Berdasarkan informasi yang Anda miliki tentang

Bagian 3 Berdasarkan informasi yang Anda miliki tentang

Universitas Kristen Maranatha UKM , Universitas Katolik Parahyangan UNPAR , dan WIDYATAMA Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bandung STIEB , maka beri angka 1 untuk universitas yang TERBAIK dalam hal pernyataan yang ada di kotak sebelah KIRI, beri angka 3 untuk universitas yang TERBURUK dalam hal pernyataan yang ada. Universitas Kristen Universitas Katolik Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi No INFORMASI yang SAYA MILIKI menyatakan bahwa MARANATHA UKM PARAHYANGAN UNPAR Bandung STIEBWidyatama 1 KECANGGIHAN TEKNOLOGI adanya internet, dll 2 Ke-LENGKAP-an fasilitas fisik gedung, laboratorium, ruang kuliah, perpustakaan, dll 3 KEMENARIKAN media PROMOSI yang digunakan brosur, spanduk, iklan,dll 4 KETERSEDIAAN media PROMOSI yang MEMADAI sehingga Universitas dapat dikenal DIMANA-MANA 5 Secara umum, tingkat AKREDITASI program-program pendidikan nya BAIK 6 Kesesuaian KURIKULUM yang digunakan dengan perkembangan IPTEK 7 Ketersediaan UNIT-UNIT KEGIATAN EKSKUL yang MENDUKUNG untuk penyaluran bakat dan hobby 8 Ke-UP TO DATE-an informasi yang diberikan info tentang jurusan baru, pendaftaran, dsb 9 Perasaan BANGGA jika DITERIMA 10 KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN TERBAIK 11 KUALITAS DOSEN PENGAJAR TERBAIK 12 KESAN orang-orang di sekeliling saya mengenai KUALITAS LULUSAN nya 13 Ke-MUDAH-an untuk MENCARI KERJA setelah lulus 14 REPUTASI Universitas di mata masyarakat 15 Ketersediaan BANYAK PILIHAN JURUSANFAKULTAS 16 SUASANA AKADEMIK paling MENDUKUNG untuk BELAJAR 17 Ke-STRATEGIS-an LOKASI Universitas 18 BANYAK TEMANKERABAT yang MEREKOMENDASIKAN nya 19 Ke-SESUAI-an BIAYA KULIAH dengan FASILITAS yang DISEDIAKAN 20 Ke-SESUAI-an BIAYA KULIAH dengan KUALITAS yang DIBERIKAN 21 Ke-SESUAI-an BIAYA KULIAH dengan KEMAMPUAN orangtua saya Lampiran 2 ƒ Data Mentah Kuesioner Uji Coba 12 ƒ Data Mentah Kuesioner Penelitian Lampiran 3 ƒ Validitas Konstruk Lampiran 4 ƒ Validitas Kuesioner Uji Coba 1 ƒ Validitas Kuesioner Uji Coba 2 ƒ Validitas Kuesioner Penelitian Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Uji Coba 1 Method 1 space saver will be used for this analysis R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A Mean Std Dev Cases 1. VAR00001 4.2000 .6644 30.0 2. VAR00002 4.4000 .4983 30.0 3. VAR00003 3.7667 .7739 30.0 4. VAR00004 3.7000 .6513 30.0 5. VAR00005 3.9333 .5833 30.0 6. VAR00006 3.9333 .5208 30.0 7. VAR00007 4.1333 .6814 30.0 8. VAR00008 3.8000 .6644 30.0 9. VAR00009 4.0667 .6915 30.0 10. VAR00010 4.1000 .5477 30.0 11. VAR00011 3.9667 .4901 30.0 12. VAR00012 3.8667 .5713 30.0 13. VAR00013 3.7000 .7497 30.0 14. VAR00014 3.9000 .5477 30.0 15. VAR00015 3.8333 .7466 30.0 16. VAR00016 3.9667 .7184 30.0 17. VAR00017 4.0000 1.0171 30.0 18. VAR00018 3.8000 .8867 30.0 19. VAR00019 3.6333 .6687 30.0 20. VAR00020 3.8333 .5921 30.0 21. VAR00021 3.5000 .8200 30.0 N of Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 82.0333 44.7230 6.6875 21 _ R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted VAR00001 77.8333 40.1437 .4915 .8072 VAR00002 77.6333 42.0333 .3779 .8134 VAR00003 78.2667 39.5126 .4740 .8075 VAR00004 78.3333 41.1264 .3798 .8126 VAR00005 78.1000 41.4034 .3969 .8121 VAR00006 78.1000 41.4034 .4548 .8103 VAR00007 77.9000 40.8517 .3911 .8120 VAR00008 78.2333 40.5299 .4435 .8095 VAR00009 77.9667 39.9644 .4896 .8071 VAR00010 77.9333 40.7540 .5246 .8072 VAR00011 78.0667 41.3057 .5043 .8090 VAR00012 78.1667 40.7644 .4978 .8080 VAR00013 78.3333 38.2989 .6317 .7987 VAR00014 78.1333 40.8092 .5164 .8076 VAR00015 78.2000 45.7517 -.1570 .8400 VAR00016 78.0667 39.3747 .5360 .8044 VAR00017 78.0333 43.2747 .0309 .8394 VAR00018 78.2333 41.9092 .1766 .8262 VAR00019 78.4000 40.3862 .4577 .8088 VAR00020 78.2000 40.6483 .4933 .8079 VAR00021 78.5333 39.2920 .4629 .8081 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 30.0 N of Items = 21 Alpha = .8199 Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Uji Coba 2 Correlations 1.000 .426 . .019 30 30 .426 1.000 .019 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00001 VAR00022 VAR00001 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .438 . .016 30 30 .438 1.000 .016 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00002 