Romberg Integration

6.3 Romberg Integration

Romberg integration combines the composite trapezoidal rule with Richardson ex- trapolation (see Art. 5.3). Let us first introduce the notation

R i,1 =I i

where, as before, I + b

i represents the approximate value of a f (x)dx computed by the recursive trapezoidal rule using 2 i−1 panels. Recall that the error in this approximation

is E = c 1 h 2 +c 2 h 4 + · · ·, where b−a

h= 2 i−1

is the width of a panel. Romberg integration starts with the computation of R 1,1 =I 1 (one panel) and R 2,1 =I 2 (two panels) from the trapezoidal rule. The leading error term c 1 h 2 is then

eliminated by Richardson extrapolation. Using p = 2 (the exponent in the error term) in Eq. (5.9) and denoting the result by R 2,2 , we obtain

It is convenient to store the results in an array of the form

1,1 R 2,1 R 2,2

The next step is to calculate R 3,1 =I 3 (four panels) and repeat Richardson extra- polation with R 2,1 and R 3,1 , storing the result as R 3,2 :

(b) The elements of array R calculated so far are

Both elements of the second column have an error of the form c 2 h 4 , which can also

be eliminated with Richardson extrapolation. Using p = 4 in Eq. (5.9), we get

(c) This result has an error of O(h 6 ). The array has now expanded to

⎣ R 2,1 R 2,2

After another round of calculations we get

R 4,1 R 4,2 R 4,3 R 4,4 where the error in R 4,4 is O(h 8 ). Note that the most accurate estimate of the integral is always the last diagonal term of the array. This process is continued until the differ-

ence between two successive diagonal terms becomes sufficiently small. The general extrapolation formula used in this scheme is

4 j−1 R

i, j−1 −R i−1, j−1

= i, j

i > 1,

j = 2, 3, . . . , i (6.13a)

4 j−1

A pictorial representation of Eq. (6.13a) is

R i−1, j−1 ց

(6.13b)

ց R i, j−1 →β→R i, j

where the multipliers α and β depend on j in the following manner:

−1/3 (6.13c) −1/15 −1/63 −1/255 −1/1023

64/63 256/255 1024/1023 The triangular array is convenient for hand computations, but computer imple-

mentation of the Romberg algorithm can be carried out within a one-dimensional array r. After the first extrapolation—see Eq. (a)—R 1,1 is never used again, so that it can be replaced with R 2,2 . As a result, we have the array

1 =R 2,2 r 2 =R 2,1

In the second extrapolation round, defined by Eqs. (b) and (c), R 3,2 overwrites R 2,1 , and R 3,3 replaces R 2,2 , so that the array now contains

1 =R 3,3

⎣ r 2 =R 3,2 ⎥ ⎦ r 3 =R 3,1

and so on. In this manner, r 1 always contains the best current result. The extrapolation formula for the kth round is

4 k− j r

j+1 −r j

The algorithm for Romberg integration is implemented in the function romberg . It returns the value of the integral and the required number of function evaluations. Richardson’s extrapolation is performed by the subfunction richardson .

function [I,numEval] = romberg(func,a,b,tol,kMax) % Romberg integration. % USAGE: [I,numEval] = romberg(func,a,b,tol,kMax) % INPUT: % func

= handle of function being integrated. % a,b

= limits of integration. % tol

= error tolerance (default is 1.0e-8). % kMax

= limit on the number of panel doublings

% (default is 20). % OUTPUT: %I

= value of the integral. % numEval = number of function evaluations.

if nargin < 5; kMax = 20; end if nargin < 4; tol = 1.0e-8; end r = zeros(kMax); r(1) = trapezoid(func,a,b,0,1); rOld = r(1); for k = 2:kMax

r(k) = trapezoid(func,a,b,r(k-1),k); r = richardson(r,k); if abs(r(1) - rOld) < tol

numEval = 2ˆ(k-1) + 1; I = r(1); return

end rOld = r(1);

end error(’Failed to converge’)

function r = richardson(r,k) % Richardson’s extrapolation in Eq. (6.14). for j = k-1:-1:1

c = 4ˆ(k-j); r(j) = (c*r(j+1) - r(j))/(c-1); end

EXAMPLE 6.5 Show that R k,2 in Romberg integration is identical to the composite Simpson’s 1/3 rule

in Eq. (6.10) with 2 k−1 panels. Solution Recall that in Romberg integration R k,1 =I k denoted the approximate in-

tegral obtained by the composite trapezoidal rule with 2 k−1 panels. Denoting the abscissas of the nodes by x 1 , x 2 ,..., x n , we have from the composite trapezoidal rule in Eq. (6.5)

