Acting Phase Observing Phase
Y 9-7
Very Poor: essentially translation, little knowledge of English vocabulary, idioms, word
form, or not enough to evaluate
L A
N G
U A
G
E U
S E
25-22 Excellent to Very Good: effective complex
constructions, few errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns,
prepositions 21-18
Good to Average: effective but simple constructions, minor problems in complex
constructions, several errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunctions, articles,
pronouns, prepositions but meaning seldom obscured
17-11 Fair to Poor: major problems in simplecomplex
constructions, articles, pronouns, prepositions andor fragments, run-ons, deletions, meaning
confused or obscured. 10-5
Very Poor: virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules, dominated by errors, does
not communicate, or not enough to evaluate
M E
C H
A N
I C
5 Excellent to Very Good: demonstrates mastery
of conventions, few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing
4 Good to Average: occasional errors of spelling,
punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not obscured
3 Fair to Poor: frequent errors of spelling,
punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, poor handwriting, meaning confused or obscured
2 Very Poor: no mastery of conventions,
dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, handwriting
illegible or not enough to evaluate Table 3.1
Analytical scoring rubric adapted from Weigle
Process the analysis qualitative is used when the observation of
students’ activities during teaching learning process, and the interview before and after CAR. In this case, the writer collected the whole data that have
gained. In analyzing the statistical data, the writer puts on the average of students’ reading score per action in one cycle. It is used to measure the
students’ ability in writing. To get the mean of students’ writing score within one cycle uses the formula:
7
X : mean x : individual score
n : number of students In gaining the class percentage which passes the minimum mastery
criteria- Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 68 uses the formula:
8
P : The class percentage F : Total percentage score
N : Number of students Next step, the writer identifies the improvement score on students’
recount text writing from pre-test up to post-test score in cycle 1 and cycle 2. The writer uses the formula:
9
P : Percentage of Students’ Improvement
y : Pre- test Result y1 : Post-test 1
7
Anas Sudijono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2008, p. 81.
8
Anas Sudijono, Pengantar …, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2008, p. 43.
9
David E. Meltzer, The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible Hidden Variable in Diagnostic Pretest Scores, Iowa:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, 2008, p. 3.
n x
X
F P =
── X 100 N
Y1 - y P =
─── X 100 y
y2 - y P =
─── X 100 y