THE REPRESENTATION OF POWER IN JOKOWIDODO SPEECH.

(1)

THE REPRESENTATION O

Submitted as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement

Registration Number :

ENGLISH

FACULTY OF LANGUAGE

STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

THE REPRESENTATION OF POWER IN JOKO

WIDODO’S SPEECH

A THESIS

Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra

By:

SERIUS AFANDI BUKIT

Registration Number : 2113220037

ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS

STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

2016

F POWER IN JOKO

for the Degree of

AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT

AND ARTS


(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

i ABSTRACT

Bukit, Serius Afandi, 2113220037. The Representation of Power in Joko Widodo Speech. A Thesis, English Departement, Faculty of Language and Arts, State University of Medan, 2016.

This study aims to figure out how power can be seen in the Joko Widodo’s speech. what is the dominant types used in Joko Widodo’s speech and why. In this case we were talking about Discourse analysis problem. It deals with the tenor which is focused on the power. The data that support this study by using descriptive qualitative data by reading some references related to the subject matters. The data of this study taken from article in the internet. The data were the speech of Joko Widodo, it takes from different four speech that Jokowi have done in different place and situation. The writer found that the power that realized in Joko widodo’s speech mostly is equal while Jokowi speak in the international situation.


(7)

ii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Great thanks and praise to the Almighty Allah SWT who has blessed and given the ability to the writer to complete his thesis as the partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Sarjana Sastra at the English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

This thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and the help of several individuals who always contributed and extended their valuable assistances in the preparation and completion of this thesis. The writer’s special appreciation goes to:

Prof. Dr. Syawal Gultom, M.Pd., the Rector of State University of Medan.

Dr. Isda Pramuniati, M.Hum., the Dean Faculty of Language and Arts, State University of Medan.

Prof. Dr. Hj. Sumarsih, M.Pd., the Head of English and Literature Department, Dra. Meisuri, M.A., the Secretary of English Department, and Syamsul Bahri, S.S, M.Hum., the Head of English Non-Educational Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.

Drs. Muhammad Natsir, M.Hum as his thesis supervisor.

Prof. Dr. Berlin Sibarani, M.Pd., Indra Hartoyo, S.Pd, M.Hum. as his thesis examiners.


(8)

iii

Eis Sri Wahyuningsih, M.Pd., as the Administration Staff of English Department for helping the writer in preparing all the fulfillment in conducting this thesis.

 Beloved parents, Rianto Bukit and Arihta br. Sitepu for the patience, affection, prayer, financial support and taught the writer many worth things in facing the life. Thanks also given to her sisters Fitri Panca and Febriyani.

 All his beloved friends in English Literature A and B 2011 and other faculty, especially for Rezeky Sofian, Sofian Fernandesh, Raja Bobby, David Sihite, Manguhal Hutagalung, and all of the Genchat fams , and others that cannot be mentioned all. Thanks for their support, kindness, great love and care to the writer, also warm hearted encouragement friendship in finishing this thesis to the writer.

 The people who direct or indirectly contributed in this study, your kindness means a lot to him.

Medan, March 2016 The writer,


(9)

v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...i

ACKNOWLEDGMENT...ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS... ...iii

CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION...1

A. The Background of the Study...1

B. The Problem of the Study...3

C. The Scope of the Study...3

D. The objective of the study ...4

E. The Significance of the Study...4

CHAPTER II : REVIEW OF LITERATURE...5

A. Theorytical Framework...5

B. Context...5

1. Linguistic context...5

2. Social context...6

a. Context of culture...7

b. Ideology ...8

c. Context of situation...9

1) Field ...10


(10)

v

.

