Normality Homogeneity Normality and Homogeneity

54

4.2.1 Normality

Before the t-test computation, the researcher had to make sure that the data were normal. table of Normality No Control Group X 2 Experimental Group X 1 Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest 1 50 60 50 60 2 55 62 55 63 3 55 63 55 66 4 56 63 57 68 5 58 64 58 68 6 58 64 60 74 7 60 66 61 74 8 60 69 61 74 9 62 69 62 74 10 62 70 65 74 11 65 70 65 75 12 65 70 69 76 13 65 71 69 76 14 66 71 69 76 15 66 71 69 76 16 66 71 69 76 17 66 72 70 76 18 66 72 71 79 19 66 72 71 80 20 68 74 72 81 21 68 74 73 81 22 71 75 73 82 23 71 75 74 82 24 72 75 74 82 25 72 76 75 83 26 73 77 75 84 27 75 77 75 84 28 75 78 77 85 29 76 78 77 87 30 77 83 80 90 Total 1967 2132 2027 2306 Mean 66 71 67 77 Variance 32.6 22.28 47.47 31.47 SD 5.71 4.72 6.89 5.61 55 After getting the data of experimental and control group, I analyzed the normality. I found that the X 2 of pretest and posttest of experimental group was 3.73 and 3.21 and the X 2 of pretest and posttest of control group was 2.36 and 3.31. Then, the results were consulted with critical value of X 2 αdk with α = 0.05 and dk = 1, whose result is 3.84. Since the value of X 2 αdk of experimental and control group were lower than 3.84, the data were considered to be normally distributed.

4.2.2 Homogeneity

Homogeneity is important to check whether the data of each group are homogeneous or not. The computation of homogeneity goes as follow: In the formula above, F stands for the homogeneity, Ve stands for the variance of experimental group, and Vc stands for the variance of control group. Use the formula stated above, the homogeneity of pretest of experimental and control group is computed as follow: F = 1.46 The result was consulted with the value of F table with dk numerator v 1 = 30-1 = 29, dk numerator v 2 = 30-1 = 29, and α = 0.05, squared to v 1 = 30 and v 2 56 = 30 is 1.79. Because the F 1.46 1.79, then the data were considered to be homogeny. While the homogeneity of posttest of both groups is computed as follow: F = 1.41 The result was consulted with the value of F table with dk numerator v 1 = 30-1 = 29, dk numerator v 2 = 30-1 = 29, and α = 0.05, squared to v 1 = 30 and v 2 = 30 is 1.79. Because the F 1.46 1.79, then the data were considered to be homogeny.

4.3 Computation between the Two Means

Dokumen yang terkait

The Reading Comprehension Ability Of SMA Student (The Case of the second year students SMA Negeri 1 Gebang Langkat Academic Year 2013/2014)

0 41 15

The Effectiveness Of Using Story Mapping Technique Towards Students’ Reading Ability Of Narrative Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At Tenth Grade Students Of Sma N 4 Tangerang Selatan)

4 78 108

The effectiveness of using mind mapping technique on students’ reading of narrative text: a quasi-experimental study at the second grade of MAN 19 Jakarta

0 4 181

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE SECOND YEAR OF SMA N 1 ANDONG, BOYOLALI.

0 0 14

The Use of Sociogram to Improve Students’ Ability in Reading Narrative Text for Junior High School (An Action Research of the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 Moga,.

0 0 2

(ABSTRAK) The Use of “Digital Story” to Improve Students’ Ability in Reading Narrative Text (a Case of Second Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Pegandon, Kendal).

0 0 2

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING “BRITISH COUNCIL ANIMATION” AS MEDIA TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL IN NARRATIVE TEXT (A Case of Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 2 Kendal in the Academic Year of 2010/ 2011).

0 0 1

(ABSTRAK) THE USE OF ILLUSTRATED FOLKTALE “THE CARELESS JAKA TARUB” TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN UNDERSTANDING NARRATIVE READING TEXT (An Experimental Research at the Eighth Year Students of MTs Abadiyah Gabus-Pati in the Academic Year of 200

0 0 1

The Use of an Animated Film Entitled “Garfield the Movie” to Improve the Students’ Ability in Writing Narrative Texts (An Experimental Study of the Year Eleven Students of SMA NU 01 Al-Hidayah Kendal in the Academic Year of 2008/2009).

0 0 50

1.1 Background of the Study - THE USE OF SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION IN TEACHING NARRATIVE TEXT TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING ABILITY (A Quasi Experimental Study on the Implementation of SGD to the Second Year Students of SMA Islam Sudirman Ambarawa in the Acad

0 0 7