THE APPLICATION OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY IN LEARNING SPEAKING OF HIGH, AVERAGE, AND LOW LEVEL STUDENT IN SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 OF SURABAYA SKRIPSI
THE APPLICATION OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY IN LEARNING SPEAKING OF HIGH, AVERAGE, AND LOW LEVEL STUDENT IN SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 OF SURABAYA SKRIPSI Submitted in a Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for S-1 Degree in English Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty BY: AS AMARIZULHAQ 20121111048 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA 2016
THE APPLICATION OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY IN LEARNING SPEAKING OF HIGH, AVERAGE, AND LOW LEVEL STUDENT IN SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 OF SURABAYA SKRIPSI Submitted in a Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for S-1 Degree in English Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty BY: AS AMARIZULHAQ 20121111048 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA 2016
PERNYATAAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PLAGIAT
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini: Nama : AS AMARIZULHAQ NIM : 20121111048 Pogram Studi : Bahasa Inggris Fakultas : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Menyatakan dengan sebenarna bahwa skripsi yang saya tulis ini benar- benar merupakan hasil karya saya sendiri, bukan merupakan pengambilalihan tulisan atau pikiran orang lain yang saya akui sebagai hasil tulisan atau pikiran saya sendiri.
Apabila kemudian hari terbukti atau dapat dibuktikan bahwa skripsi ini hasil jiplakan, maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi atas perbuatan tersebut sesuai peraturan yang berlaku.
Surabaya, 08 Agustus 2016 Yang Membuat pernyataan,
(As Amarizulhaq) Motto: ”Do not ever waste your time, because it will not come back to you”.
Dedication: ”This dedication for both of my parents, my mother and father who always support me whatever I do. Thank you so much”.
Halaman Persetujuan Pembimbing
Skripsi yang ditulis As Amarizulhaq ini telah disetujui oleh dosen pembimbing untuk diujikan tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Pembimbing Tanda Tanga Tanggal I.
Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd. M.Pd.
………………. ………… II. Vega Hesmatantya, S.Pd. M.Pd. ………………. ………….
Mengetahui: Ketua Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris, Sulton Dedy Wijaya, S.Pd.
Halaman Pengesahan Penguji
Skripsi ini yang ditulis oleh As Amarizulhaq telah diuji dan dinyatakan sah oleh Panitia Ujian Tingkat Sarjana (S1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya sebagai salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar Sarjana Pendidikan, pada tanggal 16 Agustus 2016.
Dosen Penguji Tanda Tangan Tanggal Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd, M.Pd.
I.
……………. ………..
…………… ………… III. Sofi Yunianti, S.Pd, M.Pd.
……………. ………… Mengetahui, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya,
Dekan, Dr. M. Ridlwan, M.Pd.
ACKNOWLEDEMENT
All praises to Allah SWT who has provided grace for his guidence and blessing and
greeting are due to our prophet Muhammadiyah SAW, hope Allah always bestows His
guidences and blessings to him, his family, companions and His fellows who always
istiqomah in the way of Allah, so the author is given the opportunity to be able to finish
this research on time. This study entitled The Application of Metacognitive Strategy in
Learning Speaking of High, Average, and Low Level Student in SMA Muhammadiyah 2
at Surabaya is structured to fulfill the requirements obtained a degree of English Program
in Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya.To be able finish this research, the author gets lots of help and support from all of
people surround who provide morally and materially. For that, no words can express my
pleasure except thank you, especially to: 1.DR. Dr. Sukadiono, M.M. as Rector of Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya.
2. Dr. M. Ridlwan, M.Pd, as Dean of Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya.
3. Mr. Sulton Dedy Wijaya, S.Pd. as Chairperson of English Program.
4. Mrs. Gusti Nur Hafifah, S.Pd. M.Pd. and Miss. Vega Hesmatantya, S.Pd. M.Pd. as my Advisors of English Program who guide me during make this thesis. They help me with all the time with their passion without hesitate. Hope, Allah give them long- life and blessings all the time.
