S BIO 1202317 Bibliography
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdulmumeen, H., Risikat, A., & Sururah, A. (2012). Food: Preservatives,
Additives, and Aplications. International Journal of Chemical and
Biochemical Sciences. pp. 36-47.
Al-shammari, E., Bano, R., & Khan, S. (2014).The Effect Of Preservatives
and Flavours Additive On The Productionof Oxygen-Free Radicals.
International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 3, 210-215
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara
Bekiroglu, F. (2012). Examination of Relationship Between Engagment in
Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. Internation
Journal of Science and Mathemathics Education, 10, 1415-1443
Berne, B, .(2014). Progression in ethical reasoning when andressing socioscientific issues in biotechnology. International Journal of Science
Education, 36, 2958-2977
BPOM. (2015). Jakarta: Warta POM: Media Internall Badan POM. Edisi
Maret-April 2015. (25 Juni 2015)
BSNP. (2006). BSNP : Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan
Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta
Campbell, Reece, & Urry. (2008). Biologi: edisi kedelapan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Chaniago Amrean. (2002). Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung:
Pustaka Setia
Dawson. V. M., & Venbille, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing
students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high
school genetics. Reseach in Science Educarion, 40, 133-148.
Dermawan, Rizky. (2012). Pengambilan Keputusan Landasan Filosofis,
Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Alfabeta
Furtak, E., Hardy, I., & Beinberch, C. (2008). A Framework for Analyzing
Evidence-Based Reasoning in Science Classroom Discourse.
Educational Assesment, 15, 175-196
He, F.J.,& MacGregor. (2007). Dietary salt, high blood pressure and other
harmful effects on health, Reducing salt in foods: Practical strategies.
Kilcast D, Angus F, editors. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead. pp. 18–54.
Herawati, Desti. (2015). Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Berorientasi
Lingkungan dan Sekolah Multinasional. Sekolah Pascasarjana,
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Hornikx, J & Hann, U. (2012). Reasoning and Argumentation: Towards an
Integrated Psychology of Argumentation. Thinking and Reasoning.
18(3), 225-243
Inch, E., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and
Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. USA: Pearson
Education,Inc.
Irianto, Hariyadi. (2007). Upaya Peningkatan Keamanan, Mutu, Gizi dan
Pangan. Jakarta : CV. Andi Offset
Ernawati.
(2003)
Meningkatkan
Kemampuan
Pemahaman
KonsepMatematika Siswa SMU Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis
Masalah. FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI
PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
87
Khishfe, Roli. (2012). Nature of Science and Decision-Making. International
Journal of Education,34, 67-100
Kimball, John. (1999). Biologi. Jakarrta: Erlangga Mahameru
Kurnadi,
Kemal
Adyana
(2011).
DasarDasarAnatomidanFisiologiTubuhManusia.
Bandung :JurusanPendidikanBiologi FPMIPA UPI
Lawson, A.E. (2004). Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning. International
Jounal of Science Education.
Lee, Yeung Chung & Grace. (2012). Students’ Reasoning And Decision
Making About A Socioscientific Issue : A Cross-Context Comparison.
Science Education. 96:787–807
Mamun, M. A. (2011). Toxicological Effect of Formalin as Food
Preservatives on Kidney and Liver Tissues in Mice Model. IOSR
Journal of Enviromental Science, Toxicologu and Food Technology, 8,
47-51
Osborne, J.(2012). The role of argument: Learning how to learn in school
science. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds), Second
international handbook of science education. Springer International
Handbooks of Educarion. New York. NY: Springer. pp.933-949
Sadler, T., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of Informal Reasoning In the
Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. Journal of Research In
Science Teaching, 42, 112-138.
Sahidi, F., Kamil, J., & Arachichi, V. (1999). Food Aplications of Chitin and
Chitosans. Trends in Food Science and Technology. Food Science and
Technology(10), 37-51
Salusu, J. (2002). Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology 5th ed. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for Analysis of Everyday
Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations, Argumentation,
17, 185-202
Suriasumantri, J.S. (2010). Filsafat Ilmi: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta:
Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Tyler, R & Peterson, S.(2013). Contruction Representations to Learn in
Science. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Verheji, B. (2005). Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme
Argumentation, 19, 347-371
Wang, Xingyu. (2007). The Cognitive Process of Decision Making.
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence,
12, 73-85
Winarno, F. G. (2004). Kimia Pangan dan Gizi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka
Utama
Winarno.Fardiaz, S, & Fardiaz, D. (1980). Pengantar Teknologi Pangan.
Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Yudistira. (2014).Surakarta Post: 7 Persen dari 800 Sampel Makanan di
Pasar Tradisional Mengandung Zat Berbahaya.[Online] Tersedia:
http://www.surakarta.go.id/konten/17-persen-dari-800-sampel-
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI
PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
88
makanan-di-pasar-tradisional-mengandung-zat-berbahaya [5 November
2015]
Zo’bi, Abdullah. (2014). The Effect of Using Socio-scientific Issues
Approach in Teaching Environmental Issues on Improving the Students’
Ability of Making Appropiate Decisions Toward These Issues.
International Education Studies, 7, 133-123
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI
PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
Abdulmumeen, H., Risikat, A., & Sururah, A. (2012). Food: Preservatives,
Additives, and Aplications. International Journal of Chemical and
Biochemical Sciences. pp. 36-47.
