees (Alexandrov et al., 2007).

In the next section we present the relevant literature. This is followed by discussions of the method and results of our empirical study. We conclude with implications of the results and suggestions for future research.

IJBM

Relevant literature

Organizational support Inspired by the works of Bakker et al. (2004), Halbesleben and Buckley (2004), and Lytle et al. (1998), we define organizational support as a set of enduring policies, practices, procedures and tools that:

diminish the demands of the job; and/or

assist employees in achieving their work goals and stimulate their personal growth/development.

Such support may be physical, psychological or social in nature and may be located at the organizational and task levels, in interpersonal/social relations and the organization of work. Organizational support can be in the forms of performance feedback, skill variety, autonomy, job security, training, salary, supervisory support, empowerment, team climate, rewards, career opportunities, servant leadership and service technology support (Babakus et al., 2003; Bakker, Demerouti, Taris, Schaufeli and Schreurs, 2003; Baker, Demerouti, de Boer and Schaufeli 2003; Ben-Zur and Yagil, 2005; Demerouti et al., 2001; Lewig and Dollard, 2003; Lytle et al., 1998; Maslach, 2005; Wilk and Moynihan, 2005). In our study, we focus on six organizational resources that are widely recognized as being crucial to organizational success and outcomes. They are supervisory support, training, servant leadership, rewards, empowerment and service technology support (Babakus et al., 2003; Demerouti et al., 2001; Lytle et al., 1998).

Supervisory support (Bell et al., 2004; Babin and Boles, 1996) refers to the willingness of the supervisors to go to bat for their subordinates. It manifests itself in the encouragement and concern supervisors provide to their subordinates. According to the reciprocity rule as employees receive greater support from their supervisors, their sense of obligation to reciprocate with greater effort increases.

Training programs sponsored by an organization can improve employees’ task-related and behavioral skills, enhance their capability to deal with varying customer needs, personalities and circumstances effectively. Employees who receive training become more capable and motivated, and provide higher levels of service. In contrast, employees who do not possess the requisite job and interpersonal skills fail to provide satisfactory service and cannot deal with customer demands and complaints effectively (Boshoff and Allen, 2000). Training not only helps develop skills and creative thinking necessary to serve customers effectively, but also sends a strong signal to frontline employees regarding top management’s commitment to service quality (Babakus et al., 2003). Servant leadership (Lytle et al., 1998) reflects the managerial service behaviors, which conspicuously direct and shape the service climate in an organization through example rather than simply dictating service policies.

Rewards characterize inducements employees receive from their organization, including compensation, esteem, status and social identity. Particularly monetary rewards count a lot in frontline service jobs, which are generally low paying positions (Babakus et al., 2003; Forrester, 2000). Having appropriate reward policies in place induces frontline employees to deliver high quality services to customers and to deal with customer complaints effectively (see Lytle et al., 1998). On the other hand, lack of rewards creates an unpleasant environment and diminishes employees’ work efforts and/or may cause them to withdraw from the job.

Empowerment refers to the freedom and ability to make decisions and

A study of

commitments (Forrester, 2000). It entails a set of managerial activities and practices, which provide employees with power, authority and control, and involves

frontline bank

transmission of power to those who are less powerful in an organization (Ergeneli

employees

et al., 2007). Empowerment enhances employees’ problem solving capability and helps them to reach their full potential. Empowered employees have the responsibility and authority to act quickly without a long chain of command (see Babakus et al., 2003).

Service technology support encompasses provision of sophisticated and integrated tools to employees (Lytle et al., 1998). Such support enables frontline employees to be free from routine tasks and gives them more time to deal with customers. Technology can elevate the competitive advantage of a service organization by enhancing employees’ capacity to offer superior service to their customers.

Customer orientation as a personal resource Customer orientation, which has been studied both at the organizational and individual worker levels, is one of marketing’s most celebrated concepts (see Deshpande et al., 1993; Donavan et al., 2004; Henning-Thurau, 2004; Kohli and Jaworski, 1990; Narver and Slater, 1990). At the organizational level, customer orientation is an integral component of a market orientation (Deshpande et al., 1993; Narver and Slater, 1990), which provides a unifying focus for the activities of an organization and serves as a vehicle for the implementation of the time-honored marketing concept as a business philosophy (Kohli and Jaworski, 1990). A firm’s customer orientation is not only a potent path to business success, but also results in desirable employee outcomes (Henning-Thurau, 2004; Jaworski and Kohli, 1993).

