CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION AND LIMITATION THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER BOARD MEMBER, COMMISSIONER BOARD SIZE, AUDIT COMITTEE, CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP AND CULTURE TOWARD EARNINGS MANAGEMENT.

CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION, SUGGESTION AND LIMITATION

5.1.

Conclusion
Based on data analysis that has been done, researcher may draw following

conclusions:
1. Independent commissioner boards proportion does not negatively affect
earnings management.
2. Commissioner boards size does not negatively affect earnings management.
3. Audit committee does negatively affect earnings management.
4. Concentrated ownership does negatively affect earnings management.
5. Culture does affect earnings management.

5.2.

Research Limitations and Suggestions
This study has several limitations, they are:


1. Sample for this study only consist of 47 manufacturing companies. Upcoming
research can

use a bodder range of industry to increase the number of

samples.
2. This study only analyze the effect of proportion independent commissioner
board,board size, audit committee, concentrated ownership and culture on
earnings management. There are many other variables that play a role in
56

57

affecting earnings management. Therefore, further research is expected to add
other variables deemed to affect earnings management, such as institutional
ownership, managerial ownership and size of company.
3. Concentrated ownership is calculated based on the largest percentage of
ownership by individual or group. The researcher did not identify relationship
among owners eventhough such relationship may exist. Subsequent research
should identify whether or not relationships exist among owners. This will

affect the calculation of concentrated ownership.

LAMPIRAN I

Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N
Earnings management
Independent
commissioner board
proportion
Commissioner board size
Audit committee
Concentrated ownership
Culture
Valid N (listwise)

47

Minimum

-.20

Maximum
1.09

Mean
.0811

Std. Deviation
.23887

47

.20

1.00

.4229

.15892


47
47
47
47
47

3.00
.00
10.17
.33

11.00
.50
96.65
1.00

5.8723
.3121
60.2716

.8615

2.28051
.12221
21.58725
.19771

LAMPIRAN II

Normality Test
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

N
Normal Parametersa,b
Most Extreme
Differences

Mean
Std. Deviation
Absolute

Positive
Negative

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.

Unstandardize
d Residual
47
.0000000
.23559144
.144
.144
-.093
.986
.286

LAMPIRAN III


Multicolinearity Test
Variables Entered/Removedb

Model
1

Variables Entered
Culture, Audit committee ,
Independent commissioner board
proportion , Concentrated
ownership,
Commissioner board
a
size
a. All requested variables entered.

Variables
Removed


Method
.

b. Dependent Variable: Earnings management
Coefficientsa

Model
1

Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance
VIF

Independent
commissioner board
.865
proportion
Commissioner board size
.704
Audit committee

.693
Concentrated ownership
.850
Culture
.900
a. Dependent Variable: Earnings management

1.156
1.420
1.444
1.177
1.111

Enter

LAMPIRAN IV

Heteroscedasticity Test
Variables Entered/Removedb
Variables

Removed

Model
1

Variables Entered
Culture, Independent
commissioner board proportion
, Commissioner board size ,
Audit committee ,
a
Concentrated ownership
a. All requested variables entered.

Method
.

Enter

b. Dependent Variable: ABSY


Model Summary
Adjusted R
Std. Error of
Model
R
R Square
Square
the Estimate
1
.285a
.081
-.031
.16362
a. Predictors: (Constant), Culture, Independent commissioner board proportion
, Commissioner board size , Audit committee , Concentrated ownership
ANOVAb
Sum of
df
Mean Square
F
Squares
Regression
.097
5
.019
.723
Residual
1.098
41
.027
Total
1.194
46
a. Predictors: (Constant), Culture, Independent commissioner board proportion ,
Commissioner board size , Audit committee , Concentrated ownership

Model
1

Sig.
.610a

b. Dependent Variable: ABSY
Coefficientsa

Model
1

(Constant)
Independent
commissioner board
proportion
Commissioner board size
Audit committee
Concentrated ownership
Culture
a. Dependent Variable: ABSY

Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
.006
.146

Standardized
Coefficients
Beta

t
.043

Sig.
.966

-.131

.160

-.129

-.819

.417

.010
-.015
.002
.061

.011
.212
.001
.127

.141
-.012
.251
.075

.892
-.072
1.542
.479

.377
.943
.131
.635

LAMPIRAN V

Autocorrelation Test
Variables Entered/Removedb

Model
1

Variables Entered
Culture, Independent
commissioner board proportion
, Commissioner board size ,
Audit committee ,
a
Concentrated ownership
a. All requested variables entered.

Variables
Removed

Method
.

