Adjective to adjective derivation. The fifth most frequent errors is Adjective to adverb derivation. The sixth most frequent error happened Verb to adjective derivation. The following table is the table of error

The other prefixes are de- with 18 errors or 3.68, dis- with 12.3 or 6 errors, and prefix mis- with 12 errors or it equals to 2.45. The table for this explanation is shown as follow. Table 5 The Frequency of Error in Verb to Verb Derivation Category Affixation Test Number Frequency of Error Percentage Verb to Verb Derivation mis- 37 12 2.45 de- 18 18 3.68 dis- 16 6 12.3 un- 27 7 1.43 pre- 31 20 4.09 Total 63

12.9 Noun to Noun Derivation. The table below showed the frequency of

errors in Noun to Noun Derivation. Based on the table, the most frequent errors happened to prefix un- with 21 times or it equals to 4.3. While, derivational suffix -ship and prefix dis- are equal with 9 errors or 1.8. The other derivational suffixes are –ism with 12 errors or it is equal to 2.5 and 1.6 of derivational suffix –ity or it is equal to 8 errors. Table 6 The Frequency of Error in Noun to Noun Derivation Category Affixation Test Number Frequency of Error Percentage Noun to Noun Derivation un- 8 21 4.3 dis- 15 9 1.8 -ship 13 9 1.8 -ism 28 12 2.5 -ity 21 8 1.6 Total 59

12.1 Adjective to adjective derivation. The fifth most frequent errors is

Adjective to Adjective Derivation. There are 14 errors or it is equal to 2.9 from prefix in-, 3.5 of error or it is the same as 17 errors from prefix dis-, 12 errors or 2.5 from prefix im-, 6 errors or 1.2 from prefix il-, and from prefix un- 4 times or 0.8. Then, the total of error is 53 errors or equal to 10.8 as written on the table. Table 7 The Frequency of Error in Adjective to Adjective Derivation Category Affixation Test Number Frequency of Error Percentage Adjective to Adjective Derivation im- 9 12 2.5 un- 38 4 0.8 dis- 44 17 3.5 in- 41 14 2.9 il- 11 6 1.2 Total 53

10.8 Adjective to adverb derivation. The sixth most frequent error happened

to Adjective Adverb Derivation. Each number has almost the same frequencies. The total of error is 50 errors or it is equal to 10.2 only from one derivational suffix –ly. Each item has different error frequency as written on the table below. Table 8 The Frequency of Error in Adjective to Adverb Derivation Category Affixation Test Number Frequency of Error Percentage Adjective to Adverb Derivation -ly 14 8 1.6 -ly 7 9 1.8 -ly 43 13 2.7 -ly 34 10 2 -ly 29 10 2 Total 50

10.2 Verb to adjective derivation. The following table is the table of error

frequency on Verb to Adjective Derivation. There are 14 errors or it equals to 2.9 from derivational suffix –able, 0.4 or it equals to 2 errors from derivational suffix –ive, 17 errors or 3.5 happened to suffix –y, 3 errors or 0.6 occurred on other derivational suffix –able, and on other derivational suffix –ive 8 times or it equals to 1.6. Then, the total of the errors are 44 errors or equal to 9. Table 9 The Frequency of Error in Verb to Adjective Derivation Category Affixation Test Number Frequency of Error Percentage Verb to Adjective Derivation -able 4 14 2.9 -ive 12 2 0.4 -y 17 17 3.5 -able 45 3 0.6 -ive 47 8 1.6 Total 44 9 Noun to verb derivation. The eight most frequent errors is Noun to Noun Derivation and the error frequency is written on the following table. There are nine errors on derivational suffix –en or it is equal to 1.8, 7 errors or 1.4 happened to prefix en- and derivational suffix –ify, 2 errors or 0.4 occurred on derivational suffix –ize, and 3 errors from derivational suffix –ate. The accumulation of the error frequency on Noun to Verb Derivation is 28 errors or 5.7. The data is showed on the following table. Table 10 The Frequency of Error in Noun to Verb Derivation Category Affixation Test Number Frequency of Error Percentage Noun to Verb Derivation -ize 2 2 0.4 en- 26 7 1.4 -en 36 9 1.8 -ify 33 7 1.4 -ate 23 3 0.6 Total 28

5.7 Verb to noun derivation. The second least frequent error is from Verb to

Dokumen yang terkait

ORAL ASSESSMENTS AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA

0 4 10

ERROR ANALYSIS IN THE USE OF PASSIVE VOICE AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA BATCH 2012

0 4 142

AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON THE USE OF CONJUNCTION IN STUDENTS’ WRITING AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA

2 11 149

Error Analysis on the Use of In, At, On in the Writings of Students of English Education Department Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Batch 2015

0 14 221

Students’ Attitude on the Implementation of the Presentation Technique at the English Education Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

0 3 76

THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF AUTHENTIC MATERIALS IN WRITING CLASS AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA

0 3 74

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF GROUP DISCUSSION IN IMPROVING COMMUNICATION SKILL AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (EED) OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA

0 5 94

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE USE OF SONG LYRICS IN LEARNING ENGLISH AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA

0 3 59

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE USE OF SONG LYRICS IN LEARNING ENGLISH AT ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA

0 4 59

AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF WRITING OF THE FIRST SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT An Error Analysis Of Writing Of The First Semester Students Of English Education Department In Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta In 2011/2012 Academic Year.

0 0 10