At the individual level, customer orientation describes a personal resource of an employee and is defined as “an employee’s tendency or predisposition to meet customer needs in an on-the-job context” (Brown et al., 2002, p. 111). Customer orientation, as a personal resource, may serve as an antidote to the detrimental effects of job demands and can lead to delivery of superior customer service, especially when combined with organizational support. Among others, customer-oriented employees exhibit strong concern for others’ needs, optimism and cheerfulness. They also show low levels of nervousness and frustration during service encounters. Customer orientation makes employees more capable of “serving with a smile”, with less “emotional labor” or “acting” (see Grandey, 2003).

Perhaps more importantly, customer orientation positively influences an employee’s job satisfaction and commitment (Donavan et al., 2004). In this study, we draw on the conceptualization of customer orientation at the individual worker level (Brown et al., 2002) and treat it as a personal resource.

Work outcomes In various contextual settings, research in marketing and management has focused on

a number of work outcomes ranging from affective organizational commitment to turnover intentions to job performance (e.g. Donavan et al., 2004; Ogaard, 2006; Yavas et al., 2008). As discussed by Rhoads et al. (1994) and Singh et al. (1996), these outcomes can be dichotomized into psychological (e.g. job satisfaction, tension) and behavioral outcomes (e.g. turnover, job performance). Psychological outcomes reflect employees’ psychological approach or avoidance attitudes toward their jobs while behavioral outcomes reflect employees’ performance results. In our study, we focus on three

IJBM

psychological (affective organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover

28,3 intentions) and a behavioral outcome ( job performance). Under Rhoads et al.’s (1994)

and Singh et al.’s (1996) taxonomy, turnover intentions represent the avoidance aspect of psychological outcomes. Turnover intentions, in turn, are recognized as precursors to actual turnover (e.g. Allen et al., 2003; Jackofsky, 1984), which is a behavioral outcome (Rhoads et al., 1994).

Affective organizational commitment refers to an attitude in the form of an attachment between an individual and his/her organization. It is reflected in the relative strength of an individual’s psychological identification and involvement with the organization (Mowday et al., 1979). Job satisfaction reflects a positive affective state resulting from an employee’s overall assessment (i.e. not any specific aspect(s)) of his/her job (Babin and Boles, 1998; Singh et al., 1996). Performance refers to an employee’s assessment of his/her performance relative to his/her peers on job-related behaviors and results (Babin and Boles, 1998; Singh et al., 1996). Finally, turnover intentions reflect employees’ thoughts about quitting the organization they work for (Singh et al., 1996).

Past research, albeit not simultaneously using all the independent and dependent variables we include here, demonstrates that organizational support and work outcomes are related. Research, for instance, reveals that supervisory support leads employees to exert more effort in the workplace (Brown and Peterson, 1994; Den Hartog and Verburg, 2002; Schneider and Bowen, 1993), enhances employees’ positive attitudes toward their work and reduces their turnover intentions (Babin and Boles, 1996; Bell et al., 2004; Ito and Brotheridge, 2005). Training programs in task-related and behavioral skills enhance employees’ affective commitment to their organization (Tsui et al., 1997) and reduce their turnover intentions (Cheng and Brown, 1998). Empowered employees exhibit lower turnover intentions (Bowen and Lawler, 1992). Likewise, an organization’s reward structure has a significant impact on employee loyalty and commitment (Lawler, 2000). Rewards reduce employees’ turnover intentions as well (Podsakoff et al., 2006).

Prior research also reveals that the variables within our dependent variable set may also be interrelated. For instance a meta-analysis ( Jaramillo et al., 2005) shows that there is a significant relationship between organizational commitment and job performance. Job satisfaction as well demonstrates a significant relationship with job performance (Babakus et al., 2003). Both job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment depict negative relationships with turnover intentions (Alexandrov et al., 2007). While the research is not monotonic in support, the weight of the evidence also suggests that job performance and turnover intentions are related ( Jackofsky, 1984).