VAR00022 VAR00002 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .378 . .039 30 30 .378 1.000 .039 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00003 VAR00022 VAR00003 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .519 . .003 30 30 .519 1.000 .003 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00004 VAR00022 VAR00004 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .463 . .010 30 30 .463 1.000 .010 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00005 VAR00022 VAR00005 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .628 . .000 30 30 .628 1.000 .000 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00006 VAR00022 VAR00006 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .704 . .000 30 30 .704 1.000 .000 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00007 VAR00022 VAR00007 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .593 . .001 30 30 .593 1.000 .001 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00008 VAR00022 VAR00008 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .560 . .001 30 30 .560 1.000 .001 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00009 VAR00022 VAR00009 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .531 . .003 30 30 .531 1.000 .003 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00010 VAR00022 VAR00010 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .521 . .003 30 30 .521 1.000 .003 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00011 VAR00022 VAR00011 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .537 . .002 30 30 .537 1.000 .002 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00012 VAR00022 VAR00012 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .618 . .000 30 30 .618 1.000 .000 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00013 VAR00022 VAR00013 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .729 . .000 30 30 .729 1.000 .000 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00014 VAR00022 VAR00014 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .524 . .003 30 30 .524 1.000 .003 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00015 VAR00022 VAR00015 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .701 . .000 30 30 .701 1.000 .000 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00016 VAR00022 VAR00016 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .437 . .016 30 30 .437 1.000 .016 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00017 VAR00022 VAR00017 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .669 . .000 30 30 .669 1.000 .000 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00018 VAR00022 VAR00018 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .492 . .006 30 30 .492 1.000 .006 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00019 VAR00022 VAR00019 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .687 . .000 30 30 .687 1.000 .000 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00020 VAR00022 VAR00020 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level 2-tailed. . Correlations 1.000 .406 . .026 30 30 .406 1.000 .026 . 30 30 Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N Pearson Correlation Sig. 2-tailed N VAR00021 VAR00022 VAR00021 VAR00022 Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level 2-tailed. . Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 30.0 N of Items = 21 Alpha = .8815 Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Penelitian Method 1 space saver will be used for this analysis _ R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A Mean Std Dev Cases 1. VAR00001 3.8343 .9861 181.0 2. VAR00002 3.8840 .9791 181.0 3. VAR00003 3.6133 .9514 181.0 4. VAR00004 3.8453 1.0793 181.0 5. VAR00005 3.9945 .9159 181.0 6. VAR00006 3.8674 .8782 181.0 7. VAR00007 3.6519 1.0085 181.0 8. VAR00008 3.6354 1.0851 181.0 9. VAR00009 3.7182 1.2397 181.0 10. VAR00010 3.8564 .9611 181.0 11. VAR00011 3.8287 .9709 181.0 12. VAR00012 3.6298 .9781 181.0 13. VAR00013 3.3923 .9976 181.0 14. VAR00014 3.8398 1.0337 181.0 15. VAR00015 3.8564 1.1457 181.0 16. VAR00016 3.6796 .9815 181.0 17. VAR00017 3.9392 1.1263 181.0 18. VAR00018 3.5912 1.3657 181.0 19. VAR00019 3.3646 1.1641 181.0 20. VAR00020 3.3702 1.1060 181.0 21. VAR00021 2.8785 1.3278 181.0 N of Statistics for Mean Variance Std Dev Variables SCALE 