Background of The Study

1

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Background of The Study

Language is very crit ical to human lives and it s main function is for comm unicat ion. Basically, communication wit h language is carried out t hrough relat ed but separat e act ivities, nam ely speaking and list ening. They are seemingly effort less, aut omat ic and spont aneous process, which demand a minimum of one’ s cognitive resources. On a closer exam ination, they are act ually complicat ed language skill. These act ivit ies are part icular import ance t o psycholinguist s. According to Ferdinand De Saussure, language is the m ost prominent dist inguishing feat ure because t he language of any social group as a whole felt different from the other groups. Language is a means of comm unicat ion bet ween members of t he com munit y in form of symbols sound produced by human tongue. Language gives t he possibilit y of much more ext ensive and complex t han can be obt ained by using the media. Language is a tool produced by human sound and the sound it s self is as symbol. Funct ion of language in general, as a tool to express feelings and also t o Express an ideas and purpose. Through language, people can disclose everyt hing t hat is implied in their heart s and m inds. There are t w o element s t hat drive t o express t hem selves, t o draw att ent ion t o ourselves and t he desire t o break free 2 from all the em ot ional st ress. As com municat ion t ool, language is the channel means som eone, who gave birt h to feelings and allow s people t o work toget her. Com munication is a further consequence of self-expression. At t he tim e of using language, a communicat ion m eans having a goal of keeping t he reader or list ener t o be the main t arget of som eones at t ention. Hum ans are social beings who cannot be separat ed from communication w ith their social creat ures. Comm unicat ion can t ake place using form al and informal language. Language can be used to express feelings t hrough art media, such as poet ry and poet ry, in this case required a thorough underst anding to be able to know the m eaning to be conveyed. Using language, it can know the event s in t he past and also, exploiting Science and Technology w ith know ledge human will alw ays follow the changing tim es and preserve it for their lives. Era of advanced science and t echnology is growing rapidly; more open t he opportunit y t o com municat e int ernat ionally. M ast ery of the English language is very im port ant because any global inform ation in various aspect s of life using t he English language. English language is not only serving as a tool or medium for comm unicat ion bet w een nat ions but as a global, language proved more and more people t ry t o learn English to be able t o com m unicat e w ell. People learn a process t o achieve a variet y of compet encies, skills, and hum an at titude. The abilit y to study is an import ant charact erist ic t hat distinguishes m an from other creat ures, t hus learning can change everyt hing. 3 Psycholinguist ics is a field of st udy concerned with psychological aspect of language. According to Kess in Fauziat i 2011:1 there are t w o aspect s first , t he t heoret ical aspect , it usually at t em pt s t o provide a linguist ically and psychologically valid theory of language which can explain t he nature of language and it s acquisit ion. Second, t he pract ical applied it generally t ries t o apply linguist ic and psychological knowledge t o linguist ic problem s, such as reading bilingualism , second language learning and t eaching, speech pat hology. Basically, psycholinguistics t ries t o uncover t he ment al processes t hat are im plicat ed in t he comprehension, product ion, and acquisition of language. Psycholinguist ics at t empt s t o find out the ment al processes t hat are im plicat ed in the com prehension, production, and acquisition of language. To do so, she has t o begin with the st udy of language nam ely, st ructure and t he function. When they learn a language t hey learn t he sound used in that language, t he basic unit s of meaning and the rules t o combine t hese t o form new sentence. Gram m at ical rules represent regularit ies in the behaviour of people speaking a language. There are gram mat ical rules t o deals w ith three major aspect s of language: phonology t he sounds and their st ruct ure, synt ax the w ay w ords combines to form sent ences and semant ic the m eaning of words and sentences. English is a tool to com m unicat e orally and so in w rit ing. Communication is t o underst and and t o express inform at ion, t hought s, feelings, and to develop science, t echnology, and culture. Abilit y t o com municat e in a full underst anding 4 is the abilit y of discourse, exam ple, and abilit y t o underst and or t o produce oral t ext s and or to writ e t hat is realized in t he four language skills, nam ely list ening, speaking, reading and w riting. The fourt h skill is used t o respond t o or creat e discourse in public life. Therefore, subject s w ere direct ed to develop the English language skills so t hat graduat es are able to communicate in English and discourse at a cert ain level of lit eracy. Level of lit eracy includes performat ive, functional, inform at ional, and epist em ic. At the performat ive level, people are able to read, writ e, list en, and speak t o the symbols used. At the funct ional level, people are able t o use language t o meet the needs of daily living such as reading newspapers, m anuals or inst ructions. At the informational level, people are able to access know ledge w it h language skills, w hile at the epist em ic level of Learning English at SM P or M Ts t arget ed so that learners can achieve t he functional level t o communicat e orally and in w rit ing to resolve everyday