Method Sample To achieve the purposes of the study, data were collected from boundary-spanning employees of a large bank in New Zealand who spent their time dealing directly with customers for transactions and/or responding to customer queries, problems and complaints. Specifically, 724 questionnaires were distributed to employees working in

50 branches of the bank via the bank’s intranet. The manager of each bank wrote a memo to the employees and requested their cooperation. Employees were given assurance of confidentiality and allowed to respond to the survey anonymously during work hours. The responses were transferred into a data file at the corporate office 50 branches of the bank via the bank’s intranet. The manager of each bank wrote a memo to the employees and requested their cooperation. Employees were given assurance of confidentiality and allowed to respond to the survey anonymously during work hours. The responses were transferred into a data file at the corporate office

A study of

collection, 530 usable surveys were received for a response rate of 73.2 percent. The number of responses across the bank branches ranged from five to 27 with an average

frontline bank

of 10.6 responses per branch.

employees

Over three-quarters of the respondents (76.2 percent) were female. In total, 58 percent had secondary education and 31.4 percent had college/university education or more. Respondents were spread across all age groups with 20.7 percent between the

ages of 18 and 24, 25.8 percent between the ages of 25 and 34, 22.6 percent between the ages of 35 and 44, 18.7 percent between the ages of 45 and 54 and 12.2 percent 55 years and older. A comparison of the sample profile to the company records indicated that the sample was representative of the population of frontline employees.

Measurement Dependent variables. Affective organizational commitment was operationalized via six items from Mowday et al. (1979). Six items each adapted from Babin and Boles (1998) were used to measure job satisfaction and performance. Turnover intentions, was measured with four items adapted from Singh et al. (1996) and Boshoff and Allen (2000). Responses to each of these items were elicited on five-point scales ranging from

5 ¼ strongly agree to 1 ¼ strongly disagree. Statements were scored in such a way that higher scores indicated higher levels of affective organizational commitment, job

satisfaction, job performance and turnover intentions. Independent variables. Three items from Bell et al. (2004) were used to measure supervisory support. A four-item scale was used to measure training (Rogg et al., 2001). Servant leadership (six items) and empowerment (two items) were measured with items adapted from Lytle et al. (1998). Service technology support (four items) and rewards (three items) were measured using items adapted from Lytle et al. (1998) and Johnson (1996).

Customer orientation was measured via 13 items from Donavan et al. (2004). Responses to each of these items were also obtained on five-point scales ranging from

5 ¼ strongly agree to 1 ¼ strongly disagree. Again because of the scoring system used, higher scores indicated higher levels of supervisory support, training, servant

leadership, rewards, empowerment, service-technology support and customer orientation. Age and education were measured using five-point scales with higher scores indicating older age and higher education. During the analysis stage, these variables were reduced to a binary (0/1) form (see the Appendix). Gender was recorded as 1 ¼ female and 0 ¼ male.

In designing the questionnaire, items comprising the perceptual dependent and independent variables were separated in an effort to reduce single-source method bias (Podsakoff et al., 2003). As shown previously, the internal consistency reliabilities of

the measures with the exception of the rewards measure ( a ¼ 0.62) exceeded the recommended minimum threshold value of 0.70 (Nunnally, 1978). Prior to administering in the field, the questionnaire was pre-tested with a pilot sample of 25 employees and no changes in the wording of the questions were deemed necessary.

Results Canonical correlation analysis was employed to examine the relationships between the independent and the dependent variables described in the preceding section. This technique is particularly useful in situations where, as is the case here, there are

IJBM

multiple dependent variables and correlations exist between and within variable sets

(Hair et al., 1998). The simplest way to view canonical analysis is as a kind of double-barreled principle components analysis. Given a correlation matrix representing the between and within correlations of two sets of variables, the analysis derives successive pairs of linear functions of independent and dependent variable sets. The functions are maximally correlated between the variable sets while

mutually uncorrelated within the sets. The first pair of canonical functions extracts the maximum variance possible, the second pair extracts the maximum variance not accounted for by the first pair and successive canonical functions are extracted in the same fashion.

