The Result of Experimental Group

1. The Result of Experimental Group

In this case the data of experimental group consisted of the pre-test scores, the post-test score, and the comparison between both of them. The data of the pre-test score and post-test score of the experimental group are explained as follows:

Table 4.1 The Comparison of Pre-test and Post-test Score of

Experimental Group

No. Code Pre-test Category Post-test Category Different

85 Very Good

90 Very Good

85 Very Good

80 Very Good

90 Very Good

90 Very Good

80 Very Good

11 A11

80 Very Good

95 Very Good

85 Very Good

13 A13

80 Very Good

95 Very Good

85 Very Good

85 Very Good

16 A16

80 Very Good

90 Very Good

85 Very Good

18 A18

75 Good

80 Very Good

80 Very Good

85 Very Good

21 A21

55 Poor

70 Good

22 A22

55 Poor

75 Good

90 Very Good

Deviation Standard

For the table of pre-test above, it can bee seen that there were 5 students (21.73%) whose score was classified in the poor category. There were 9 students (39.13%) whose score was classified in the fair category. There were 6 students (26.08%) whose score was classified in the good category. There were 3 students (13.04%) whose score was classified in the very good category. Meanwhile for the table of post-test, it can bee seen that there were 5 students (21.73%) whose score was classified in the good category. There were 18 students (78.26%) whose score was classified in the very good category. The process to find mean, standard deviation, and standard error are available in appendix 6.

a. The Result of Pre-Test

Based on the data above. It can be seen that the student‟s highest score was 80 and the student‟s lowest score was 55. To determine the range of score, the class interval and interval temporary, the writer calculated using formula as follows:

The highest score (H)

The lowest score (L)

The range score (R)

= H-L + 1 = 80-55 + 1 = 25 + 1 = 26

The class interval (K)

= 1 + 3,3 log n = 1 + 3,3 log (23)

Interval of Temporary (I) = R/K

So, the range of score was 26, the class interval was 6 and the interval of temporary was 4. It was presented using frequency distribution in the following table:

Table 4.2 Frequency Distribution of the Pre-Test Score

The

Frequency Frequency Class Interval Frequency

Mid

Limtation

Relative Cumulative (K)

of Each

3 72 69.5-74.5 13.04 73.92 4 65-69

The ditribution of student‟s predicated in pre-test score of Experimental group can also be seen in following figure.

Interval (I)

Figure 4.1 The Frequency Distribution of Pre-test of the

Experimental Group

The table and figure above showed the pre-test score students in experimental group. It can be seen that there were 5 students who got score 55-59. There were 4 students who got score 60-64. There were 5 students who got score 65-69. There were 3 students who got score 70-74. There were 3 students who got score 75-79. There were 3 students who got score 80-84.

b. The Result of Post-Test

Based on the data on the table 4.1 . It can be seen that the student‟s highest score was 95 and the student‟s lowest score was 70. To determine

the range of score, the class interval and interval temporary, the writer calculated using formula as follows:

The highest score (H)

The lowest score (L)

The range score (R)

= H-L + 1 = 95-70 + 1 = 25 + 1 = 26

The class interval (K)

= 1 + 3,3 log n = 1 + 3,3 log (23) = 1 + 3,3 .1,4 = 1 + 4,62 = 5,62 =6

Interval of Temporary (I) = R/K

So, the range of score was 26, the class interval was 6 and the interval of temporary was 4. It was presented using frequency distribution in the following table:

Table 4.3 Frequency Distribution of the Post-Test Score

The

Frequency Frequency Class Interval Frequency

Mid

Limtation

Relative Cumulative (K)

of Each

7 87 84.5-89.5 30.43 69.94 4 80-84

The ditribution of student‟s predicated in post-test score of Experimental group can also be seen in following figure.

75-79 70-74

Interval (I)

Figure 4.2 The Frequency Distribution of Post-test of the

Experimental Group

The table and figure above showed the post-test score students in experimental group. It can be seen that there were 1 student who got score 70-74. There were 4 students who got score 75-79. There were 4 students who got score 80-84. There were 7 students who got score 85-89. There were 5 students who got score 90-94. There were 2 students who got score 95-99.

Dokumen yang terkait

THE EFFECT OF READING LOG TOWARD READING ACHIEVEMENT AND READING STRATEGY USE OF THE FOURTH SEMESTER STUDENTS AT ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM IN IAIN PALANGKA RAYA THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Sarjana Pen

0 0 21

PENGARUH PERILAKU KONSUMEN DAN LABEL HALAL PRODUK MAKANAN RUMAH TANGGA TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN KONSUMSI DI PALANGKA RAYA (Keluarga Mahasiswa Ekonomi Syariah IAIN Palangka Raya)

0 2 106

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI TERBIMBING BERBANTUAN MEDIA ANIMASI TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK PADA MATERI SISTEM PEREDARAN DARAH KELAS VIII SEMESTER I MTs MIFTAHUL JANNAH PALANGKA RAYA TAHUN AJARAN 20152016

0 0 208

BAB II KAJIAN PUSTAKA A. Penelitian yang Relevan - Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) menggunakan peta konsep terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada materi struktur dan fungsi tubuh tumbuhan di Kelas VIII MTs M

0 0 46

EFEKTIVITAS REMEDIAL PADA MATA PELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM PADA KELAS III DI SDN 2 PAHANDUT PALANGKA RAYA SKRIPSI

0 0 99

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH CARTOON MOVIE TOWARD VOCABULARY SCORE AT THE SEVENTH GRADERS OF MTs MUSLIMAT NU PALANGKA RAYA THESIS Presented to Department of Education of the State Islamic Institute of Palangka raya in Partial Fulfillment of the Requiremen

0 1 157

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENGLISH CARTOON MOVIE TOWARDS VOCABULARY SCORE Uswatun Hasanah Akhmad Ali Mirza akhmad.ali.mirzaiain-palangkaraya.ac.id IAIN Palangka Raya Abstract - The effectiveness of English cartoon movie towards vocabulary score - Digital Librar

0 10 20

PERSEPSI PENGUSAHA MUSLIM KOTA PALANGKA RAYA TENTANG MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN (MEA)

0 0 116

BY DYAH SRI WULANDARI NIM 1301120858 STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION 2017 M 1439 H

0 2 100

BY SRI TINA WATI NIM 1201120795 STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION 2017 M 1439 H

0 0 16