Benefits of Knowing Low and High-Frequency Words Relevant Previous Studies

7 Approach Assume Benefit Constitue Create Derive Environment Area Authority Concept Context Data Distribute Establish Off-list family words consist of proper nouns, unusual words, specialist vocabulary, acronyms, abbreviations, and misspelling Cobb, n.d.. Table 4 provides the examples of some Off-list words appearing in various articles. Table 4. Examples of the Off- list words Menken, 2010; Walinski, Kredens, Goźdź- Roszkowski, 2007; Laufer Ravenhorst-Kalovski, 2010 Appeal Biology Criticism Moscow Opposition Rebar Reference Richard Shish

6. Benefits of Knowing Low and High-Frequency Words

Laufer 1999 stated that classifying the high and low frequency words are principally required for educators, because it can be a useful help for them to know the current vocabulary development stages of the students. However, educators are usually found spending time on teaching the low-frequency words and the learners will get the minimal advantage from knowing them Laufer, 1999. Therefore, Nation 2014 suggests that learning the high frequency words will be well repaid because of the high chance of meeting and using them. Therefore, after knowing the distinction between high and low frequency words, the teacher could emphasize more on the most common words of academic vocabulary and design the exercises in which the students will be using the vocabulary. 8

7. Relevant Previous Studies

The previous study by Farjami 2014 using the vocabulary profiler was aimed to provide a specific detail about the vocabulary coverage in seven English textbooks used in Iranian context. The researcher excluded the marginal information such as the table of content, page numbers, and the index at the end of the book but included the metatextual information such as instructions and summaries to be analyzed. The result was presented in the form of table showing the numbers of the frequency profile of vocabulary in those seven textbooks. From the analysis, the researcher could notice that the lexical input containing high frequency and academic vocabulary in the material should be developed. Another study was conducted by Liontou 2015. VocabProfile 3.0 was used to examine the lexicogrammatical differences between intermediate and advanced reading comprehension tests in Greek. The program was utilized to analyze 135 texts and the result showed Fhigh differences between those two levels. The text in the intermediate level contained a higher proportion of unique words, whereas the advanced level is richer according to the lexical density. The two previous studies mentioned above utilized vocabulary profiler generated by Cobb. They described the representativeness of exposure to English in the texts analyzed. In addition, Farjami also investigated the word recycling index. C. THE STUDY This study was aimed to investigate the vocabulary profile of Academic Listening class material used by English Language Education Program in the Faculty of Language and Literature in Satya Wacana Christian University. The descriptive method was chosen for this 9 study because the result of the vocabulary profile reported will aspire to describe the word frequencies of the material.

1. Context of The Study