In canonical correlation analysis, the maximum number of canonical functions that can be extracted from the independent and the dependent variable sets equals the number of variables in the smaller set. Since the smaller set in the present study (i.e. the dependent set) consists of four variables, a maximum of four canonical functions can

be extracted. As in principal components analysis, the objective of canonical analysis is to summarize the complex multivariate relationship between the two sets of variables in a smaller number of canonical variates (linear composites or combinations) without too much loss of information. Considering the criteria (i.e. statistical significance of the function and the magnitude of the canonical correlations depicting the bivariate correlations between the independent and the dependent linear composites) recommended by Hair et al. (1998), in this study two canonical functions were retained. Both functions were significant (Function 1: F ¼ 16.48, p , 0 :0001 and Function 2: F ¼ 2.41, p , 0 :001). As shown in Table I, the canonical correlations between the dependent and independent variates of the first and the second functions were 0.80 and 0.30 respectively.

In interpreting the underlying structures of the independent and the dependent variable composites, canonical loadings can be used. Also referred to as structure

Function 1 2

Dependent variables Affective organizational commitment

0.26 Job satisfaction

0.22 Job performance

2 0.75 Turnover intentions

0.59 2 0.24 Independent variables

0.52 Training

Supervisory support

0.35 Servant leadership

2 0.42 Service technology

0.39 Customer orientation

2 0.03 Table I.

0.008 Canonical loadings

Education

Canonical correlation 0.80 0.30 Canonical correlation 0.80 0.30

A study of

observed variable in the independent (or dependent) set and the set’s canonical variate. As can be seen from the loadings presented in Table I, the first dependent variate was

frontline bank

characterized by affective organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover

employees

intentions. On the other hand, job performance was at the root of the dependent variate of the second function. An inspection of the loadings of the independent variables revealed that gender and education were more closely associated with the first

independent variate. The second independent variate, on the other hand, depicted closer association with age. Customer orientation and empowerment also had high loadings on this variate.

Having determined the underlying structures of the variates, in the next phase of analysis, an attempt was made to obtain insights into which independent variables had the most influence in relation to the dependent variable composites (i.e. variates). The standardized canonical coefficients, which are analogous to standardized beta coefficients in multiple regression, and the weights we calculated based on these coefficients revealed some interesting results. As shown in Table II, supervisory support had the most impact on the first dependent variate (i.e. affective outcomes). A close scrutiny of the results revealed that the second dependent variate (i.e. job performance) was most susceptible to influences of customer orientation followed by service technology and empowerment. Overall, the background characteristics did not have much impact on the dependent variates and collectively accounted for 10 percent of the weight in each case. Furthermore, their relative impacts on the dependent variates were comparable.

Discussion Several inferences surface from our results. First, our findings demonstrate that earlier findings based on studies conducted in other service sectors and countries can be extended to banking and New Zealand. Second, our results show that different forms of

Function

n 2 relative weights Dependent variables

n 1 relative weights

Affective organizational commitment

0.38 0.49 0.24 Job satisfaction

0.35 0.33 0.16 Job performance

0.57 Turnover intentions

0.07 0.07 0.03 Independent variables

Supervisory support

0.42 0.27 0.11 Training

0.08 0.07 0.03 Servant leadership

0.19 Service technology

0.12 0.48 0.20 Customer orientation

0.16 2 0.61 Table II. 0.25 Age

0.11 0.06 0.10 0.04 Standardized canonical Gender

0.02 0.01 0.06 0.02 correlations and relative Education

0.06 0.03 0.12 0.05 weights

IJBM

organizational support are associated with different work outcomes. For instance, the

28,3 results suggest that supervisory support is most closely associated with affective work

outcomes. On the other hand, job performance is more likely to be impacted by service technology and empowerment. Third, our results also confirm that work outcomes can

be dichotomized into psychological (organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intentions) and behavioral outcome ( job performance) categories as discussed

by Rhoads et al. (1994) and Singh et al. (1996). Fourth, however, these work outcomes do not seem to show any variations across employee characteristics.

Finally, an intriguing result of our study is the impact of customer orientation (a personal resource) on job performance more so than psychological outcomes. Some plausible explanations can be offered for this finding. Customer orientation encompasses an internal drive to engage in such customer-satisfying behaviors as finding and promptly delivering solutions to customer problems, being well-prepared and organized during customer interactions, approaching customers with natural ease and confidence, treating customers with both kindness and politeness, maintaining a consistent level of emotionality during customer interactions and a natural propensity to enjoy work (see Cran, 1994; Donavan et al., 2004; Gwinner et al., 2005; Surprenant and Solomon, 1987). Also agreeableness, a basic personality trait, which reflects cooperation and service to others, is at the root of customer orientation (Brown et al., 2002; Licata et al., 2003). Customer-oriented frontline employees perform well in the workplace as they are predisposed to enjoying the work of serving customers (Brown et al., 2002; Donavan et al., 2004).

