Discussion Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:A:Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment:Vol78.Issue3.May2000:

A. Diaz Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 78 2000 249–259 255 Table 5 Spearman Rank correlations r between species’ abundance cover and levels of rabbit incidence number of faecal pellets in 625 m 2 sites in each region a Fintray n = 40 sites Oyne n = 40 sites Dalcross n = 30 sites Species r P Species r P Species r P Aphanes arvensis + 0.66 0.001 Myosotis discolor + 0.73 0.001 Poa annua + 0.80 0.001 Bellis perennis + 0.66 0.001 Holcus lanatus + 0.67 0.001 Veronica officinalis + 0.76 0.001 Poa annua + 0.66 0.001 Cerastium fontanum + 0.67 0.001 Myosotis discolor + 0.75 0.001 Agrostis capillaris + 0.54 0.001 Trifolium repens + 0.62 0.001 Erophila verna + 0.70 0.001 Myosotis discolor + 0.54 0.001 Lolium perenne + 0.58 0.001 Aphanes arvensis + 0.69 0.001 Cerastium fontanum + 0.50 0.001 Cirsium arvense + 0.50 0.001 Capsella bursa-pastoris + 0.64 0.001 Trifolium dubium + 0.50 0.001 Veronica serpyllifolia + 0.47 0.002 Myosotis arvensis + 0.64 0.001 Senecio jacobaea + 0.48 0.002 Ranunculus repens + 0.45 0.004 Viola arvensis + 0.58 0.001 Sagina procumbens + 0.48 0.002 Bellis perennis + 0.36 0.024 Agrostis capillaris + 0.53 0.003 Veronica officinalis + 0.48 0.002 Cirsium vulgare + 0.33 0.037 Vicia sativa + 0.52 0.003 Viola tricolor + 0.41 0.009 Papaver rhoeas + 0.50 0.005 Trifolium repens + 0.38 0.015 Trifolium dubium + 0.49 0.005 Cirsium vulgare + 0.35 0.025 Geranium molle + 0.44 0.015 Rumex acetosa + 0.37 0.044 Senecio vulgaris + 0.36 0.049 Dactylis glomerata − 0.54 0.001 Elymus repens − 0.52 0.001 Dacylis glomerata − 0.76 0.001 Poa trivialis − 0.48 0.002 Holcus mollis − 0.48 0.002 Taraxacum officinale group − 0.72 0.001 Arrhenatherum elatius − 0.42 0.007 Poa trivialis − 0.56 0.001 Epilobium obscurum − 0.32 0.048 Chamaenerion angustifolium − 0.53 0.003 Ranunculus repens − 0.47 0.009 Geranium dissectum − 0.46 0.010 a Only species that occurred in at least 20 of the sites per region are shown. Only correlations of P 0.05 are shown. correlated to levels of rabbit incidence Table 5. Species that were significantly more abundant where rabbit incidence was higher tended to be low-growing forbs, e.g., Bellis perennis and Myoso- tis discolor, or species of disturbed ground, e.g., Papaver rhoeas and P. annua. By contrast, species whose abundance was negatively related to the inci- dence of rabbits were often taller-growing grasses e.g., Dactylis glomerata and Poa trivialis. 3.3. The relationship between plant palatability and sward composition The extent to which differences in sward compo- sition between grazed and ungrazed sites could be related to differences in plant palatability was inves- tigated for the 22 species in the palatability trials. Although the sites showed a range of incidence of rabbits and plant abundance Fig. 2, they were for the purpose of this analysis categorised as ‘grazed’ or ‘ungrazed’ based on whether they had more than 125 faecal pellets per 100 m 2 per week recorded on the site. The mean relative abundance of each plant species on ‘ungrazed’ and ‘grazed’ sites was calculated. A clear relationship emerged when the percent palatability of each plant species were plotted against the ratio of its mean relative abundance on ungrazed and grazed sites Fig. 3. Most very palatable species were seen to be far more abundant on ungrazed sites and most un- palatable species were more abundant on grazed sites.