77.2707 215.1985 14.6696 21 _ R E L I A B I L I T Y A N A L Y S I S - S C A L E A L P H A Item-total Statistics Scale Scale Corrected Mean Variance Item- Alpha if Item if Item Total if Item Deleted Deleted Correlation Deleted VAR00001 73.4365 196.4807 .6419 .9294 VAR00002 73.3867 197.8385 .5955 .9301 VAR00003 73.6575 202.4153 .4388 .9326 VAR00004 73.4254 194.0791 .6636 .9289 VAR00005 73.2762 197.0677 .6725 .9290 VAR00006 73.4033 198.5975 .6395 .9296 VAR00007 73.6188 197.4372 .5908 .9302 VAR00008 73.6354 197.4885 .5421 .9311 VAR00009 73.5525 191.2153 .6547 .9291 VAR00010 73.4144 194.1551 .7512 .9276 VAR00011 73.4420 195.9702 .6727 .9289 VAR00012 73.6409 195.0092 .7040 .9284 VAR00013 73.8785 196.1629 .6456 .9293 VAR00014 73.4309 194.6466 .6755 .9287 VAR00015 73.4144 191.8107 .6956 .9282 VAR00016 73.5912 195.0875 .6983 .9284 VAR00017 73.3315 195.5451 .5837 .9304 VAR00018 73.6796 189.1967 .6424 .9296 VAR00019 73.9061 196.8522 .5201 .9316 VAR00020 73.9006 194.2901 .6384 .9293 VAR00021 74.3923 201.4064 .3192 .9365 Reliability Coefficients N of Cases = 181.0 N of Items = 21 Alpha = .9330 Lampiran 5 ƒ Analisis Regresi Descriptive Statistics 181 1.00 181.00 91.0000 52.3943 181 1.00 5.00 2.6409 .9057 181 1.00 5.00 3.8343 .9861 181 1.00 5.00 3.8840 .9791 181 1.00 5.00 3.6133 .9514 181 1.00 5.00 3.8453 1.0793 181 1.00 5.00 3.9945 .9159 181 1.00 5.00 3.8674 .8782 181 1.00 5.00 3.6519 1.0085 181 1.00 5.00 3.6354 1.0851 181 1.00 5.00 3.7182 1.2397 181 1.00 5.00 3.8564 .9611 181 1.00 5.00 3.8287 .9709 181 1.00 5.00 3.6298 .9781 181 1.00 5.00 3.3923 .9976 181 1.00 5.00 3.8398 1.0337 181 1.00 5.00 3.8564 1.1457 181 1.00 5.00 3.6796 .9815 181 1.00 5.00 3.9392 1.1263 181 1.00 5.00 3.5912 1.3657 181 1.00 5.00 3.3646 1.1641 181 1.00 5.00 3.3702 1.1060 181 1.00 5.00 2.8785 1.3278 181 RESP X101 X201 X202 X203 X204 X205 X206 X207 X208 X209 X210 X211 X212 X213 X214 X215 X216 X217 X218 X219 X220 X221 Valid N listwise N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Model Summary .653 a .426 .351 .8058918 Model 1 R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Predictors: Constant, ZscoreX221, ZscoreX206, ZscoreX213, ZscoreX203, ZscoreX208, ZscoreX218, ZscoreX211, ZscoreX207, ZscoreX217, ZscoreX202, ZscoreX219, ZscoreX209, ZscoreX214, ZscoreX204, ZscoreX215, ZscoreX201, ZscoreX205, ZscoreX216, ZscoreX220, ZscoreX212, ZscoreX210 a. Variables EnteredRemoved b ZscoreX2 21, ZscoreX2 06, ZscoreX2 13, ZscoreX2 03, ZscoreX2 08, ZscoreX2 18, ZscoreX2 11, ZscoreX2 07, ZscoreX2 17, ZscoreX2 02, ZscoreX2 19, ZscoreX2 09, ZscoreX2 14, ZscoreX2 04, ZscoreX2 15, ZscoreX2 01, ZscoreX2 05, ZscoreX2 16, ZscoreX2 20, ZscoreX2 12, ZscoreX2 10 a . Enter Model 1 Variables Entered Variables Removed Method All requested variables entered. a. Dependent Variable: ZscoreX101 b. ANOVA b 76.736 21 3.654 5.626 .000 a 103.264 159 .649 180.000 180 Regression Residual Total Model 1 Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Predictors: Constant, ZscoreX221, ZscoreX206, ZscoreX213, ZscoreX203, ZscoreX208, ZscoreX218, ZscoreX211, ZscoreX207, ZscoreX217, ZscoreX202, ZscoreX219, ZscoreX209, ZscoreX214, ZscoreX204, ZscoreX215, ZscoreX201, ZscoreX205, ZscoreX216, ZscoreX220, ZscoreX212, ZscoreX210 a. Dependent Variable: ZscoreX101 b. Coefficients a -9.73E-16 .060 .000 1.000 .115 .092 .115 1.253 .212 -.123 .088 -.123 -1.399 .164 -3.33E-02 .081 -.033 -.411 .682 2.025E-02 .090 .020 .224 .823 4.614E-02 .093 .046 .495 .621 -.307 .095 -.307 -3.239 .001 .120 .085 .120 1.407 .161 9.473E-02 .077 .095 1.233 .219 .242 .087 .242 2.777 .006 -7.73E-02 .115 -.077 -.672 .503 -3.49E-02 .102 -.035 -.342 .733 .129 .108 .129 1.197 .233 -1.90E-02 .094 -.019 -.203 .839 1.421E-02 .096 .014 .148 .883 -2.35E-02 .096 -.024 -.246 .806 .109 .095 .109 1.140 .256 .103 .081 .103 1.275 .204 .146 .086 .146 1.704 .090 -.119 .102 -.119 -1.171 .243 .229 .102 .229 2.237 .027 .155 .075 .155 2.058 .041 Constant ZscoreX201 ZscoreX202 ZscoreX203 ZscoreX204 ZscoreX205 ZscoreX206 ZscoreX207 ZscoreX208 ZscoreX209 ZscoreX210 ZscoreX211 ZscoreX212 ZscoreX213 ZscoreX214 ZscoreX215 ZscoreX216 ZscoreX217 ZscoreX218 ZscoreX219 ZscoreX220 ZscoreX221 Model 1 B Std. Error Unstandardized Coefficients Beta Standardi zed Coefficien ts t Sig. Dependent Variable: ZscoreX101 a. Lampiran 6 ƒ Tabel r Product Moment ƒ Tabel Distribusi t