In addition, it may be surmised that, customer orientation may actually serve as an antidote to job demands and play an instrumental role in increasing job resources. For instance, when a frontline employee lacks adequate information and procedures to accomplish a required task, customer orientation may serve as internal compass and provide clear, well-defined guidelines to reduce uncertainties and ambiguities inherent in that task ( Jones et al., 2003). Also, customer orientation may alleviate the negative effects of conflicts in a job environment as it enables employees to control a threatening situation with calm and emotional stability (Donavan et al., 2004; Surprenant and Solomon, 1987; Winstead, 2000). Furthermore, customer orientation may lead employees to find more effective and creative ways of serving customers, which may actually reduce work overload. Similarly, customer orientation may encourage employees to seek more resources from management to better serve customers. All of these factors may explain the strong impact of customer orientation on job performance.

Managerial implications Perhaps the most important managerial implication emerging from this study is that an undifferentiated approach would pay dividends in managing employees. In other words, similar strategies would be equally effective in inducing favorable and reducing negative affective and performance outcomes among employees with different demographic characteristics. Results of the study suggest that to fuel greater affective organizational commitment and job satisfaction among frontline employees and to reduce their turnover intentions, management must take proactive actions for the frontline employees to receive support and encouragement from their supervisors. In this context, actions such as instituting a structured mentoring program and providing training programs to supervisors in support skills, for instance, can pay dividends.

Support given to subordinates should not be limited to emotional support but should

A study of

also include informational support. When employees’ beliefs in their supervisors’ reliability, dependability, competence and willingness to help subordinates increases

frontline bank

as a result of mentoring programs, then, among others, subordinates’ job satisfaction

employees

would improve and their withdrawal tendencies from their jobs would diminish. Likewise, to improve employee performance, employees must be empowered. In empowering employees, giving them more power and authority should not be the only

goal. In addition, employees’ psychological empowerment should be enhanced. Psychological empowerment reflects whether or not employees perceive themselves as being empowered. As Ergeneli et al. (2007) discuss, if employees do not behave as expected when power and control are transferred to them, this may be due to lack of awareness of the fact that they are empowered. Also given the study results, employees must be provided with requisite service technologies to further enhance their performance.

Finally, the linkage between customer orientation and job performance leads to an interesting managerial implication. Customer orientation entails such personality traits as enjoying serving others, being caring and calm, and showing emotional stability in stressful situations. All of these traits are particularly fitting for frontline service jobs. Given that a good fit between a person’s abilities and personality and the requirements of a job leads to better job outcomes (see Donavan et al., 2004), management should recruit and select frontline employees who possess customer orientation qualities. This would necessitate incorporating predictors of customer orientation into the service worker selection process. Also management should consider making customer orientation an explicit component of periodic employee evaluations to align its broader policies to nourish and nurture employees’ customer orientation over the long run.

It should be remembered that as discussed in Schneider and White’s (2004) the “customer-linkage” model and more specifically in Heskett et al.’s (1994) the “service-profit chain” model, any managerial actions to improve employees’ affective and performance job outcomes would lead not only to better customer outcomes (e.g. customer loyalty, customer satisfaction) but also stimulate such desirable organizational outcomes as profits and growth.

Limitations and future research directions Although this study contributes to our knowledge base, viable prospects for further research remain. First, the constructs in this study were developed by responses from the same participants. This may potentially provide biased estimates of model parameters. To avoid the problem in future studies, multiple sources should be used in data collection and, for instance, job performance should be measured via responses from supervisors and/or customers. Second, in this study we used frontline employees of a single company in a single country in a single industry and at a single point in time. This may have led to sampling artifacts and ignored the potential temporal dynamics of the relationships. Therefore, generalizations beyond the specific context of this research must be guarded. Replications in New Zealand and elsewhere among frontline employees in banking as well as other service settings are in order for conclusive generalizations. Likewise, longitudinal designs would help determine the causal relationships among the study variables. Third, our focus in this study was on the individual frontline employee as the unit of analysis and we did not differentiate between employees of small vs. large branches. Possible psychological climate and

IJBM

management style variances emanating from the size of a branch may have

confounded the results. Hence, investigation of the impact of branch size on the relationships studied here is a worthy topic for future research.

