– 2 3 – 8 – Chapter 24 case studies in project program and organizational project management

xxi The Principles of Management EQUIFINALITY Equifinality, a term from systems science, refers to the principle through which multiple means different inputs and processes may lead to a same end in open systems. CONTINGENCY Contingency, in management terms, refers to one of several approaches one might take in dealing with a condition, situation, or set of circumstances involv- ing uncertainty. In other words, after examining alternatives to find the most appropriate solution, another possible solution might be considered if the first one doesn’t work out a “Plan B,” so to speak. xxii Acknowledgments To complete the book, we owe gratitude to many people. First, we’d like to thank our co-authors who helped us in writing a number of the outstanding cases or provided many valuable inputs for the case write-ups. These people are: Abdi Mousar, Andrea Hayes-Martinelli, Art Cabanban, Bjoern Bierl, Diane Yates, Don Hallum, Ferra Weyhuni, James M. Waddell, James Schneidmuller, James Staffan, Joakim Lillieskold, Joseph Genduso, Jovana Riddle, Lars Taxen, Mani Amabalan, Marie-Anne Lamb, Mathius Sunardi, Meghana Rao, Michael Adams, Murugappan Chettiar, Nicolas Charpenel, Osman Osman, Priya Venugopal, Rabah Kamis, Russ J. Martinelli, Stevan Jovanovic, Sung Han, and Wilson Clark Our sincere thanks to many of our colleagues, co-workers, and previous organizations or those we have been involved with in the past for the knowledge and information we gained and used for this book. Finally, we are deeply grateful to our institutions, namely the Department of Engineering and Technology Management Portland State University, USA, Wesley J. Howe School of Technology Management Stevens Institute of Technology, USA, and Sasin GIBA of Chulalongkorn University Thailand for their support and environment, which enabled us to complete this book. 1 Part I CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT WHAT IS PROJECT MANAGEMENT? It is well recognized that project management has been practiced since early civilization. The evidences from past history to the present are abundant: the construction of the Great Pyramids of Giza in the ancient world, the Great Wall of China construction in the 16th century, and the London Millennium Bridge in the globalization era. Without project management, these structures would not have existed. With a competitive business environment, many organizations nowadays use projects not only to build structures, to implement changes, or to introduce new products, but also as a way to put strategies into action. Despite multiple meanings of a project, the one defined by Project Management Institute PMI is perhaps the most widely known definition. According to PMI, a project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result. 1 With its tem- porary nature, a project is often perceived as standing on the opposite spectrum of business as usual; it is often referred to as an “ operation ” by project manage- ment scholars. As projects differ from operations, managing projects therefore 1 A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge , 4th ed., Project Management Institute, 2008, p. 5. 2 CASE STUDIES requires a discipline 2 of planning, organizing, and managing resources to bring about the successful completion of specific goals and objectives. This discipline is referred to as project management . The discipline of project management has evolved from different fields of application. The work of Frederick Winslow Taylor on theories of scientific management is considered to be the foundation of project management tools, such as the Work Breakdown Structure. The Gantt chart, developed by Henry Gantt, is recognized as a forefather of project management planning and control techniques. And the work of Henri Fayol on management functions is the founda- tion of project and program management body of knowledge. However, it wasn ’ t until the middle of the 20th century that project manage- ment was recognized as a formal discipline 3 ; emerging from the construction of the first atomic bomb during World War II the project known as the Manhattan Project. Since then, more and more new processes and disciplines have emerged that support the use of project management, including Time Quality Management TQM in 1985, concurrent engineering in 1990, and reengineering in 1993, just to name a few. As a result, more and more project management tools and tech- niques have emerged, including the Critical Path Method CPM and Program Evaluation and Review Technique PERT in the 1950s, and the Critical Chain Project Management in 1997. As the discipline of project management has grown, the standards governing the field have also evolved. While each organization practicing project manage- ment may develop its own criteria, several national and international organizations have proposed project management standards. These standards are, for example, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge PMBOK ® Guide from the Project Management Institute in the United States and PRINCE2: 2009 Refresh PRoject IN Controlled Environment from the Office of Government Commerce in the UK. Among these standards, the PMBOK Guide receives strong recognition from project management communities. The PMBOK Guide suggests nine knowledge areas of project manage- ment: integration management, scope management, time management, cost management, quality management, human resource management, communi- cation management, risk management, and procurement management. These knowledge areas are used as skeletons for organizing case studies in Part I. 2 David I. Cleland and Roland Gareis, Global Project Management Handbook , McGraw - Hill Professional, 2006. 3 Aaron J. Shenhar and Dov Dvir, Reinventing Project Management: The Adaptive Diamond Approach , Harvard Business School Press, 2007. 3

Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION

Chapter 1 presents examples of organizations that have recognized the impor- tance of projects as an engine of their growth or a survival mechanism during economic turbulence. Various efforts of these organizations in response to the need for project management, therefore, were initiated. In this chapter, there are six case studies: five critical incidents and one issue - based case. The cases generally discuss a number of concepts e.g., organi- zational structures, that can be found in Chapters 1 Introduction and 2 Project Life Cycle and Organization of A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge the PMBOK ® Guide . 1. AaronSide Goes to Teams 2. Cocable Inc. 3. A RobustArm Global Industries ’ SledgeHammer 4. Another Trojan Horse 5. Call a Truck 6. The Project Hand - off Method These cases demonstrate different situations where companies made the transition from non - project - oriented organizations to project - oriented ones. To capture the transition efforts from multiple views and settings, we offer cases from different industries: “ AaronSide Goes to Teams ” is in the metal machining industry; “ Cocable Inc. ” is in cable manufacturing business; “ A RobustArm Global Industries ’ SledgeHammer ” providesbuilding materials; “ Another Trojan Horse ” 4 CASE STUDIES is in the nuclear industry; “ Call a Truck ” offers shipping and transportation services; and “ The Project Hand - off Method ” is from the field of medical equip- ment manufacturing. CHAPTER SUMMARY Name of Case Area Supported By Case Case Type Author of Case AaronSide Goes to Teams Project Management Organization Functional vs. Matrix Structure Critical Incident Dragan Z. Milosevic, Peerasit Patanakul, and Sabin Srivannaboon Cocable Inc. Project Management Organization Training by Doing Critical Incident Jovana Riddle A RobustArm Global Industries ’ Sledgehammer Project Management Organization Standardized Project Management Critical Incident Dragan Z. Milosevic, Peerasit Patanakul, and Sabin Srivannaboon Another Trojan Horse Project Management Organization Training Issue - based Case Stevan Jovanovic Call a Truck Project Management Organization Matrix Structure Critical Incident Dragan Z. Milosevic, Peerasit Patanakul, and Sabin Srivannaboon The Project Hand - off Method Project Management Process Critical Incident Dragan Z. Milosevic, Russ J. Martinelli, and James M. Waddell