RESULT AND DISCUSSION 51 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 70

2.1.8. Learning Theory Support 30 2.1.8.1. Learning Theory Support by Vygotsky 30 2.1.8.2. Learning Theory Support by Brunner 31 2.2. Conceptual Framework 33 2.3. Action Hypothesis 35 CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 36 3.1. Location and Time of Research 36 3.2. Population and Sample of Research 36 3.3. Variable of Research 36 3.3.1. Independent Variable 37 3.3.2. Dependent Variable 37 3.4. Type and Design of Research 37 3.5. Procedure of Research 37 3.6. Instrument of Research 40 3.6.1. Initial Test 40 3.6.2. Observation Sheet 40 3.6.3. Test of Mathematical Representation Ability of Students 40 3.6.3.1. Validity of Test 43 3.6.3.2. Reliability of Test 45 3.7. Data Analysis Technique 46 3.7.1 Observation Sheet 46 3.7.2 Normalized Gain N- Gain 47 3.7.3 Normality Test 48 3.7.4 Homogenous Test 48 3.7.5 Hypotheses Test 49

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION 51

4.1. Result of Research 4.1.1. The Description of Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability 51 4.1.2. Analysis of Research Data 56 4.1.2.1. Normality Test 56 4.1.2.2. Homogeneity Test 59 4.1.2.3. Compare Means Test One Tailed 61 4.1.2.4. Analysis of Observation Sheet 64 4.2. Discussion of Research 66 4.2.1. Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability 66 4.2.2. The Learning Process which Support Research Result 68

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 70

5.1 Conclusion 70 5.2 Suggestion 70 REFFERENCE 71 APPENDICES 74 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 2.1. Indicator of Mathematical Representation Ability Table 2.2. The Syntaxes of Cooperative Learning 17 20 Table 2.3. Award Criteria Group 24 Table 2.4. The Comparison Between Cooperative Learning type Teams Games Tournament and Conventional Learning 24 Table 2.5 The Syntaxes of Conventional Learning Table 2.6. The Comparison between Cooperative Learning Model Type Teams Games Tournament and Conventional Learning 28 29 Table 3.1 The Blueprint of Mathematical Representation Ability Problem 41 Table 3.2. The Rubric of Mathematical Representation Ability Problem 42 Table 3.3. Classification of Validity Interpretation 44 Table 3.4. Validity Testing of Each Instrument test Pretest 44 Table 3.5. Validity Testing of Each Instrument Test Posttest 45 Table 3.6. Classification of Reability Interpretation Table 3.7 Criteria of Observation Sheet Table 3.8. Criteria of Gain Index Table 4.1 Pretest of Mathematical Representation Ability Table 4.2 Posttest of Mathematical Representation Ability Table 4.3 N-Gain of Mathematical Representation Ability Table 4.4 The Result of Normality Test For Pretest Table 4.5 The Result of Normality Test For Posttest Table 4.6 The Result of Normality Test For N-Gain Table 4.7 The Result of Homogeneity Test For Pretest Table 4.8 The Result of Homogeneity Test For Posttest Table 4.9 The Result of Homogeneity Test For N-Gain Table 5.0 The Result of Hypothesis Test for Posttest Table 5.1. The Result of Hypothesis Test for N-Gain Table 5.2. The Observation Results of Teacher Activity in Classroom Table 5.3. The Observation Results of Students Activity in Classroom 46 47 48 52 53 53 57 57 58 59 60 60 62 63 64 65 ix LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1. Observation Result of Student’s Answer Number One 5 Figure 1.2. Observation Result of Student’s Answer Number Two 5 Figure 1.3. Observation Result of Student’s Answer Number Three 6 Figure 2.1. The Relationship between Internal and External Representation in Developing Child’s Understanding of the Concept of Numeracy Figure 2.2. Placement of Table Tournament Figure 2.2. The Relationship between Teams Games Tournament and Student’s Mathematical Representation Ability Figure 3.1. Procedure of Research Figure 4.1. The Diagram of Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability Pretest Figure 4.2. The Diagram of Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability Posttest Figure 4.3. The Diagram of Students’ Mathematical Representation Ability N-Gain 15 23 26 39 54 55 55 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 The Blueprint of Mathematical Representation Ability Initial Test 74 Appendix 2 Initial Test of Mathematical Representation Ability 75 Appendix 3 Alternative Solution of Mathematical Representation Ability 77 Appendix 4 Lesson Plan of Experiment Class Meeting 1 79 Appendix 5 Lesson Plan of Experiment Class Meeting 2 89 Appendix 6 Lesson Plan of Experiment Class Meeting 3 97 Appendix 7 Student Activity Sheet Meeting 1 104 Appendix 8 Student Activity Sheet Meeting 2 110 Appendix 9 Student Activity Sheet Meeting 3 121 Appendix 10 Problem of Games Tournament Meeting 1 128 Appendix 11 Problem of Games Tournament Meeting 2 132 Appendix 12 Problem of Games Tournament Meeting 3 138 Appendix 13 Lesson Plan of Control Class 1 143 Appendix 14 Lesson Plan of Control Class 2 147 Appendix 15 Lesson Plan of Control Class 3 151 Appendix 16 Blueprint of Research Instrument 155 Appendix 17 Mathematical Representation Ability Test Pretest 156 Appendix 18 The Alternative Solution of Mathematical Representation Ability Test Pretest 159 Appendix 19 Mathematical Representation Ability Test Posttest 163 Appendix 20 The Alternative Solution of Mathematical Representation Ability Test Posttest 166 Appendix 21 Scoring Guideline of Mathematical Representation Ability Test 170 Appendix 22 Data Distribution of Experiment Class 172 Appendix 23 Data Distribution of Control Class 173 Appendix 24 N-Gain Criteria of Experiment Class 174 Appendix 25 N-Gain Criteria of Control Class 175 Appendix 26 Validity Test Pretest 176 Appendix 27 Reliability Test Pretest 181 Appendix 28 Validity Test Posttest 183 Appendix 29 Reliability Test Posttest 188 Appendix 30 Normality Test 190 Appendix 31 Homogeneity Test 193 Appendix 32 Hypothesis Test 196 Appendix 33 The Value of r-Product Moment 201 Appendix 34 Table of Critical Value in Kolmogorov – Smirnov Test 202 Appendix 35 The Value of t-Distribution 203 Appendix 36 Research Documentation Appendix 37 Requirement Letters 204 215