232 References

Alexandrov, A., Babakus, E. and Yavas, U. (2007), “The effects of perceived management concern for frontline employees and customers on turnover intentions: moderating role of employment status”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 356-71.

Allen, D.G., Shore, L.M. and Griffeth, R.W. (2003), “The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process”, Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 99-118.

Angur, M.G., Nataraajan, R. and Jahera, J.S. (1999), “Service quality in the banking industry: an assessment in a developing economy”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 116-23.

Babakus, E., Yavas, U., Karatepe, O. and Avci, T. (2003), “The effect of management commitment to service quality on employees’ affective and performance outcomes”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 272-86.

Babin, B.J. and Boles, J.S. (1996), “The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 72 No. 1, pp. 57-75.

Babin, B.J. and Boles, J.S. (1998), “Employee behavior in a service environment: a model and test of potential differences between men and women”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 77-91.

Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. and Verbeke, W. (2004), “Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 83-104.

Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., de Boer, E. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2003), “Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 341-56.

Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., Taris, T.W., Schaufeli, W.B. and Schreurs, P.J.G. (2003), “A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations”, International Journal of Stress Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 16-38.

Bell, S.J., Menguc, B. and Stefani, S.L. (2004), “When customers disappoint: a model of relational internal marketing and customer complaints”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 112-26.

Ben-Zur, H. and Yagil, D. (2005), “The relationship between empowerment, aggressive behaviors of customers, coping, and burnout”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 81-99.

Boshoff, C. and Allen, J. (2000), “The ınfluence of selected antecedents on frontline staff’s perceptions of service recovery performance”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 63-90.

Bowen, D.E. and Lawler, E.E. (1992), “The empowerment of service workers: what, why, how, and when”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33, Spring, pp. 31-9.

Brown, S.P. and Peterson, R.A. (1994), “The effect of effort on sales performance and job

satisfaction”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 70-80.

Brown, T.J., Mowen, J.C., Donavan, T. and Licata, J.W. (2002), “The customer orientation of

A study of

service workers: personality trait determinants and effects on self- and supervisor performance ratings”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39, February, pp. 110-9.

frontline bank

employees

Cheng, A. and Brown, A. (1998), “HRM strategies and labor turnover in the hotel industry:

a comparative study of Australia and Singapore”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 136-54.

Cran, D.J. (1994), “Towards validation of the service orientation construct”, The Services Industry

Journal, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 34-44. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Nachreiner, F. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2001), “The job demands-resources

model of burnout”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 3, pp. 499-512. Den Hartog, D.N. and Verburg, R.M. (2002), “Service excellence from the employees’ point of

view: the first line supervisors”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 159-64. Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U. and Webster, F.E. Jr (1993), “Corporate culture, customer orientation,

and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, pp. 23-37.

Donavan, D.T., Brown, T.J. and Mowen, J.C. (2004), “Internal benefits of service-worker customer orientation: job satisfaction, commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 128-46.

Ergeneli, A., Ari, G.S. and Metin, S. (2007), “Psychological empowerment and its relationship to trust in immediate managers”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 41-9.

Forrester, R. (2000), “Empowerment: rejuvenating a potent idea”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 67-80.

Grandey, A.A. (2003), “When ‘the show must go on’: surface acting and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 86-96.

Gwinner, K., Bitner, J., Brown, S.W. and Kumar, A. (2005), “Service customization through employee adaptiveness”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 131-48.

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Halbesleben, J.R.B. and Buckley, M.R. (2004), “Burnout in organizational life”, Journal of Management, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 859-79.

Henning-Thurau, T. (2004), “Customer orientation of service employees: its impact on customer satisfaction, commitment, and retention”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 460-78.

Heskett, J.L., Jones, T.O., Loveman, G.W., Sasser, W.E. and Schlesinger, L.A. (1994), “Putting the service-profit chain to work”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, March-April, pp. 164-74.

