Methodology – legal research Traditionally Owned Land and the Threat from Investment Adat and the Dreaming A Comparative Study of the Legal Protection of Traditional Owners and their Land Rights in Bali, Bali and the Northen Terr.

A comparative study: Traditionally-owned land and investment. In its current form it contains a clause at s 51xxvi which allows the Commonwealth to make laws with respect to, ‘The people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws,’ giving the Commonwealth power to treat people differently according to their ethnicity or origins. It is known as the race power. There is close to universal agreement in Australia that this clause should go. Section 25 of the Constitution penalises states where they remove the vote from Indigenous people, by reducing their population numbers for House of Representatives seats. The section implies states might perform such an unacceptable act and is basically a dead letter, as a reminder of the past. Like s 51xxvi, there is near universal agreement it too should go. With this in mind, the circumstances surrounding legal protection of traditional land in Indonesia starts on a higher level than that in the Northern Territory.

3. Methodology – legal research

This research is a legal, normative research conducted through a desktop audit to locate relevant national laws of Indonesia, local regulations from Bali and legislation from the Republic of Indonesia and the Commonwealth of Australia and the Northern Territory. A statutory analysis was applied to two selected case studies, one from each jurisdiction to identify breaches and loopholes used by investors. A comparative approach was then chosen between Bali and the Northern Territory where the similarities shared by the jurisdictions’ traditional land owners dominated the differences: a. Both have communities with traditional ownership of their land under the description of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People; b. Both have communities facing threats from investors and other agents to the traditional ownership of their land; c. Both jurisdictions have national and regional legislation that make it possible for ownership of traditional land to be extinguished where the public interest outweighs the traditional community ’s interest, and A comparative study: Traditionally-owned land and investment. d. Both require certain conditions to be met where traditional owners have been dispossessed or seek to reclaim their land. The differences between the jurisdictions can mostly be attributed to their Constitutions: a. The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia recognises and respects traditional land ownership while the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia does not include reference to its traditional land owners b. Traditional land owners on Bali have a stable traditional system of land ownership governed by customary law Adat while Indigenous Northern Territorians seek to reclaim their traditional land their dreaming following the colonisation of Australia 200 years ago and the introduction of terra nullius by the British colonisers; c. Traditional owners on Bali remain culturally strong in spite of inevitable change imposed by the growth in tourism while Indigenous Australians struggle for national recognition and respect and are the country’s most disadvantaged group and in the Northern Territory have the highest percentage of prisoners 84, attributed to cultural breakdown and loss of land and language. This research draws on two case studies to illustrate the impact of investment and disturbance of traditional lands. In Bali the first case study shows how in a village with a strong commitment to Adat , one villager and one investor managed to circumvent the law resulting in violation of Adat and external ownership of customary land. The investor concerned was obliged to know his legal obligations and responsibilities under Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment Law Number 10 of 2009 concerning Tourism, and importantly the Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Law . In the Northern Territory, case study 2 examines a lengthy land claim that was at first defeated by action of the Government when they too managed to circumvent a local Planning Regulation.

4. Case studies and analysis