2 2 When we halve the number of panels (panel width 2h), only the odd-numbered ab-

i=2

scissas enter the composite trapezoidal rule, yielding

n−2

R k−1,1 =I k−1 =

Applying Richardson extrapolation yields

R k,2 = R

3 k,1 − R 3 k−1,1

3 n ) i=2,4,... h

which agrees with Simpson’s rule in Eq. (6.10). EXAMPLE 6.6

Use Romberg integration to evaluate + π

0 f (x) dx, where f (x) = sin x. Work with four decimal places.

Solution From the recursive trapezoidal rule in Eq. (6.9b) we get

R 1,1 = I (π) =

2 [ f (0) + f (π)] = 0

R 2,1 = I (π/2) =

2 I (π ) + 2 f (π /2) = 1.5708

R 3,1 = I (π/4) =

2 I (π /2) + [ f (π /4) + f (3π/4)] = 1.8961 4

R 4,1 = I (π/8) = [ f (π /8) + f (3π/8) + f (5π/8) + f (7π/8)]

2 I (π /4) + 8

Using the extrapolation formulas in Eqs. (6.13), we can now construct the following table:

R 4,1 R 4,2 R 4,3 R 4,4 1.9742 2.0003 2.0000 2.0000 + It appears that the procedure has converged. Therefore, π

0 sin x dx = R 4,4 = 2.0000, which is, of course, the correct result.

EXAMPLE 6.7

Use Romberg integration to evaluate 0 2x 2 cos x 2 dx and compare the results with Example 6.4.

Solution

>> format long >> [Integral,numEval] = romberg(@fex6 _ 7,0,sqrt(pi)) Integral =

-0.89483146948416 numEval = 257 >>

Here the M-file defining the function to be integrated is

function y = fex6 _ 7(x) % Function used in Example 6.7 y = 2*(xˆ2)*cos(xˆ2);

It is clear that Romberg integration is considerably more efficient than the trape- zoidal rule. It required 257 function evaluations as compared to 4097 evaluations with the composite trapezoidal rule in Example 6.4.

PROBLEM SET 6.1

0 ln(1 + tan x)dx. Explain the results.

1. Use the recursive trapezoidal rule to evaluate + π/ 4

2. The table shows the power P supplied to the driving wheels of a car as a function takes for the car to accelerate from 1 m/s to 6 m/s. Use the trapezoidal rule for 2. The table shows the power P supplied to the driving wheels of a car as a function takes for the car to accelerate from 1 m/s to 6 m/s. Use the trapezoidal rule for

, 6s

t=m

(v/P) dv

1s

which can be derived from Newton’s law F = m(dv/dt) and the definition of power P = F v.

v (m/s)

0 1.0 1.8 2.4 3.5 4.4 5.1 6.0 P (kW)

3. Evaluate + 1 −1 cos(2 cos −1 x)dx with Simpson’s 1/3 rule using 2, 4 and 6 panels. Explain the results.

1 (1 + x ) −1 dx with the trapezoidal rule using five panels and com- pare the result with the “exact” integral 0.243 75. Hint: use the transformation

4. Determine + ∞

x 3 = 1/t.

The table below gives the pull F of the bow as a function of the draw x. If the bow is drawn 0.5 m, determine the speed of the 0.075-kg arrow when it leaves the bow. Hint: the kinetic energy of arrow equals the work done in drawing the bow; that

0 f (x) dx as accurately as possible, where f (x) is defined by the data

f (x) 1.0000 0.3431 0.2500 0.3431 1.0000

8. Evaluate

, 1 sin x √ dx

with Romberg integration. Hint: use transformation of variable to eliminate the indeterminacy at x = 0.

9. Show that if y = f (x) is approximated by a natural cubic spline with evenly spaced

knots at x 1 , x 2 ,..., x n , the quadrature formula becomes

I= (y 1 + 2y 2 + 2y 2 3 + · · · + 2y n−1 +y n )

24 1 + 2k 2 +k 3 + · · · + 2k n−1 +k n ) where h is the spacing of the knots and k = y ′′ . Note that the first part is the

(k

composite trapezoidal rule; the second part may be viewed as a “correction” for curvature.

