Commercial Use Case Summary

151 Copyright © 2016 Open Geospatial Consortium Annex B: Use-Cases and Implementation Results informative Five use-cases were developed by the GW2IE to determine GWML2 requirements and to test implementation results. While the use-cases describe a variety of actions to be taken, this interoperability experiment focusses on delivering the data that would enable such actions. XML instance documents referred to in the results can be found at: https:xp- dev.comsvngwml2Documentsinstance .

1. Commercial Use Case Summary

The commercial scenario involves serving data to allow water wells and springs to be found on a map, identified, and related information used to estimate the cost to complete a water supply well. For example, a consultant or water well driller could use a web client to investigate the local geology and inspect wells located near the target area. By investigating the rock materials and water levels at each well in the web client, the consultant could infer the distance and materials to the water table, as well as the expected yield, and the driller could estimate the cost of drilling. The public is also impacted in this scenario, as they are able to assess online water well records and make independent estimates. This not only informs them about drilling potential, but it might also influence property purchases. Objective: serving water well and aquifer data so it can be used for commercial purposes such as to inform drilling. Usersactors Public, Consultants, Drillers Information types ฀ water wells: o general: id, source, location, elevation, length, water level, well purpose o logs: depth interval, lithologies, porosity, hydraulic conductivity ฀ springs, etc. ฀ aquifers: 152 Copyright © 2016 Open Geospatial Consortium o general: name, area, o geology: formations, lithologies o properties: confinement, media, water storage, sediment thickness, aquifer thickness, porosity, conductivity o water balance: aquifer recharge, aquifer discharge o water use: yield, usage type, quality o risk: physical vulnerability, threats Actions ฀ A member of the public finds wells near their home. ฀ A consultant examines the well-logs and aquifer info and determines there is groundwater potential. ฀ A driller uses the well-logs and aquifer info to estimate depth to water for price estimate. Results Seven organizations served primarily Hydrogeological Units and Wells via WFS, complemented by some related WMS see Table 3. The bulk of the core data held by the participants was adequately mapped to GWML2 and streamed via the web services, thus meeting the basic requirements of this use-case. The source data varied widely in terms of the breadth of information available for a feature, particularly for aquifer properties and water well construction details. Several issues and proposed solutions are noted in Table 4. Table 3: Use-Case 1 contributions. Participan t Web Service s Features Technologies Example XML Instances File Name NRCan WMS, WFS GW_HydrogeoUnit , GW_Well Custom WFS, MapServer WMS GW_Aquifer_GSC_uc1.xml GW_Well_GSC_uc1.xml BRGM WMS, WFS GW_HydrogeoUnit , GW_Well Constellation WFS GW_Aquifer_BRGM-uc1.xml GW_AquiferSystem_BRGM- uc1.xml 153 Copyright © 2016 Open Geospatial Consortium GW_Well_BRGM-uc1.xml CSIRO- BOM WFS GW_AquiferSyste m, GW_Well, GW_Aquifer, Borehole Geoserver 2.5 PostGIS 9.3 GW_AquiferSystem_BoM_uc1.x ml GW_Well_BoM_uc1_qld- 40217816.xml GW_Well_BoM_uc1_nsw- 10042141.xml GW_Well_BoM_uc1_nsw- 10019168.xml GW_Aquifer_BoM_uc1_hgu-act- 100000.xml Borehole_BoM_uc1_nsw- 10019460.xml FedUni WFS WMS GW_Aquifer, GW_FluidBody, GW_Spring, GW_Discharge, GW_Recharge, OM_Observation, GW_Well Borehole MySQL 5.6, PostGIS 9.3, Geoserver 2.5, Mapserver 6.x GW_Aquifer_FedUni-uc1.xml GW_FluidBody_FedUni-uc3.xml GW_Spring_FedUni_uc1.xml GW_Discharge_FedUni_uc1.xml GW_Recharge OM_Observation_FedUni_uc1.x ml GW_Well_FedUni_uc1.xml Borehole_FedUni-uc1.xml GNS UZ WFS, ö ÷ ø GW_Well, GW_Spring, GW_MonitoringSit e Geoserver 2.7+app- schema, Tomcat 7, PostgreSQL 9. x shape-files and property files GW_Well_GNS_uc1.xml, GW_Spring_GNS_uc1.xml, GW_MonitoringSite_GNS_uc1.x ml USGS WMS, WFS GW_HydrogeoUnit , GW_Well GeoServer WMS, Custom WFS GW_Well_USGS_uc4- mapping.xml, GW_AquiferSystem_USGS_uc4- mapping.xml Table 4: Use-Case 1 issues. Issue Participant Issue Summary Proposed Solution Timeline 154 Copyright © 2016 Open Geospatial Consortium 1.1 GSC BoM for GW_Flow, gwFlowVolumeRate is OM_Measurement: that constrains the result to be a gml:Measurement , so a single value with a uom. We have ranges in the database Change all OM_Measurements in the model, to OM_Observations Later version 1.2 BoM OM_Observation featureOfInterest can be the samplingFeature GW_Well or the sampledFeature GW_Aquifer. For some observed properties e.g. pH the former doesn’t make sense, so need to be able to distinguish the two. Modify OM to have ultimate featureOfInterest 0..n and samplingStrategy 0..n for intermediate sampling features. OGC SWG 1.3 USGS Screen hole size only has one dimension and does not account for non-circular holes, i.e. slits Expand to two fields: screenHoleLength, screenHoleWidth

2. Policy Use Case Summary