3) Mode ...12

C. Power...12

D. Biography of Joko Widodo...13

CHAPTER III : RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...17

A. Research Design...17

B. Source of Data...17

C. Technique of Collecting Data...18

D. Technique of Analyzing Data...18

CHAPTER IV : DATA ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FINDINGS... A. The Data...19

B. The data analysis...19

C. Research findings...40

D. Discussion...40

CHAPTER V : CONCLUSSION AND SUGGESTION...42

A. Conclussion...42

B. Suggeston...42

REFERENCES...43


(11)

CHAPTER I INTRODECTION

A. The background of the study

Everybody on this world cannot live with their self; they need to interact with the others. That’s why people use language, because language is a network of relationship. According to Halliday (2002) one function of language is to provide for interaction between people, by allowing the expression of statues, social, and individual attitudes, assessment, judgment and the like; and this is includes participation in linguistic interaction. Language itself defines as the roles which people may take the situation in which they are communicating with one another. Halliday stated that language is simultaneously used as representation, exchange, and organization of experience. Every language incorporates opinion whereby the speaker can vary his own communication role, making assertion, asking question, giving orders, expressing doubt and so on.

According to Hallyday, there is an interrelation between the “surface level realization of the linguistics function and the sociocultural framework” (munday, 2001: 90). Register consist of three types; they are Field, Mode, and Tenor. Field concerns with the topic of situation or in another word what is going on or what activity is taking place. Mode is about who takes part in situation and where the place situation takes. Meanwhile, tenor deals with things that influence the situation. How the social relationship is played by addressee and addresser.


(12)

This study attempt to discuss one of three types of register, it is tenor which is focus on power. The source data of this study is the script of Ir. Joko widodo speech. Tenor that is interpersonal meaning its concern more with the interaction between the speaker and addressee, influence his behavior and how the speaker expresses his viewpoint.

This reason why this research was conducted because people sometimes don’t realize that the way they speak can show the aspect of power and status in tenor. They are affected by the wealth, ethnicity, position, age, geographical origins, sex, knowledge, and physical appearance of the speaker.

Chronologically at one occasion there occurs a conflict or discrepancy of need between two sides of the participants. The conflict sets to roles that are to that of the addresser (the speaker in spoken language or the writer in the written language) and that of the addressee (the listener/hearer in spoken language or the reader in written language). After the participants have their own roles, they are then set to social relationship to solve the conflict.

The script sample of Ir. Joko Widodo’s speech can be seen as following : “Salam Damai Sejahtera untuk kita semua, Baru saja kami mengucapkan sumpah, sumpah itu memiliki makna spiritual yang dalam, yang menegaskan komitmen untuk bekerja keras mencapai kehendak kita bersama sebagai bangsa yang besar.”


(13)

The power of the speech from this script sample can be seen that Joko Widodo statement has an equal status with the addressee, because he state that “we” as an Indonesian society.

Joko "Jokowi" Widodo is an Indonesian politician who has been President of Indonesia since October 2014. Jokowi's popularity across Indonesia rose sharply following his election to the high-profile position of governor of Jakarta. During 2013 and early 2014 he was increasingly seen as a potential PDI-P (Indonesia Democratic Party - Struggle) candidate for the 2014 presidential election. His nomination was announced on 14 March 2014. This study will help readers and the students to know how are tenor in Ir. Joko Widodo’s speech.

Someone has power is she/he gained wealth. In other words, someone is powerful if she/he is rich as by his richness he/she can pay others to do or not to do what he wants (Saragih:40:2014)

B. The Problems of the Study

The problems of this study are formulated as the following: 1. How is power realized in Joko Widodo’s speech?

2. What types of power is dominantly used in Joko Widodo’s speech?

3. Why such type is dominantly used Joko Widodo’s speech?


(14)

The research studies about power applied in Joko Widodo’s speech. The writer chooses the speech of Jokowi’s speech. It is taken from article in the internet.

D. The Objectives of the Study The objectives of the study are:

1. To describe what types of power is used in Joko Widodo’s speech based on the place and situation.

2. To describe the most dominant types of power used in Joko Widodo’s speech in every place and situation.

3. To explain why the dominant type is used in Joko Widodo’s speech. E. The Significant of the Study

1. The findings will hopefully give the benefit to the readers who want to know about power in tenor.

2. The findings are expected to give the information about how to make a good conversation according to the place and situation.

