AN ANALYSIS ON SUMMATIVE TEST CONSTRUCTEO BY THE ENGLISH TEACHER OF SMUN 1 WARU -PAMEKASAN IN THE 1999/2000 ACADEMIC YEAR
AN ANALYSIS ON SUMMATIVE TEST CONSTRUCTEO BY THE
ENGLISH TEACHER OF SMUN 1 WARU -PAMEKASAN
IN THE 1999/2000 ACADEMIC YEAR
THESIS
Prop()sed to Fulfill one of che i'equlremenu to Obtain the Decree or S-1 at
the ER1Iieh Educatlo• Pro1ram Lancuace and Area Department, Faculty of
Teacher Tralnln& and Educaclon. The Untverelty of Jember
s
;;l D
by :
Terima
t--o . lu rh... ;
ｾ＠
t
( C>.l. 33f
'11urul Jskan ar
NIM : 960210401054
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
THE UNIVERSITY OF JEMBER
JANUARY 2001
2lutl1 ﾷｾ
ＭＮｾ
7
/SK.
({ .
MOTTO:
ｌｾＣｬＭＦｫ＠
ｾｵ｡＠
(Proverb)
II
DEDICATION
This thesis is honorably dedicated to:
•!• My father (Sajcwt) and mother (Vuhltalus Z) who always encourage me in
finishing this study, and nothmg compared to your endless love for me:
LOVE YOU SO MUCH.
•:• My beloved brother (Eddy & Yayrmg) and sisters (Rrka & Virda), especially
my oldest sister (Mbak Ena): f DO LOVE YOU.
•:• My teachers
•:• My Almamater 1996 level, especially for Wiwin, lin, Etik, Mia,etc. Thank you
very much for your kindness !
•:• My everlasting friends of lite Endang, Dita, Tedy, Sufi',and Kurdi. You make
my life wonderful.
•:• Bang Hery, Tono, Huda and all m my boarding house thanks for your
kindness ofheautitul friondshir.
------>; ｾ＠
-
-. "e'
Ill
ｌｬＱＡ［ｾ＠
PER PUS T
L ' ' I \ I:..K ' • J ｬＧＮｾ＠
uu
Jl:./\. 1- Ll'.
1
l
CONSULTANTS' APPROVAL SHEET
AN ANALYSIS ON SUMMATIVn TEST CONSTRUCTED 11Y Till'
1-:NULISI-I TEACIIER OF SMUN I WARU- PAMii KASAN IN THE 199l)/2000
ACADEMIC YEAR
TilES IS
Proposed to Fulfill one of the Requirements to obtain the Degree ofS-1 at the
English education Program Language and Arts Department, Faculty of Teacher
Training and Education, The University of Jember
Name
: Nurul Iskandar
Identification Number : 96021040 I 054
Level
. 1996
Place and Date of Birth : Pamekasan I March 27' 1\ 1977
Department
: Language and Arts Education
Program
: English Education
Approved by:
Consultant n
Consultant I
asnim MA
Dra. Wiwiek Eko B, MPd
Nip. 131 660 789
Nip. 131 475 844
iv
APPROVAL SHEET
This thesis is approved and received by the examination Committee of the
Teacher Training and Education Faculty, the University of Jember
Day
: Saturday
Date
: January 27th, 2001
Place : Building I FKIP Jember University
Examiners,
iwick Eko B.. MPd
Nip.l31 475 844
The members:
Signature:\
(. ...... ｢Ｇｦｾｔ＠
1. Ora. Made Adi A, MEd
Nip. 13 I 832 325
2. Ora. Zakiyah Tasnim, MA
(.
Nip. 131 660 789
The Dean of
.,Hum
\'
ｾ
Ｍｾｊ
ｵ ｵＩ＠
ACKNO\VJ .. EI>GMENT
First of all, I would like to thank to Allah SWT, the Almighty, who has
given me blessing and mercies. Without this, I would not be able to accomplish
this thesis.
In addition, I would like to express my great gratitude to:
1. The Dean of the Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Jember University;
2. The Chairperson of Language and Ans Education Department of the Teacher
and Education Faculty;
3. The Chairperson of the English Education Program of The Teacher Training
and Education Faculty;
4. The first and the second consultants who have sacrificed some of their time to
help me finish this thesis;
5. The principle of SMUN
Waru who gives me permission to conduct this
research;
6. The English teacher of SMUN 1 Waru who helped me in obtaining the data;
7. The administration staffs who have assisted me in exploring the data;
8. All my friends who supported me to accomplish the thesis.
Jember, January 200 I
The writer
VI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE .........................................................................................................
MOTTO...................................... ................................................................
II
DEDICATION ...........................................................................................
111
CONSULTANTS' APPROVAL SHEET ................................................ tv
APPROVAL SHEET ................................................................................ v
ACKNOWLEDG-MENT ............. ..............................................................
VI
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................... vu
ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................
X
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study.................................................................... .
