The Scope of the Study The Significances of the Study

64 REFERENCES . Alboghobeish, A. K. Sedghi H. 2014. Information Structure in Arabic Research Article Abstract. International Journal of English and Education, vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 2278- 4012. Anwar, R. 1991. Bahasa Jurnalistik dan Komposisi. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita. Beaugrande, R. De and Dressler, W. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. Bamforth, R. 1992. ‘Process Versus Genre: Anatomy of a False Dichotomy’. Prospect, 81: 89-99. Bhatia, V.K. 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman. Bloor, T. Bloor, M. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English: A Halidayyan Approach, London: Arnold. Bloor, T. Bloor, M. 1997: The Functional Analysis of English . London: Arnold. Christie, F. 1985. Language Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Daňes F. 1974: “Functional sentence perspective and the organisation of the text”, in F.Daneš ed, Papers on functional sentence perspective, Mouton : La Hague, 106- 128. Denzin, N.K. Lincoln, Y.S. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Eggins, S. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics 2 nd ed.. New York: Continuum. Eiler, M. 1986. Thematic Distribution as a Heuristic for Written Discourse function. In B. Couture ed.. Emery, M. Edwin, E, Nancy, L. R. 2000. The Press and America. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Enkvist, N.E. 1974. “Theme Dynamics and Style: an Experiment.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 5: 127-135. Folkerts, J Dwight, L. 2002. Voices of a Nation. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Francis, G. 1989. “Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse.” Word 40, 201-221. Francis, G. 1990. `Theme in the Daily Press. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 4: 51-87. Gerot, L Wignell, P. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler. Ghadessy, M. 1995. Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres. In M. Ghadessy Ed., Thematic development in English text. pp. 129 –126. Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Second Edition. London: Edward Arnold. Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third Edition. London: Edward Arnold. Hamka, 2009. Theme and Rheme in Children’s song Textbook: Getting Started in English. Unpublished Thesis, English Applied Linguistics Study Program. Medan: Postgraduate Program, State University of Medan. Hatim, B. and Mason, I. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman Hawes, T. S. Thomas. 1997. “Problems of thematization in student writing.” RELC Journal 28:35, 35-54. Hawes, T. 2010. Thematic Progression and Rhetoric in Sun and Times Editorials: 1991- 2008. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 2, Spring. Hornby, E. 2001. Learner’s Dictionary. London: Longman. Jing, W. 2015. Theme and Thematic Progression in English Writing Teaching. Journal of Practice. Vol. 6, No. 21, 2015. Kenez, P. 1985. The Birth of the Propaganda State: Soviet Methods of mass Mobilization, 1917-1929. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University. Khedri, M. Ebrahimi S. F. 2012. The Flow of Information in English and Persian Academic Text. Journal of Language teaching and Research, Vol. 3 No. 6, pp. 1175-1179. Marfuaty, F. A. 2015. An Analysis of Thematic Progression Patterns: Opinion Section Texts of The Jakarta Post. Martin, J. R. 1993. `Technicality and Abstraction: Language for the Creation of Specialized Texts. In M.A.K. Halliday J. R. Martin Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: The Falmer Press: 203-220. Mauranen, A. 1993. ‘Theme and Prospection in Written Discourse’. In M. Baker, G.