10. Use a computer program to evaluate

, π/ 4 dx √

0 sin x with Romberg integration. Hint: use the transformation sin x = t 2 .

11. The period of a simple pendulum of length L is τ = 4 L/g h(θ 0 ), where g is the gravitational acceleration, θ 0 represents the angular amplitude and

, π/ 2 dθ h(θ 0 )=

0 1 − sin 2 (θ 0 / 2) sin 2 θ Compute h(15 ◦ ), h(30 ◦ ) and h(45 ◦ ), and compare these values with h(0) = π/2 (the

approximation used for small amplitudes).

rq a P

The figure shows an elastic half-space that carries uniform loading of intensity q over a circular area of radius a. The vertical displacement of the surface at point

P can be shown to be

, π/ 2 cos 2 θ

w(r) = w 0 dθ

r≥a

0 (r/a) 2 − sin 2 θ 0 (r/a) 2 − sin 2 θ

xm b k

The mass m is attached to a spring of free length b and stiffness k. The coefficient of friction between the mass and the horizontal rod is µ. The acceleration of the mass can be shown to be (you may wish to prove this) ¨ x = − f (x), where

f (x) = µg + m (µb + x) 1− √

b 2 +x 2

If the mass is released from rest at x = b, its speed at x = 0 is given by ( , b

v 0 = 2 f (x)dx

Compute v 0 by numerical integration using the data m = 0.8 kg, b = 0.4 m,

µ = 0.3, k = 80 N/m and g = 9.81 m/s 2 .

14. Debye’s formula for the heat capacity C V of a solid is C V = 9Nkg(u), where

, 1/u

g(u) = u

dx

0 (e x − 1) 2

The terms in this equation are N = number of particles in the solid

k = Boltzmann constant

D T = absolute temperature

D = Debye temperature Compute g(u) from u = 0 to 1.0 in intervals of 0.05 and plot the results.

15. A power spike in an electric circuit results in the current

i(t) = i 0 e −t/t 0 sin(2t/t 0 ) i(t) = i 0 e −t/t 0 sin(2t/t 0 )

, ∞ E= 2 R [i(t)] dt

Find E using the data i 0 0 = 0.01 s.

Dokumen yang terkait

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Harapan dan Kepentingan Pengguna Jasa Angkutan Udara Terhadap Pelayanan di Bandar Udara H.AS Hanandjoeddin–Tanjung Pandan Belitung Air Transport Passenger Expectations and Interest of Airport Services in H.A.S Hanandj

0 0 12

The Evaluation of Air Transportation Infrastructure Performance in Indonesian Capital Province

0 0 10

Demand Forecasting of Modal Share of Bandara Internasional Jawa Barat (BJIB) in Kertajati Majalengka

0 1 12

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Analisis Flutter Pada Uji Model Separuh Sayap Pesawat N219 di Terowongan Angin Kecepatan Rendah The Analysis of Half Wing Flutter Test N219 Aircraft Model in The Low Speed Wind Tunnel

0 0 8

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Penerapan Skema Badan Layanan Umum Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Bandar Udara Internasional Jawa Barat The Application of Badan Layanan Umum Scheme in The Financial Management of Jawa Barat International Airport

0 0 16

Speech Recognition Conceptual Design in Aircraft Communications to Reduce Flight Communication Mistake

0 0 10

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Perencanaan Integrasi Transportasi Antarmoda Dalam Pembangunan Bandar Udara (Studi Kasus: Pembangunan Bandar Udara di Kertajati) Intermodal Transportation Integration Planning in Airport Development (Case Study: Airpo

0 0 8

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Gaya Hambat Saat Hidro Planing dan Gaya Angkat Aerodinamika Saat Cruise di Efek Permukaan pada Pesawat Wing in Surface Effect The Hump Drags During Hydro Planing and Aerodynamic Lift During Cruise in Surface Effect Al

0 0 8

WARTA ARDHIA Jurnal Perhubungan Udara Peran Jasa Ground Handling Terhadap Pelayanan Perusahaan Air Freight di Bali dalam Menghadapi Kompetisi Global The Role of Ground Handling Services to The Air Freight Services in Bali in The Face of Global Competition

0 1 14

Advance Engineering Mathematic chaper 1

0 0 63