1.2 Problem Formulation .......................................................................... 4
l .2. I Major Problem .......................................................................... 4
1.2.2 Minor Problems .......... ..... ........ .... .. .... ..... ........ .... ............ .. ... ... .. 4
1.3 Operational Definition of the Variables.......................... ... ................. 5
1.3.1 An Analysis............................................................................... 5
1.3.2 Summative Test Constructed By the English Teacher ............. 5
1.4 Research Objective ............................................................. ................ 5
1.4.1 Major Objective... .. .... ............................................................... 5
1.4.2 Minor Objectives ...................................................................... 6
1.5 The Significances of the Study ........................................................... 7
1.5.1 For the English Teacher............................................................ 7
1.5.2 For Other Researcher ................................................... ............ 7
II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1 The Meaning ofEvaluation ................................................................ 8
2.2 TheFunction of Evaluation ................................................................. 9
2.3 Types of Language Tests.................................................................... 10
2.4 Summative Test..... ............................................. ................ ................ 12
2.5 Teacher-Made Test ............................................................................. 12
Vll
2.6 Characteristics of a Good Test ............................................................ 13
2.6. I Validity ..................................................................................... 14
2.6.2 Reliability............. ..................................................................... 14
2.6.3 Practicality ................................................................................ 15
2.7 Item Analysis ...................................................................................... 16
2.7.1 The Index of Difficulty ............................................................. 17
2.7.2 The Index of Discrimination Power.......................................... 17
2.7.3 The Effectiveness ofDistractcrs ............................................... 18
ill. RESEARCH METHOD
3.1 Research Design.................................................................................. 20
3.2 Research Subject................................................................................. 20
3.3 Research Area ............................................................................. ........ 20
3.4 Data Collection Method...................................................................... 21
3.4.1 Documentation ......................................................................... 2 1
3.4 .2 Interview ................................................................................... 21
3.5 Data Analysis Method......................................................................... 22
3.5.1 Analyzing Content Validity .. ......................... .. ......................... 22
3.5.2 Analyzing Reliability ........... ..................................................... 23
3.5.3 Analyzing Practicality............................................................... 24
3.5.4 Item Analysis ............................................................................ 24
a. The Index of Difficulty ......................................................... 24
b. The Index of Discrimination Power ..................................... 25
c. The Effectiveness of Distracters ............................. .............. 25
IV. RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Research Result. ........................................................... ...................... 26
4.1 . 1 Content Validity ........................................................................ 26
4.1.2 Reliability ...................................... ............................................ 27
4.1 .3 Practicality ................................................................................ 27
4.1.4 Level of Difficulty .................................................................... 28
4.1.5 Level of Discrimination ............................ .......... ...................... 29
4.1.6 The Effectiveness of Distracters ...... ......................... ................ 29
viii
4.5 Discussion.............................. .......... .............................................. 30
V.
ENGLISH TEACHER OF SMUN 1 WARU -PAMEKASAN
IN THE 1999/2000 ACADEMIC YEAR
THESIS
Prop()sed to Fulfill one of che i'equlremenu to Obtain the Decree or S-1 at
the ER1Iieh Educatlo• Pro1ram Lancuace and Area Department, Faculty of
Teacher Tralnln& and Educaclon. The Untverelty of Jember
s
;;l D
by :
Terima
t--o . lu rh... ;
ｾ＠
t
( C>.l. 33f
'11urul Jskan ar
NIM : 960210401054
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
THE UNIVERSITY OF JEMBER
JANUARY 2001
2lutl1 ﾷｾ
ＭＮｾ
7
/SK.
({ .
MOTTO:
ｌｾＣｬＭＦｫ＠
ｾｵ｡＠
(Proverb)
II
DEDICATION
This thesis is honorably dedicated to:
•!• My father (Sajcwt) and mother (Vuhltalus Z) who always encourage me in
finishing this study, and nothmg compared to your endless love for me:
LOVE YOU SO MUCH.
•:• My beloved brother (Eddy & Yayrmg) and sisters (Rrka & Virda), especially
my oldest sister (Mbak Ena): f DO LOVE YOU.
•:• My teachers
•:• My Almamater 1996 level, especially for Wiwin, lin, Etik, Mia,etc. Thank you
very much for your kindness !
•:• My everlasting friends of lite Endang, Dita, Tedy, Sufi',and Kurdi. You make
my life wonderful.
•:• Bang Hery, Tono, Huda and all m my boarding house thanks for your
kindness ofheautitul friondshir.
------>; ｾ＠
-
-. "e'
Ill
ｌｬＱＡ［ｾ＠
PER PUS T
L ' ' I \ I:..K ' • J ｬＧＮｾ＠
uu
Jl:./\. 1- Ll'.
