Content Validity RESEARCH METHODS

Where: rk : the reliability of the test rl : the reliability of half test The criteria are: 0,90 – 1,00 is high 0,50 – 0,89 is moderate satisfactory 0,0 – 0,49 is low After conducted the try out test, the result of reliability found through this research was 0.75 see Appendix 5. By referring to the criteria of the reliability proposed by Hatch and Farhady 1982:268, the test had moderate or satisfactory reliability in the range of 0,50 – 0,89. It indicated that this instrument would produce consistent result when administered in the similar condition to the same participants and in different time Hatch and Farhady, 1982.

3.5.2.1.3. Level of Difficulty

The test was used to measure the difficulties of the item test. The try out test had given before the treatment and the researcher counted the students correct answer. If the amount of students who answer correctly was higher than the amount of students who failed, it was assumed that the test is easy for the students. To determine the level of difficulty, the researcher used the following formula: N R LD  Where: LD : Level of Difficulty R : The number of students who answer correctly N : The total of students following the test. The criteria are: 0.30 = difficult 0.30 – 0.70 = average 0.70 = easy Shohamy, 1985:79 Based on the computation result of level difficulty see Appendix 6, the researcher found that there were 8 items which were more than 0.70 which means that the items were easy and 2 items were below 0.30 which means difficult. Meanwhile there were 40 items which were between the ranges 0.30 – 0.70 or belonged to average.

3.5.2.1.4. Discrimination Power

It was used to discriminate among the different candidates and reflects the different performances of the individuals in a group of students. It was also used to discriminate the number of upper group students who answer correctly and who do not answer correctly. To find out the discrimination of power, the researcher uses this formula: n L U DP 2 1  

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH SQ3R AND TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 69 60

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A Comparative Study of Students’ Speaking Achievement between Those Taught through Silent Viewing and Sound Only Technique at The First Grade of SMA N I Natar

0 11 67

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH VIDEO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH AUDIO IN SMPN 26 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 26 59