in  school  2007:vii.  After  the  study’s completed,  he  knows  that  there  is  no significant  difference  between  student’s  perception  on  bullying  behaviour  in
school 2007: 55. Another  study  of  bullying  is  done  by  Justinus  Parlindungan  Sihombing.
The  study  entitled Yogyakarta  People  Attitude  toward  School  Bullying aims “to assess  the  attitude  of  people  in  Yogyakarta  toward  school  bullying” 2010:viii.
This  study  researches  people  living  in  Yogyakarta.  The  respondents  are  14- 64 years old. The writer of  this study  concludes that the subjects of this study  have
negative attitudes towards bullying 2010: 63. Indriyani Sitompul also has a study on bullying. Her study titled Bullying
Phenomenon  at  Boys  and  Girls  Student  in  2
nd
of  PIRI  I  Junior  High  School Yogyakarta tries to “study the types of bullying that exist, the places where often
be  used  to  bully  in  school  environment,  the  different  of  a  number  of  the  victim and perpetrator of bullying between boys and girls student, the effect of bullying
to  the bullies  and  the  victims”  2008:viii.  As  the  result  of  the  study,  Indriyani Sitompul  shows  that  bullying  oftenly  happens  in  PIRI  I  Junior  High  School
Yogyakarta 2008: 62. Considering any data got, the writer decides to have a study on the object
of the study with the focus of the study chosen. With this study, the writer wants to  discover  something  new,  in  this  case  the  result  of  social  bullying  toward  the
victim, with an object of the study that has not been discussed as a research. Any tendencies of plagiarism can be put out.
B. Review of Related Theories 1. Theories of Character and Characterization
In every story, there must be characters running the story. It can be one be the main character or not. Without any character in the story, it will not be a story
anymore. Characters appear in every part of the story bringing their motivation. In drama,  a character  can  be  called  as  actor  or  actress.  Their  appearance  brings
dialogue  written  in  the  script.  In A  Glossary  of  Literary  Terms:  Fourth  Edition, M.H Abrams states the definition of character.
The persons presented in a dramatic or narrative work, who are interpreted by the reader as being endowed with moral and dispositional qualities that
are  expressed  in  what  they  say-the  dialogue- and  by  what  they  do-the action. The grounds in a character’s temperament and moral nature for his
speech and actions constitute his motivation. Abrams, 1981: 34
Abrams  also  states  that the  characterization  is “the  process  by  which  the characters are rendered to make them seem real to the reader” Abcarian, Richard,
Marvin Klotz, 1998: 6 and characterization can be “revealed by what characters do, say,  and by what other characters say or reveal” Abcarian, Richard,  Marvin
Klotz ,1998: 21. Hugh Holman and William Harmon brings another definition to examine.
For them,  character is a  brief descriptive sketch  of personage who typifies some definite  quality.  In  the  biography  and  the  history,  the  author  presents  the
characters of actual persons; and in fiction the drama, the novel, the short story, and  the  narrative  poem,  the  author  reveals  the  characters  of  imaginary  persons.
The creation of these imaginary persons so that they exist for the reader as lifelike
is  called  characterization.  The  ability  to  characterize  is  a  primary  attribute  of  a good writer Holman and Harmon, 1986: 81.
According  to  Holman  and  Harmon,  there  are  three  fundamental  methods of  characterization  in  fiction.  The  first  one  is  “the  explicit  presentation  by  the
author  of  the  character  through  direct  exposition,  either  in  an  introductory  block or  more  often  piecemeal  throughout the work,  illustrated  by  action”  1986:  81.
The second one, they state that “the presentation of the character in action, with little or no explicit comment by the author, in the expectation that the reader will
be  able  to  deduce  the  attributes  of  the  actor  from  the  actions;  and the  last  one” 1986:  81. For  the  last  one “the  representation  from  within  a  character,  without
comment on the character by the author, of the impact of actions and emotions on the character’s inner self, with the expectation that the reader will come to a clear
understanding  of the  attributes  of  the  character” 1986:  81 comes  as  one  of  the fundamental methods of characterization.
2. Theories of Social Bullying and the Impact of Social Bullying
In social life, there are connections among a person toward the others. In childhood, children play and interact with their friends as a form of interaction in
their  age.  These interactions result many  things.  Interactions  can  result  good  or bad things. The good things can be in the form of friendship or healthy peer. On
the contrary, bad things can come in the form of bullying. Referring to the age of the characters, the victim and the doers of social bullying, in the book, the writer
finds out the age range. The age range of the characters is 11-12  years old since