97
B. Suggestions for Language Teachers
This study could be used in classrooms providing these trainings in conversational English as case studies of maxim flouting. The in-depth analysis
could also provide for discussions in order that an increased understanding could be achieved. Indeed, this study would have achieved its goal of creation if it were
able to contribute to the collective knowledge regarding conversational English on the topic of maxim flouting, in particular which would enrich language
students seeking to really be able to understand how to appropriately hold a conversation in English.
C. Recommendations for Future Researches
As this research is done to analyze maxim flouting in House, M.D., episode “Occam’s Razor”, this research stays off the realm of maxim violation
and infringing. It was immediately apparent, however, during the process of selection of utterance, that House, in particular, very often employs maxim
violations in his utterances. This study finds that this often creates very interesting results, although without in-depth analysis, it would be difficult to determine
exactly what resulted from this violation. Therefore, it may be highly beneficial for one wishing to conduct another
linguistic study on maxims also investigate maxim violations in House, M.D.. Such a study could perhaps be done across episodes or even across television
series in
order that
it would
provide more
comprehensive results.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
REFERENCES
Aitchison, J. 2003. Teach Yourself Linguistics. London: Hodder and Stroughton Educational.
Berelson, B. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research, New York: The Free Press.
Cruse, A. 2006. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Cutting, J. 2002. Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. New York: Routledge Taylor Francis Group.
Gerfen. 2002. Pragmatics. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. http:www.unc.edu~gerfenLing30Sp2002pragmatics.htm, accessed on
3 August 2010.
Grice, H.P. 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan Eds., Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41-58.
New York: Academic Press.
Grundy, P. 1995. Doing Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holsti, O.R. 1968. Content Analysis. In G.Lindzey E.Aronson Eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology
2nd ed., 596-692, Vol.II, New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co.
Johnson, J.D.
2005. House,
M.D. Season
One .
Goffstown, NH.
http:www.dvdverdict.comreviewshousemdseason1.php, accessed on 3 August 2010.
Kohn, L. and Wynn Y. 2010. Constructing a Pedagogy of Comedy: Sarcasm and Print Codes as Social Literacies in Winnie-the-Pooh
. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 61, 58-74.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99 Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology.
London: Sage.
Leow, J.
2008. House
103: Occam’s
Razor Review .
Melbourne. http:jeffreyleow.wordpress.comhouse-md-reviews,
accessed on
3 August 2010.
Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
McTavish, D.G., Pirro, E.B. 1990. Contextual Content Analysis. Quality and Quantity
, 24, 245-265.
Nordquist, R.
Pragmatics .
Armstrong Atlantic
State University.
http:grammar.about.comodpqgpragmaticsterm.htm, accessed on 25 August 2010.
Scott. 2004. House – Episode 3: “Occam’s Razor”. Southwestern Illinois.
http:politedissent.comhouse_pd.html, accessed on 25 August 2010.
Shore, D. Writer, Singer, B Director. 2004. Occam’s Razor. [Television series episode]. In D. Shore Producer, House, M.D.. New Jersey: Fox
Studios.
Stempel, G.H. 1989. Content Analysis. In G.H.Stempel and B.H.Westley Eds Research Methods in Mass Communications,
Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Taviss, I. 1969. Changes in the Form of Alienation: The 1900’s vs. the 1950’s. American Sociological Review, 34
February: 45-57.
Tesch, R. 1990. Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
Thomas, J. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Harlow: Pearson Education.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
100
Yell, S. Cooperative Principle, Well, Warm, Hot, Vous, Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition,
and Logical
Form .
http:psychology.jrank.orgpages2047implicature.html, accessed on 25 August 2010.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
101
APPENDIX
A. Table of Coded Utterances And Their Relevant Dialogues
Kategori