problem s, whereas for SM A or M A is expect ed t o reach the level of inform at ional as t hey are prepared t o continue their educat ion into college. Epist em ic lit eracy level is considered t oo high to be achieved by learners of SM A or M A as English in Indonesia serves as a foreign language, with second language, t hey could accom plish all the things which basically can be cat egorized int o t wo key funct ions, nam ely: t he sym bolic funct ion used is to express t hought and ideas and the int eract ive function in our everyday social int eract ions. 5 In abilit y of com munication, student s should be capable in four languages skills, list ening, speaking, reading and w riting. As one of t he four language skill, speaking has alw ays occupied a place in most English language and the abilit y t o express t he sam e t hings of oral form in English. Speaking is an int eract ive process of const ruct ing meaning that involves producing and receiving and processing informat ion and also labelling oral product ion. St udent s are learning in their language developm ent. The abilit y to converse is highly value by student s. In this research, the researcher focuses on int erlanguage errors. Learning English at t he high school include four language skills, they are : reading, list ening, speaking and w rit ing. All w ere support ed bother language elem ent s nam ely: vocabulary, gramm ar and pronunciat ion. Four language skills above, learning skills t alk t urns less at t ent ion. St udent s have not been able t o com municat e in English, alt hough in very simple w ay. This incident is also support ed by the cult ural background of st udent s shy. M ost of the st udent s who w ere int erview ed were experiencing shame and fear t o error in learning English. Four language skills above should be given in one unit y in learning process. It is in English curriculum t hat four skills have t o be reached by st udent s. This st at es t hat t he 2006 curriculum in M A is expect ed t hat part icipant s st udent s may have t he abilit y to develop the compet ence t o comm unicat e using English language, not only in writ ing form but also orally for reaching a cert ain level of lit eracy. 6 Speaking skills is one t he indicator of the qualit y of English language learning. Learning through int eract ion or repeat ed t raining is an effect ive w ay of underst anding the st udent s learns English. Be able t o speak English student s can achieve t hrough learning of t elling st ory, so, English learning achievem ent can be seen from t he student s skill in speaking. The purpose of learning English at school in general or in part icular, in M Ts or M AN is not only giving the student s’ know ledge of language but how student s can use t he language it self appropriat e t he exist ing rule. The learning does not only give t heory but also provides a variet y of exercises in language skills. Learning English at SM P or M Ts t arget ed so t hat learners can achieve t he functional level t o com municat e orally and in w riting to resolve everyday problems, whereas for SM A or M A is expect ed t o reach t he level of inform at ional as t hey are prepared t o cont inue t heir educat ion into college. Epist emic lit eracy level is considered t oo high t o be achieved by learners SM A or M A as English in Indonesia that serves as a foreign language. M eanwhile, in Indonesian cont ext t he implem ent at ion learning process is guided by t he Nat ional Educat ion minist ry regulat ion. The M inist ry regulat ion number 221, year 2006 on the cont ent st andard for primary and secondary education unit st at es t hat t he goals of the English language learning in Senior High School are t o enable and to equip the st udent s w ith 1. The language skill is to develop t heir com municat ive com pet encies in spoken and w rit t en English t ext t o reach the functional lit erary. 2 The aw areness 7 on the import ance and t he essence of English m ast ery for t he not ion compet itiveness in the global com munity. 3 The abilit y to develop their range of underst anding on the relat ion bet w een language and cult ure. The aim of t he regulat ion is st udent s can m ast er English. To develop st udent s abilit y to use English in an all-round way, especially in speaking, so that in their future work and social int eract ions t hey w ill be able to exchange inform ation effect ively t hrough both spoken and writ t en channels, and at the sam e t im e they w ill be able t o enhance t heir abilit y to st udy independently and im prove t heir cultural qualit y so as to meet t he needs of schools social. Basic compet ence of for Senior High School includes 1 expressing the meaning of short m onologue in t ext using a variet y of simple spoken language accurat ely, fluently and accept able in the cont ext of daily life in the form of narrat ive t ext , descript ive and new s it em s. 2 revealing t he meaning in t ext using a variet y of sim ple spoken language accurat ely, fluent ly and accept able in many cont ext s of daily life in the form of recount t ext , narrat ive and procedure. They have t o pract ice in English one of example in st oryt elling t o increase t heir spoken. Story t elling is the act of sharing a t ale or a series of event s. As a learning t ool, st ory t elling can encourage t he st udents to explore t heir unique expressiveness and can height en a st udent’s ability t o com municat e thought and t heir feelings. Speaking seems t o be a very inst rum ent al act . They t alk in order t o have som e effect s on list eners. They t alk for a cert ain purpose to assert beliefs, to ask 8 quest ion, to ask for informat ion, t o t ell a st ory so, they select and ut t er a part icular sent ence w hich will bring about t he effect and need considerable planning what to st art . Thus, producing