Enter

b. Dependent Variable: Earnings management
Model Summaryb
Adjusted R
Std. Error of
Model
R
R Square
Durbin-Watson
Square
the Estimate
1
.603a
.363
.285
.20191
1.860
a. Predictors: (Constant), Culture, Independent commissioner board proportion
, Commissioner board size , Audit committee , Concentrated ownership
b. Dependent Variable: Earnings management
ANOVAb
Sum of
df
Mean Square
F
Squares
Regression
.953
5
.191
4.676
Residual
1.672
41
.041
Total
2.625
46
a. Predictors: (Constant), Culture, Independent commissioner board proportion ,
Commissioner board size , Audit committee , Concentrated ownership

Model
1

Sig.
.002a

b. Dependent Variable: Earnings management
Coefficientsa

Model
1

Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
.785
.180

(Constant)
Independent
commissioner board
-.060
proportion
Commissioner board size
-.002
Audit committee
-.593
Concentrated ownership
-.003
Culture
-.319
a. Dependent Variable: Earnings management

Standardized
Coefficients
Beta

t
4.354

Sig.
.000

.198

-.040

-.304

.762

.014
.262
.002
.157

-.017
-.304
-.312
-.264

-.132
-2.267
-2.297
-2.036

.896
.029
.027
.048

LAMPIRAN VI

Regression
Variables Entered/Removedb

Model
1

Variables Entered
Culture, Independent
commissioner board proportion ,
Commissioner board size , Audit
committeea, Concentrated
ownership
a. All requested variables entered.

Variables
Removed

Method
.

Enter

b. Dependent Variable: Earnings management

Model Summary
Adjusted R
Std. Error of
Model
R
R Square
Square
the Estimate
1
.603a
.363
.285
.20191
a. Predictors: (Constant), Culture, Independent commissioner board proportion
, Commissioner board size , Audit committee , Concentrated ownership
ANOVAb
Sum of
df
Mean Square
F
Squares
Regression
.953
5
.191
4.676
Residual
1.672
41
.041
Total
2.625
46
a. Predictors: (Constant), Culture, Independent commissioner board proportion ,
Commissioner board size , Audit committee , Concentrated ownership

Model
1

Sig.
.002a

b. Dependent Variable: Earnings management
Coefficientsa

Model
1

Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
.785
.180

(Constant)
Independent
commissioner board
-.060
proportion
Commissioner board size
-.002
Audit committee
-.593
Concentrated ownership
-.003
Culture
-.319
a. Dependent Variable: Earnings management

Standardized
Coefficients
Beta

t
4.354

Sig.
.000

.198

-.040

-.304

.762

.014
.262
.002
.157

-.017
-.304
-.312
-.264

-.132
-2.267
-2.297
-2.036

.896
.029
.027
.048

LAMPIRAN VII

2006
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Nama Perusahaan
PT Astra Graphia Tbk
PT Astra International Tbk
PT Astra Otoparts Tbk
PT Budi Acid Jaya Tbk
PT Fast Food Indonesia Tbk
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
PT United Tractors Tbk

Kode
ASGR
ASII
AUTO
BUDI
FAST
UNVR
UNTR

Independent commissioner

0.3333
0.5556
0.4000
0.3333
0.3333
0.8000
0.3333

Board Size
3
9
5
3
6
5
6

Komite Audit
0.3333
0.0000
0.3333
0.3333
0.5000
0.3333
0.3333

Concentrated ownership
76.87

50.11
86.72
19.73
43.77
85
58.45

Culture
1
1
0.86
1
1
0.67
1

Earnings Management
0.0169
0.1465
0.1108
0.2714
0.2904
0.2430
0.1533

2007
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Nama Perusahaan
PT Astra Graphia Tbk
PT Astra International Tbk
PT Astra Otoparts Tbk
PT Budi Acid Jaya Tbk
PT Fast Food Indonesia Tbk
PT Indocement Tunggal Prakasa Tbk
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
PT United Tractors Tbk

Kode
ASGR
ASII
AUTO
BUDI
FAST
INTP
UNVR
UNTR

Independent commissioner

0.3333
0.5000
0.4286
0.4000
0.3333
0.2857
0.8000
0.6000

Board Size
3
10
7
5
6
7
5
5

Komite Audit
0.3333
0.0000
0.3333
0.3333
0.5000
0.3333
0.3333
0.3333

Concentrated ownership
76.87

50.11
86.72
20.94
43.82
65.14
85
58.45

Culture
1
0.86
1
1
1
0.5
0.67
1

Earnings Management
-0.1889
-0.0860
0.1046
-0.0002
-0.1614
-0.2014
-0.0515
-0.0791

2008
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Nama Perusahaan
PT Astra International Tbk
PT Astra Otoparts Tbk
PT Budi Acid Jaya Tbk
PT Fast Food Indonesia Tbk
PT Indocement Tunggal Prakasa Tbk
PT Merck Tbk
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
PT United Tractors Tbk

Kode
ASII
AUTO
BUDI
FAST
INTP
MERK
UNVR
UNTR

Independent commissioner

0.5000
0.3333
0.4000
0.3333
0.4286
0.3333
0.8000
0.4000

Board Size
10
9
5
6
7
3
5
5

Komite Audit
0.0000
0.3333
0.3333
0.5000
0.3333
0.3333
0.3333
0.3333

Concentrated ownership
50.11
93.91
25.5
43.84
65.14
74
85
59.5

Culture
0.88
1
1
1
0.5
0.33
0.88
1

Earnings Management
0.3267
0.3175
0.2878
0.3673
0.3809
0.0528
0.4116
0.5535

2009
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Nama Perusahaan
PT AKR Corporindo Tbk
PT Astra International Tbk
PT Astra Otoparts Tbk
PT Budi Acid Jaya Tbk
PT Fast Food Indonesia Tbk
PT Indocement Tunggal Prakasa Tbk
PT Merck Tbk
PT Perdana Bangun Pusaka Tbk
PT Tunas Ridean Tbk
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
PT United Tractors Tbk

