The Students` ability to think critically from external perspective

digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 11 x. 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 10 10 12 x. 12 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 20 20 13 x. 13 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 13 13 14 x. 14 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 12 12 15 x. 15 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 16 x. 16 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 14 14 17 x. 17 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 12 12 18 x. 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 8 19 x. 19 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 22 22 20 x. 20 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 21 x. 21 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 12 12 22 x. 22 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 12 12 23 x. 23 2 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 14 14 24 x. 24 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 14 14 25 x. 25 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 12 12 26 x. 26 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 10 10 27 x. 27 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 12 12 28 x. 28 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 12 12 29 x. 29 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 11 11 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 30 x. 30 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 14 14 ∑ FX 54 51 69 34 35 35 56 61 39 5 39 5 Mean 1,8 1,7 2,3 1,1 3 1,1 7 1,1 7 1,87 2,03 13, 17 13, 2 The average of students’ score = = 395 30 = 13, 17 The average percentage of students’ score: = = 395 30 = 13, 2 Based on the finding after conducting the test, the students` ability to think critically was categorized as “low”. From the table above, researcher got that the average of students’ score was 13, 17 which means low. It means that the students` ability to think critically was low.

2. The students` ability to think critically from internal perspective

To find out the students` ability to think critically from internal perspective, the questionnaire was distributed. This questionnaire was as digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id reflective of the students after the test given and as self assesses their critical thinking ability. Actually, this questionnaire was self assessment for the students` ability to think critically. The researcher gave the students 5 items which have to be answered. The questions were related to critical thinking. Each question has four choices in which each choice has different value. The further result of the research through questionnaire was presented below.

a. Tabulating data of the questionnaire

1 Finding the Mean The formula used for computing the mean was as follows: M = Explanation: M = Mean ∑ X = the sum of the item scores N = the number of the students digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id Table 4.2 Result of Questionnaire No Research Subject Score Per Item Total Score Mean 1 2 3 4 5 1 x.1 3 4 3 4 4 18 3,6 2 x. 2 2 3 4 4 2 15 3 3 x. 3 2 3 4 4 2 15 3 4 x. 4 2 2 2 2 2 10 2 5 x. 5 3 3 2 4 3 15 3 6 x. 6 2 1 2 1 3 9 1,8 7 x. 7 2 1 3 4 3 13 2,6 8 x. 8 1 2 1 4 2 10 2 9 x.9 3 4 3 4 4 18 3,6 10 x. 10 2 3 4 4 3 16 3,2 11 x. 11 3 2 1 1 2 9 1,8 12 x. 12 2 3 2 2 1 10 2 13 x. 13 2 2 3 3 4 14 2,8 14 x. 14 2 2 3 3 1 11 2,2 15 x. 15 3 2 3 1 2 11 2,2 16 x. 16 3 4 2 4 2 15 3 17 x. 17 4 3 3 4 4 18 3,6 18 x. 18 3 2 4 4 2 15 3 19 x. 19 3 2 4 2 3 14 2,8 20 x. 20 4 3 4 4 3 18 3,6 21 x. 21 4 2 3 3 3 15 3 22 x. 22 4 2 2 3 3 14 2,8 23 x. 23 3 3 3 4 3 16 3,2 24 x. 24 3 4 2 1 2 12 2,4 25 x. 25 2 2 2 1 2 9 1,8 digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id digilib.uinsby.ac.id 26 x. 26 2 1 1 2 1 7 1,4 27 x. 27 2 2 2 4 2 12 2,4 28 x. 28 2 2 2 4 2 12 2,4 29 x. 29 3 3 3 3 3 15 3 30 x. 30 3 3 2 1 2 11 2,2 ∑ 79 75 79 89 75 Mean 2,7 2,5 2,3 2,9 2,5 Bellow is the diagram of students ’ response of questionnaire. 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 question 5 A B C D

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of critical reading strategies on students’ critical thinking ability at English teacher education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel.

0 2 77

English reading habit of student teachers at english teacher education department of Sunan Ampel State Islamic University: level and common factor analysis.

0 1 75

An error analysis on derivational suffixes in the students' writing assignments of English Teacher Education Department of State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

6 9 71

Conversational hand gestures of student teachers to give instruction in microteaching class of English Teacher Education Department at Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya.

0 1 120

CULTURAL CONTENT IN SPEAKING FOR EVERYDAY COMMUNICATION CLASS IN ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 0 110

VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGIES IN INTERNSHIP PROGRAM AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 108

STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY AT ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA.

0 1 85

CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ LEARNING STYLE AND ACHIEVEMENT IN CRITICAL READING CLASS OF ENGLISH TEACHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AT SUNAN AMPEL STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SURABAYA.

0 0 78

STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION 2015

0 0 17

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION FACULTY OF STATE INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC STUDIES (IAIN) OF SALATIGA 2017

0 0 196