5.2 Suggestions
This  research  only  examines negative  equivalent  construction  „no‟  and
„not‟ syntactically and semantically by analyzing its syntactic features, scope and focus  of  negation,  entailments,  and  case  and  state  roles.  Thus,  there  will  be
another  opportunity  for  the  next  researchers  who  want  to  do  further  research  of this  topic  by  using  other  theories.  For  example
,  negative  „no‟  and  „not‟  can  be analyzed to examine the implication
of both „no‟ and „not‟ in study of pragmatics. For  instance,
A:  “would  you  come  to  the  concert  tonight?”  and  B:  “I  have  no money
.”. The implication of the no-construction is that B wants to emphasize that B could not come because B has no money at all emphasizing.   In addition, in
study  of  syntax  and  semantics,  negative  „no‟  and  „not‟  can  also  be  analyzed  in form  of  double  negation  construction  to  examine  their  different  intention.  For
instances, „If  I  had  no  eyes,  I  would  not  ask  for  life‟,  this  construction  shows
deeper  intenti on  rather  than  to  say  „  If  I  had  two  eyes,  I  would  ask  for  life‟.
Finally,  in  order  to  give  clear information  about  negative  „no‟  and  „not‟  in  the
sentence, the  next  researchers  can  analyze  the  distribution  of  „no‟  and  „not‟  in
other  construction  such  as  in  the  sentence  whether  it  is  simple,  compound,  or compound complex.
78
REFERENCES
Borjars,  Kersti  and  Kate  Burridge.  1986.  Introducing  English  Grammar.  New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Celce,  Marianne  and  Murcia  Diane  Larsen.  1999.  The  Grammar  Book.  Second Edition. USA: Thomson Publishing, Inc.
Djadjasudarma, T. Fatimah. 1993. Metode Linguistik. Bandung: Eresco. Goddard, Cliff. 1998. Semantic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to The Grammar of English. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press. Larson,  Mildred  L.  1984.  Meaning  Based  Translation:  A  Guide  to  Cross-
Language Equivalent. USA: University Press of America. Quirk,  Randolph,  et  al.  1985.  A  Comprehensive  Grammar  of  The  English
Language. Fifth impression. London: Longman Group Limited. -------  1999.  Longman  Grammar  of  English  and  Written  English.  Edinburg:
Pearson Education Limited. Rakhmania, Ria. 2011. A Comparison Between English and Indonesian Negation
Marker. Bandung: Universitas Gunadharma. Soeria,  Soemantri  Ypsi.  2011.  Struktur  Kalimat  Negatif  dalam  Bahasa  Inggris.
Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran. Thomas, Linda. 1991. Beginning Syntax. Cambridge: Blackwell Publisher
Yule,  George  2006.  The  Study  of  Language.  3rd  ed.  Cambridge:  Cambridge
University Press.
86
CURRICULUM VITAE
1. Personal Identity
a. Name
: Ima
b. Place and Date of Birth
: Jakarta, February 1989
c. Home Address
: Jl. Raya Cipatik km 3, Soreang- Bandung
40951 d.
Phone
: 083820452005
e. Sex
: Female
f. Citizenship
: Indonesian
g. Religion
: Moslem
h. E-mail
:wayangmiripakuyahoo.com
2. Educational Background
2.1 Formal Education
No Year
Institution
1 1993- 1994
TK Gajah Jakarta 2
1994 - 2000 SDN KOPO I
3 2000
– 2003 SLTP Negeri 2 Soreang
4 2003 - 2006
SMU Negeri 1 Soreang
5 2007 - 2012
English Department Indonesia University  of Computer