3. The findings are expected to give more knowledge to the next researcher who want to develop this study, especially is about power in tenor.


(15)

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGESSION

A. Conclusion

Aftef analyzing the fepfesentation of powef in Joko widodo’s speech, the conclusions can be dfawn as following:

1. All of the fouf speech that Jokowi have done wefe mostly using an equal powef; they afe, Joko widodo’s speech in Istana negafa (60%). Joko widodo’s speech in Confefence of Asia-Affica (75%), Joko widodo’s speech in Washington D.C (75%).

2. The only speech that mostly using unequal powef wefe Joko widodo’s speech in Kampung pulo jahe (85%)

B. Sugession

Based on the conclusion, it is well to suggested that:

1. It was suggested that the students know how to speak well accofding to whom they speak and accofding to the situation.

2. It was hoped that the feadef should use the powef coffectly to make good convefsation.


(16)

REFFERENCES

Adjei S.B. (2013) Discourse Analysis: Examining Language Use in

Context

Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. London : st. Martin.

salliday, M.A.K. (2002.) Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Lo1don: Jonathan Webster.

Lukin, A., Moore, A. R., serke, M., Wegener, R. & Wu, C.( 2011), 'Halliday's model of register revisited and explored', Linguistics and the Human

Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 187-213.

Lynne Y. (2006). The Power of Language: How discourse influence

society.London.

Martin, J.R. (1992). English Text : System and Structure. A1sterda1 : John Benja1ins.

Munday, Jere1y. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies : Theories and

Applications. London: Routledge.

Nahl Diane. (2006). A discourse analysis technique for charting the flow of

micro- informationbehavior. Depart1ent of Infor1ation and Co1puter

Sciences, University of sawaii.

Saragih, (2013). Functional Grammar. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan

Saragih, (2013). Language Varieties, State University of Medan, Medan.

Saragih. (2013). Discourse Analysis/ A Study on Discourse Based on Systemic

Functional Linguistic Theory. State University of Medan, Medan.

Song Lichao, (2010). The Role of Context in Discourse Analysis, Qingdao University of Science and Technology. China

Strauss, Ansel1 and Juliet Corbin. (2003). Dasar-dasar penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar offset.

Tho1pson, G. (2014). Introduction Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). new York :

routledge


(17)

http://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20150422132321-106-48424/pidato- lengkap-jokowi-di-kaa/

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joko_Widodo


(1)

This study attempt to discuss one of three types of register, it is tenor which is focus on power. The source data of this study is the script of Ir. Joko widodo speech. Tenor that is interpersonal meaning its concern more with the interaction between the speaker and addressee, influence his behavior and how the speaker expresses his viewpoint.

This reason why this research was conducted because people sometimes don’t realize that the way they speak can show the aspect of power and status in tenor. They are affected by the wealth, ethnicity, position, age, geographical origins, sex, knowledge, and physical appearance of the speaker.

Chronologically at one occasion there occurs a conflict or discrepancy of need between two sides of the participants. The conflict sets to roles that are to that of the addresser (the speaker in spoken language or the writer in the written language) and that of the addressee (the listener/hearer in spoken language or the reader in written language). After the participants have their own roles, they are then set to social relationship to solve the conflict.

The script sample of Ir. Joko Widodo’s speech can be seen as following : “Salam Damai Sejahtera untuk kita semua, Baru saja kami mengucapkan sumpah, sumpah itu memiliki makna spiritual yang dalam, yang menegaskan komitmen untuk bekerja keras mencapai kehendak kita bersama sebagai bangsa yang besar.”


(2)

The power of the speech from this script sample can be seen that Joko Widodo statement has an equal status with the addressee, because he state that “we” as an Indonesian society.

