www.ccsenet.orgijbm International Journal of Business and Management
Vol. 11, No. 5; 2016
290
sound 1. Voice vehicle
2. Voice workshop practice
3. Voices from the field
16,17 18
19,20 Teacher performance Y
Source: Gintings 2010 Plan learning
1. Plan objectives 2. Planning for teaching materials
3. Planning methods 4. Planning ratings
1 2
3 4
Implement learning 1. Knowledge of learning theory
2. Skills technique Teach 3. Skills assess
5 6
7 8
assessing the results Learn 1. Assessment of illuminative
2. Assessment of structural 3. Evaluation of PBM
9-10 11
12 fostering and train learners
1. Guidance learning 2. Guidance intracurricular
3. Guidance extracurricular 13-14
15 16
Carrying out additional tasks 1. Carry out the duties structural
2. Carry out the duties Special 17
18 19
20 competency Z Source:
Afnil Guza 2005 knowledge
1. Knowledge creative 2. Innovative Knowledge
3. Knowledge of religion 1,2,3
4,5,6 7
skills 1. Communicate orally, in writing
2. The creative work 3. Develop yourself
8,9,10 11,12,13
14,15 attitude
1. Be competitive and sportive 2. Respect for religious diversity
3. Confident and responsibilities 16,17,18
19 20
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Calculation of Correlation Coefficient Calculation of the correlation coefficient using correlation analysis Pearson Product Moment, to find out how
strong the relationship between several independent variables studied. Calculation of the correlation coefficient using SPSS version 20, with the results as shown in Table 2 below:
Table 2. Correlation between variables
Correlations
teacher competency
Organizational culture
Work environment teacher
performance teacher
competency Pearson Correlation
1 ,589
,549 ,634
Sig. 2-tailed ,000
,000 ,000
Sum of Squares and Cross-products 27,438
18,958 14,921
17,643 Covariance ,184
,127 ,100
,118 N 150
150 150
150 Organizational
culture Pearson Correlation
,589 1
,653 ,862
Sig. 2-tailed ,000
,000 ,000
Sum of Squares and Cross-products 18,958
37,716 20,780
28,142 Covariance ,127
,253 ,139
,189 N 150
150 150
150 Work
environment Pearson Correlation
,549 ,653
1 ,781
Sig. 2-tailed ,000
,000 ,000
Sum of Squares and Cross-products 14,921
20,780 26,890
21,538 Covariance ,100
,139 ,180
,145 N 150
150 150
150 . Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed.
www.ccsen
From the t 1 The rela
obtained a that has a m
for signifi moderate l
2 The rela obtained a
table that correlation
a moderate
3 The rela a value of
the level significanc
correlation
3.2 Calcul The results
Table 3. L
Variable
Teacher com Organization
Work environ Source: Stati
Based on t variable X
coefficient each Indep
effect ind
The path d substructu
Equation s
0,634
net.orgijbm
table above int ationship betw
a value of 0.59 medium level
icance 0.000 level of correla
ationship betw a value of 0.54
has a medium n for significan
e level of corre ationship betw
0.653 is at the of a strong an
ce 0.000 0.01 n 0.653 with
lation of Path A s of path coeff
Line calculation
mpetence X
1
nal culture X
2
nment X
3
stical Calculation
the table abov X1 that is e
t of 0.586, and pendent variab
direct effect ca
diagram above ures path of uni
substructures p
0,653 0,589
Teache
Organiz
Work
Intern
terpretation cri ween the variab
98 is at the lev of relationship
0.01. The sta ation 0.598 w
ween the variab 49 is at the le
m level of rela nce 0.000 0.01
elation 0.549 ween organizati
e level of interp nd direct rela
. The stateme the working en
Analysis Path ficient calculat
n results
Results.
ve has describe equal to the l
d the work env ble on the dep
an be seen in th
Fig e, consists of
ity:
path of unity:
er Competency X1
zational Culture X2
k Environment X3
national Journal
iteria can be ex bles of teacher
vel of interpreta p and the direc
atement can b with the organi
bles of teacher evel of interpre
ationship and t . The statemen
with the work ional culture v
pretation betw ationship if th
ent can be int nvironment.
h Analysis tion using SPS
ed the results o lowest path co
vironment vari endent variabl
he following p
gure 4. Path an two sub-struct
Y = 0,11X1
0,592
0,331 0,114
l of Business and
291
xplained as fol r competence
ation between ction if its valu
be interpreted izations cultur
r competence etation betwee
the direction i nt can be interp
king environm variables X2
ween 0.60 to 0.7 he value is po
erpreted that
SS software ver
of the calculati oefficient 0.10
iables X3 pa le influence ei
picture:
nalysis diagram tures that form
0,59X2 + ε1 0
e1 =
r
2
= 0,836
Teacher Performa Y
d Management
llows: X1 with var
.40 to .599 on ue is positive. X
that the com re.
X1 with the w en 0.40 to 0.5
if its value is preted that the
ment. the work envi
799 on the cor ositive. X2 an
organizational
rsion 20 can be
Coefficient L
0,107 0,586
0,335
ion of the path 07, variable o
ath coefficient ither directly
m in overall m 2 lanes as t
0,33X3
0,03
0,844 ance
riable organiza n the correlatio
X1 and X2 sig mpetence of th
work environm 99 on the corr
positive. X1 competence o
ironment varia rrelation coeffi
d X3 signific l culture has a
e seen in Table
Line
h, where the tea organizational
of 0.335. As f Direct Effect
the following r
2
=
Competenc
Vol. 11, No. 5;
ational culture on coefficient
gnificant correl he teachers ha
ment variables rrelation coeffi
and X3 signif of the teachers
ables X3 obta icient table tha
ant correlation a strong degre
e 3 below:
achers compet culture X2
for the influen as well as ind
equation: Equ
e2 = 0,16
0,712
ce Of Graduates Z
2016
X2 table
ation ave a
X3 icient
ficant have
ained at has
n for ee of
tence path
nce of direct
uation
www.ccsenet.orgijbm International Journal of Business and Management
Vol. 11, No. 5; 2016
292
Z = 0,844Y + ε2
Based on Figure 4.1, above explained the flow of research results, which consist of the amount of correlation values, the value of each coefficient beta, the coefficient of determination R2 and the value epsilon.
As to know the effect of direct and indirect effect of variable X to Y, variable X to Z can be seen in the following table:
Table 4. Value direct and indirect influence
Variabel Direct influence
to Y Indirect Influence
Total Indirect Influence
Total Effect X1 X2 X3
X1 0,11 0,06
0,04 0,10 0,21
X2 0,59 0,06
0,19 0,25 0,84
X3 0,33 0,04 0,19
0,23 0,56
Total Effect X To Y 0,836
Total Effect Y To Z 0,712
4. Discussion Amount of Influence
