Instrument of the Research Procedure of Data Collection

And here is the result of the observation table 4.1 Table 4.1 Score of Observation No Respondents’ Code Score of 1L+1S+2Sp4 Pred Ach Lrnd Sentc Spch 1 – 100 1 – 4 1 R1 75 75 75 75.00 3.00 B G 2 R2 80 75 75 73.75 2.95 B G 3 R3 90 80 80 82.50 3.30 B+ G 4 R4 70 65 60 63.75 2.55 B- G 5 R5 65 60 60 61.75 2.45 B- G 6 R6 70 60 65 65.00 2.60 B- G 7 R7 90 90 85 87.50 3.50 A- VG 8 R8 85 80 80 81.25 3.25 B+ G 9 R9 60 60 55 57.50 2.30 C+ F 10 R10 70 65 65 66.25 2.65 B- G 11 R11 90 90 85 87.50 3.50 A- VG 12 R12 75 70 75 73.75 2.95 B G 13 R13 70 65 65 66.25 2.65 B- G 14 R14 65 65 65 65.00 2.60 B- G 15 R15 70 65 70 68.75 2.75 B G 16 R16 70 70 65 67.50 2.70 B G 17 R17 85 80 85 83.75 3.35 A- VG 18 R18 75 70 70 71.25 2.85 B G 19 R19 95 90 95 93.75 3.75 A VG 20 R20 80 75 80 78.75 3.15 B+ G 21 R21 65 60 60 61.25 2.45 B- G 22 R22 70 70 70 70.00 2.80 B G 23 R23 75 70 75 73.75 2.95 B G 24 R24 85 80 85 83.75 3.35 A- VG 25 R25 75 70 75 73.75 2.95 B G No Respondents’ Code Score of 1L+1S+2Sp4 Pred Ach Lrnd Sentc Spch 1 – 100 1 – 4 26 R26 70 60 65 65.00 2.60 B- G 27 R27 75 70 75 73.75 2.95 B G 28 R28 80 80 80 80 3.20 B+ G 29 R29 65 60 60 61.25 2.45 B- G 30 R30 70 70 75 72.50 2.90 B G 31 R31 60 60 60 60 2.40 B- G 32 R32 55 50 50 51.25 2.05 C+ F 33 R33 85 80 80 81.25 3.25 B+ G 34 R34 70 65 65 66.25 2.65 B- G 35 R35 60 55 60 58.75 2.35 B- G 36 R36 60 55 55 56.25 2.25 C+ F The above table gives a quite a clear picture that there are more respondents who get B-, the ranges of which is from 2.35 – 3.00, and a few who gets more than A-. In a glance, it shows the category they would achieve in the rating scale used in this research. Something must be done further, so that the result can give better and clearer picture for anyone to understand and interpret without having to spend more time by looking into the table deeply. That is why, to have a better picture of the score obtained by the respondents, frequency distribution f should be known first. Frequency distribution is found by using the table of frequency distribution Table 4. 2 below as suggested by Heaton 1975 39 . By this table, those who rank the top and the bottom would also be revealed. 39 Heaton, J.B. 1979. Writing English Language Test. London: Longman Group Limited. Table 4. 2 Frequency Distribution Score of Observation Table 1 Table 2 Table 2 Respondents ’ Code S Pred Resps’ Code Pred Pred Frequency R7 VG R25 G VG 5 R11 VG R27 G G 28 R16 VG R30 G F 3 R19 VG R4 G R24 VG R5 G R3 G R6 G 3 R8 G R10 G R20 G R13 G R28 G R14 G D+ R33 G R21 G D R1 G R26 G R2 G R29 G R12 G R31 G R15 G R34 G R16 G R35 G R18 G R9 G R22 G R32 G R23 G R36 G The above table 4.2 contains a frequency distribution showing the number of respondents who obtained each score awarded. By sort descending method, the frequency of score dispersion or distribution gets clearer. Sort descending can also illustrate how many who come to the best category VG, how many who come to