5. Mr. and Mrs. Lecturer of English Teaching and Education Department who taught the author so many things.
6. All of my friends and others who could not I say it one by one in this thesis.
Through this research that had been settled as perfect as possible. Hopefully, this
thesis could give so many benefits to the readers, for all of education world and could
give contribute to whoever need. So, we hope critics and suggestions from all the readers
which are really need to improve this research in the future.Surabaya, 08 Agustus 2016 As Amarizulhaq NIM 20121111048
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PageCover .................................................................................................................. i Halaman Judul ..................................................................................................... ii Motto and Dedic ation…………………………………………………….. ........ iii Lembar Persetujuan
Pembimbing…………………………………………… ... iv Lembar Pengesahan Penguji ............................................................................... v Pernyataan Keaslian
Tulisan………………………………………………….. . vi Abs tract…………………………………………………………… ................... vii Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………....... viii Table of
Contents………………………………………………….. .................. ix List of Tables
………………………………………………………………….. xi List of Figu res………………………………………………………………… . xii List of Append ix………………………………………………………………. xiii
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION……………………………………............. 1
1.1. Background of the Study …………………………………….………… ............ 1 1.2.
Research Questions…………………….………………………… .................... 4 1.3. Purpose of the Study……………………………………………….….. ............ 4 1.4. Scope and Limitation of the Study………….……………………….... ............. 5 1.5. Significant of the Study……………………………………………..… ............. 5 1.6. Definition of Key Terms………………….…………………………… ............ 6
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW……………….…………………… 7
2.1. Language Learning Strategies……………………………………………….. 7
2.1.1. Factors of Langua ge Strategy………………………………............. 7 2.1.2.
8 The Comparison of Teaching Strategies and Learning Strategies 2.2. Learning Speaking…………………………………………………...……… 8 2.2.1.
9 Definition of Speaking…...............................................................
2.3. Metacognitive Learning Strategies………………………………………….. 12 2.3.1.
The Definition of Metacognitive…………………………………… 13 2.4. English Learners.……………………………………………………………. 15
2.4.1. High Level Learner…………………………………………………. 15
2.4.2. Average Level Learner ……….…………………………………….. 15
2.4.3. Low Level Le arner……………………………………………......... 16
2.5.
16 Previous Study……………………………………………………………….
CHAPTER III RESEARCH
19 METHODOLOGY………………………….…
3.1. Design of the
19 Research………………………………………………… 3.2.
19 Subject and Data of the Research………………………………..........
3.2.1. High Level Learner………………………………………………….
19
21
3.2.2. Average Level Learner……………………………………………… 3.2.3.
22
3.3. Instruments of the Research…………………………………………..........
4.1.3. Strategy used by Low Level Student of Speaking Skill in Four Main Representative’s Metacognitive Strategy……………………………... 39
54 List of Appendix................................................................................................
5.2.4. To the Further Researcher………………………………………. 53 Bibliography……………………………………………………………… .......
To Parents………………………………………. ........................ 52
5.2.2. To English Teachers…………………………………………….. 52 5.2.3.
5.2.1. To the Other En glish Learners………………………………… . 52
5.2. Suggest ions…………………………………………………………… ... 52
5.1. Conclus ion……………………………………………………………. ... 51
CHAPTER V CONCUSIO N AND SUGGESTIONS…………………….. ..... 51
4.2. Discussion s……………………………………………………………….. 43
4.1.3.4. Evalu ation…………………………………………………….. .. 41
4.1.3.3. Monitori ng…………………………………………………….. . 41
4.1.3.2. Plan ning……………………………………………………….. . 40
4.1.3.1. Selective At tention…………………………………………….. 39
4.1.2.4. Evalu ation…………………………………………………….. .. 37
23 3.4. Data Collection techniques…………………………………………………..
4.1.2.3. Monit oring…………………………………………………….. . 37
4.1.2.2. Plan ning……………………………………………………….. . 35
4.1.2.1. Selective At tention…………………………………………….. 35
4.1.2. Strategy used by Average Level Student of Speaking Skill in Four Main Representative’s Metacognitive Strategy …………………………. . 34
4.1.1.4. Evalu ation…………………………………………………….. .. 32
4.1.1.3. Monit oring…………………………………………………….. . 31
4.1.1.2. Plan ning……………………………………………………….. . 30
4.1.1.1. Selective A ttention…………………………………………….. 29
4.1.1. Strategy used by High Level Student of Speaking Skill in Four Main Representative’s Metacognitive Strategy …………………………. .. 28
4.1. Findi ngs……………………………………………………………… .... 27
SCUSSIONS…………………….......... 27
26 CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DI
24 3.5. Data Analysis…………………………………………………………............ .
57 Biography……………………………………………………………………… 106
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1.1 the percentage of High Level Learner Metacognitive LearningSpeaking
Table 4.1.2 the percentage of Average Level Learner Metacognitive LearningSpeaking
Table 4.1.3 the percentage of Low Level Learner Metacognitive LearningSpeaking