Joko "Jokowi" Widodo is an Indonesian politician who has been President of Indonesia since October 2014. Jokowi's popularity across Indonesia rose sharply following his election to the high-profile position of governor of Jakarta. During 2013 and early 2014 he was increasingly seen as a potential PDI-P (Indonesia Democratic Party - Struggle) candidate for the 2014 presidential election. His nomination was announced on 14 March 2014. This study will help readers and the students to know how are tenor in Ir. Joko Widodo’s speech.

Someone has power is she/he gained wealth. In other words, someone is powerful if she/he is rich as by his richness he/she can pay others to do or not to do what he wants (Saragih:40:2014)

B. The Problems of the Study

The problems of this study are formulated as the following: 1. How is power realized in Joko Widodo’s speech?

2. What types of power is dominantly used in Joko Widodo’s speech? 3. Why such type is dominantly used Joko Widodo’s speech?


(3)

The research studies about power applied in Joko Widodo’s speech. The writer chooses the speech of Jokowi’s speech. It is taken from article in the internet.

D. The Objectives of the Study The objectives of the study are:

1. To describe what types of power is used in Joko Widodo’s speech based on the place and situation.

2. To describe the most dominant types of power used in Joko Widodo’s speech in every place and situation.

3. To explain why the dominant type is used in Joko Widodo’s speech. E. The Significant of the Study

1. The findings will hopefully give the benefit to the readers who want to know about power in tenor.

2. The findings are expected to give the information about how to make a good conversation according to the place and situation.

3. The findings are expected to give more knowledge to the next researcher who want to develop this study, especially is about power in tenor.


(4)

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGESSION A. Conclusion

Aftef analyzing the fepfesentation of powef in Joko widodo’s speech, the conclusions can be dfawn as following:

1. All of the fouf speech that Jokowi have done wefe mostly using an equal powef; they afe, Joko widodo’s speech in Istana negafa (60%). Joko widodo’s speech in Confefence of Asia-Affica (75%), Joko widodo’s speech in Washington D.C (75%).

2. The only speech that mostly using unequal powef wefe Joko widodo’s speech in Kampung pulo jahe (85%)

B. Sugession

Based on the conclusion, it is well to suggested that:

1. It was suggested that the students know how to speak well accofding to whom they speak and accofding to the situation.

2. It was hoped that the feadef should use the powef coffectly to make good convefsation.


(5)

REFFERENCES

Adjei S.B. (2013) Discourse Analysis: Examining Language Use in

Context

Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. London : st. Martin.

salliday, M.A.K. (2002.) Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Lo1don: Jonathan Webster.

Lukin, A., Moore, A. R., serke, M., Wegener, R. & Wu, C.( 2011), 'Halliday's model of register revisited and explored', Linguistics and the Human Sciences, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 187-213.

Lynne Y. (2006). The Power of Language: How discourse influence

society.London.

Martin, J.R. (1992). English Text : System and Structure. A1sterda1 : John Benja1ins.

Munday, Jere1y. (2001). Introducing Translation Studies : Theories and Applications. London: Routledge.

Nahl Diane. (2006). A discourse analysis technique for charting the flow of micro- informationbehavior. Depart1ent of Infor1ation and Co1puter Sciences, University of sawaii.

Saragih, (2013). Functional Grammar. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan

Saragih, (2013). Language Varieties, State University of Medan, Medan.

Saragih. (2013). Discourse Analysis/ A Study on Discourse Based on Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory. State University of Medan, Medan.

Song Lichao, (2010). The Role of Context in Discourse Analysis, Qingdao University of Science and Technology. China

Strauss, Ansel1 and Juliet Corbin. (2003). Dasar-dasar penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar offset.

Tho1pson, G. (2014). Introduction Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). new York : routledge


(6)

http://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20150422132321-106-48424/pidato- lengkap-jokowi-di-kaa/

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joko_Widodo