A Guidance regarding Goal and Objectives

72 MinistryAgency’s Working and Budget Planning 294 provided that the Satker is part of the ministerial working unit that conducting some activities as part of the organization’s programs. 295 Furthermore, others regulation 296 mentioned that the head of state budget working unit KPA is authorized to sign a contract with a third party. Based on the interpretation above, when Perpres No. 802011 mentions that the trust fund institution is treated as a Satker, means that the chairperson of the Satker KPA is authorized to enter into agreement with a third party 297 on behalf the ministryagency. In sum, we may say that Indonesian development trust funds are technically has a quasi- independent legal personality. As it is part of working unit at the institution who own the trust fund, they don’t have separate legal personality. But, as a state budget working unit, they are authorized to act independently and to enter into contract with the third party. With the current legal status, it is unclear whether the Indonesian development trust fund has its own legal personality or not. Another question that also arises is whether Indonesian development trust funds has a legal capacity to enter into agreement with foreign donor or with international organizations other than goods and services provider?

B. Goals and Objectives

1. A Guidance regarding Goal and Objectives

One of the key lessons learned from international best practices is that it is critical to have the basic vision of the fund in place before making decisions on design issues. 298 Also, it is more congenial and less controversial to discuss the potential scope or goals and objectives of 294 Government Regulation No. 212004 regarding The Preparation of MinistryAgency’s Working Plan and. 295 It also has been defined similarly by the Presidential Regulation No. 52015 on Government Procurement and Ministry of Finance Regulation No. 170PMK.052010 on Completion of State’s Budget Working Unit Claims. 296 Id. 297 Guidelines for Accountable Entities and Implementation Structures, MCC US July 21, 2008, at Sec. 2.1 A. 298 Ruth Norris, supra note 291, at 34. 73 the fund before there is a sum of money over which various constituencies are already competing. Potential goals and objectives of the trust funds are translated from its broad vision and mission statement. 299 The vision of trust fund itself should clarify the organization’s direction and purpose; be relatively action oriented and future oriented; reflect high ideals and challenging ambitions; and capture the organization’s uniqueness and distinctive competence as well as desirable features of its history, culture and values. 300 While a mission is a clear statement of the reasons for an organization’s existence, the purposes or functions it desires to fulfil, its primary customer base, and the primary methods through which it intends to fulfil this purposes. 301 Generally funds that focus their goals and objectives on activities selected for strategic impact, feasibility, and ability to be carried out quickly to build a track record, do better than those that start out with an “open door” policy based on reacting to whatever is proposed. 302 Finally, funds that lack a focused strategy run the risk of spreading their resources too thinly, financing many discrete efforts but cumulatively failing to achieve any significant impact,” highlighting even more the importance of di scussing “scope” before “design.”. 303

2. Unclear Guidance of Goals and Objectives