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN

Dokumen yang terkait

Pengaruh Periklanan radio STAR FM terhadap Keputusan siswa memilih SMU Swasta Kristen Immanuel Medan.

1 27 96

Prasangka Sosial Pelajar Keturunan Cina dan Kecenderungannya pada Tingkat Interaksi Sosial ( Kasus Pelajar SMU Keturunan Cina, SMU Kristen 1 Cirebon, Kotamadya Cirebon, Propinsi Jawa Barat)

0 11 96

HUBUNGAN KECEMASAN DENGAN PRESTASI BELAJAR PADA REMAJA PUTRI DENGAN OBESITAS PADA REMAJA PUTRI DENGAN OBESITAS DI SMU 1, SMU 2 DAN SMU 10 PADANG TAHUN 2009.

0 0 11

Pengaruh Media Periklanan terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Siswa SMU untuk Mendaftar di Universitas Kristen Maranatha: Sikap Konsumen sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Kasus Siswa SMU di Bandung).

0 0 14

Pengaruh Persepsi Iklan Surat Kabar Pada Siswa/i SMU Swasta BPK 2 Terhadap Minat Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Universitas Kristen Maranatha Bandung.

0 0 27

Hubungan antara status sosial ekonomi orang tua dengan minat siswa untuk melanjutkan studi ke perguruan tinggi : studi kasus pada SMU I Wates, SMU II Wates dan SMU I Pengasih di Kabupaten Kulon Progo.

0 0 160

Perencanaan dan pengembangan karir siswa

0 1 1

DAMPAK PARTISIPASI ORANGTUA DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWA PADA SMU KRISTEN DIAKUI MAKASSAR (Polikarpus Ka'pan) Abstrak - Dampak Partisipasi Orangtua dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Pada SMU Kristen Diakui Makass

0 7 16

Pengaruh Informasi Kualitas dan Asosiasi Merek Terhadap Minat Memilih Universitas Kristen Maranatha Untuk Melanjutkan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus Siswa SMU Kelas 3 SMU Kristen 1, SMU Kristen 2, SMU Santa Maria 1, dan SMU Santa Maria 2 Cirebon) - MCUrepository

0 0 25

BAB 1 PENDAHULUAN - Pengaruh Informasi Kualitas dan Asosiasi Merek Terhadap Minat Memilih Universitas Kristen Maranatha Untuk Melanjutkan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus Siswa SMU Kelas 3 SMU Kristen 1, SMU Kristen 2, SMU Santa Maria 1, dan SMU Santa Maria 2 Cire

0 0 10