eligible to be a corpus for this research because the corpus shows how the two people, which one is a senior journalist and the other one is a prime minister, find
their ways to be polite in this interview. As a senior journalist, Desi Anwar has to look for information about the
bilateral relations between Indonesia and the Netherlands. She will ask the question politely because the lack of power makes her to do so. On the other hand,
Mark Rutte as the Prime Minister will speak to Desi Anwar without considering any language rules. He has freedom when giving his statements. In this interview,
their ways to find appropriate utterances are interesting to be analyzed within this analitical research.
Based on this background, the writer is interested in conducting this research in order to know how Desi Anwar and Mark Rutte use linguistic
politeness to save each other‟s face as public figures. The writer is also interested
in finding out how imposition, social distance, and power play role in employing their linguistic politeness. Interestingly, there are probabilities that Desi Anwar
and Mark Rutte perform linguistic politeness are different from each other in a way that cannot be easily described without a linguistic approach.
B. Focus of the Study
This research focuses on the implementation of positive and negative politeness strategies to save
hearer‟s face based on Brown and Levinson‟s politeness theory in an interview between Desi Anwar and Mark Rutte. As a
limitation, the writer only analyzes the data which includes face-threatening act and face-saving act.
C. Research Questions
According to the background of the study, the writer formulates the research questions as follows:
1. What kinds of positive and negative politeness strategies are used by
Desi Anwar and Mark Rutte? 2.
Why do Desi Anwar and Mark Rutte use those positive and negative politeness strategies?
D. Objectives of the Study
The research objectives are: 1.
To find out what the types of positive and negative politeness strategies are used by Desi Anwar and Mark Rutte.
2. To analyze the factor that influences Desi Anwar and Mark Rutte in
choosing the positive and negative politeness strategies.
E. Significances of the Study
The result of the research is expected to give contributions as follows: 1.
The research is expected to give a practical contribution for other students that concern with pragmatics, as a reliable reference to learn
about politeness.
2. It is expected that the study is to give the readers and the writer more
knowledge about politeness and face threatening act FTA. 3.
It is expected that the study can trigger deeper analysis for further research.
F. Research Methodology
1. Method of the Research
In this research, the writer uses a qualitative method. A research with qualitative method employs observation, textual analysis, interview, and the
recording and transcribing of speech.
11
A qualitative method used to answer research questions in rich description and in-depth information in the analysis.
2. Technique of Data Analysis
To analyze the data, the writer collects the data from the dialogue of the interview. The writer also conducts some specific steps. First, he watches the
video and its script. Second, he chooses the data for the analysis. Third, he analyzes the data descriptively. In analyzing the data, he tries finding face
threatening acts and face saving acts. 3.
Research Instrument The instrument of the research is the writer himself as it is out of question to
analyze the data directly without interpretations from the researcher since the data are in a form of utterances. Furthermore, the writer is also the person who collects
and analyzes the data.
11
R. L. Trask and Peter Stockwell, Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts, 2
nd
edition, New York: Routledge, 2007, p. 240.
4. Unit of Analysis
The unit of analysis is an interview of Mark Rutte on Metro TV‟s Face 2 Face with Desi Anwar program that broadcasted on January 18, 2014.
7
CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
