Data Treatment Hypothesis Testing

Junior High School more preferred to focus and interested to map the name of the physical objects around them and adverb becomes the lowest type of content words, because Adverbs have many kinds of meanings and the position and it can be challenging for students because adverbs can fall into various positions of a sentence.

5.2. Suggestions

Referring to the conclusion above, some suggestions can be listed as follows: 1. In teaching process it would be better if the teacher chooses appropriate media to make the students interest in learning English especially in vocabulary by using contextual clues. For example uses picture series, video, etc. 2. The teacher should more focus to select the appropriate materials i.e. familiar and simple texts for the students in teaching vocabulary by using contextual clues technique. So, the students are more easier to understand the text and it can help them to master vocabulary by using contextual clues technique. For further researchers: a. In this research, the researcher applies contextual clues in teaching vocabulary by using guessing meaning technique, content words and descriptive text at the second grade of Junior High School. Other researchers can conduct other kinds of types of contextual clues techniques i.e. definition, experience, contrast, and creativity, kinds of words i.e. function words, substitute words and distributed words and also kinds of text i.e. exposition, recount, narrative, or report text b. For further researcher are recomended to consider the construct validity of vocabulary test to make a good instruments form, especially focusing to select vocabulary items to measure students vocabulary mastery. REFERENCES Aitchison, J. 2001. Learning change. Progress or decay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Alkufaishi, A. 1988. A Vocabulary-Building Program Is A Necessity Not A Luxury. English Teaching Forum. XXXVI. Allen, E.D. and Vallete, R. 1997. Classroom Techniques: Foreign Language and English as a Second Language. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Allen, L. 1998. An Integrated Strategies Approach: Making Word Identification Work for Beginning Readers. The Reading Teacher. 523, 254-268. Allen, V.F. 1983. Technique in Teaching Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Arbainaya, A. 2012. Increasing Students’ Vocabulary Achievement Taught Through Clustering Technique at SMP Negeri 1 Abung Semuli North Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University. Arikunto, S. 2006. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bina Aksara. Brown, D.F. 1980. Eight Cs and G. Guidelines for vocabulary Teaching. RELC Journal Supplement, N0.3 June, 1-17. Cameron, L. 2001. Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Collier, M.I. 1971. The Key to English Vocabulary. New York: the Macmillan Company. Freebody, P. Anderson, R. 1983. Effects on Text Comprehension of Differeing Proportions And Locations of Difficult Vocabulary. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 19-39. Fries. C.C. 1975. Improving Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Development Through Multiple Instructional Strategies and Technology. Unpublished master’s thesis, Saint Xavier University IRISkylight, Chicago, Illinois. Fries, C.C. 1974. Teaching and Learning English as Language Learning. An Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 45. Golinkoff R.M, Chung HL,Hirsh-Pasek K, Liu J, Bretenthal BI, Brand R, Maguire MJ, Hennon EA. 2002. Point-light Displays as A Key to Early Verb Learning. Developmental Psyhcology. Vol 4, 604-615. Hatch, E. Brown, C. 1995 and Roget. 1980. Definition of Vocabulary. http:definitionofvocabulary_eifhty8hundred.htm. Retrieved on October 6 th , 2013. Hatch, Eveyln and Hossein, Farhady. 1982. Research Design and Statistic for Applied Linguistics. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House Publisher. Heaton, J.B. 1991. Writing English Language Test. New York: Longman Inc. Hornby. A.S. 1995. Definition of Speaking skill. New York: Publisher. Hornby, A.S. 1995. Oxford Advances Learners’ Dictionary of Current English. New York: Oxford University Press. Jayanti, P. 2006. A Comparative Study of Teaching English Vocabulary through Deducing Meaning from Context and Memorizing Word List at first year of SMA Wijaya Bandar Lampung: Bandar Lampung. Unpublished Script. Kaosa, L. 2012. The Use of Videos in Teaching Vocabulary in an Elementary School: A Queasy Experimental Study of Fourth Grade Students at One School in Bandung. Bandung: Indonesia University of Education, Unpublished Script. Kochappilly, S. 2011. Creative Methods in Teaching English Vocabulary to the ESL Learners. ELTWeekly Newsletter Vol. 3 Issue96. Macfadyen, Heather. 2007. In Syurahman, Perzan. 2009. A Comparative Study between Students’ Vocabulary Achievement who are Taught through Flashcard and through Regular Teaching Technique at the first year of SMP N 19 Bandar Lampung. Lampung University.Unpublished Script. McWhorter, Kathleen T, 1986. Guide to College Reading. Toronto: Little Brown Company. Mercer, N. 2000. Words And Minds: How We Use Language To Think Together. London and New York: Routlege Taylor and Francis Group. Nation, P. 1990. Teaching and Learning English. New York: Newbury House Publisher. Nation, I.S.P. 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. United State America. Heinle Heinle publishers. Qonita, B.S. 2014. The Effectiveness of Using Context Clues On The Students’ Vocabulary Mastery of The Fourth Grade At Mi Al-Azhaar Bandung: Tulungagung. Rhoder, C., Huerster, P. 2002. Use Dictionaries For Word Learning With Caution. Journal of Adolescent Adult Literacy. 458, 730-735. Richards, J.C., S chymidt, R. 2002. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Malaysia: Pearson Education. Rynette, R.K. 2010. Context Clues-Can You Figure it Out. Educational Handout for Teachers and Parents. Retrived from www.superduperinc.com. Sari, M. 2004. Comparative Study Between The Students’ Achievements on Vocabulary Taught through Pictorial Presentation and Verbal