ETP Bycatch Species Sri Lankan Blue Swimming Crab Fishery Assessment

52 Rationale: Insufficient qualitative information is available on the amount of main discarded species if present taken by the fishery. Information is inadequate to qualitatively assess the outcome status with respect to biologically based limit or support measures to manage main discarded species. No bycatch monitoring system is in place Target  Identification and quantification of all species retained by fishermen from the SLBSC fishery, including any main retained species i.e., 5 of the total catch Data Sources  Ecological Impact Assessment UNI Other  Ecological Impact Monitoring

2.3 ETP Bycatch Species

209 2.3.1 Status: The SLBSC fishery is located in an area of high biodiversity, including a large number of ETP species, such as the dugong Dugong dugon, indo-pacific humpback dolphin Sousa chineusis, as well as a number of other cetaceans and marine reptiles including four species of marine turtle. The presence of ETP species in the SLBSC fishery bycatch appears to be uncommon. Turtles and small sharks are rarely caught in the bycatch of the bottom-set gill nets. Catching, landing and or selling turtles is illegal in Sri Lanka. The law is partially enforced. Performance Indicators SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 Known effects of the fishery are likely to be within limits of national and international requirements for protection of ETP species. The effects of the fishery are known and are highly likely to be within limits of national and international requirements for protection of ETP species. There is a high degree of certainty that the effects of the fishery are within limits of national and international requirements for protection of ETP species. Known direct effects are unlikely to create unacceptable impacts to ETP species. Direct effects are highly unlikely to create unacceptable impacts to ETP species. There is a high degree of confidence that there are no significant detrimental effects direct and indirect of the fishery on ETP species. Indirect effects have been considered and are thought to be unlikely to create unacceptable impacts. SLBSC Fishery Score = SG 60 FAIL Rationale: Insufficient information is available to adequately judge the effects of the SLBSC fishery on ETP species. The fishery assessment conducted by SEASL in 2013 identify three species of mammal, several species of reptiles i.e., sea snakes and turtles, as well as sharks that are may interact with the fishery. No other data or information is available describing the effects if any of the fishery on ETP species. Target  Identification and quantification of all ETP species interaction with the SLBSC fishery. Data Sources  Ecological Impact Assessment UNI Other 210 2.3.2 Management Strategy: The status of the ETP bycatch from the SLBSC fishery is unknown. No strategy is necessary to management i.e., reduce the variety or quantity of the ETP bycatch associated with the SLBSC bottom-set gill net fishery. Performance Indicators SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 There are measures in place that minimize mortality, and are expected to be highly likely to achieve national and international requirements for the protection of ETP species. There is a strategy in place for managing the fishe s i pa t o ETP spe ies, i ludi g measures to minimize mortality that is designed to be highly likely to achieve national and international requirements for the protection of ETP species. There is a comprehensive strategy in place for a agi g the fishe s i pa t o ETP spe ies, including measures to minimize mortality that is designed to achieve above national and international requirements for the protection of ETP species. The measures are considered likely to work, based on plausible argument e.g. general experience, theory or There is an objective basis for confidence that the strategy will work, based on some information directly about the fishery andor the species involved. The strategy is mainly based on information directly about the fishery andor species involved, and a quantitative analysis supports high confidence that the strategy will work. 53 comparison with similar fisheriesspecies. There is evidence that the strategy is being implemented successfully. There is clear evidence that the strategy is being implemented successfully, and intended changes are occurring. There is evidence that the strategy is achieving its objective SLBSC Fishery Score = SG 60 FAIL Rationale: There are no measures in place to minimise the interaction mortality of ETP species from the SLBSC fishery. Insufficient data is available to assess whether such measures are necessary and if so for which ETP species. Target  Appropriate measures to minimise interactions mortality if any of ETP species in the SLBSC fishery introduced and operational  Data Sources  SLBSC Fishery Management Plan DFAR 211 2.3.3 Information Monitoring: The status of the ETP bycatch associated with the SLBSC fishery is unknown. An indication of the possible ETP bycatch associated with the SLBSC bottom-set gill net fishery was gathered during the field assessment. No monitoring systems are currently in place. 212 Performance Indicators SG 60 SG 80 SG 100 Information is adequate to broadly understand the impact of the fishery on ETP species. Information is sufficient to determine whether the fishery may be a threat to protection and recovery of the ETP species, and if so, to measure trends and support a full strategy to manage impacts. Information is sufficient to quantitatively estimate outcome status with a high degree of certainty. Information is adequate to support measures to manage the impacts on ETP species Sufficient data are available to allow fishery related mortality and the impact of fishing to be quantitatively estimated for ETP species. Information is adequate to support a comprehensive strategy to manage impacts, minimize mortality and injury of ETP species, and evaluate with a high degree of certainty whether a strategy is achieving its objectives. Information is sufficient to qualitatively estimate the fishery related mortality of ETP species. Accurate and verifiable information is available on the magnitude of all impacts, mortalities and injuries and the consequences for the status of ETP species SLBSC Fishery Score = SG 60 FAIL Rationale: The information that is available describing the interaction of ETP species with the SLBSC fishery is inadequate to broadly understand the impact if any of the fishery on ETP species; to support measures to manage the impacts if any on ETP species or to qualitatively estimate the fishery related mortality of ETP species. Target  Identification and quantification of all ETP species interacting with the SLBSC fishery. Data Sources  Ecological Impact Assessment UNI Other  Ecological Impact Monitoring

2.4 Marine Habitats