Kode
AKRA
ASII
AUTO
BUDI
FAST
INTP
MERK
KONI
TURI
UNVR
UNTR

Independent commissioner

0.3333
0.5000
0.3333
0.4000
0.3333
0.4286
0.3333
0.3333
0.4000
0.6667
0.3750

Board Size
3
10
9
5
6
7
3
3
5
8
8

Komite Audit
0.3333
0.0000
0.3333
0.3333
0.5000
0.3333
0.3333
0.3333
0.2500
0.3333
0.3333

Concentrated ownership

70.82
50.11
95.65
25.91
43.84
50
74

64.16
68.885
85
59.5

Culture
0.89
0.89
1
1
1
0.5
0.43
1
0.8
0.75
1

Earnings Management
-0.0469
0.0159
0.0515
0.0639
-0.0433
-0.0292
0.2180
1.0897
0.0917
0.1365
0.0193

2010
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Nama Perusahaan
PT AKR Corporindo Tbk
PT Astra Graphia Tbk
PT Astra International Tbk
PT Astra Otoparts Tbk
PT Budi Acid Jaya Tbk
PT Fast Food Indonesia Tbk
PT Indocement Tunggal Prakasa Tbk
PT Kalbe Farma Tbk
PT Merck Tbk
PT Perdana Bangun Pusaka Tbk
PT Tunas Ridean Tbk
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
PT United Tractors Tbk

Kode
AKRA
ASGR
ASII
AUTO
BUDI
FAST
INTP
KLBF
MERK
KONI
TURI
UNVR
UNTR

Independent commissioner

0.3333
0.3333
0.4545
0.3000
0.4000
0.3333
0.2857
0.3333
0.3333
0.3333
0.2000
1.0000
0.5000

Board Size
3
3
11
10
5
6
7
6
3
3
5
6
6

Komite Audit
0.3333
0.3333
0.0000
0.3333
0.3333
0.5000
0.3333
0.3333
0.3333
0.3333
0.2500
0.3333
0.3333

Concentrated ownership

59.24
76.87
50.11
96.65
25.81

43.84
51
10.17
74
64.16

43.84
85
59.5

Culture
0.8
1
0.88
1
1
1
0.5
1
0.43
1
0.75
0.75
1

Earnings Management
-0.1795
-0.1968
0.0912
0.1364
-0.1525
-0.1243
-0.0778
-0.0271
-0.1189
-0.1754
-0.0923
-0.0967
-0.0093

Dokumen yang terkait

The Effect Of Good Corporate Governance, Growth Opportunities And Sales Growth To Accounting Conservatism (Empirical Study On LQ 45 Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange)

0 13 83

Pengaruh Proporsi Komisaris Independen, Ukuran Komite Audit, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Siklus Konversi Kas (Cash Conversion Cycle)

2 14 111

Peran Good Corporate Governance dan Kualitas Audit dalam Memoderasi Hubungan Manajemen Laba terhadap Return Saham

0 6 181

THE IMPACT OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, AUDIT QUALITY, AND FIRM SIZE TOWARD EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THE IMPACT OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, AUDIT QUALITY, AND FIRM SIZE TOWARD EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THROUGH REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION.

0 4 14

CONCLUSION THE IMPACT OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, AUDIT QUALITY, AND FIRM SIZE TOWARD EARNINGS MANAGEMENT THROUGH REAL ACTIVITIES MANIPULATION.

0 4 57

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION EARNINGS MANAGEMENT AND THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF EARNINGS.

0 5 28

THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER BOARD MEMBER, COMMISSIONER BOARD SIZE, AUDIT COMITTEE, THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER BOARD MEMBER, COMMISSIONER BOARD SIZE, AUDIT COMITTEE, CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP AND CULTURE TOWARD EARNINGS MANAGEMENT.

0 2 11

INTRODUCTION THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER BOARD MEMBER, COMMISSIONER BOARD SIZE, AUDIT COMITTEE, CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP AND CULTURE TOWARD EARNINGS MANAGEMENT.

0 2 6

THEORETICAL REVIEWS THE EFFECT OF INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER BOARD MEMBER, COMMISSIONER BOARD SIZE, AUDIT COMITTEE, CONCENTRATED OWNERSHIP AND CULTURE TOWARD EARNINGS MANAGEMENT.

0 4 27

THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION ASYMMETRY, INDEPENDENT COMMISSIONER BOARD, AUDIT COMMITTEE, MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP, AND FIRM SIZE ON EARNINGS MANAGEMENT Lita Yulita Fitriyani, Sutoyo, Sri Suryaningsum,Vivin Marlita Rohmawati Faculty of Business and Economics,

0 0 5