40 situation. Afterwards, some of the students presented their results in front of the
class by writing them down on the blackboard. It could be seen from the procedure of activity 11 that there was no procedure about presenting in front of
the class, but the teacher asked the students to present their results. It meant that the teacher made an improvement on the implementation.
However,for the instruction and time allocation, ET1 did not really pay attention to them. During the teaching and learning activity, mostly the teacher
used Bahasa Indonesia. She gave the instruction in Bahasa Indonesia, although the meaning was the same as the instruct
ion stated on the teacher‟s guidebook. Based on the observation about the
implementation of teacher‟s guidebook of 2013 Curriculum in the teaching and learning activities in ET1
‟s English class, the researcher could conclude that the teacher did not exactly implement the
learning instruction stated on the teacher‟s guidebook. She made some
improvements on the implementation. For the activity itself, ET1checked the students‟ understanding. When the students had understood the material, then
ET1 continued to the next activity. However, for the activity that needed to do the exercise, it took longer time allocation than other activities. Based on the
researcher‟s observation, each student had different ability, so it also affected the time allocation for each activity.
2. Observation in Teacher ET2
’s Class
The second English teacher was ET2. The researcher did the observations on Saturday, August 8, 2015 and on Tuesday, August 18, 2015. The first day of
observation, the activity was activity 5 up to activity 8. The topic was about PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41 greeting. Firstly the teacher did the opening session by greeting the students using
English to create English atmosphere and checking students‟ attendance. Then the
teacher went to activity 5. On the activity 5, the students were asked to present the dialogue on the activity 5 with their seatmates. However, ET2 only asked the
students to read it with their seatmates without presented it. Before that, ET2 read the dialogue on the activity 5 and then the students repeated it. The time
allocation for activity 5 was more than what was stated on the teacher‟s
guidebook. The time allocation was stated 40 minutes on the teacher‟s guidebook.
In reality, it took 42 minutes. For activity 6, there were three points of the procedure. However, ET2
did not implement all of those procedures. ET2 just asked the students to observe the dialogue on the activity 6, then ET2 read the dialogue and the students
repeated it. It was done more than twice. Based on the researcher‟s perception,
ET2 felt enough towards that activity so that she continued it to the next activity without doing other two points of procedure on the activity 6.
For activity 7, ET2 skipped it and the deeper explanation why ET2 skipped it would be explained on the subchapter B. The last activity for that day
was activity 8. There were two points of procedure in delivering the activity 8. They asked the students to ob
serve the pictures on the student‟s textbook and describe each picture using correct expressions. Here, ET2 asked the students to
ask their classmates about their feeling and wrote the result down on the table. It was not mentioned in the procedure about what the teachers should do towards the
table. If we saw on the student‟s textbook, we could see that on the activity 8 was PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42 not only about picture and dialogue but also table. Here, ET2 did not discuss the
pictures, she only asked the students to complete the table about asking the classmates‟ feeling.
For the instructionnote and the time allocation, ET2 did not really pay attention to them. She did not exactly implement the procedure stated on the
teacher‟s guidebook. Mostly, she used Bahasa Indonesia in giving instruction to the students. It was to make the instruction more understandable to the students.
However, she also spoke English although Bahasa Indonesia held a large portion. The second observation was on Tuesday, August 18, 2015. The topics
were about expression and response of thanks and apology. The activity was from activity 14 up to activity 18. As usual, ET2 opened the class by greeting the
student in English and checking the students‟ attendance. ET2 also asked the
students about what they had learnt in the previous meeting. By asking the materials of the previous meeting, the students were expected to recall the
previous material. Then ET2 continued the activity to study the activity 14. ET2 did what stated on the procedure. She asked the students to make a dialogue based
on the pictures on the activity 14 using expression of thanks. Then, ET2 asked four students to write the result down on the blackboard and the others students
read it. ET2 also gave explanation about the expression and response of thanks, although it was not mentioned in the procedure. It took 25 minutes to do the
activity 14. For activity 15, there were four points of procedure in delivering activity
15. We could see from the observation checklist that the third and the fourth point PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43 of the procedure were not done by ET2. However, ET2 changed the procedure.
It was stated that the students worked in pairs in making dialogues and then read it in front of the class. In reality, ET2 asked the students to make dialogues
individually and asked four students to write the result down on the blackboard. Before ET2 asked the students to make the dialogues, she read the example of
dialogues and asked the students to repeat it. For activity 16, ET2 skipped it and directly went to activity 17. It would
be explained on the subchapter B why the teacher skipped it. In activity 17, there were three points of procedure in delivering activity 17. The last procedure was
not done. B ased on the researcher‟s perception, it did not need to be done. Then to
cover it, ET2 gave notes about the expressions and responses of apology and she explained it. ET2 felt that the students needed to know another expressions and
responses of apology which were stated on the activity 17. Then, the last activity for that day was activity 18. There were five points
of procedure in delivering activity 18. As seen from the observation checklist, for the first and second points, ET2 tried to make an improvement on the
implementation. ET2 tried to change the expression to another expression of apology while she read the dialogue, although it was not mentioned in the
procedure of activity 18. Meanwhile, the third point of theprocedure was not done at al
l. Based on the researcher‟s perception, it did not need to be done.The bell rang 10 minutes before the time, so all of the activities on the activity 18 could not
be covered. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44 For the instructionnote and time allocation, like in the first observation,
mostly ET2 used Bahasa Indonesia. She used her own language in giving instruction, but had the same meaning stated on the instructionnote. Meanwhile,
for the time allocation, ET2 did not pay attention to it. She allocated the time herself based on the a
ctivity and the students‟ understanding.
Based on the observations about the implementation of teacher‟s
guidebook of 2013 Curriculum in the teaching and learning activities in ET2 ‟s
English class, the researcher could conclude that the teacher did not exactly implement the learning instruct
ion stated on the teacher‟s guidebook. Sometimes, ET2 made an improvement in the implementation. ET2 also made complement
by adding the material, such as giving information towards another expressions and responses which were
stated on the student‟s textbook. The researcher also found that ET2 used a video as a media in the teaching and learning activity. The
video was about greeting. After the students watched the video, ET2 asked the students to follow what the video said. The students repeated
the greeting‟s sentence from the video. It was in the form of music, so the students looked
enthusiastic in following the video. Here, the teacher made an improvement by playing a video, although it was not mentioned in the procedure.
3. Observation in Teacher ET3