1
l
CONSULTANTS' APPROVAL SHEET
AN ANALYSIS ON SUMMATIVn TEST CONSTRUCTED 11Y Till'
1-:NULISI-I TEACIIER OF SMUN I WARU- PAMii KASAN IN THE 199l)/2000
ACADEMIC YEAR
TilES IS
Proposed to Fulfill one of the Requirements to obtain the Degree ofS-1 at the
English education Program Language and Arts Department, Faculty of Teacher
Training and Education, The University of Jember
Name
: Nurul Iskandar
Identification Number : 96021040 I 054
Level
. 1996
Place and Date of Birth : Pamekasan I March 27' 1\ 1977
Department
: Language and Arts Education
Program
: English Education
Approved by:
Consultant n
Consultant I
asnim MA
Dra. Wiwiek Eko B, MPd
Nip. 131 660 789
Nip. 131 475 844
iv
APPROVAL SHEET
This thesis is approved and received by the examination Committee of the
Teacher Training and Education Faculty, the University of Jember
Day
: Saturday
Date
: January 27th, 2001
Place : Building I FKIP Jember University
Examiners,
iwick Eko B.. MPd
Nip.l31 475 844
The members:
Signature:\
(. ...... ｢Ｇｦｾｔ＠
1. Ora. Made Adi A, MEd
Nip. 13 I 832 325
2. Ora. Zakiyah Tasnim, MA
(.
Nip. 131 660 789
The Dean of
.,Hum
\'
ｾ
Ｍｾｊ
ｵ ｵＩ＠
ACKNO\VJ .. EI>GMENT
First of all, I would like to thank to Allah SWT, the Almighty, who has
given me blessing and mercies. Without this, I would not be able to accomplish
this thesis.
In addition, I would like to express my great gratitude to:
1. The Dean of the Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Jember University;
2. The Chairperson of Language and Ans Education Department of the Teacher
and Education Faculty;
3. The Chairperson of the English Education Program of The Teacher Training
and Education Faculty;
4. The first and the second consultants who have sacrificed some of their time to
help me finish this thesis;
5. The principle of SMUN
Waru who gives me permission to conduct this
research;
6. The English teacher of SMUN 1 Waru who helped me in obtaining the data;
7. The administration staffs who have assisted me in exploring the data;
8. All my friends who supported me to accomplish the thesis.
Jember, January 200 I
The writer
VI
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE .........................................................................................................
MOTTO...................................... ................................................................
II
DEDICATION ...........................................................................................
111
CONSULTANTS' APPROVAL SHEET ................................................ tv
APPROVAL SHEET ................................................................................ v
ACKNOWLEDG-MENT ............. ..............................................................
VI
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................... vu
ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................
X
I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study.................................................................... .
1.2 Problem Formulation .......................................................................... 4
l .2. I Major Problem .......................................................................... 4
1.2.2 Minor Problems .......... ..... ........ .... .. .... ..... ........ .... ............ .. ... ... .. 4
1.3 Operational Definition of the Variables.......................... ... ................. 5
1.3.1 An Analysis............................................................................... 5
1.3.2 Summative Test Constructed By the English Teacher ............. 5
1.4 Research Objective ............................................................. ................ 5
1.4.1 Major Objective... .. .... ............................................................... 5
1.4.2 Minor Objectives ...................................................................... 6
1.5 The Significances of the Study ........................................................... 7
1.5.1 For the English Teacher............................................................ 7
1.5.2 For Other Researcher ................................................... ............ 7
II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.1 The Meaning ofEvaluation ................................................................ 8
2.2 TheFunction of Evaluation ................................................................. 9
2.3 Types of Language Tests.................................................................... 10
2.4 Summative Test..... ............................................. ................ ................ 12
2.5 Teacher-Made Test ............................................................................. 12
Vll
2.6 Characteristics of a Good Test ............................................................ 13
2.6. I Validity ..................................................................................... 14
2.6.2 Reliability............. ..................................................................... 14
2.6.3 Practicality ................................................................................ 15
2.7 Item Analysis ...................................................................................... 16
2.7.1 The Index of Difficulty ............................................................. 17
2.7.2 The Index of Discrimination Power.......................................... 17
2.7.3 The Effectiveness ofDistractcrs ............................................... 18
ill. RESEARCH METHOD
3.1 Research Design.................................................................................. 20
3.2 Research Subject................................................................................. 20
3.3 Research Area ............................................................................. ........ 20
3.4 Data Collection Method...................................................................... 21
3.4.1 Documentation ......................................................................... 2 1
3.4 .2 Interview ................................................................................... 21
3.5 Data Analysis Method......................................................................... 22
3.5.1 Analyzing Content Validity .. ......................... .. ......................... 22
3.5.2 Analyzing Reliability ........... ..................................................... 23
3.5.3 Analyzing Practicality............................................................... 24
3.5.4 Item Analysis ............................................................................ 24
a. The Index of Difficulty ......................................................... 24
b. The Index of Discrimination Power ..................................... 25
c. The Effectiveness of Distracters ............................. .............. 25
IV. RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Research Result. ........................................................... ...................... 26
4.1 . 1 Content Validity ........................................................................ 26
4.1.2 Reliability ...................................... ............................................ 27
4.1 .3 Practicality ................................................................................ 27
4.1.4 Level of Difficulty .................................................................... 28
4.1.5 Level of Discrimination ............................ .......... ...................... 29
4.1.6 The Effectiveness of Distracters ...... ......................... ................ 29
viii
4.5 Discussion.............................. .......... .............................................. 30
V.