Scoring System Data Analysis

The criteria are: H is accepted if sig . In this case, the researcher uses the level of significant 0.05.

3.9. Hypothesis Testing

After collecting the data, the researcher recorded and analyzed them in order to find out whether there is a difference of students’ achievement in reading comprehension of narrative text or not after the treatment. The researcher used independent group T-test to know the level of significance of the treatment effect by using this formula: With: Where: : Mean from the difference pre-test and post-test of experimental class : Mean from the difference pre-test and post-test of control class : Standard error of differences between means n : Subjects on sample The criteria are: If the t-ratio is higher than t-table : H 1 is accepted If the t-ratio is lower than t-table : H is accepted Hatch and Farhady, 1982:111 c e X X c e S X X t    2 2 2 1                    n S n S S e e X X c e e X c X c e X X S 

V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1. Conclusions

In line with the results of the data analysis and discussion, the following conclusions are drawn: a. There was a significant difference of students’ reading comprehension achievement between those who are taught through predictive technique and those who are taught through making inferences technique at the second grade of SMAN 1 Kotagajah. The mean difference was 9.32 meaning that the experimental class gained 9.32 which was higher than control class based on the posttest result. Besides that, the significant value of the posttest in both classes was 0.000 that was lower than 0.05 0.000 0.05. t-value was higher than t-table 5.841 2.000. b. Predictive technique was more effective than making inferences technique. It can be seen from the average score of students who were taught through predictive technique which was higher than those who were taught through making inferences technique. The mean or average score of posttest in experimental class was higher than control class 81.50 72.18. It indicated that the increase in experimental class was higher than in control class. The

Dokumen yang terkait

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 4 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS TECHNIQUE AND TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT SMAN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 9

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH LOGICO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CROSSWORD PUZZLE AT THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 21 BANDAR LAMPUNG

5 48 74

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

1 7 62

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH RECIPROCAL TEACHING TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 5 METRO

0 3 50

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH SQ3R AND TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATION TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMP NEGERI 8 BANDAR LAMPUNG

3 69 60

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE WHO ARE TAUGHT THROUGH RETELLING STORY AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH TRANSLATING A FAIRY TALE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF MA MA’ARIF 4 KALIREJO LAMPUNG TENGAH

0 12 46

A Comparative Study of Students’ Speaking Achievement between Those Taught through Silent Viewing and Sound Only Technique at The First Grade of SMA N I Natar

0 11 67

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT BETWEEN THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH PREDICTIVE TECHNIQUE AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH MAKING INFERENCES TECHNIQUE AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KOTAGAJAH

2 14 60

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STUDENTS’ LISTENING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT TAUGHT THROUGH VIDEO AND THOSE TAUGHT THROUGH AUDIO IN SMPN 26 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 26 59