Dependent Variable Descriptive Statistics

55

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND ANALYSIS

A. General Description of Research Object

This chapter presents and discusses the findings of the research. The population of this research is real estate business listed in IDX within period 2012-2014. The selection of sample is chosen by criteria of population that have explained in research methodology in previous chapter that is taken as annually in 2012-2014. In 2012-2014, Real estate business that go public in Indonesia Stock Exchange are 50 companies. This research is used purposive sampling. And from 50 companies, regarding on criteria of sampling in previous chapter, so the amount of sampling are 12 companies. This research will use pooling data method in which the variable will be tasted in three year, so the total sample are 36 samples of annual report. Companies that become the sample is the company that fulfill the criteria of the sample in this research: 56 Table 4.1 Sample Selection No. Criteria Number 1 Population real estate business 50 2 Real estate business that do not have institutional ownership 38 Total sample of companies 12 Total sample of annual report used in this Research 36 Source : Data Process Table 4.2 List of Companies Sample Source : Data Process No Company Code 1 Agung Podomoro Land Tbk. APLN 2 Bekasi Fajar Industrial Estate Tbk. BEST 3 Bukit Darmo Property Tbk. BKDP 4 Ciputra Development Tbk. CTRA 5 MNC Land Tbk. KPIG 6 Lamicitra Nusantara Tbk. LAMI 7 Indonesia Prima Property Tbk. OMRE 8 Pudjiati Prestige Tbk. PUDP 9 Pakuwon Jati Tbk. PWON 10 Rista Bintang Mahkota Sejati Tbk. RBMS 11 Roda Vivatex Tbk. RDTX 12 Summarecon Agung Tbk. SMRA 57

B. Analysis and Discussion

The data processing in this research is conducted by the statistical application. The application used for data processing in this research is SPSS 22.0 version.

1. Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive statistics provide an overview of the minimum value, maximum value, average value mean and standard deviation of the data used in the study. Table 4.3 Descriptive Statistics N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation EM 36 -,01 ,02 ,0009 ,00603 BOD 36 2,00 9,00 5,6111 2,34555 MO 36 ,01 56,70 8,6180 15,69764 IO 36 19,18 92,88 59,1797 22,77275 TobinsQ 36 ,24 2,97 1,1526 ,67146 Size 36 24,08 30,87 27,8583 1,95453 Valid N listwise 36 Source : Output SPSS 22.0 Based on table 4.1 above, the variables of research can be described as follows:

a. Dependent Variable

Variable TobinsQ has an average 1.1526. The minimum value is .24 the name of the company is PT Pudjiati Prestige Tbk. and the 58 maximum value is 2.97 that is PT Bekasi Fajar Industrial Estate Tbk., where as the standard deviation value is 0.67146.

b. Independent Variable

1 Earnings Management EM Variable earnings management has an average 0.0009. The minimum value is -0.1 that is PT Rista Bintang Mahkota Sejati Tbk and the maximum value is 0.02 that is PT Rista Bintang Mahkota Sejati Tbk., where as the standard deviation value is .00603. 2 Board of Director BOD Variable Board of Director as an average 5.6111. The minimum value is 2.00 that is PT Bumi Serpong Damai Tbk and the maximum value is 9.00 that is PT Agung Podomoro Land Tbk, PT Ciputra Development Tbk and PT Summarecon Agung Tbk, whereas the standard deviation value is 2.34555. 3 Managerial Ownership MO Variable Managerial Ownership has an average 8.6180. The minimum value is 0.01 that is PT Lamicitra Nusantara Tbk and the maximum value is 56.70 that is PT Rista Bintang Mahkota Sejati Tbk, whereas the standard deviation value is 15.69764. 59 4 Institutional Ownership IO Variable Institutional Ownership has an average .59.1797 The minimum value is 19.18 that is PT. Rista Bintang Mahkota Sejati Tbk and the maximum value is 92.88 that is PT Lamicitra Nusantara Tbk, whereas the standard deviation value is 22.77275. 5 Size of Company Variable size of company has an average 27.8583. The minimum value is 24.08 that is PT Rista Bintang Mahkota Tbk and the maximum value is 30.87 that is PT MNC Land Tbk, whereas the standard deviation value is 1.95453.