Al-shammari, E., Bano, R., & Khan, S. (2014).The Effect Of Preservatives
and Flavours Additive On The Productionof Oxygen-Free Radicals.
International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 3, 210-215
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2009). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta:
Bumi Aksara
Bekiroglu, F. (2012). Examination of Relationship Between Engagment in
Scientific Argumentation and Conceptual Knowledge. Internation
Journal of Science and Mathemathics Education, 10, 1415-1443
Berne, B, .(2014). Progression in ethical reasoning when andressing socioscientific issues in biotechnology. International Journal of Science
Education, 36, 2958-2977
BPOM. (2015). Jakarta: Warta POM: Media Internall Badan POM. Edisi
Maret-April 2015. (25 Juni 2015)
BSNP. (2006). BSNP : Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan
Pendidikan Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta
Campbell, Reece, & Urry. (2008). Biologi: edisi kedelapan. Jakarta: Erlangga
Chaniago Amrean. (2002). Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung:
Pustaka Setia
Dawson. V. M., & Venbille, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing
students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high
school genetics. Reseach in Science Educarion, 40, 133-148.
Dermawan, Rizky. (2012). Pengambilan Keputusan Landasan Filosofis,
Konsep dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Alfabeta
Furtak, E., Hardy, I., & Beinberch, C. (2008). A Framework for Analyzing
Evidence-Based Reasoning in Science Classroom Discourse.
Educational Assesment, 15, 175-196
He, F.J.,& MacGregor. (2007). Dietary salt, high blood pressure and other
harmful effects on health, Reducing salt in foods: Practical strategies.
Kilcast D, Angus F, editors. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead. pp. 18–54.
Herawati, Desti. (2015). Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Sekolah Berorientasi
Lingkungan dan Sekolah Multinasional. Sekolah Pascasarjana,
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Hornikx, J & Hann, U. (2012). Reasoning and Argumentation: Towards an
Integrated Psychology of Argumentation. Thinking and Reasoning.
18(3), 225-243
Inch, E., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical Thinking and
Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. USA: Pearson
Education,Inc.
Irianto, Hariyadi. (2007). Upaya Peningkatan Keamanan, Mutu, Gizi dan
Pangan. Jakarta : CV. Andi Offset
Ernawati.
(2003)
Meningkatkan
Kemampuan
Pemahaman
KonsepMatematika Siswa SMU Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis
Masalah. FPMIPA, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI
PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
87
Khishfe, Roli. (2012). Nature of Science and Decision-Making. International
Journal of Education,34, 67-100
Kimball, John. (1999). Biologi. Jakarrta: Erlangga Mahameru
Kurnadi,
Kemal
Adyana
(2011).
DasarDasarAnatomidanFisiologiTubuhManusia.
Bandung :JurusanPendidikanBiologi FPMIPA UPI
Lawson, A.E. (2004). Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning. International
Jounal of Science Education.
Lee, Yeung Chung & Grace. (2012). Students’ Reasoning And Decision
Making About A Socioscientific Issue : A Cross-Context Comparison.
Science Education. 96:787–807
Mamun, M. A. (2011). Toxicological Effect of Formalin as Food
Preservatives on Kidney and Liver Tissues in Mice Model. IOSR
Journal of Enviromental Science, Toxicologu and Food Technology, 8,
47-51
Osborne, J.(2012). The role of argument: Learning how to learn in school
science. In B.J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds), Second
international handbook of science education. Springer International
Handbooks of Educarion. New York. NY: Springer. pp.933-949
Sadler, T., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of Informal Reasoning In the
Context of Socioscientific Decision Making. Journal of Research In
Science Teaching, 42, 112-138.
Sahidi, F., Kamil, J., & Arachichi, V. (1999). Food Aplications of Chitin and
Chitosans. Trends in Food Science and Technology. Food Science and
Technology(10), 37-51
Salusu, J. (2002). Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology 5th ed. New York: The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
Simosi, M. (2003). Using Toulmin’s Framework for Analysis of Everyday
Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations, Argumentation,
17, 185-202
Suriasumantri, J.S. (2010). Filsafat Ilmi: Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta:
Pustaka Sinar Harapan
Tyler, R & Peterson, S.(2013). Contruction Representations to Learn in
Science. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Verheji, B. (2005). Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme
Argumentation, 19, 347-371
Wang, Xingyu. (2007). The Cognitive Process of Decision Making.
International Journal of Cognitive Informatics and Natural Intelligence,
12, 73-85
Winarno, F. G. (2004). Kimia Pangan dan Gizi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka
Utama
Winarno.Fardiaz, S, & Fardiaz, D. (1980). Pengantar Teknologi Pangan.
Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Yudistira. (2014).Surakarta Post: 7 Persen dari 800 Sampel Makanan di
Pasar Tradisional Mengandung Zat Berbahaya.[Online] Tersedia:
http://www.surakarta.go.id/konten/17-persen-dari-800-sampel-
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI
PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
88
makanan-di-pasar-tradisional-mengandung-zat-berbahaya [5 November
2015]
Zo’bi, Abdullah. (2014). The Effect of Using Socio-scientific Issues
Approach in Teaching Environmental Issues on Improving the Students’
Ability of Making Appropiate Decisions Toward These Issues.
International Education Studies, 7, 133-123
Intania Zainal Nurul Huda, 2016
PEMAHAMAN DAN PENALARAN SISWA SMP DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN MENGENAI
PENGGUNAAN BAHAN PENGAWET PADA MAKANAN
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu