Grade Achievement DATA ANALYSIS AND THE RESULT OF THE STUDY

The number of subjects in this experiment for experimental and control groups were 32. The t-value is higher than t-table 4, 18 3, 5 so the difference is statistically significant. Based on the computation there was significant difference between teaching descriptive text using outdoor classical music and teaching descriptive text without using outdoor classical music.

4.3. Grade Achievement

The study was to find out whether using outdoor classical music as a media for teaching students in writing descriptive text of the eleventh grade students was effective or not. The measurement of the students’ achievement could be interpreted based on Harris 1969: 134 as mentioned in chapter III. Frequency was the number of the students in the one grade. The number of the students in the one grade was put into percentage. To show the score described in the frequency and percentage, the list below was the achievement according to the grade for the both group. Table 1 The list of the Experimental Group Frequency Percentage A 10 62,5 B 6 37,5 C - - D - - Table 2 The list of the Control Group Frequency Percentage A 4 25 B 12 75 C - - D - - The result of writing descriptive text of experimental and control group is reported here in the form of diagram. The vertical line shows the percentage of students for each grade. The horizontal line shows the grade achievement of the scores obtained by students. This diagram presents the achievement of both groups. The broken line --- describes the students’ achievement of the control group. The percentage of the students who got grade A and B were 25 and 75 . The solid line describes the students’ achievement of the experimental group. The percentage of the students who got grade A and B were 62.5 and 37.5 . D C B A 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 37.5 62.5 75 25 The diagram above describes that in control group as presented by the broken line ---, students who got D are 0. It means that no students got 0 – 49 scores in control group. Then, the students who got C are also 0. It means that no students got 50 – 59 scores in control group. Students who got B are 75. It means that 75 of 16 students got 60 – 79 scores. There are 12 students who got those scores. While students who got A is 25. It means that 25 of 16 students got 80 – 100 scores. There are 4 students who got those scores. Meanwhile, the experimental group is presented by the solid line . Students who got D are 0. It means that no students got 0 – 49 scores in experimental group. Then, students who got C are also 0. It means that no students got 50 -59 scores in experimental group. Students who got B are 37.5. It means that 37.5 of 16 students got 60 – 79 scores. There are 6 students who got those scores. While students who got A are 62.5. It means that 62.5 of 16 students got 80 -100 scores. There are 10 students who got those scores. The comparison above explains that there is a significant improvement from the students’ achievement in which the control group only 25 of students who got A, while the experimental group 62.5 of students who got A. 4.4. Discussion of the Research Findings 4.4.1. The Meaning of the Test

Dokumen yang terkait

THE TYPES OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IMPLEMENTED BY THE TEACHER IN TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS The Types Of Corrective Feedback Implemented By The Teacher In Teaching Writing Descriptive Text To The Second Year Students Of

0 4 18

TEEACHING Teaching Writing Recount Text For The Second Year Students Of SMP Negeri 2 Banyudono In 2012/2013 Academic Year (A Descriptive Study).

0 1 13

INTRODUCTION Teaching Writing Recount Text For The Second Year Students Of SMP Negeri 2 Banyudono In 2012/2013 Academic Year (A Descriptive Study).

0 1 6

TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT FOR THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 BANYUDONO IN 2012/2013 Teaching Writing Recount Text For The Second Year Students Of SMP Negeri 2 Banyudono In 2012/2013 Academic Year (A Descriptive Study).

0 1 21

STUDENTS CAPABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA NEGERI 1 PURWODADI IN 2010-2011 STUDENTS CAPABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA NEGERI 1 PURWODADI IN 2010-2011 ACADEMIC YEAR.

0 0 13

A STUDY ON TEACHING WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT TO THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 COLOMADU A Study of Teaching Writing Descriptive Text To The Second Year Students Of SMP Negeri 2 Colomadu In 2010/2011 Academic Year.

0 0 14

INTRODUCTION A Study of Teaching Writing Descriptive Text To The Second Year Students Of SMP Negeri 2 Colomadu In 2010/2011 Academic Year.

0 0 4

The Use of Pictures to Teach Writing Descriptive Text (The Case of the Eighth-Year Students of SMP N 13 Semarang in the Academic Year of 2006/2007).

0 0 1

THE USE OF CUE CARDS IN TEACHING SPOKEN DESCRIPTIVE TEXT: The case of eighth year students of SMP N 13 Semarang Academic Year 2006/2007.

0 0 60

AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ COMPETENCE IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS: A CASE STUDY AT THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 LINGSAR IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20142015

0 0 13