Speaking Activities in the classroom

4 Language is of an acceptable level. Learners express themselves in utterances that are relevant, easily comprehensible to each other and of an acceptable level of language accuracy. 22 The characteristics of both difficulties and successful speaking activity are very contradictive. For that, speaking need a comprehensive cooperation between teacher and students themselves in order that they can help each other to express their idea and act out it, because if they feel comfortable in speaking class activities and they are given the same chance to practice their language, their speaking ability will improve even without they realize it. This process of course needs creative teachers and who will always measure his or her students, speaking ability through many kinds of techniques that are agreed by students and suitable with their level, whether beginner, intermediate or advanced students.

2. Speaking Activities in the classroom

Heidi Riggenbach and Anne Lazaraton described that for use in the ESLEFL classroom, there are many speaking activities and materials which are available as creative teachers, for the purpose of this discussion, oral skill activities are organized into distinct types 23 : 22 Ibid 23 Marianne Celce-Murcia, ed., Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 2 nd ed., Heinle Heinle Publisher, USA, 1991, p. 127-128 a. Drills, or linguistically structured activities Prator 1972 classifies classroom activities for ESL learners by means of a continuum, with “manipulative” activities at one extreme and communicative activity at the other extreme. Although today, in ESLEFL classroom throughout the world, communicative activities tend to more effectively meet the goals of the curriculum, also useful are “manipulative” activities, or those, which provide students with a “prepackaged” structure by means of teacher, tape or book. The use of drills, however, is helping learners to be formally accurate in their speech and in helping them to quickly learn a useful collection of phrases and sentences that allow them to start using the language as soon as possible. As their proficiency and experience in the language develop, most of the sentences and phrases may be re-analyzed and incorporated into the learners’ system of knowledge of the language. Language use based on memorization can be starting point for more creative use of the language. Traditional classroom speaking practices often takes the form of drills in which one person asks a question and another give an answer. The question and the answer are structured and predictable, and often there is only one correct, predetermined answer. The purpose of asking and answering the question is to demonstrate the ability to ask and answer the question. 24 24 http:www.nclrc.orgessentialsspeakingstratspeak.htm, op.cit In contrast, the purpose of real communication is to accomplish a task, such as conveying a telephone message, obtaining information, or expressing an opinion. In real communication, participants must manage uncertainty about what the other person will say. Authentic communication involves an information gap; each participant has information that the other does not have. In addition, to achieve their purpose, participants may have to clarify their meaning or ask for confirmation of their own understanding. To create classroom-speaking activities that will develop communicative competence, instructors need to incorporate a purpose and an information gap and allow for multiple forms of expression. However, quantity alone will not necessarily produce competent speakers. Instructors need to combine structured output activities, which allow for error correction and increased accuracy, with communicative output activities that give students opportunities to practice language use more freely. 1. Structured Output Activities Two common kinds of structured output activities are information gap and jigsaw activities. In both these types of activities, students complete a task by obtaining missing information, a feature the activities have in common with real communication. However, information gap and jigsaw activities also set up practice on specific items of language. In this respect, they are more like drills than like communication. 2. Communicative Output Activities Communicative output activities allow students to practice using all of the language they know in situations that resemble real settings. In these activities, students must work together to develop a plan, resolve a problem, or complete a task. The most common types of communicative output activities are role-plays and discussion. b. Performance activities Performance activities are those in which student prepares beforehand and delivers a massage to a group. There are some examples of performance activities: 25 1 Speeches 2 Debates 3 Role Plays One other way of getting students to speak is role-playing. Students pretend they are in various contexts and have a variety of social roles. In role-play activities, the teacher gives information to the learners such as who they are and what they think or feel. 26 c. Participation activities There are some examples of participation activities: 1 Conversations 2 Guided discussion 25 Marianne Celce-Murcia, Teaching English as a second or Foreign Language, 3 rd -ed., HeinleHeinle Publisher USA, 1991, p.106-108 26 http:www.iteslj.orgTechniquesKayi-TeachingSpeaking.html 3 Audio taped Oral dialogue Journals 4 Interview d. Observation activities

C. Learning Activities

1. Teacher’s Roles

Some suggestions for English Language teachers while teaching oral language: 27 a. Provide maximum opportunity to students to speak the target language by providing a rich environment that contains collaborative work, authentic materials and tasks, and shared knowledge. b. Try to involve each student in every speaking activity; for this aim, practice different ways of student participation. c. Reduce teacher-speaking time in class while increasing student-speaking time. Step back and observe students. d. Indicate positive sign when commenting on a students’ response. e. Ask eliciting question such as “What do you mean? How did you reach that conclusion?” in order to prompt students to speak more. f. Provide written feedback like “Your presentation was really great…” g. Do not correct students’ pronunciation mistakes very often while they are speaking. Correction should not distract student from his or her speech. 27 Hayriye Kayi, Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Language, University of Nevada, on line on http:iteslj.orgtechniqueskayi-teachingspeaking.html

Dokumen yang terkait

Using active learning in teaching vocabulary : an experimental study of the seventh year students of Islamic Junior High School 13 Jakarta

0 6 83

The effectivness of using pictures in teaching vocabulary : a case study at the year of smp ruhama ciputat

0 5 65

Teaching reading using contextual teaching and learning approach : (a case study at the first year students of SMPN 2 Ciputat)

0 5 39

The effectiveness of classroom debate to improve students' speaking skilll (a quasi-experimental study at the elevent year student of SMAN 3 south Tangerang)

1 33 122

INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN FOR THE TEACHING OF SPEAKING SKILL AT SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 10 Instructional Design For The Teaching Of Speaking Skill At SMP Muhammadiyah 10 Surakarta: A Naturalistic Study.

0 2 13

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON TEACHING SPEAKING METHOD TO THE SEVENTH YEAR STUDENT A Descriptive Study On Teaching Speaking Method To The Seventh Year Student Of SMP Negeri 3 Baturetno.

0 0 14

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON TEACHING SPEAKING METHOD TO THE SEVENTH YEAR STUDENT A Descriptive Study On Teaching Speaking Method To The Seventh Year Student Of SMP Negeri 3 Baturetno.

0 1 17

INCREASING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY USING OUTDOORACTIVITIES AT THE SEVENTH YEAR OF SMP PGRI 13 Increasing Students’ Speaking Ability Using Outdoor Activities At The Seventh Year Of SMP PGRI 13 Gondangrejo In 2011/2012 Academic Year.

0 0 15

INCREASING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY USING OUTDOORACTIVITIES AT THE SEVENTH YEAR OF SMP PGRI 13 Increasing Students’ Speaking Ability Using Outdoor Activities At The Seventh Year Of SMP PGRI 13 Gondangrejo In 2011/2012 Academic Year.

0 0 11

View of THE TEACHING AND LEARNING ON SPEAKING SKILL: A CASE STUDY AT SEVENTH GRADE VII F STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 KEBONAGUNG PACITAN

0 0 10