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

Dokumen yang terkait

APPLYING JIGSAW II ACTIVITY IN COOPERATIVE LANGUAGE LEARNING TO IMPROVE THE ABILITY OF THE GRADE VIII C STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 PUGER JEMBER IN A WRITING NARRATIVE PARAGRAPH IN THE 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 2 15

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF COMMUNICATIVE STRUCTURE TEACHING AND LEARNING BY USING STRUCTURAL GAMES IN THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 12 JEMBER IN THE 2007/2008 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 3 1

IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF COMMUNICATIVE STRUCTURE TEACHING AND LEARNING BY USING STRUCTURAL GAMES IN THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 12 JEMBER IN THE 2007/2008 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 6 6

IMPROVING THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ TENSE ACHIEVEMENT BY USING TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) TECHNIQUE AT SMPN 1 MANGARAN IN THE 2012-2013 ACADEMIC YEAR

0 6 17

THE IMPROVEMENT OF STUDENT’S VOCABULARY MASTERY INTO COOPERATIVE LEARNING TYPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT IN SMP AL KAUTSAR BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 16 61

ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION ABILITY BY USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING TALKING STICK TYPE

0 0 12

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL ACHIEVEMENT BY USING GUIDED-DISCOVERY AND COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL JIGSAW TYPE

0 0 10

IMPROVING READING ABILITY OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMA MUHAMMADIYAH KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20112012 BY USING PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH)

0 0 18

THE READING ABILITY OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 5 KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 TAUGHT BY USING PQ4R STRATEGY

0 0 17

THE SPEAKING ABILITY OF THE FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SD N 05 CENDONO KUDUS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20112012 TAUGHT BY USING CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING By INNAYATI NIM 200832263

0 0 21