Arini Rusyda, 2014 A SOCIAL ACTION ANALYSIS OF NEWS ON 2011 WAR IN LIBYA: REPRESENTATION OF THE US
ALLIANCES ON ONLINE USA TODAY AND THE TRIPOLI POST Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
2.6 News Discourse as the Analytical Field of Van Leeweun’s CDA
24 2.7 Current Studies on CDA
26
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Formulation of Problems 30
3.2 Research Design 30
3.3 Data Collection 31
3.4 Data Analysis 32
CHAPTER IV: FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Findings 37
4.1.1 Social Actors Represented on USA Today and Tripoli Post 37
4.1.2 Actions and Reactions 38
4.1.2.1 Material and Semiotic Actions 40
4.1.2.2 Transactive and Nontransactive Material and Semiotic Actions 43
4.1.2.3 Transactive Instrumental and Interactive Action 45
4.1.3. Reactions: Cognitive, Affective and Perceptive 47
4.1.3.1 Affective Reactions 48
4.1.3.2 Perceptive Reactions 49
4.1.3.3 Cognitive Reactions 49
4.1.4 Transformations on Action and Reaction 50
4.1.4.1 Deactivation: Objectivation and Descriptivization 50
4.1.4.2 De-agentialization: Eventuation, Existentialization, and Naturalization
53 4.1.4.3 Abstraction: Generalization and Distillation
55 4.1.4.4 Overdetermination: Symbolization and Inversion
57 4.1.5 Social Actions Attributed to US Alliances
60 4.1.5.1 Social Actions Attributed to US Alliances on USA Today
60 4.1.5.2 Social Actions Attributed to US Alliances on Tripoli Post
63
Arini Rusyda, 2014 A SOCIAL ACTION ANALYSIS OF NEWS ON 2011 WAR IN LIBYA: REPRESENTATION OF THE US
ALLIANCES ON ONLINE USA TODAY AND THE TRIPOLI POST Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
4.2 Discussions 69
4.2.1 Social Actors on online USA Today and Tripoli Post from Viewpoints of Social Actions
70 4.2.2 The Distributio
n of the US Alliance’s Social Actions and Their Transformations
73 4.2.3 The Tendency of Objectivation and Abstraction
on US Alliances 74
4.2.4 Media Discursive Strategy through Representation of US Alliances on USA Today and Tripoli Post:
Legalization on War 75
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
5.1 Conclusions 76
5.2 Suggestions 78
REFERENCES 79
APPENDICES
Arini Rusyda, 2014 A SOCIAL ACTION ANALYSIS OF NEWS ON 2011 WAR IN LIBYA: REPRESENTATION OF THE US
ALLIANCES ON ONLINE USA TODAY AND THE TRIPOLI POST Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
LIST OF TABLES
1. Table 2.1 Elements of Social Practices
19 2.
Table 3.3 The Initial Analysis 36
3. Table 4.1 Source articles taken from online USA Today
38 4.
Table 4.2 Source articles taken from online Tripoli Post 38
5. Table 4.3 Actions and reactions on USA Today’s articles
39 6.
Table 4.4 Actions and reactions on Tripoli Post’s articles 39
7. Table 4.5 Materializations and Semioticizations
on USA Today’s articles 41
8. Table 4.6 Materializations and Semioticizations
on Tripoli Post’s articles 41
9. Table 4.7 Transactive and Nontransactive Actions
on USA Today’s articles 43
10. Table 4.8 Transactive and Nontransactive Actions
on Tripoli Post’s articles 43
11. Table 4.9 Transactive Instrumental and Interactive Actions
on USA Today’s articles
45 12.
Table 4.10 Transactive Instrumental and Interactive Actions on USA
Today’s articles 46
13. Table 4.11 Affective Reactions on USA Today
and Tripoli Post’s articles 48
14. Table 4.12 Perceptive Reactions on USA Today
and Tripoli Post’s articles 49
15. Table 4.13 Cognitive Reactions on USA Today
and Tripoli Post’s articles 49
16. Table 4.14 Objectivations and Descriptivizations
Arini Rusyda, 2014 A SOCIAL ACTION ANALYSIS OF NEWS ON 2011 WAR IN LIBYA: REPRESENTATION OF THE US
ALLIANCES ON ONLINE USA TODAY AND THE TRIPOLI POST Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
on USA Today and Tripoli Post’s articles
51 17.
Table 4.15 Deagentializations on USA Today and Tripoli Post 55
18. Table 4.16 Generalizations and Distillations
on USA Today and Tripoli Post 56
19. Table 4.17 Symbolizations and Inversions
on USA Today and Tripoli Post 58
20. Table 4.18 Reactions Embedded to the US Alliances
on USA Today 61
21. Table 4.19 Materializations and Semioticizations
Embedded to the US Alliances on USA Today 61
22. Table 4.20 Transactive and Nontransactive Actions
Embedded to the US Alliances on USA Today 62
23. Table 4.21 Transactive Actions Represented to the
US Alliances’ Social Actions on USA Today 62
24. Table 4.22 Reactions Embedded to the US Alliances
on Tripoli Post 64
25. Table 4.23 Actions Embedded to the US Alliances
on Tripoli Post 64
26. Table 4.24 Transactive and Nontransactive Actions
Embedded to the US Alliances on Tripoli Post 65
27. Table 4.25 Transactive Actions Embedded to the
US Alliances on Tripoli Post 65
28. Table 4.26 Deactivation Represented to the US Alliances’
Social Actions 66
29. Table 4.27 Deagentialization Represented to the US Alliances’
Social Actions 68
30. Table 4.28 Abstraction Represented to the US Alliances’
Social Actions 68
31. Table 4.29 Overdetermination Represented to the US Alliances’
Social Actions 69
Arini Rusyda, 2014 A SOCIAL ACTION ANALYSIS OF NEWS ON 2011 WAR IN LIBYA: REPRESENTATION OF THE US
ALLIANCES ON ONLINE USA TODAY AND THE TRIPOLI POST Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
LIST OF FIGURES
1. Figure 2.1 Influence of discourse on practice
17 2.
Figure 2.2 Social Actions Network 21
3. Figure 3.1 Selected research corpus
32 4.
Figure 3.2 Detailed scheme on data analysis 34
5. Figure 4.1 Objectivation and its forms
51 6.
Figure 4.2 Constitutions of an action that can be abstracted through generalization
55 7.
Figure 4.3 Types of Social Action and Their Transformations on USA Today and Tripoli Post
59
Arini Rusyda, 2014 A SOCIAL ACTION ANALYSIS OF NEWS ON 2011 WAR IN LIBYA: REPRESENTATION OF THE US
ALLIANCES ON ONLINE USA TODAY AND THE TRIPOLI POST Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
