Conclusion Suggestion CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

87

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

5.1. Conclusion

Based on the result of research and the analysis of data, it could be concluded as explanation below: 1. Implementation model of basic technology education BTE can be improving the ownership of students’ concept of students’ on colloidal systems matter that proved with T-Test, averages gain in Experiment class is 76.09±8.33 and control class 55.62±8.92 at significance level 5 Ha received and refuse Ha t count 9.22 t table 1.55 2. Implementation model of basic technology education BTE can be improving Science process skills of students’ on colloidal systems matter. That proved with T-Test, averages gain in Experiment class is 80.64±7.89 and control class 64.47±6.91 at significance level 5 Ha received and refuse Ha t count 9.43 t table 1.70 3. There is relation that linier and significance between two variables, those are science process skills and ownership of the concepts. The equation regression is 26.59 +0.71x and correlation value of it 68.57. It means very high correlation between two variables. The yen of students’ in entrepreneurship case in experiment class is 23.33, which categorized high, 6.67, which categorized enough, 20, which categorized less, while in control class is 13.33, which categorized high, 10, which categorized enough, 53.33,which categorized less and 23. 33 students’ at control class is not interest to be an entrepreneur. 87 88

5.2. Suggestion

Based on the calculations of this study, the authors can provide advices as follows: 1. Chemistry teachers, especially in pharmacy vocational high school APIPSU of Medan could apply model of basic technology education BTE as an alternative model to improve entrepreneurship spirit of students’ on chemistry learning 2. Readers and the other researcher, as a new information and references to do a sort research in other time 3. It is need to do the next research with the other subject matter as an attempt to increase education quality especially in chemistry subject 89 REFERENCES Anderson and Krathwohl., 2007, Science Teaching and The Development of Thinking . California: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Anni, Chatarina, dan Dina P., 2005, Psikologi Belajar. Semarang : UPT UNNES Press. Anita., 2007, Metode Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving TAPPS dapat meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan ketrampilan proses sains siswa pada pembelajaran Larutan Penyangga . JurusanPendidikanKimia FPMIPA UPI: Tidak diterbitkan Amin., 2009, Memahami Karakteristik Kewirausahaan . Dari http:viewcomputer.wordpress.com, accessed on April, 27 th 2010 Arifin, M., 2003, Bentuk kegiatan praktikum untuk meningkatkan pemahaman siswa . Laporan Penelitian FMIPA IKIP Bandung : Tidak diterbitkan Arifin, M., 2002, Dasar – dasar evaluasi pendidikan”. Jakarta: PT RinekaCipta. Arifin, Zaenal., 1991, Evaluasi Interaksional : Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Arikunto, S., 2003, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan EdisiRevisi. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara Arikunto, S., 2002, Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek .Jakarta : PT. RinekaCipta. Arsyad, A ., 2007, Media pembelajaran. Jakarta :RajagrafindoPersada Astamoen., 2005, Effective Small Business Management: An Entrepreneurial Approach , New Jersey: Prentice Hall Bell Gredles., 1986, The Effect of Process Skill Instruction on Performance of Pre- Service Elementary Teachers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching Vol. 14. 1: 83-87. Brady, James E. Sukmariah Maun, 1999, Kimia Universitas Asasdan Struktur. Edisi Kelima. Jilid Dua. