Definition Topic Sentence and Supporting Sentences in Argumentative writing

‘Aspirin should be banned’ is the conclusion of the topic sentence; while ‘because excessive amounts of it are poisonous’ is the premise. This premise gives support to the conclusion and gives boundaries to the supporting sentences that the supporting sentences are still in the boundaries of the topic “the poisonous excessive amounts in an aspirin”. In order to gather the data, the researcher needs to conduct a test. Thus, the researcher needs to know the basic understanding about testing writing.

2.1.4. TESTING WRITING

The best way to test the students’ writing competency is to get the students to write Hughes, 1989. In this study, the researcher will conduct a diagnostic test in order to gather the data. This test is used to know the basic competence of the students. 2.1.4.1.Diagnostic Test Diagnostic test is used to identify students’ strengths and weaknesses. It is intended primarily to ascertain what further teaching is necessary Hughes, 1989. It means that by using the diagnostic test, the researcher is tried to identify the students’ basic competence to know the students’ strengths and weaknesses to diagnose what items to be improved.

2.1.4.2. Rubric

Testing writing is a subjective matter. However, it could be minimize using a rubric. “Rubric is a tool in performance assessor kit which tells potential performers and judges what elements of performance matter most and how the work to be judged. The result will be distinguished in form of relative quality.” Wiggins, 1988:153 A scoring rubric is the established criteria, including rules, principles, and illustrations, used in scoring responses to individual items and clusters of items of performance assessment. It has three main functions: establishing objective criteria of judgment, providing established expectations to teachers and students, and maintaining focus on content and standards of a student work. There are several elements of useful rubrics, and each is discussed in turn below Huba Freed, 2000. a. Level of Mastery Columns which describe the level of students’ work b. Dimensions of Quality The rows of each figure list the dimensions of quality that are important in reaching the goal of the project or program. c. Organizational Grouping The dimensions of quality are grouped into several groups. This helps students understand that they will be evaluated on complex abilities that are multidimensional. d. Commentaries For each aspect of qualities, the rubric provides a commentary describing the defining features of work at each level of mastery. e. Descriptions of Consequences In the commentaries, it is described for the students the likely consequences of performing at the level of quality in a real-life setting. A scoring rubric developer can have three options: adopt, adapt, or start from the beginning. If an existing rubric which matches of with the items can be found, it may be adopted. Otherwise, it may be modified to fit the need. Since the researcher could not formulate the rubric by herself, the researcher adapts the rubric from several sources. The researcher adapts the rubric stated in From: Huba Fred 2000, Stiggins 2001 and other sources from Internet. The rubric was adapted and formulated as follows: Figure 2.1 Scoring Rubric Score Descriptions No Items 3 2 1 Topic Sentence 1. Subject and attitude There are a subject and an attitude There is a subject but not an attitude There is no topic sentence 2. Debatable statement The topic sentence is clear and debatable The topic sentence is too general and predictable The topic sentence is unclear or absent Supporting Sentences 3. Support the topic sentence clearly and completely develop the topic sentence unclear or incomplete in developing the topic sentence Totally not supporting the topic sentence 4. Relevant statement There is no irrelevant sentence There is one irrelevant sentence There are two or more irrelevant sentences. 5. Reasoning Thinking Persuasive, often insightful adequate Inadequate, confusing overall Grammar and Coherence 6. Mechanics and Grammar All sentences are complete and grammatical, and have no errors in punctuation, For the most part, sentences are complete and grammatical, and have maximum 4 For the most part, sentences are not complete and grammatical and have more than 5

Dokumen yang terkait

Students` perception on the use of blog in basic writing class in English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 0 110

Students` perception of the use of internet in writing VI course in english language education study program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 0 85

A study on grammatical awareness in student`s writing in the English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 0 106

A study of word-order errors in noun phrase constructions in the first semester students` writing at the english language education program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 1 115

A Study on the fourth-smester students` english paragraph writing in Sanata Dharma University.

0 1 87

The acquisition of noun premodification in the writing of the first semester students of the English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.

0 1 121

Paragraphing and positioning topic sentences among fourth semester students of English department of Sanata Dharma University : A Gender study.

0 0 100

A Study on the general competence of the seventh semester students of Sanata Dharma University in the writing language seminar papers.

0 0 124

A study on the fourth semester students` writing competency in writing a topic sentence and supporting sentences in an argumentative paragrapg in english language education study program of Sanata Dharma University - USD Repository

0 0 127

Learning strategies in writing used by writing III students of the english language education study program of Sanata Dharma University - USD Repository

0 0 127