2 The concept of Speaking

5. Comprehension

Comprehension is the ability of understanding the speakers’ intention and general meaning Heaton, 1991. It implies that if someone can express or respond well and correctly, heshe comprehends well. According to Brown 2008, there are several types of classroom speaking performance which are explained as follows:

1. Imitative

A very limited portion of classroom speaking time may legitimately be spent generating “human tape recorder” speech, for example, learners practice an intonation contour or try to pinpoint a certain vowel sound. Imitation of this kind is carried out not for the purpose of meaningful interaction but, for focusing on some particular element of language form.

2. Intensive

Intensive speaking goes to one-step beyond imitative to include any speaking performance that is designed to practice some phonological or grammatical aspect of language. Intensive speaking can be self-initiated or it can even form part of some pair work activity, where learners are “going over” certain forms of language.

3. Responsive

A good dealt of student speech in the classroom is responsive short applies to teacher or students initiated questions or comments. These replies are usually sufficient and do not extend into dialogues. Such speech can be meaningful and authentic.

4. Transactional dialogue

Transactional dialogue, that is carried out for the purpose of conveying or exchanging specific information is an extended form of responsive language. Conversation, for example, may have more of a negotiate nature to them than does responsive speech.

5. Interpersonal dialogue

Interpersonal dialogue is carried out more for maintaining social relationship than for the transmission of facts and information. The conversation is pretty trickier for learners because they can involve some or all of the following factors: • A casual register • Colloquial language • Emotionally charge language • Slang • Ellipsis • Sarcasm • A covert “agenda”

6. Extensive monologue

Students who are at intermediate to advanced level are called on to give extended monologues in the form of oral reports, summaries, or probably short speeches. In this, the register is more formal and deliberative. This monologue can be planed or impromptu. From the explanation above, the researcher assumed that speaking is a process of building and sharing meaning, in which thought and knowledge are used to express what people would deliver and communicate in different situations. In speaking, there are several aspects that must be dealt with and it could be reference to assess the speaking activity. Some types of speaking activity are also illustrated. In this research, the researcher will use story telling with serial picture to improve students’ speaking ability.

2. 3 Teaching Speaking

While speaking means to make use of words in an ordinary voice, so teaching speaking is giving instruction to a person in order to communicate Hornby, 1995. Teaching speaking means giving opportunity to learners to enable themselves understood. Harmer 2001 says that there are three main reasons to make students speak in the classroom. Firstly, speaking activities provide rehearsal opportunities to practice real-life speaking in the classroom. It means that the teacher provides

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SDN 6 METRO PUSAT KOTA METRO

0 8 37

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION AT THE THIRD YEAR OF SD N 6 METRO PUSAT

0 5 8

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH ROLE PLAY AND THOSE THROUGH JIGSAW TECHNIQUES

1 13 64

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THE STUDENTS’ WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH DIRECT METHOD AND THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH SILENT WAY AT THE FOURTH YEAR OF SDN 1 PISANG PENENGAHAN LAMPUNG SELATAN

4 20 53

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS READING ACHIEVMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA'ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 8 46

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

0 10 61

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY BETWEEN STUDENTS WHO ARE TAUGHT USING STORY TELLING AND THOSE THROUGH ROLE PLAYING ACTIVITY AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF THE FIRST SEMESTER OF MA AL-HIKMAH BANDAR LAMPUNG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2017/2018 - Ra

0 0 114