speech seem s t o follow t wo t ypes of processes, nam ely: planning and execut ion. In planning and execut ing speech, in discourse plan, t hey decide what kind of discourse t hey are going to t ake part in. In t elling a story, they generally follow such st ructure. First , sent ence plan, in planning a sent ence, t here are t hree options t o choose: a. the propositional cont ent, it is the st ates or event s t he speakers t alks about . b. the illocut ionary cont ent, it deals with the w ay t he speakers w ant to deal with it. c. them at ic st ructure, it deals with t he speaker’ s judgm ent s about t he list ener’s current m ent al st at e. In general, t hem at ic st ructure has t hree main functions: to convey given inform at ion and new informat ion, to convey t he subject and predicat e, and to convey fram e and insert . They have t o select t he right sent ence suit able with the discourse. Second, const it uent plan, in so doing t hey have t o pick up t he right w ords, phrases, or idiom s and put t hem in the right order. Third, articulatory program , it cont ains the phonet ic segm ent , st resses, and int onation. Language learning is a creat ive const rictions process. Wit h this view , errors are t hen considered as an inevit able and posit ive part of that process. At t itudes t ow ards errors have m oved aw ay from t hose of behaviourist s in 1950s t o 1960s who saw error as som et hing to be prevent ed through int ensive modelling and eradiat ed t hrough int ensive drilling. Errors are now seen as 9 reflect ions of learners’ st age of int erlanguage developm ent. When learners produce correct , free ut t erances, they may t ell a litt le about what is going on in t heir mind. Errors t hen hold vit al clues about the process of language learning. In t his case t hat their int erlanguage know ledge is fault y, t he result is an error. Error analysis in Fauziat i is “ the first approach t o t he st udy of second language acquisit ion which includes an int ernal focus on learners’ creat ivit y abilit y t o const ruct language” Saville-Troike 2006:38. The prim ary focus of error analysis is on learner errors and the evidence of how learner errors could provide an underst anding of the underlying processes of second language learning or second language acquisit ion. Error Analysis provides a validation for the classical const ructive analysis CA of w hich the goal is t o find out something about t he psycholinguistics process or cognit ive m echanism of second language learning. It hopefully enables us t o draw cert ain conclusions about the learning st rat egies or t he underlying cognit ive mechanism used by t he learner in his second language learning process. Error analysis requires the det erminat ion of elem ent s in the sample of learner language which deviat e from the t arget language in som e w ay. For this, dist inction should be made bet ween error and m ist ake. The concept s of errors analysis are that there are t w o different phenom ena and int ent ionalit y plays a decisive role in this dist inct ion. Errors are syst em at ic, consist ent deviance which is charact erist ic of the learner’ s linguist ic syst em at a given st age of learning. Errors are also t ypically produced by learners who do not yet fully comm and 10 som e inst it ut ionalized language syst em ; t hey arise due to the imperfect compet ence in the t arget language. M ist akes are deviat ions due t o perform ance fact ors such as memory limit ation, fat igue, and em otional st rain. They are t ypically irregular and can be readily correct ed by the learners t hem selves w hen t heir at t ent ion is draw n to t hem. Thus, errors can be identified by comparing original ut t erances w ith reconst ruct ed ut t erances, w hich is correct sent ences having the m eaning int ended by t he learner. St udies have been carried out on error such as Daryanto 2013, Hanif 2012, Suhart ini 2012 Sugiyono 2011, Ika Sulist yarini 2012 but m ost of t hem accelerat es t he errors in w rit t en t ext , m eanwhile in the oral form medium has not been done, and t herefore I w ould discrim inat e analysis error on spoken t hrough oral narrat ive. The researcher finds som e int erlanguage errors done by the st udent s in ut t erance. They oft en m ake int erlanguage in t heir spoken especially in gramm ar and sounds. To get the data, the researcher gives a free st ory composit ion t ext t o t he st udent s of M AN I Boyolali. And then, they t ell a st ory t ext one by one orally. The researcher list ens then records them and not at es, ident ified and classifyed t hen described. Below is the exam ple of student s’ product s: I asked one of st udent: What is your unforget t able experience t hat happened in your life? She answered “ Two years ago when I ent ered in M AN I Boyolali w as very busy. I have t o copy m y form dat a, so I feel very t ired” . 11 The sent ences above are incorrect because t hey applied the Indonesian rule int o English. The sent ence “ I have t o copied” should be “ I had t o copy” ‘had t o’ was followed by infinit ive and “ my form dat a” should be “ my dat a form” and t he last sent ence t he verb ‘feel’ should be ‘felt ’ Verb2, she spoke in recount t ext so she have to use simple past t ense . The st udent ignored the rule rest rict ion. They omit t ed t o present t ense in V1 although that is simple past t ense. They should add ‘ed’ in regular verb or the verb w as changed in irregular verb t his applies for all pronouns or the subject . She also ut t ers t he w ord ‘’ w as’’ in ‘w es’. The w ord ‘w as’ should be utt ered w ɒz. Phenom enon proved that the learners m ade Int erlanguage errors. Based on t he phenom ena above, the w rit er is int erest ed in analysing it int o a t hesis ent itled: Int erlanguage Error in oral narrat ive m ade by student s of M AN I Boyolali.