Ito, J.K. and Brotheridge, C.M. (2005), “Does supporting employees’ career adaptability lead to commitment, turnover, or both?”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 5-19.

Jackofsky, E.F. (1984), “Turnover and job performance: an integrated process model”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, January, pp. 74-83.

Jaramillo, F., Mulki, J.P. and Marshall, G.M. (2005), “A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational commitment and salesperson job performance: 25 years of research”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, June, pp. 705-14.

Jaworski, B.J. and Kohli, A.K. (1993), “Market orientation: antecedents and consequences”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, July, pp. 53-70.

IJBM

Johnson, J.W. (1996), “Linking employee perceptions of service climate to customer satisfaction”,

28,3 Personnel Psychology, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 831-51.

Jones, E., Busch, P. and Dacin, P. (2003), “Firm market orientation and salesperson customer orientation: interpersonal and intrapersonal influences on customer service and retention in business-to-business buyer-seller relationships”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 323-40.

Kohli, A.K. and Jaworski, B.J. (1990), “Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, April, pp. 1-18.

Lawler, E.E. (2000), Rewarding Excellence, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Lewig, K.A. and Dollard, M.F. (2003), “Emotional dissonance, emotional exhaustion and job

satisfaction in call center workers”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 366-92.

Licata, J.W., Mowen, J.C., Harris, E.G. and Brown, T.J. (2003), “On the trait antecedents and outcomes of service worker job resourcefulness: a hierarchical model approach”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 256-71.

Lytle, R.S., Hom, P.W. and Mokwa, M.P. (1998), “SERV * OR: a managerial measure of organizational service-orientation”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 74 No. 4, pp. 455-89.

Maslach, C. (2005), “Understanding burnout: work and family issues”, in Halpern, D.F. (Ed.), From Work-family Balance to Work-family Interaction: Changing the Metaphor, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 99-114.

Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M. and Porter, L.W. (1979), “The measurement of organizational commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 224-47.

Narver, J.C. and Slater, S.F. (1990), “The effects of a market orientation on business profitability”,

Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, October, pp. 20-35. Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Ogaard, T. (2006), “Do organizational practices matter for hotel industry employees’ jobs: a study

of organizational practice archetypal configurations and job outcomes”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 647-61.

Podsakoff, P.M., Bommer, W.H., Podsakoff, N.P. and MacKenzie, S.B. (2006), “Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: a meta-analytic review of existing and new research”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 99 No. 2, pp. 113-42.

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879-903.

Rhoads, G.K., Singh, J. and Goodel, P.G. (1994), “The multiple dimensions of role ambiguity and their impact on psychological and behavioral outcomes of industrial salespeople”, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 1-24.

Rogg, K.L., Schmidt, D.B., Shull, C. and Schmitt, N. (2001), “Human resource practices, organizational climate, and customer satisfaction”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 431-49.

Schaufeli, W.B. and Bakker, A.B. (2004), “Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 293-315.

Schneider, B. and Bowen, D.E. (1993), “The service organization: human resources management is crucial”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 39-52.

Schneider, B. and White, S.S. (2004), Service Quality: Research Perspectives, Sage Publications,

A study of

Thousand Oaks, CA.

frontline bank

Singh, J., Goolsby, J.R. and Rhoads, G.K. (1996), “Behavioral and psychological consequences of boundary spanning burnout for customer service representatives”, Journal of Marketing

employees

Research, Vol. 31, November, pp. 558-69. Singh, J., Verbeke, W. and Rhoads, G.K. (1996), “Do organizational practices matter in role stress

processes? A study of direct and moderating effects of marketing-oriented boundary

spanners”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 No. 3, pp. 69-86. Surprenant, C.F. and Solomon, M.R. (1987), “Predictability and personalization in the service

encounter”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 No. 2, pp. 86-96. Tsui, A.S., Pearce, J., Porter, L.W. and Tripoli, A.M. (1997), “Alternative approaches to the

employee-organization relationship: does investment in employee pay off?”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 1089-121.

Wilk, S.L. and Moynihan, L.M. (2005), “Display rule ‘regulators’: the relationship between supervisors and worker emotional exhaustion”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90 No. 5, pp. 917-27.

Winstead, K.F. (2000), “Service behaviors that lead to satisfied customers”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 Nos 3/4, pp. 399-417.