2. Classical Assumtion Test

a. The Result of Normality Test

Normality Data test aims to test whether the dependent variable and independent variables both have a normal distribution or not in the regression model. The statistical test that can be used to test whether the residuals are normally distributed non-parametric test statistic Kolmogorov-Smirnov KS by making hypotheses : H0: the data were normally distributed residuals Ha: the data not normally distributed residuals. 60 If the significance value greater than 0.05 then H0 is accepted and Ha rejected, otherwise if the significance value is less than 0.05 then H0 rejected and Ha accepted. The results of the normality data test using Kolmogorov-Smirnov KS can be shown in the following table: Table 4.4 One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Model 1 Unstandardized Residual N 36 Normal Parameters a,b Mean ,0000000 Std. Deviation ,38854437 Most Extreme Differences Absolute ,147 Positive ,147 Negative -,088 Test Statistic ,147 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed ,048 c Source : Output SPSS 22.0 Table 4.5 One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Model 2 Unstandardized Residual N 36 Normal Parameters a,b Mean ,0000000 Std. Deviation ,50789697 Most Extreme Differences Absolute ,123 Positive ,123 Negative -,065 Test Statistic ,123 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed ,182 c Source : Output SPSS 22.0 61 Table 4.6 One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Model 3 Unstandardized Residual N 123 Normal Parameters a,b Mean ,0000000 Std. Deviation ,09871739 Most Extreme Differences Absolute ,063 Positive ,040 Negative -,063 Test Statistic ,063 Asymp. Sig. 2-tailed ,200 c,d Source : Output SPSS 22.0 Based on the results of statistical tests with models such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov contained in table can be seen from the significance value of model 1 is 0.048, the significance value of model 2 is 0.182 and the significance value of model 3 is 0.200. In table model 1 the significance value is 0.048 that means that the data not normally distributed because less than 0.05. But refers to the assumption of the Central Limit Theorem Dielman 1961 in Ghozali which states that for a large sample, especially more than 30 distribution of samples considered close to the normal distribution, which means that even on the classic assumption test in the form of normality test indicates that there is data distribution is not normal but because observation of more than 30 then the data will still be considered normal, because the use of 12 companies with 36 observation of the sample. 62 Normally distributed data can also be viewed using a normal plot of the standardized residuals probably, the result is shown in Figure below: Figure 4.1 Model 1 Source : Output SPSS 22.0

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effect Of Firm Value And Profitability On Corporate Social Responsibility Of Telecommunication Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange

0 44 102

THE EFFECT OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE, AND GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON THE VALUE OF MINING COMPANIES LISTED IN INDONESIA STOCK EXCHANGE

0 2 81

The Influence Of Good Corporate Governance Implementation Towards The Firm Performance: The Study On Manufacturing Companies Listed In Malaysian Stock Exchange Period (2010-2014)

0 7 131

THE IMPMANA THE IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THROUGH REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION (Empirical study of Merchandising Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange).

0 5 14

INTRODUCTION THE IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THROUGH REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION (Empirical study of Merchandising Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange).

0 3 12

LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT THE IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THROUGH REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION (Empirical study of Merchandising Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange).

0 3 39

CONCLUSION AND LIMITATION THE IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THROUGH REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION (Empirical study of Merchandising Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange).

0 4 36

CONCLUSION AND LIMITATION THE IMPACT OF GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THROUGH REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION (Empirical study of Merchandising Companies Listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange).

0 2 8

THE EFFECTS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON DIVIDEND POLICY AND FIRM VALUE An Empirical Research at Banks Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for the Period of 2008-2012

0 0 19

Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital on Firm Value of Banking Sector Companies Listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange in Period 2008-2012

0 2 12