B. Research Problem

Dokumen yang terkait

INTRODUCTION Errors In Spoken Production Made By Students Of MAN 1 Boarding School Surakarta.

0 2 5

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 5 21

INTRODUCTION Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 4 5

INTRODUCTION Interlanguage Error Made By Students In Writing Recount Text (A Study At Man 2 Boyolali).

0 1 14

Interlanguage Error Made by Students in Writing Recount Text (A Study at MAN 2 Boyolali) Interlanguage Error Made By Students In Writing Recount Text (A Study At Man 2 Boyolali).

0 1 16

INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN ORAL NARRATIVE MADE BY STUDENTS OF MAN I BOYOLALI Interlanguage Errors In Oral Narrative Made By Students Of Man I Boyolali.

0 2 14

INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN ORAL NARRATIVE MADE BY STUDENTS OF MAN I BOYOLALI Interlanguage Errors In Oral Narrative Made By Students Of Man I Boyolali.

0 1 13

INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT MADE BY SECOND GRADE STUDENTS Interlanguage Errors In Writing Recount Text Made By Second Grade Students Of SMP Al-Islam Kartasura.

0 2 14

INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT MADE BY STUDENTS OF SMA NEGERI 1 SUMBERLAWANG. Interlanguage Errors In Writing Descriptive Text Made By Students Of SMA Negeri 1 Sumberlawang.

0 3 15

INTRODUCTION Interlanguage Errors In Writing Descriptive Text Made By Students Of SMA Negeri 1 Sumberlawang.

0 4 8