Yavas, U., Babakus, E. and Karatepe, O.M. (2008), “Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of work-family conflict and family-work conflict: does gender matter?”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 7-31.

Yavas, U., Bilgin, Z. and Shemwell, D.J. (1997), “Service quality in the banking sector in an emerging economy: a consumer survey”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 217-23.

Yavas, U., Karatepe, O.M., Babakus, E. and Avci, T. (2004), “Customer complaints and organizational responses: a study of hotel guests in Northern Cyprus”, Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing, Vol. 11 Nos 2/3, pp. 31-46.

Yoon, M., Beatty, S. and Suh, J. (2001), “The effect of work climate on critical employee and customer outcomes: an employee-level analysis”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 500-21.

Further reading Kickul, J. and Posig, M. (2001), “Supervisory emotional support: an explanation of reverse

buffering effects”, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 328-44. Parasuraman, A. (1987), “Customer-oriented corporate cultures are crucial to services marketing

success”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 39-46. Posig, M. and Kickul, J. (2003), “Extending our understanding of burnout: test of an integrated

model in non-service occupations”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 3-19.

Schneider, B., White, S.S. and Paul, M.C. (1998), “Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: test of a causal model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp. 150-63.

Thoits, P.A. (1995), “Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next?”, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 53-79.

IJBM

Appendix. Study variables

28,3 Dependent variables

Affective organizational commitment (adapted from Mowday et al., 1979) ( a ¼ 0.89): (1) I talk up this bank to my friends as a great organization to work for. (2) I find that my values and the bank’s values are very similar. (3) I am proud to tell others that I work for this bank.

(4) This bank inspires the very best in me in the way of job performance. (5) I really care about the future of this bank. (6) This bank earned my complete loyalty.

Job satisfaction (adapted from Babin and Boles, 1998) ( a ¼ 0.91):

(1) My job is very pleasant. (2) I am highly satisfied with my job. (3) I am very enthusiastic about my work. (4) I find real enjoyment in my work. (5) I definitely dislike my job. (6) My job is very worthwhile.

Job performance (adapted from Babin and Boles, 1998) ( a ¼ 0.76):

(1) I am a top performer. (2) I get along with customers better than others. (3) My performance is in the top 10 percent. (4) I consistently deliver better quality service than others. (5) I have been rated consistently as a star performer. (6) I go out of my way to help customers.

Turnover intentions (adapted from Singh et al., 1996; Boshoff and Allen, 2000) ( a ¼ 0.82):

(1) I will probably be looking for another job soon. (2) I often think about quitting. (3) I will quit this job sometime in the next year. (4) It would not take too much to make me resign from this bank.

Independent variables Supervisory support (adapted from Bell et al., 2004) ( a ¼ 0.86):

(1) My boss is very concerned about the welfare of those under him/her. (2) My boss is willing to listen to work-related problems. (3) My boss can be relied on when things get difficult at work.

Training (adapted from Rogg et al., 2001) ( a ¼ 0.82): (1) At this bank, sufficient time is allocated for training. (2) At this bank, sufficient money is allocated for training. (3) At this bank, training programs are consistently evaluated. (4) At this bank, training programs focus on how to improve service quality.

Servant leadership (adapted from Lytle et al., 1998) ( a ¼ 0.90):

(1) Management constantly communicates the importance of service quality

(2) Management regularly spends time “in the field” or “on the floor” with customers and

A study of

frontline employees.

frontline bank

(3) Management is constantly measuring service quality. (4) Managers give personal input and leadership into creating quality service.

employees

(5) Management provides resources, not just “lip service, to enhance our ability to provide excellence service.

(6) Management shows they care about service by constantly giving of themselves.

Rewards (adapted from Lytle et al., 1998; Johnson, 1996) ( a ¼ 0.62):

(1) We have financial incentives for service excellence. (2) I receive visible recognition when I excel in serving customers. (3) My promotion depends on the quality of service I deliver.

Empowerment (adapted from Lytle et al., 1998): (1) I often make important customer decisions without seeking management approval. (2) I have the freedom and authority to act independently in order to provide service

excellence.

Service technology/support (adapted from Lytle et al., 1998; Johnson, 1996) ( a ¼ 0.83):