4. Discussion

This study found a relationship between measured plant palatability to rabbits and the comparative abun- dance cover of these plant species in grazed and ungrazed swards. In general, the more palatable the species, the greater its relative cover in ungrazed swards compared to that in grazed swards. This rela- tionship was particularly strong for most of the highly palatable and highly unpalatable species. Given that strong positive correlations have been found between 256 A. Diaz Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 78 2000 249–259 Fig. 2. The relationship between the incidence of rabbits on each of the 110 sites studied measured as number of faecal pellets found and the abundance measured as cover of a palatable plant species Poa trivialis; an unpalatable species Myosotis discolor; a species of intermediate palatability Poa annua. Open triangles represent Poa trivialis. Crosses represent Myosotis discolor. Solid circles represent Poa annua. competitive ability and palatability for species in the Silwood grassland Crawley, 1990, this finding is con- sistent with the prediction of competitor release of unpalatable species when exposed to rabbit grazing Pacala and Crawley, 1992. The quite low levels of palatability found for P. annua and H. lanatus agree with previous work which suggests that, compared to other grasses, these are avoided by rabbits Fenton 1940 and Gillham 1955 for H. lanatus and Ham- bler et al. 1995 for P. annua. For other species with intermediate palatabilities, the relationship was weaker, perhaps because the direct effect of grazing is less important than other direct and indirect effects of rabbits. For example, P. annua is far more abun- dant in heavily grazed areas despite its intermediate palatability to rabbits. P. annua germinates more read- ily in light conditions on disturbed ground Grime et al., 1988 and the greater availability of favourable microsites for seed germination may explain some of its greater abundance in grazed swards. The two species for which predictions of abundance based on palatability data would have given the poorest fit to observed results were Rumex acetosella and F. rubra. R. acetosella was far more abundant on grazed sites, despite its apparently high palatability to rabbits. It is probable that its greater abundance in grazed swards is due to the indirect effect of competitor release as many of the other plant species on the fertile, ex-arable land studied can grow far taller than can R. acetosella. The palatability observed for F. rubra was lower than might be expected from accounts of it increasing cover in the absence of rabbits e.g., Gillham, 1955; Ran- well, 1960; Thomas, 1963; Crawley, 1990. It may be that the palatability data for F. rubra obtained in this A. Diaz Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 78 2000 249–259 257 Fig. 3. The relationship between a plant species’ palatability to rabbits and the ratio of its abundance cover in grazed and ungrazed sites. study is less reliable than for other species as the vari- ance of these data was relatively high. The precise interaction of factors which determines feeding preference for different plant species by rab- bits is unknown and may vary over time Chapuis and Forgeard, 1982. Roles have been suggested for tis- sue protein content Beaumont et al., 1933; Burton et al., 1964; Myers and Bults, 1977 and for chemical and physical defences Burton et al., 1964. Such de- fences may become more pronounced as the plant ages Beaumont et al., 1933; Burton et al., 1964. Also, it is known that tissue damage caused by rabbit grazing may induce the production of chemical defences, such as glucosinolates, in some species Macfarlane Smith et al., 1991. In this study, the plants in the field var- ied in age and included flowering adults. By contrast, those in the palatability trial were at a pre-flowering stage of development and had not been previously sub- jected to herbivore attack. However, despite all of these possible sources of variation, results from this study showed that, for most species growing in established set-aside grasslands, their relative plant abundance in grazed and ungrazed swards could be predicted from their performance in palatability trials. This suggests that palatability trials can offer a methodology that need not be limited in its validity to providing esti- mates of relative herbivory of field plants that are at a similar stage of growth as those in the palatability trial. In this study, the palatability of species was as- sessed by placing plants into heavily grazed swards, all of which were quite close to warrens. Although the species were found to differ greatly in their palatabil- ity, this method may produce a conservative estimate of differences in palatability. This is so because areas close to warrens have been found to be most grazed by rabbits when they first exit the warren Southern, 1940 when they are perhaps most hungry and least selective in their grazing. The relative palatability of plant species to rabbits was found to be consistent across a number of different rabbit populations and a 258 A. Diaz Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 78 2000 249–259 range of background vegetation types. There is con- siderable anecdotal evidence that suggests that some species are consistently ignored by rabbits if there is alternative food, e.g., Urtica dioica, Cirsium spp. and S. jacobaea, whilst others, including many grasses, appear to be consistently palatable reviewed in Tans- ley, 1949; Thompson and Worden, 1956; Thompson, 1994. Despite this, the degree of consistency found in this study could be considered as surprising as in- fluences on relative palatability have been detected in captive rabbits. These include pre-exposure to the plant species either directly or through maternal trans- mission Bilkó et al., 1994 and effects of specific plant species’ combinations when the palatability of a number of species is measured by offering only pairs of species at any one time Soane, 1980. It may be that pre-exposure also affects palatability in field con- ditions but that the range of plants eaten by the wild rabbits was so large that this effect was not sufficient to be detected in the present field study. Likewise, it may be that the palatability of a species was not greatly affected by the nature of its adjacent ‘back- ground’ species in this study because the rabbits were free ranging and had ample food sources.

5. Conclusions