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara. Budikase, Nurainto dan Sumar H.,2000, Pengembangan Keterampilan Proses SAINS Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Melalui Praktikum Fisika Dasar Pada Pokok Bahasan Fluida, Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia.2:13-18 Carin, H.T., 1993, Science Process Skills: Their nature and interrelation ships, Journal of Science and Technological Education 1: 6-11 89 90 Chandra, D.T., 2006, Panduan Pengembangan dan Implementasi Program PTD SMP , Direktorat Pembinaan SMP, Ditjen Mandikdasmen, Depdiknas, Jakarta. Chandra, D.T., 2005, Penerapan pendidikan teknologi dasar PTD, Direktorat Pembinaan SMP, Ditjen Mandikdasmen, Depdiknas, Jakarta. Chittleborough, G.D., 2004, The Role of teaching models and chemical Representation in developing mental models of chemical phenomena . Thesis, Science and mathematics education centre. Dahar, R,W., 1985, Kesiapan guru mengajarkan Sains Di Sekolah Dasar Ditinjau Dari Segi Pengambangan Keterampilan proses sains . Disertasi Doktorpada FPS IKIP Bandung : Tidak diterbitkan De Porter, 2004, Quantum learning: Unleashing the genius in you, atau Quantum learning: Membiasakan belajar nyaman dan menyenangkan , terjemahan Alwiyah Abdurrahman. Bandung: Kaifa. Depdiknas, 2003, Pendekatan Kontekstual Contextual Teaching and Learning . Jakarta: Dirjen, Didasmen, Direktorat Sekolah Lanjutan Pertama Djajadisastra., 2008, Practical work in school science : Exploring some direction for change”. International journal of science education 11: 42-52. Dlamini Betty., 1996, Liked and Disliked Learning Activities : Respon of Swazi Student to Science Material With a Technological Approach. Journal Research in Science Technological Education . Firman, Harry., 2000, Penilaian Hasil belajar Dalam pengajaran Kimia. Bandung :Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FMIPA UPI. Gagne, R.M., 1963, The Learning Requirements for Enquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2: 144-153. Hamalik, O., 2001, Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: BumiAksara Handley, Dave and Lyle Sue., 1996, Pupils Perceptions of Design and Technology : a Case-study of Pupils in South Wales. Journal Research in Science Technological Education. 2: 40-46 Hartolaksono., 2008, esensi dan iovasi pendidikan menuju era globalisasi modern , Harian kompas, minggu 15 januari 2012. Hasibuan and Moedjiono., 2006, Implementasi Pelaksanaan Kurikulum 1994, SSEP. Jakarta. Iskandar., 2009, Kewirausahaan Membangun Usaha Sukses Sejak Usia Muda. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Julinton., 2012, http:julintonchemistryarea.blogspot.com .Accesed on 12 th – 16 th February 2012, o’clock 15.39 pm 91 Matsumoto., 2008, basic scientific inquiry in science and its assessment, Bandung : Science education facing against challenges of the 21 th century : Jurnal pendidikan 12-15 Pleogmakers., 2007, Creative Wellsprings for Science Teaching. West Lafayette, Indiana: Creative Venture. Robbins., 2001, Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Ruindungan., 1990, Pendidikan Sains yang Humanistis. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta. Ruindungan., 1996, Model Bimbingan Peningkatan Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Menengah Umum . Disertasi. PPS IKIP Bandung. Rustaman., 2003, Nuryani, Keterampilan Dasar Mengajar IPA Berbasis Konstruktivisme , Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang. Rustaman., 2005, Strategi Belajar mengajar Biologi. Malang : Universitas Negeri Malang Sardiman, A.M., 2004, Inetaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Slameto., 2003, Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Suherman, Erman., 1990, Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: UPI. Sukmadinata, Didianto dan Simanjuntak., 1990, Pengembangan Kurikulum, Teori dan Praktek . Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung. Sunarto., 2011, Kebijakan pemerintah dalam pengembangan ICT di Bidang pendidikan . [Online. http:www.thplb.orgdocumentsetraining- media20pembelajaran1.kebijakan_pemerintah_dalam_pengembangan_IC T_di_bidang_pendidikan.pdf] accessed on12 th January 2012, o’clock 15:00 pm Sudjana., 2005, Metoda statistika. Bandung; Penerbit Tarsito bandung Suprapto., 2007, Proses Kewirausahaan. Dari http:Proses Kewirausahaan Catatan Online ghaNOZ 2480.htm, 11 Mei 2011 Susiwi and Sidibyo W., 2009, Analisa keterampilan proses sains siswa SMA pada “Model pembelajaran praktikum D-Ei-Hd”. Jurnal pengajaran MIPA .12,2 Weber and Ruud., 1997, Basic Technology Education BTE Curriculum Indonesia .Educaplan, Kenisspecialisten, Enschede. The Netherlands. Winataputra., 1993, Strategi Belajar Mengajar IPA, Depdikbud, Dikdasmen, Jakarta.