1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Conducting Classroom Observation Data collecting technique 1.

confirmation check through repetition.i The ninth frequency was response self- modification. j The tenth frequency was confirmation check trough completion. Then, response other modification.

5.2 Suggestions

Referring to the research findings on the last chapter, the writer would like to propose some recommendations as follows: 1. Students can be more motivated and more active to practice English in order to improve their English ability. The students are expected to practice their speaking whether in class or out of class. For example they can practice their speaking with his or her friends. 2. The teacher is expected to give the students the knowledge about negotiation of meaning. For example, teacher gives the explanation about negotiation of meaning and the examples of negotiation of meaning especially trigger and signal in the conversation. REFERENCES Brown, H. Douglass. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Aproach to Language Pedadogy. San Fransisco: State University. Annenberg Media. 2005. Teaching Foreign Language K-12. Anneberg: http:www.learner.orgchannellibrariestflkey_terms.html.January 10, 2006. Basturkmen, H. 1994. Using Learners’ Writing for Oral Information-Gap Activities. London: http:exchanges.state.govforumvolsvol32no1p50.html. January 10, 2006. Bialystok, Ellen. 1990. Communication Strategies: a Psychological Analysis of Second Language Use. London: T.J. Press. Ltd. Bryne, Don. 1984. Teaching Oral English. New Jersey: Lingman Group Ltd. Diknas.2006. Buku Satuan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Doff, Adrian. 1987. Teaching English. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Emayuta. 2011. A Comparative Students’ Production of Utterances and Negotiation of Meaning using Information Gap Task in Pair and Small Group in Speaking Class in Second Grade of SMK Karya Pembangunan Gajah Mada Metro. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University Unpublished Script. Foster, P. 1998. A Classroom Prespective on the Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistic 19 1, 1-23. Gass, S.M. and Varonis, E.M. 1984. The Effect of Familiarity on the Comprehensibility of Non-Native Speech. Language Learning, 34 1, 65-89. Harris, David. 1974. English as Second Language. New York: Mc, Graw Mill. Heaton, J. B. 1982. Language Testing Modern English Publications. London: Longman.

Dokumen yang terkait

INCREASING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION OF RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH SQ4R STRATEGY AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 7 51

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY THROUGH INFORMATION GAP TECHNIQUE AT THE FIRST GRADE OF SMAN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 9 58

THE ROLE OF STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES IN SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA MUHAMMADIYAH 2 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 8 67

THE EFFECT OF STUDENTS’ SELF-ESTEEM ON THEIR ENGLISH SPEAKING ABILITY AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 14 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 13 42

THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION GAP TASK IN TEACHING ENGLISH SPEAKING AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMA YP UNILA BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 9 58

AN ANALYSIS OF NEGOTIATION OF MEANING IN STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE IN DIALOGUE BY USING REALIA AT SECOND GRADE OF SMAN 1 KALIANDA

6 38 62

AN ANALYSIS OF NEGOTIATION OF MEANING IN STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACTIVITY IN TASK-BASED LEARNING AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA NEGERI 5 BANDAR LAMPUNG

1 9 75

INCREASING STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH EXTENSIVE READING AT SECOND YEAR OF SMPN 6 BANDAR LAMPUNG

0 3 84

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING COMPETENCE THROUGH INFORMATION GAP (AN ACTION RESEARCH AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMP 2 PANINGGARAN PEKALONGAN).

0 1 6

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL USING INFORMATION GAP AT SECOND YEAR IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL USING INFORMATION GAP AT SECOND YEAR OF SMP N I NGRAMPAL SRAGEN IN 2010/2011 ACADEMIC YEAR.

0 0 15